State govt giving top priority to protection of children: CM
Addressing the State Level Meet -2025 on POCSO here on Saturday, the CM said that the government has already launched the 'Bharosa' project for the protection of girls and 29 centres which are already functioning in the State. The centres are providing legal and medical aid, and counseling through police to the victims.
Stating that Telangana became the first State to launch child-friendly courts through the Hyderabad-based Bharosa Centre in the country, the Chief Minister said that the centres are not only resolving cases expeditiously but also taking necessary steps for complete protection and instill confidence among children for their development.
Highlighting the importance of the strict implementation of the POCSO Act and Juvenile Act, CM Revanth Reddy, however, added, 'we are facing some hurdles in the enforcement of the Acts. These Acts are completely helpful in protecting the future of the victims without causing any harm.'
The CM underscored the perpetrators should be dealt with strictly without showing any mercy towards those who abuse children through social media.
Apart from the courts, the Chief Minister asserted that the State government is ready to take necessary steps to the strict enforcement of the child protection Acts with an aim to deliver justice at every stage. Children should get justice through all processes including police stations and child welfare centers.
CM Revanth Reddy appealed to judges, police, child welfare committees and other partners to join hands with the government and strive for the protection of child rights. 'Justice means it is not just about awarding punishment but also protect the victim and giving a hope of a decent life' , the CM said that measures should also be taken ensuring child protection, due respect to them in society and lead a happy childhood life.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Brics leaders condemn Pahalgam attack; PM Modi calls for sanctions against terrorists
The BRICS has emerged as an influential grouping as it brings together 11 major emerging economies of the world, representing around 49.5 per cent of the global population, around 40 per cent of the global GDP and around 26 per cent of the global trade. read more From left, Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto, South Africa's President Cyril Ramaphosa, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi and China's Premier Li Qiang pose for a group photo at the 17th annual BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, Sunday, July 6, 2025. (AP Photo) In what is being seen as a diplomatic achievement for India, the BRICS nations on Sunday strongly condemned the April 22 terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam that killed 26 people. In a joint declaration issued after the BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro, the leaders called the assault 'criminal and unjustifiable,' and reiterated their commitment to combating terrorism in all its forms. The bloc — comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and new member states called for united global action to root out terrorism and emphasised the importance of cooperation under international law. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We express strong condemnation of any acts of terrorism as criminal and unjustifiable, regardless of their motivation, whenever, wherever and by whomsoever committed. We condemn in the strongest terms the terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir on 22 April 2025, during which 26 people were killed and many more injured. We reaffirm our commitment to combating terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, including the cross-border movement of terrorists, terrorism financing and safe havens,' it said. 'We urge to ensure zero tolerance for terrorism and reject double standards in countering terrorism. We emphasize the primary responsibility of States in combating terrorism and that global efforts to prevent and counter terrorist threats must fully comply with their obligations under international law, including the Charter of the United Nations,' it added. Prime Minister Narendra Modi also asserted that the victims and supporters of terrorism cannot be 'weighed on the same scale'. PM Modi's call for imposing sanctions on terrorists without hesitation comes against the backdrop of China blocking efforts at the UN Security Council in recent years to list several Pakistan-based terrorists. 'For personal or political gain, giving silent consent to terrorism, supporting terror or terrorists, should not be acceptable under any circumstances,' he said. 'There should be no difference between words and actions regarding terrorism. If we cannot do this, then the question naturally arises whether we are serious about the fight against terrorism or not,' he asked. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The top leaders of BRICS held deliberations on a range of pressing challenges facing the globe on the first day of the grouping's two-day annual summit in this seaside Brazilian city.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Man booked for unlicensed use of songs in wedding videos
Ahmedabad: Maninagar police on Saturday booked a studio operator under copyright laws after a raid revealed unlicensed use of film songs in wedding and pre-wedding videos. The matter was reported by an executive of a Noida-based music company which holds the rights to a large collection of songs. The company official, assigned to monitor unauthorised use of copyrighted audio content in Gujarat, received information about a studio near Krishnabaug crossroads in Maninagar. It was alleged that the studio was using company-owned songs in wedding video projects without any licence or written permission. Based on this, the company approached police with details and evidence. Maninagar police arranged a raid with the help of panch witnesses and company representatives. During the raid, two computers were found running. Examination of hard drives showed that several wedding and pre-wedding video files contained audio tracks belonging to the complainant company. You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad When questioned, the studio operator admitted that the audio tracks were added to customer videos upon request. He also confirmed that these edited videos were backed up for service-related purposes. However, when asked to present the required licence or permission, none was provided. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like [Click Here] - 2025 Top Trending Search - Local network access Esseps Learn More Undo by Taboola by Taboola Police seized two CPUs and a hard disk from the studio, estimating the total value at Rs 45,000. The seized data included files containing popular songs mixed with customer videos. Based on this, a complaint was filed under sections of the Copyright Act.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘Victim holding grudge': Bombay HC grants bail to man accused of raping stepdaughter
The Bombay High Court, while granting bail to a man pending his appeal against conviction and life imprisonment for raping his minor stepdaughter, noted that the victim was holding a 'definite serious grudge' against the man and there was a possibility that she may not be telling the truth. 'It is very difficult to believe that for about five to six years, the victim did not confide even in her mother about what was going on,' the HC observed. On July 2, the court passed an order on interim application in the man's appeal against the conviction. Pending disposal of the appeal, he sought to be released on bail, which the HC granted. He was convicted by the sessions court last year for offences of rape punishable under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. As per prosecution, the alleged sexual abuse began when the victim was in class 5 and continued until August, 2018, when she was over 17-year-old. She informed her maternal uncle after the last such incident, following which her mother lodged the complaint. An FIR was registered and the applicant was arrested in the same month. He was later released on bail during the trial and was again taken into custody after his conviction in July, 2024. Senior advocate Ashok Mundargi argued for the applicant that the story was false and it was not possible that the girl could have kept quiet for nearly five to six years. Mundargi submitted that as per records, her mother did not support prosecution's case during trial and there was no corroborative evidence against his client. The lawyer also argued that the girl's cross-examination showed that she had very definitive reasons to falsely implicate the applicant in the case, raising doubts over her version, therefore, the applicant should not be kept in custody based on weak evidence. A bench of Justices Sarang V Kotwal and Shyam C Chandak noted that in her cross-examination, the girl stated that her mother had married the applicant out of a love relationship and her maternal uncle and grandfather were opposed to the said marriage. Admitting that she did not tell her mother about the alleged acts of the accused, the girl deposed that when the applicant and her mother saw some messages from a boy, they took her to his house and he slapped her. On another occasion, her mother saw a message from another boy and informed the applicant about it, when he broke her mobile phone and scolded her. 'These admissions show that the victim was holding a definite serious grudge against the Applicant who was her step father,' the judges noted. 'Thus, from this evidence, it is clear that there is a strong possibility that the victim may not be telling the truth. It is very difficult to believe that for about five to six years, the victim did not confide even in her mother about what was going on. Then, there is a background of the grudge which the victim was entertaining against the Applicant. Her version is not even supported by the medical evidence. Therefore, in this background, there is a strong possibility that it may be a case of false implication,' the HC observed and said the applicant 'made out a case' for bail at this stage. The bench clarified that it made the observations only for deciding his bail application.
