Millions of UK homes still powered by Russian imports after Ukraine invasion
Millions of UK homes are still being supplied with electricity from a nuclear power station fuelled by Russian imports.
The Mirror can reveal that Sizewell B in Suffolk continues to use imported uranium from Russia - three years after President Vladimir Putin 's deadly invasion of Ukraine. It comes despite French owner EDF previously indicating it would switch to an alternative source. The company has admitted it could take another three years to end its use of Russian uranium.
The discovery comes as the UK government has thrown its weight behind nuclear to help power the UK in the future, partly in an effort to reduce the country's reliance on imports in the wake of Russia's war, which has led to household energy bills soaring. Last week saw the go-ahead given for Sizewell C, a new £38billion nuclear plant that will sit alongside the existing station on the Suffolk coast.
Lib Dem defence spokesperson Helen Maguire, said: 'It is incredibly concerning that EDF is still using Russian uranium, despite indicating that they were going to look for an alternative source. Three years on from Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, this is simply unacceptable.
'The Government should do everything in its power to ensure that no UK company is using uranium, liquefied natural gas or any other resources from Russia - and they should also urgently look to address the use of Russian uranium at Sizewell B. The UK must close every possible avenue that could be used to fund Putin's imperialism.'
Dr David Lowry, a former member of the independent advisory panel for the Chief UK Nuclear Safety and Security Inspector and a nuclear policy consultant, said: 'It is sheer hypocrisy for energy ministers to say we need new nuclear to stop being dependent on imported Russian energy, when our biggest and newest nuclear plant is fully fuelled by Putin's uranium.'
Sizewell B is the UK's newest existing nuclear power station, despite having been completed 30 years ago. It has an operating pressurised water reactor, capable of supplying 2.5 million homes, or around 3% of the UK's entire electricity needs.
The plant uses enriched reprocessed uranium sourced from Russia by EDF's fuel supplier Framatome. Sources say Sizewell B is unique in the UK and that Russia is home to the only facility in the world which can prepare the required material.
EDF says it has the potential to generate for at least a further 20 years beyond its current end of generation date of 2035.
Alison Downes, from the Stop Sizewell C campaign group, claimed the limited sources for uranium called into question the rationale for backing nuclear. "It is a major stumbling block," she said.
Estimates vary on how much money Russia is raking from uranium exports. The Royal United Services Institute has pointed to a range of sources showing $2.7billion (£2billion) of enriched uranium imports from Russia in 2023.
An EDF spokesperson said: 'EDF remains in full compliance with all sanctions placed by the EU, UK and French Governments, regarding business with Russia. We have removed Russian input to the nuclear fuel supply chain for all UK plants except Sizewell B, due to long term commitments struck years before Russia invaded Ukraine.
'The fuel assemblies we load into our reactor come from our fuel supplier, Framatome, from a facility in western Europe, and the aim is to remove all Russian involvement from Sizewell B's fuel supply chain by 2028. EDF continues to work closely with UK companies, and the government, to create facilities which will be central to the future of the UK and Europe's long term energy infrastructure.'
