logo
Trump's ‘magic' act: The US Senate has just made $5.8 trillion disappear

Trump's ‘magic' act: The US Senate has just made $5.8 trillion disappear

The Age01-07-2025
That's why the Republicans have resorted to accounting gimmickry.
Conventional congressional policy measures outcomes by what's known as 'current law baseline,' which takes into account the legislated expiry of fiscal measures.
That's why the Trump tax cuts were scheduled to expire this year, to reduce the cost that would otherwise have been factored into the Congressional Budget Office's 10-year deficit and debt projections.
Extending policies with legislated extensions requires a new law, which is why the usual accounting convention is to treat the extension as a new cost.
The Republicans, however, have decided to use a 'current policy baseline' approach, which assesses the impact on deficits and debt against current fiscal policies. On that basis, the Trump tax cuts never expire and therefore have no impact on the cost of the One Big Beautiful Bill.
That simple change in accounting transforms the cost of the One Big Beautiful Bill from a $US3.3 trillion addition to US deficits over the next decade into a $US508 billion decrease in them.
The accounting trickery is deceitful, creating the pretence that the Republicans are cutting spending while actually adding trillions of dollars to future deficits and debt while creating time bombs that future administrations will have to defuse, presumably by resorting to accounting trickery of their own.
An indication of how the Republicans are manipulating the accounting rules to obscure the actual impact of the Trump budget on debt and deficits is provided by their treatment of Trump's new tax breaks for tips, overtime, senior citizens, car loans and deductions for local and state taxes.
The 'temporary' spending measures in the bill are scheduled to expire at the end of the current Trump presidency. If they were extended indefinitely, they would add about $US1 trillion to deficits over the decade, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
Normally, the question of whether the One Big Beautiful bill complied with the Senate rules would be referred to the non-partisan Senate parliamentarian, who has already ruled against inclusion of a number of items if the bill is to comply with the reconciliation process.
Loading
The Republicans, however, have avoided that scrutiny by giving the authority to decide the policy used for calculating the impact of the bill to the Senate Budget Committee chairman, Lindsey Graham, who said last week that he was 'the king of the numbers.'
'I'm Zeus, the budget king,' he said.
At the weekend he said that, as budget chairman, he had decided to use current policy as the reference point for the tax cuts.
'If you use current policy, they never expire, so the policies that were created in 2017 would not end in December. They would continue. And that's a good thing for the American people, that's a good thing for the economy, because it gives you certainty,' he said.
Unsurprisingly, the Republican majority then voted to endorse Graham's decision.
The Democrats were quick to point out that the use of current policy as the baseline sets a precedent, one they could use to implement their own agendas – and undo Republicans' – if they regained control of Congress.
Effectively, they – or a future Republican majority – could create massive new programs, legislate their expiry in a few years to minimise their apparent impact on debt and deficits and then claim that their extension was costless, even though they could blow out deficits and debt over the longer term.
While the change in accounting policy might help protect the use of the reconciliation process, it doesn't disguise the reality that the One Big Beautiful Bill will significantly increase US deficits and debt, pushing the current federal government debt level up from $US36.2 trillion to around $US40 trillion by 2034.
That's caused some dissension among Republicans. In the Senate, two senators have already declared they'll vote against the bill and as many as eight have expressed some opposition to it.
With the Senate version of the bill significantly more expensive that the one the House passed narrowly, even if it scrapes through the Senate there is no certainty that it will remain intact once it returns to the House, where the House Freedom Caucus of fiscal conservatives are saying that the Senate version needs major changes if it is to gain their support.
Trump has set a July 4 – Independence Day – deadline for passage of the bill, which is why the Republicans have been scrambling to try to lock in enough votes to ensure it clears the Senate and why Elon Musk, who went silent after his criticisms of the bill (and some verbal attacks on Trump) triggered an aggressive and threatening response from Trump, has re-emerged.
In posts on his social media platform, X, Musk described the spending levels of the bill as 'insane' and said the bill would increase the US debt ceiling by a record $US5 trillion. It was obvious, he said, that Americans were living in a one-party country, the 'porky pig party.'
He has a point. The accounting trickery is deceitful, creating the pretence that the Republicans are cutting spending while actually adding trillions of dollars to future deficits and debt while creating time bombs – the 'expiring' tax measures in the bill – that future administrations will have to defuse, presumably by resorting to accounting trickery of their own.
Loading
In the meantime, the debt, its cost (already running at about $US1 trillion of interest) and the volume of bonds US Treasury will have to issue into a market that's been showing signs of shallow liquidity will continue to mount, relentlessly.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Princess Catherine expected to lead US President Donald Trump's welcome to the UK
Princess Catherine expected to lead US President Donald Trump's welcome to the UK

7NEWS

time2 hours ago

  • 7NEWS

Princess Catherine expected to lead US President Donald Trump's welcome to the UK

