logo
More than 6,000 Dumfries and Galloway properties still rely on RTS meters

More than 6,000 Dumfries and Galloway properties still rely on RTS meters

Daily Record27-05-2025
The system is due to be switched off at the end of next month, meaning people are at risk of losing control of their heating and hot water systems.
More than 6,000 properties across Dumfries and Galloway are still using electricity meters that will stop working within weeks.
And new figures show that the vast majority of them are likely to still have a radio teleswitching service (RTS) meter installed when the service is switched off at the end of June.

That means they're at risk of losing control of their heating and hot water systems.

The figures have been revealed by the Scottish Liberal Democrats and Energy Action Scotland.
Lib Dem MSP, Beatrice Wishart, said: 'The RTS switch-off has been depressing, frustrating and entirely avoidable. Frankly it is a national disgrace.
'We have weeks until the deadline but the energy companies are still so far behind. No
one should be left without basic hot water or heating.
'Across Scotland, it will take more than a year for all remaining RTS meters to be exchanged.
'We have been promised technological fixes in advance of the switch off, yet we are, at the 59th minute of the 11th hour, still finding that there has been limited development in technology or greater connectivity to the smart metersignal.'

The data shows that as of April 18, 124,864 properties across Scotland still relied on meters using the RTS system, which controls when they switch between peak and off-peak rates.
There were 6,218 properties with a Dumfries and Galloway postcode still with the RTS system – a drop of just 413 or 10 a day from the figure onMarch 7.
At that rate, there would still be 5,510 properties using RTS by the end of June.

And it would take 632 days – more than 20 months – for all properties to be changed to a new system unless the process is sped up.
Chief executive of Advice Direct Scotland, Andrew Bartlett, said: 'With less than six weeks to go until the deadline, these figures lay bare the scale of the challenge ahead.
'The replacement rate simply isn't fast enough and must urgently speed up.

'We are continuing to see a rise in the number of calls from worried households and expect this to increase as we get nearer to June 30.
'The system isn't working as it should, putting thousands at risk of losing heating or hot water.
'Anyone who thinks they might be affected should act now and contact their supplier. If you know someone with an RTS meter, especially if vulnerable, encourage them to act.

'Free advice is available at energyadvice.scot or by calling 0808 196 8660.'
Director for retail pricing and systems at Ofgem, Charlotte Friel, said: 'We have been continually monitoring the industry's efforts to replace RTS meters as this ageing infrastructure reaches the end of its life.
Click here for more news and sport from Dumfries and Galloway.

'Last year we decided more needed to be done so convened the sector and made clear to suppliers they have to move faster.
'Following that intervention, the rate of meter replacements has increase from around 1,000 a month to more than 1,000 a day.
'However suppliers need to do more and ensure customers are protected from detriment, which is why industry is putting in place a phased area-by-area shutdown beginning from June 30.
'We have made clear that the signal serving a specific area should not be switched off until suppliers have demonstrated that they are ready and able to respond quickly to any issues customers experience.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chancellor's attempt to intervene in car finance scandal branded ‘disgraceful'
Chancellor's attempt to intervene in car finance scandal branded ‘disgraceful'

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • The Guardian

Chancellor's attempt to intervene in car finance scandal branded ‘disgraceful'

