
USA to have 22,000 deaths annually in USA due to lack of health care? Research reveals shocking details
Remove Ads
How Law may Affect Coverage
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
About the Research
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Preventive Care may Lapse
FAQs
Delayed treatments, canceled doctor visits, skipped prescriptions. Losing insurance is bad for your health. The Congressional Budget Office forecasts that the U.S. uninsured population will grow by 10 million in 2034, due to the tax and spending bill signed into law by President Donald Trump. And, thanks to a natural experiment nearly two decades ago, researchers can forecast what that will mean for patient care. Among the problems they predict will develop as a direct result of these people losing coverage: About 2.5 million people may no longer have a personal doctor, about 1.6 million patients will take on medical debt, the lack of care may cause nearly 22,000 deaths annually, AP reported.'There's really no questioning the basic reality that you can't take health care away from 10 million people without causing many preventable deaths,' said Dr. Adam Gaffney, lead researcher on a team that explored the new law's impact.Here's a deeper look at the research and challenges that could develop.It will become harder for many people to enroll in Medicaid or individual insurance plans and then stay covered. Medicaid is a state and federally funded program that covers care for people with low incomes.States will have to verify every six months whether someone remains eligible for Medicaid. That could cause coverage lapses for people with incomes that fluctuate or for those who move and miss renewal paperwork.Many also are expected to lose coverage as states require Medicaid recipients to work, volunteer or go to school unless exempted.Enrollment in Medicaid has swelled in recent years. Republicans are cutting back in part to help fund tax breaks and pay for other priorities like border security. They also say they are trying to root out waste and fraud by rightsizing Medicaid for the population it was initially designed to serve — mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children.People covered through the Affordable Care Act's individual insurance marketplaces also will see shorter enrollment windows and no more automatic renewals.Gaffney, of Harvard Medical School, and other researchers looked to past studies to measure how many people would experience detrimental effects, like going without prescriptions, from the upcoming changes. Gaffney updated the published analysis, which was originally based on the House version of the bill, at the AP's request.One study in particular was critical for their work: In 2008, Oregon offered a rare opportunity to compare groups of people enrolled in Medicaid with those who were not.After a four-year period of frozen enrollment due to budget limitations, the state determined it could enroll 10,000 more people in Medicaid. It used a lottery system to make the selection amid high demand.That gave researchers a chance to follow people who got coverage and those who did not, similar to how scientists testing a new drug might compare patients taking it to those given a placebo.'This is a gold standard research design because it replicates a randomized-controlled trial,' said Christine Eibner, a senior economist at RAND Corp. who was not involved in the study.Applying results from that study and other research to the recent CBO estimate allowed Gaffney and other researchers to estimate specific effects of losing coverage.'By taking coverage away, we are putting patients in a terrible position,' said Gaffney, a former president of Physicians for a National Health Program.Amanda Schlesier went four days without her cancer treatment Calquence this spring and wound up in a local emergency room, delirious with pain.The leukemia patient worries about what might happen if she stops treatment again for a longer stretch because she's lost Medicaid.'God forbid I forget to fill out a page of documentation, and suddenly I lose access to my medication or my doctors or any of the treatment that I've been going through,' the 33-year-old Farmington Hills, Michigan, resident said.People can still receive care when they don't have coverage, but important steps often are delayed, said Dr. Gwen Nichols, chief medical officer of The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society.Patients may be able to visit a doctor, but they would have to line up coverage or help before they can receive expensive chemotherapy. Diagnosis also may be delayed. Meanwhile, the patient's cancer continues to grow. 'It's a ticking time bomb,' Nichols said.The first thing patients often ditch when they lose coverage are screenings designed to catch health problems before they become serious, said Dr. Jen Brull, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians.That could mean patients skip tests for high cholesterol, which can contribute to heart disease, or colonoscopies that detect cancer. Researchers forecast that a half million fewer women will have gotten a mammogram within the past year by 2034.When patients struggle financially and lose coverage, they focus on things like keeping a place to live and food on their table, said Brull, a Fort Collins, Colorado, physician.'Seeing a doctor because you don't want to get sick feels like a much lower priority,' Brull said.Patients start taking financial hits at all ends of care when they lose coverage.They may have to pay up front or start a payment plan before they receive care, said Erin Bradshaw, an executive vice president with the nonprofit Patient Advocate Foundation, which helps people with medical bills.Anyone with an outstanding balance will have to pay it before the next appointment. Financial assistance may be available, but patients don't always know about it. Getting help also may take time and require the submission of tax returns, pay stubs or some validation that the patient no longer has coverage.Bradshaw said letters stating that a patient has lost Medicaid sometimes arrive a couple months after the fact. That can contribute to treatment delays or missed medication doses.Some patients also try to avoid financial stress by skipping care. Schlesier said she delayed seeing a doctor when she first felt symptoms of her cancer returning because she had no coverage at the time.If prescriptions are too expensive, patients may simply not get them or split the doses to stretch the medicine. For Thomas Harper, it's a question of priorities. 'Sometimes you have to make a choice, how well do you want to eat this week versus taking your medicine,' he said.The West Monroe, Louisiana, truck driver has around $300 a month in prescriptions as he deals with diabetes and recovers from non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a type of blood cancer.57-year-old Harper recently returned to work. That meant he lost Medicaid, which covered more of his prescription costs. He's balancing buying his meds with shopping for healthy food that keeps his blood sugar in check and builds his immune system.'I'll survive, but I know there's people out there that cannot survive without Medicaid,' he said.A1. President of USA is Donald Trump.A2. Trump tariffs deadline is ending on August 1.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
White House backs away from IVF coverage mandate despite Trump's campaign pledge
Bengaluru: The White House has no current plans to mandate insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization , despite U.S. President Donald Trump's campaign promise to expand access to fertility treatments, The Washington Post reported on Saturday. President Trump signed an executive order earlier this year directing the government to expand access to IVF and reduce the costs of the popular fertility treatment. White House officials say expanding IVF access remains a priority, but legal constraints prevent mandating coverage without Congressional approval, and no bill is currently planned, the report added. Reuters could not immediately verify this report. The White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.