Princess Catherine is expected to lead the welcome when US President Donald Trump returns to the UK in September for an official state visit. Trump on Tuesday concluded a four-day private trip to Scotland — which drew crowds of protestors — during which he visited his two Scottish golf courses and opened a new one bearing his name. He also met with UK Prime Minster Sir Keir Starmer who at a February meeting of the leaders in Washington had extended an 'unprecedented' invitation from King Charles for an official state visit. Traditionally, second-term presidents are not offered a state visit and have instead been invited for tea or lunch with the monarch. From September 17-19, Trump will be involved in a series of formal meetings with Starmer and government officials but it is the royal ceremonial events that are likely to draw the most attention. While King Charles III will play a key role, royal watchers anticipate Princess Catherine will be the face of this historic engagement. 'At the heart of the hugely important state visit will be King Charles and another key royal,' online independent royal news source Royal Central said. 'For the Princess of Wales is expected to play a major part in this historic event. 'There's every expectation that William and Kate will lead on welcoming the American delegation as well as participating in various aspects of the visit.' When French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte touched down in London on July 8, it was the Prince and Princess of Wales, William and Catherine, who welcomed the dignitaries. At a state banquet held for the French president, the princess was front and centre. Catherine wore Queen Mary's Lover's Knot tiara — her first tiara-wearing moment since revealing her cancer diagnosis in March 2024 and stepping back from royal duties while she underwent treatment. She wore a dark red Givenchy evening gown designed by Sarah Burton, who also designed her wedding dress. Trump's first official state visit to the UK was in June 2019, about two years into his first presidential term. Alongside first lady Melania Trump, he met then-queen Elizabeth II after arriving in the gardens of Buckingham Palace via helicopter. This was followed by a visit to Westminster Abbey, and later a state banquet with then-prime minister Theresa May in attendance. When extending the invitation for a second state visit, Starmer said: 'This is really special. This has never happened before. Unprecedented. 'I think that just symbolises the strength of the relationship between us. 'I think the last state visit was a tremendous success. His Majesty the King wants to make this even better than that. So, this is ... truly historic.'

Ministers coy on gambling reform as advice kept secret
Ministers coy on gambling reform as advice kept secret

Perth Now

time3 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Ministers coy on gambling reform as advice kept secret

Ministers have drawn scorn for not disclosing progress on curbing gambling harm and advertising reform, as one senator pushes for more transparency. Independent senator David Pocock forced the social services and communications ministers to table briefing materials about the reforms with a Senate order to produce documents. It relates to the recommendations from a landmark parliamentary gambling harm report handed down in 2023 by late Labor MP Peta Murphy. The keystone recommendations were a ban on gambling advertising and inducements. A draft response to recommendations was ready in November and Senator Pocock has been pushing for its release after Labor shelved any action ahead of the May election. Senator Pocock accused the government of being overly secretive. "Pages of redacted information shows how much this government doesn't want to talk about gambling reform or a proper response to the landmark Murphy review," he told AAP. Aside from a two-page summary of gambling harm statistics, Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek refused to release the documents to the Senate. The advice stated that young people are more likely to increase their betting behaviour when exposed to gambling advertising, citing the Australian Gambling Research Centre. Betting ads used humour, distinctive voiceovers and celebrities to influence children's attention and recall, the centre found. Ms Plibersek argued she didn't have to comply with a Senate order to release the documents as it would prejudice the policy decision-making process. The release could also impede the government from getting commercially sensitive information from stakeholders in the future and "have a chilling effect on comprehensive and candid advice to ministers", she said in a letter to the Senate. Communications Minister Anika Wells disclosed highly redacted documents outlining meetings with key stakeholders as part of the Senate order but documents about policy development were withheld. Ms Wells said she was still getting her feet under the desk after being sworn into the portfolio in May but that work on the issue continued when asked whether a response to the gambling harm report was forthcoming. "I have met with all the different groups that have a stake in that ongoing work," she told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday. A large number of the report's recommendations sat with the social services minister, she said. Ms Wells is overseeing the response to the recommendations that advised a full advertising ban and the prohibition of betting inducements. The communications minister also pointed to the government implementing the self-exclusion register BetStop as part of the government cracking down on gambling harm, saying more than 44,000 people had signed up. Almost four in five were under the age of 40 and nearly two in five chose a lifetime ban, briefing materials prepared for the communications minister reveal. A review of BetStop is set to be finalised by February 2026. National Gambling Helpline 1800 858 858

Trump's Mar-a-Lago admission raises questions about what he knew about Jeffrey Epstein
Trump's Mar-a-Lago admission raises questions about what he knew about Jeffrey Epstein

Sydney Morning Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Trump's Mar-a-Lago admission raises questions about what he knew about Jeffrey Epstein

Donald Trump's admission that he was aware Jeffrey Epstein 'took' young women from the spa of Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort should serve as a pivotal moment in the saga when we look back on it. Of course, things don't always work as they should. The MAGA world, once in a tailspin over Trump's refusal to release more of the Epstein investigation records, seems wholly less interested in getting to the bottom of what the man who is now president knew. Trump was good friends with Epstein in the 1990s. They moved in the same circles, attended the same parties, flew together on Epstein's plane, and in the US president's telling, shared a similar taste in 'beautiful women'. Then they apparently fell out. The exact circumstances remain vague, but once the heinous allegations of sex trafficking were publicly ventilated and a disgraced Epstein faced charges, Trump was resolutely 'not a fan'. In 2019, The Washington Post revealed the two men were pitted against each other when they competed to buy a waterfront property in Palm Beach, Maison de l'Amitie, in 2004. In 2007, The New York Post reported Epstein had been banned from the Mar-a-Lago. These days, the White House says Trump banned Epstein from the club 'for being a creep'. That is the same reason he gave his former aide Sam Nunberg in 2014, before he first ran for president, according to the Post 's 2019 story. Trump now says he knew Epstein 'stole' young women from the Mar-a-Lago spa, namely Virginia Giuffre, who escaped the clutches of Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell by marrying an Australian she met in Thailand in 2002, and moving to Australia. Tragically, she took her own life earlier this year. The question he hasn't been asked, and therefore hasn't answered is: what did he think Epstein was 'stealing' these young women for? Trump suggests he was upset about Epstein depriving him of his employees.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store