Rachel Reeves' efforts to intervene in the supreme court case on the car finance scandal were 'unprecedented and disgraceful' and send a 'really bad message' to consumers that the government is willing to defend wrongdoing by banks, Treasury committee member and Lib Dem MP Bobby Dean has said. While the supreme court largely sided with finance companies on Friday – helping lenders avoid a £44bn compensation bill – Dean said the chancellor had gone too far to show she was on the side of business. That included a controversial bid to intervene in the supreme court hearing in January, in which she urged judges to avoid handing 'windfall' compensation to borrowers. That attempt was ultimately rejected. 'I thought it was pretty unprecedented and pretty disgraceful,' said Dean, who sits on an influential parliamentary committee which scrutinises City firms, regulators and the Treasury. The chancellor had also been considering overruling the supreme court's decision with retrospective legislation, to help save lenders billions of pounds, in the event that it upheld the entirety of October's court of appeal ruling, the Guardian revealed last week. 'What message does it send to consumers that the industry can do wrong, the courts can support the claim that they've done something wrong, but the government is ready to intervene and defend the industry that's done wrong, instead of defending the consumer? I think that's a really bad message to put out,' Dean said. 'I feel like this government sometimes is too keen to demonstrate it is on the side of business, and is sometimes not understanding the rights of consumer,' he added. Reeves intervention efforts followed intensive lobbying by the car loan industry, which feared that the supreme court would uphold last October's shock ruling by the appeal court. That October ruling suggested commission payments paid by lenders to car dealers were unlawful, unless explicitly disclosed to borrowers. It could have opened the door to billions of pounds of compensation claims against companies including Lloyds Banking Group, Santander UK, Barclays and Close Brothers, and result in a redress scheme that rivalled the £50bn payment protection insurance saga. Lobby group the Financing and Leasing Association (FLA) – which represents car lenders – had warned the government that a big compensation bill could push some lenders into failure, while others would offer fewer or more expensive loans to claw back their losses. That could restrict options for borrowers who relied on credit. City bosses were also warning the Treasury that ongoing uncertainty over the scandal was deterring international investment in the finance industry, and was therefore putting the UK's economic growth at risk The FLA's head of motor finance Adrian Dally said that the lobby group was 'pleased' with the supreme court's ruling, and felt its concerns had been heard by Treasury and regulators. He confirmed the FLA had been speaking with the Treasury nearly every week in the wake of the court of appeal ruling in October, including about its concerns on the car finance case. However, he rejected suggestions the Treasury had prioritised the industry over consumers. 'We absolutely disagree with that because, ultimately, this [car finance] industry is a vital part of the nation's infrastructure, and enables millions of people to get to work, to get to school, and that was put at risk by these court cases. And ultimately, we believe the industry's interests and the consumers' interests are aligned on this.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion But Dean said government interventions set a 'really bad precedent if you're going to intervene on cases of consumer redress on the basis that it might damage industry, because then almost every consumer redress case would fall,' Dean said. Dean added that compensation schemes can give consumers confidence to borrow and invest, knowing will be protected when companies take advantage of customers. 'Obviously, the best industry is one where these redress systems are not needed in the first place, because people play by the rules.' The Financial Conduct Authority is due to confirm whether or not it will press ahead with a compensation scheme before the stock markets open on Monday morning. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'It is vital that consumers have access to motor finance to enable them to spread the cost of a vehicle in a way that is manageable and affordable. 'We respect this judgment from the supreme court, and we are working with regulators and industry to understand the impact for both firms and consumers. 'We recognise the issues this court case has highlighted, and we are already taking forward significant changes to the Financial Ombudsman Service and the Consumer Credit Act.'

Millions of UK homes still powered by Russian imports after Ukraine invasion
Millions of UK homes still powered by Russian imports after Ukraine invasion

