Oregon bill would make landlords give back rent deposit or pay fee if home found defective
Oregon rental applicants who haven't yet signed a lease could soon get their security deposits back if they find the home they've applied to is defective.
House Bill 3521, now headed to Gov. Tina Kotek's desk, would let Oregon renters get their security deposits back if the home they've applied to has mold, unsafe electrical wiring or other defects making it uninhabitable. The bill already passed the Oregon House in a 33-18 vote in April, and on Thursday it passed the Oregon Senate in a 20-8 vote.
Under the bill, landlords would have five days to return deposits or face a fee equivalent to the deposit they charged. Landlords would not face penalties if natural disasters or emergencies keep them from complying, and they could still choose to return deposits at their place of business rather than through mail.
Rep. Annessa Hartman, D-Gladstone, spearheaded the bill after hearing from renters across Oregon who lost hundreds, sometimes thousands, of dollars to hold deposits for homes they couldn't move into because of mold, broken plumbing or pest infestations.
Renters in Oregon represent 51% of all low-income households, according to Oregon Housing and Community Services. And nearly 37% of Oregonians rent their homes, according to the U.S. Census. That's higher than the national average, and renters are in the majority in cities including Eugene, Corvallis, Monmouth, Beaverton and Seaside.
'Landlords can still enter into whole deposit agreements, collect deposits and keep them when applicants back out without a good reason,' Senate sponsor Deb Patterson, D-Salem, said on the floor. 'That doesn't change. What does change is that applicants will have the right to walk away if the unit is substantially uninhabitable.'
No senator debated against the bill on Thursday. If enacted, the bill would apply to deposits received on or after Jan. 1, 2026.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Measure expanding foster youth rights passes Oregon Senate again, overriding Kotek veto
Sen. Sara Gelser Blouin, D-Corvallis, speaks on the Senate floor on Wednesday, Feb. 16, 2022. She is the lead author of a bill that the Senate passed again on Wednesday that would expand rights for foster youth in the state. (Ron Cooper/Oregon Capital Chronicle) Oregon senators rebuked Gov. Tina Kotek on Wednesday, voting overwhelmingly to override her veto of a bill that would strengthen and expand protections for Oregon's foster youth. Lawmakers voted 21-6 to repass Senate Bill 875 after the chamber learned of Kotek's veto, in which she said the policy exemplifies 'the risk of fragmented policymaking in this area.' The governor's perspective holds particular sway over the area of foster care investigations, with the office of the Children's Advocate housed in a governor advocacy office within the Oregon Department of Human Services. The issue of foster youth and care has been a contentious issue for Kotek, who unsuccessfully sought to push the Legislature this session to enact another bill lowering regulations around the transfer and seclusion of children in residential care and treatment centers. Senate Bill 875, meanwhile, would require a court order for blocking or limiting contact among foster children and their siblings. The measure also lists out several rights for foster kids, including being assigned an attorney, maintaining access to personal belongings like toys and being given appropriate luggage to carry their belongings. The bill's lead author, Sen. Sara Gelser Blouin, D-Corvallis, took to the floor minutes after legislative staff announced the veto to contest Kotek's points and argue for the bill's urgency. 'We really want to do everything we can to just prevent moving kids from their families, and we want to keep them up together,' she told her colleagues. 'Our current law says that that right exists as long as it's appropriate, but it doesn't say who makes that determination, and it doesn't really provide the youth who will be understanding why they are being denied that access.' The bill would also expand the definition of a child in care to include any child under custody of Oregon's Department of Human Services, encompassing children who live with parents during in-home safety plans or reunifications upon a trial. Kotek, however, saw that as ripe for misunderstanding. 'This means the law would expand the child abuse investigation framework for specialized child caring agencies to parents' homes,' she wrote Tuesday. 'It also shifts the standard from the type of placement to the legal status of the child without clarifying who is considered a perpetrator under the law.' Gelser Blouin, however, pushed back on Kotek's veto as a last-minute decision that sought no input from the bill's supporters. While the human services department wrote to the Legislature with questions and concerns about the legislation's language, she said Kotek's veto was 'a surprise.' 'We made adjustments to the bill. It has bipartisan sponsorship,' she said Wednesday. 'It passed both chambers with more than the two-thirds threshold, and at no point prior to that were the issues in this letter ever brought up to me by the governor's office.' The problem of child abuse and neglect in Oregon's foster care system has long been on the mind of foster youth advocates and state officials, with a 2024 oversight report from a Kotek-appointed watchdog finding that cases involving child welfare complaints were the most common type of case dealt with by the Oregon Department of Human Services. In 2023, Oregon's foster care system held custody of 7,282 children for at least one day in various facility placements such as family homes, professional treatment programs, psychiatric residential treatment, preadoptive homes, developmental disability-accomodative homes, or independent living, according to the state's most recent data published in October 2024. The bill was also amended in committee amid concerns over a provision that would also allow foster children the ability to decline to attend or participate in religious activities, which some conservative lawmakers feared would restrict families who are religious from adopting and fostering kids. The only lawmaker who spoke out against overriding the veto, Sen. Mark Meek, D-Gladstone, said he had questions about how the bill of rights would be provided to younger children who don't know how to read. He was wary of going against Kotek's wishes, pointing to an ongoing workgroup passed by lawmakers last year that is studying legal concerns over the definitions of victims, perpetrators and abuse involving children. 