Hindustan Times
14 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Health Talk: Taking the road to hepatitis elimination
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) recently classified hepatitis D as carcinogenic—cancer-causing—to humans, just like hepatitis B and C. Hepatitis D, which only affects individuals infected with hepatitis B, is associated with a two- to six-fold higher risk of liver cancer compared to hepatitis B alone, it added. (AP/ Representative photo) Hepatitis D, which only affects individuals infected with hepatitis B, is associated with a two- to six-fold higher risk of liver cancer compared to hepatitis B alone, it added. Viral hepatitis – types A, B, C, D, and E – are major causes of acute liver infection. Among these, only hepatitis B, C, and D can lead to chronic infections that significantly increase the risk of cirrhosis, liver failure, or liver cancer. Each year, July 28 is observed as World Hepatitis Day, as viral hepatitis continues to remain a serious public health threat and one of the primary causes of liver cancer. Yet most people with hepatitis don't know they're infected, says the World Health Organization (WHO). According to the UN health body, types B, C, and D affect at least 300 million people globally and cause at least 1.3 million deaths each year, mainly from liver cirrhosis and cancer. In a paper published on Monday, The Lancet Commission also mentioned that three in five liver cancer cases happen due to preventable risk factors, including fatty liver, alcohol, and viral hepatitis. It also added that obesity-linked cancer cases are on the rise. The majority of liver cancer cases can be prevented by reducing levels of viral hepatitis, alcohol consumption, and MASLD (metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease – previously called non-alcoholic fatty liver disease), it said. Liver cancer is already a major cause of death and disability. Globally, it's the sixth most common cancer and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Interestingly, the Commission estimated in the paper that at least 60% of liver cancers are preventable via control of modifiable risk factors, including hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), MASLD, and alcohol. While there are preventive measures and treatment available to combat this public health threat, last year's Global Hepatitis Report underscored some challenges that majorly impact disease management. According to the report, testing and treatment coverage remain critically low: only 13% of people with hepatitis B and 36% with hepatitis C had been diagnosed by 2022. Treatment rates were even lower – 3% for hepatitis B and 20% for hepatitis C – well below the 2025 targets of 60% diagnosed and 50% treated. Integration of hepatitis services remained uneven: 80 countries have incorporated hepatitis services into primary health care, 128 into HIV programmes, and just 27 have integrated hepatitis C services into harm reduction centres. The next challenge, according to the report, will be to scale up the implementation of prevention, testing, and treatment coverage. Achieving WHO's 2030 targets could save 2.8 million lives and prevent 9.8 million new infections. With declining donor support, countries must prioritize domestic investment, integrated services, better data, affordable medicines, and ending stigma, said experts in the report. 'Every 30 seconds, someone dies from a hepatitis-related severe liver disease or liver cancer. Yet we have the tools to stop hepatitis,' WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a statement on World Hepatitis Day. He is right. We have the tools at our disposal; all we need is for stakeholders—governments, civil society, community leaders, etc.—to come together, to jointly work towards eliminating hepatitis.


Economic Times
15 hours ago
- Economic Times
Canada is choking as wildfire smoke smothers cities and spreads into US Midwest; Health warnings issued
AP Canada is choking as wildfire smoke from the Prairies triggers extreme air-quality warnings, painting skies orange and pushing pollution to dangerous highs across the country and into the US Thick wildfire smoke drifting east from Canada's Prairie provinces has blanketed large parts of the country, triggering special air-quality warnings and health advisories from British Columbia to Quebec. Environment Canada issued alerts Saturday(August 2) citing 'extremely high' levels of pollution in regions of Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, and the Northwest Territories, with the Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) hitting level 10 or above, considered 'very high risk' for public health. The smoke, coming from hundreds of wildfires burning in Canada's western interior, has reduced visibility, tainted skies with an orange hue, and raised alarms for vulnerable populations, including children, the elderly, and people with asthma or heart hardest-hit areas include La Ronge, Sask., Flin Flon, Man., and Fort Simpson in the Northwest Territories, where the AQHI remained in the 'extremely high' range for several hours Saturday. Winnipeg was the only major Prairie city under a special air-quality statement, while northern Alberta, including Fort McMurray, is expected to see similar conditions by Sunday, according to Alberta's wildfire smoke forecast model. Environment Canada issues air-quality warnings when AQHI levels exceed 10 for at least six consecutive hours. A special air-quality statement, meanwhile, is triggered when index levels reach between 7 and from Canadian wildfires has also affected US cities. Over the past week, Chicago, Minneapolis, Detroit, and other Midwestern hubs registered dangerous AQI levels, prompting health alerts. In Minnesota, it marked the longest consecutive air-quality advisory in state agency warns of mild symptoms such as eye, nose, and throat irritation, while more serious cases could involve chest pain and severe coughing. Pregnant individuals, infants, seniors, and people with respiratory illness are most at advise people to stay indoors, use HEPA filters or N95 masks, and avoid strenuous outdoor Edmonton, where a separate heat warning remains in effect, officials have activated emergency cooling stations and are distributing water through fire hydrants and peace officers.