Daily Mirror

time4 days ago

  • Daily Mirror

Millions of UK homes still powered by Russian imports after Ukraine invasion

Critics are calling for action amid fears that UK imports could be used to fund President Vladimir Putin's war in Ukraine - Sizewell B in Suffolk is still using Russian uranium Millions of UK homes are still being supplied with electricity from a nuclear power station fuelled by Russian imports. ‌ The Mirror can reveal that Sizewell B in Suffolk continues to use imported uranium from Russia - three years after President Vladimir Putin 's deadly invasion of Ukraine. It comes despite French owner EDF previously indicating it would switch to an alternative source. The company has admitted it could take another three years to end its use of Russian uranium. ‌ The discovery comes as the UK government has thrown its weight behind nuclear to help power the UK in the future, partly in an effort to reduce the country's reliance on imports in the wake of Russia's war, which has led to household energy bills soaring. Last week saw the go-ahead given for Sizewell C, a new £38billion nuclear plant that will sit alongside the existing station on the Suffolk coast. ‌ Lib Dem defence spokesperson Helen Maguire, said: 'It is incredibly concerning that EDF is still using Russian uranium, despite indicating that they were going to look for an alternative source. Three years on from Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, this is simply unacceptable. 'The Government should do everything in its power to ensure that no UK company is using uranium, liquefied natural gas or any other resources from Russia - and they should also urgently look to address the use of Russian uranium at Sizewell B. The UK must close every possible avenue that could be used to fund Putin's imperialism.' ‌ Dr David Lowry, a former member of the independent advisory panel for the Chief UK Nuclear Safety and Security Inspector and a nuclear policy consultant, said: 'It is sheer hypocrisy for energy ministers to say we need new nuclear to stop being dependent on imported Russian energy, when our biggest and newest nuclear plant is fully fuelled by Putin's uranium.' Sizewell B is the UK's newest existing nuclear power station, despite having been completed 30 years ago. It has an operating pressurised water reactor, capable of supplying 2.5 million homes, or around 3% of the UK's entire electricity needs. ‌ The plant uses enriched reprocessed uranium sourced from Russia by EDF's fuel supplier Framatome. Sources say Sizewell B is unique in the UK and that Russia is home to the only facility in the world which can prepare the required material. EDF says it has the potential to generate for at least a further 20 years beyond its current end of generation date of 2035. Alison Downes, from the Stop Sizewell C campaign group, claimed the limited sources for uranium called into question the rationale for backing nuclear. "It is a major stumbling block," she said. ‌ Estimates vary on how much money Russia is raking from uranium exports. The Royal United Services Institute has pointed to a range of sources showing $2.7billion (£2billion) of enriched uranium imports from Russia in 2023. An EDF spokesperson said: 'EDF remains in full compliance with all sanctions placed by the EU, UK and French Governments, regarding business with Russia. We have removed Russian input to the nuclear fuel supply chain for all UK plants except Sizewell B, due to long term commitments struck years before Russia invaded Ukraine. 'The fuel assemblies we load into our reactor come from our fuel supplier, Framatome, from a facility in western Europe, and the aim is to remove all Russian involvement from Sizewell B's fuel supply chain by 2028. EDF continues to work closely with UK companies, and the government, to create facilities which will be central to the future of the UK and Europe's long term energy infrastructure.' The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: 'While the procurement of nuclear fuel, including uranium and enrichment services, is a commercial matter for operators, we have committed to prevent the import of nuclear fuels from Russia by 2030.'

Toilet charging may increase 'public fouling risk'
Toilet charging may increase 'public fouling risk'

BBC News

time5 days ago

  • BBC News

Toilet charging may increase 'public fouling risk'

Public toilets in seaside resorts and other towns and villages could be closed or have an admission fee District Council says it wants to save about £250,000 a year by closing or charging at toilets in places like Dawlish, Shaldon and Teignmouth and in rural villages on council has given a rating to 20 public toilets with the lowest 13 to be closed or transferred to town and parish councils and the possibility of charging for entry for the seven highest rated.A report setting out the plans to be debated by councillors on Tuesday acknowledges closures could lead to " an increased risk of fouling in public spaces". The council's report also said it recognised a potential "impact on tourism and businesses" and that "a reduction in public convenience provision could deter visitors". Several petitions have been launched by campaigners who want to keep services open, gathering thousands of signatures between local authority said it was a "difficult" decision to "reduce any valued service" but the impact of closures or charging "must be balanced with the council's requirement to remain financially viable".A decision on whether or not to go ahead with the plans is expected to be made by members at a full council meeting on Tuesday. Petitions have been launched by campaigners who want to keep the blocks at those locations Connett, Lib Dem councillor for Exminster and Haldon at Devon County Council, set up a petition to save the public toilets in Starcross, which is in his said the number of petitions launched showed how important the facilities were to many."They may not use them every day or indeed every week but they like to know they are there," Connett said."I hope Teignbridge think again and abandon this plan."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store