'I'm very concerned about overriding what the governor's recommendations are, and we are the body in which we produce these laws, produce these bills of writing,' he warned his colleagues. 'We have a chance to step back, take into consideration the governor's concerns, or maybe dig into those policies and see how we can fix them.' Another bill sponsor, Sen. Cedric Hayden, R-Falls Creek, urged lawmakers to get all of the Legislature's current work supporting foster youth 'over the finish line.' On Wednesday, he shared with his colleagues his own personal experiences struggling to work with the human services department while seeking custody for two children that were once abandoned with him. 'Because of the unfortunate circumstances of these children's early lives, the state is the de facto parent for these children,' he said in a statement following the vote. 'That means it's our job to provide them a safe, secure home, health care, and an education. It means we cannot stand for them to be abused.' In order to be passed, the bill would still need to clear the House with a two-thirds majority vote. In her Tuesday veto, Kotek also blocked Senate Bill 736, which would have enhanced communication between law enforcement, the human services department, and parents and guardians undergoing child abuse investigations. The Senate voted 18-9 to retain that bill in the chamber with no further official action. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Updated at 5:53 p.m. with comments from bill sponsor Sen. Cedric Hayden, R-Falls Creek.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Oregon lawmakers regulate guns, public defense, while crime victim, exoneree funding stall
Bills meant to reform and direct more money to the state's criminal justice system had a mixed bag this 2025 Legislative Session. (Photo by Ron Cooper/Oregon Capital Chronicle) Bills meant to reform and direct more money to the state's criminal justice system had some major wins and some major losses during the 2025 Legislative Session. Much needed funding for public defense lawyers, new gun control measures and new civil liberties protections overcame budgetary challenges and some strong opposition, while efforts to ensure financial compensation for victims of crime, and those who say they've been wrongfully incarcerated, remain in limbo. Addressing the state's ongoing public defender shortage was among the most pressing issues for lawmakers during the six-month session. The matter reached a fever-pitch in April, when Gov. Tina Kotek fired and replaced the head of the Oregon Public Defense Commission, calling it 'unacceptable' for thousands of Oregonians to go through the justice system without a lawyer. Under House Bill 2614, she will be allowed to fire the commission's executive director for 'just cause.' Lawmakers sought to expand the capacity for experienced lawyers' to take on cases by allocating in House Bill 5031 a nearly 15% funding increase to the commission's more than $700 million budget. But missing is more money to be used directly to support hiring more trial attorneys statewide, as Kotek requested in June. Perhaps the biggest blow to justice reform advocates was the failure of lawmakers to pass Senate Bill 1007, which would have streamlined the payout process to Oregonians found innocent after being wrongfully convicted and serving time in prison. The bill's passage would've likely called into question the state's handling of dozens of cases, and its failure 'only further harms exonerees and their families,' according to Sen. Floyd Prozanski, D-Eugene, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Gun control also rose to the top of Democrats' agenda by the end of the session. They passed Senate Bill 243, banning bump stocks and rapid-fire devices, and allowing local governments to ban the concealed carry of guns in public buildings. But, House Bill 2076, seeking to create a statewide gun licensing program, died in the House Revenue Committee in the face of staunch Republican opposition during the last week of the session. A bill to increase pay for state judges — House Bill 2712 — passed, but another — House Bill 2469 — that would have given them more discretion to lower penalties for some minor offenses, turning some misdemeanor crimes instead into 'violations,' failed. Oregonians who plead guilty to crimes on the grounds of insanity will navigate new legal guidelines under House Bill 2471, which clarifies circumstances under which a mental disorder can be used to absolve a defendant of full responsibility for committing a crime. District attorneys advocating for the bill argued that the clarity is needed in the wake of ongoing legal debates around using insanity pleas. The safety of public officials gained urgency in the wake of the fatal shootings of Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark Hortman at their home June 16, and the near-fatal shootings of Minnesota State Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette Hoffman, at their home the same morning. A day before the politically-motivated attack by 57-year-old Vance Boelter, Oregon lawmakers voted in favor of a bill that would conceal their home addresses from the public, as well as other candidates for office, Senate Bill 224. Another bill that would have made it an official crime to threaten a public official, Senate Bill 473, passed in the Oregon Senate but did not make it through the House. The Oregon Legislature passed several bills meant to offer justice to victims of abuse and sexual assault. Senate Bill 180 confers greater protections from defamation lawsuits for victims of sexual assault. Advocates say such suits can have a chilling effect on victims' willingness to bring criminal charges against perpetrators. House Bill 2975 restores courts' ability to impose distinct sentences for acts of violence like assault and strangulation that have been committed in the context of domestic violence. But when it comes to funding agencies