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: 'While the procurement of nuclear fuel, including uranium and enrichment services, is a commercial matter for operators, we have committed to prevent the import of nuclear fuels from Russia by 2030.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Russia vows ‘no limits' on nuke missiles in chilling threat to West as tensions rise
A chilling warning has been issued by Russia to the West that it no longer has any "limitations" over its deployment of nuclear missiles as tensions continue to escalate Russia says it 'no longer has any limitations' over nuclear missile deployment as it upped the ante with a chilling threat to the West. Setting the stage for a new arms race as tensions between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump escalate, Russia declared that it no longer considers itself bound by a self-imposed moratorium on the positioning of nuclear-capable intermediate range missiles. In a statement Monday, the Russian Foreign Ministry linked the decision to efforts by the West to develop intermediate range weapons and preparations for their deployment in Europe and other parts of the world. It specifically cited US plans to deploy Typhoon and Dark Eagle missiles in Germany starting next year. It comes after Putin warns of nuclear war after unleashing another night of hell on Ukraine. The ministry noted that placing missiles in Germany created 'destabilizing missile potentials' near Russia, causing a 'direct threat to the security of our country' and carry 'significant harmful consequences for regional and global stability, including a dangerous escalation of tensions between nuclear powers.' It didn't say what specific moves the Kremlin might take, but Putin has previously announced that Moscow was planning to deploy its new Oreshnik missiles on the territory of its neighbour and ally Belarus later this year. Asked where and when Russia could potentially deploy intermediate-range weapons, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that it's not something to be announced in advance, reports The Sun. 'Russia no longer has any limitations, Russia no longer considers itself to be constrained by anything,' Peskov told reporters. 'Therefore Russia believes it has the right to take respective steps if necessary." While the Foreign Ministry said: 'Decisions on specific parameters of response measures will be made by the leadership of the Russian Federation based on an interdepartmental analysis of the scale of deployment of American and other Western land-based intermediate-range missiles, as well as the development of the overall situation in the area of international security and strategic stability." Trump's announced on Friday that he would reposition two US nuclear submarines 'based on the highly provocative statements' of Dmitry Medvedev. Trump's statement came as his deadline for the Kremlin to reach a peace deal in Ukraine approaches later this week. Trump said he was alarmed by Medvedev's attitude. Medvedev, who serves as deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council chaired by Putin, has apparently sought to curry favour with his mentor by making provocative statements and frequently lobbing nuclear threats. Last week, he responded to Trump's deadline for Russia to accept a peace deal in Ukraine or face sanctions by warning him against 'playing the ultimatum game with Russia' and declaring that 'each new ultimatum is a threat and a step toward war.' Medvedev also commented on the Foreign Ministry's statement, describing Moscow's withdrawal from the moratorium as 'the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy.' 'This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with,' he wrote on X. 'Expect further steps.' Intermediate-range missiles can fly between 310 to 3,400 miles. Such land-based weapons were banned under the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Trump withdrew from the pact in his first term, citing Russian violations, which Moscow denied. It, in turn, alleged the U.S. had committed violations. The treaty was terminated in 2019, but the Kremlin declared its self-imposed moratorium on their deployment until the U.S. makes such a move. The collapse of the INF Treaty has stoked fears of a replay of a Cold War-era European missile crisis, when the U.S. and the Soviet Union both deployed intermediate-range missiles on the continent in the 1980s. Such weapons are seen as particularly destabilizing because they take less time to reach targets, compared with intercontinental ballistic missiles, leaving no time for decision-makers and raising the likelihood of a global nuclear conflict over a false launch warning. Russia's missile forces chief has declared that the new Oreshnik intermediate range missile, which Russia first used against Ukraine in November, has a range to reach all of Europe. Oreshnik can carry conventional or nuclear warheads. Putin has praised the Oreshnik's capabilities, saying its multiple warheads that plunge to a target at speeds up to Mach 10 are immune to being intercepted and are so powerful that the use of several of them in one conventional strike could be as devastating as a nuclear attack. The Russian leader has warned the West that Moscow could use it against Ukraine's NATO allies who allowed Kyiv to use their longer-range missiles to strike inside Russia.
Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil prices fall as OPEC+ output hikes counter Russia disruption concerns
NEW YORK, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Oil prices edged lower on Tuesday as rising OPEC+ supply and worries of weaker global demand countered concern about U.S. President Donald Trump's threats to India over its Russian oil purchases. Brent crude futures were down 58 cents, or 0.84%, to $68.18 a barrel at 12:17 p.m. EDT (1617 GMT), while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude slipped 59 cents, or 0.89%, to $65.7. Both contracts fell by more than 1% on Monday to settle at their lowest levels in a week. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, together known as OPEC+, agreed on Sunday to raise oil production by 547,000 barrels per day for September, a move that will end its most recent output cut earlier than planned. "The significant increase in OPEC supplies is weighing on the market," said Andrew Lipow, president of Lipow Oil Associates. "The market now is going to see if India and China agree to substantially reduce the purchases of Russian crude oil, thereby looking for alternative supplies elsewhere." Trump on Tuesday again threatened higher tariffs on Indian goods over the country's Russian oil purchases over the next 24 hours. Trump also said declining energy prices could pressure Russian President Vladimir Putin to halt the war in Ukraine. New Delhi called Trump's threat "unjustified" and vowed to protect its economic interests, deepening a trade rift between the two countries. Oil's move since Trump's threat indicates that traders are sceptical of a supply disruption happening, John Evans of oil broker PVM said in a report. He questioned whether Trump would risk higher oil prices. "I'd call it a stable market for oil," said Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS. "Assume this likely continues until we figure out what the U.S. president announces in respect to Russia later this week and how those buyers would react." India is the biggest buyer of seaborne crude from Russia, importing about 1.75 million bpd from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by trade sources. There are renewed concerns about global oil demand, with some analysts expecting faltering economic growth in the second half of this year.
Glasgow Times
5 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Nato to deliver more military aid to Ukraine after Dutch minister announces deal
Sweden also announced on Tuesday it would contribute 275 million dollars (£207 million) to the joint effort along with its Nordic neighbours Denmark and Norway. Two deliveries of equipment, most of it bought in the United States, are expected this month, although the Nordic package is expected to arrive in September. The equipment is supplied based on Ukraine's priority needs on the battlefield. Nato allies then locate the weapons and ammunition and send them on. 'Packages will be prepared rapidly and issued on a regular basis,' a Nato spokesperson said. Air defence systems are in greatest need, as the United Nations said that Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians. Russia's bigger army is also making slow but costly progress along the 620-mile front line. Currently, it is waging an operation to take the eastern city of Pokrovsk, a logistical hub whose fall could allow it to drive deeper into Ukraine. European allies and Canada are buying most of the equipment which they plan to send from the United States, which has greater stocks of military material, as well as more effective weapons. The Trump administration is not giving any arms to Ukraine. The new deliveries will come on top of other pledges of military equipment. The Kiel Institute, which tracks support to Ukraine, estimates that as of June, European countries had provided 72 billion euros (£63bn) worth of military aid since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022, compared with 65 billion dollars (£49bn) in US aid. Dutch defence minister Ruben Brekelmans said that 'American air defence systems and munitions, in particular, are crucial for Ukraine to defend itself'. Announcing the deliveries on Monday, he said Russia's attacks are 'pure terror, intended to break Ukraine'. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky expressed his gratitude to the Netherlands, posting on social media that 'Ukraine, and thus the whole of Europe, will be better protected from Russian terror'. He said the deliveries are coming 'at a time when Russia is trying to scale up its strikes. This will definitely help protect the lives of our people!' Germany said on Friday that it will deliver two more Patriot air defence systems to Ukraine in the coming days. It agreed to the move after securing assurances that the US will prioritise the delivery of new Patriots to Germany to backfill its stocks. These weapon systems are made only in the US. As an organisation, Nato provides only non-lethal assistance to Ukraine such as uniforms, tents, medical supplies and logistics support. The 32-nation military alliance has mostly sought to protect Nato territory from possible Russian attack and avoid being dragged into a war against a nuclear power. But its support role has expanded since US President Donald Trump took office in January, even as his administration insists European allies must now take care of their own security and that of their war-ravaged neighbour. Mr Trump has made no public promise of weapons or economic support for Ukraine. Mr Trump said on July 28 that the US is 'going to be sending now military equipment and other equipment to Nato, and they'll be doing what they want, but I guess it's for the most part working with Ukraine'.