that work with sexual assault victims, lawmakers came up short. House Bill 3196 would have allocated $18.5 million to the Oregon Department of Justice for awarding grants to nonprofits that help victims of abuse find safety and access shelters. House Bill 3070 would have allocated an additional $400,000 for the Attorney General's Sexual Assault Task Force, which certifies sexual assault nurse examiners. Neither effort advanced out of the powerful budgeting Joint Committee on Ways and Means. The act of doxxing has now become a misdemeanor under Senate Bill 1121, building on a previous law that empowered victims to sue. It is also now a misdemeanor to distribute AI-generated nude images under House Bill 2299, which prohibits sharing such images. To curb illicit sex trafficking in spas and massage parlors in the state, Kotek signed House Bill 3819 which raises fines for operating facilities that violate state trafficking laws, and allows the State Board of Massage Therapists to post signs on businesses that violate such laws. But in amendments, the bill was scrubbed of language empowering district attorneys to prosecute businesses based on testimony from victimized women who grow reluctant to share that testimony in court later on, a change that critics worry gives the law now less teeth. A bill conferring new rights for foster kids — Senate Bill 875 — hit unexpected speedbumps when Kotek vetoed it after raising concerns that the bill did not clearly define perpetrators, abuse and the definition of custody and a child in care of the state. The bill would have required a court order from a foster parent seeking to block or limit contact among foster children and their siblings, and provided kids in the foster care system with a public attorney. The bill also guaranteed them access to personal belongings when being moved between new foster placements, and required they be given appropriate luggage to carry their belongings. The Senate moved to override Kotek's veto of the bill, but the House opted to concur with Kotek after she raised concerns about the bill's specificity. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Newsweek
3 days ago
- Newsweek
Idaho Group Calls Federal Intervention 'Necessary' To Redraw State Border
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Leaders of a movement to redraw Oregon's state borders so more conservative residents can officially live in Idaho are calling federal intervention "necessary" following years of inaction on behalf of the Democratic-led state Legislature. Why It Matters The Greater Idaho Movement has been successful on ballot measures in 13 Oregon counties as of December 2024, with efforts beginning in 2020 to legally redraw state borders to allow current residents in Eastern Oregon to officially become part of Idaho. Leaders and supporters have been transparent about wanting to promote a "greater Idaho" by adding conservative representation from current Oregon residents. They have also criticized the border line that was established 163 years ago, referring to it as "outdated" and indicative of a current "cultural divide" when juxtaposed with western Oregon. Demonstrators hold signs in favor of the Greater Idaho Movement in Enterprise, Oregon, on May 12, 2023. Demonstrators hold signs in favor of the Greater Idaho Movement in Enterprise, Oregon, on May 12, 2023. ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images What To Know State lawmakers from eastern Oregon who sponsored bills this past session to spur a border redrawing "were completely ignored by the Democrat majority in Salem," the Greater Idaho Movement said in a statement on Monday. "This failure to listen to the people of Eastern Oregon or our elected representatives only reinforces why Eastern Oregon counties need the governance of Idaho, a state far more in line with our values and way of life," the statement says. "After five years of hearing from voters and advocating with legislators to respect voter wishes, it is clear to our organization that Oregon leadership is intent on holding Eastern Oregon counties captive as part of a state we no longer wish to be part of and that federal engagement is necessary to achieve self-determination for the people Eastern Oregon." Newsweek reached out to the group for comment. Even with the successful local ballot measures over the years, the longtime Democratic majorities in the Oregon House and Senate have made the group's ultimate intentions to redraw lines and live in Idaho difficult. Democrats have controlled the Oregon House, Senate and governor's office since 2007. Newsweek reached out to Democratic leadership for comment. "The failure of the Oregon Legislature to move either of the Greater Idaho bills in this session is an affront to the people of Eastern Oregon, as well as the democratic process in general," the statement adds. "For five years the people of Eastern Oregon have been making their wishes known at the ballot box. "Those wishes are to have elected leaders investigate letting our counties separate and join Idaho." In December 2024, following the election of President Donald Trump, Greater Idaho Movement President Mike McCarter, Vice President Sandie Gilson and Executive Director Matt McCaw sent the then-president-elect a letter requesting support from the incoming administration. In the letter, the group told Trump that "the people here overwhelmingly voted for you," adding: "We humbly ask you for your support in helping Eastern Oregonians achieve what the people have said they want, and that's to join Idaho." McCaw told Newsweek in 2023 that area voters have been receptive to solving the urban-rural divide, with elections in the eastern portion of Oregon heavily leaning Republican. "Eastern Oregon is far more similar to Idaho in almost every way than it is to western Oregon," McCaw said at the time. "It doesn't make any sense to be getting the state-level government from the state of Oregon, who feels very differently on almost every issue. It would make far more sense to get that government from Idaho." Neither the Trump administration nor the president has not commented on the efforts of the Greater Idaho Movement. What People Are Saying Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, told Newsweek in 2023 that Greater Idaho's efforts are a "dubious siren song" that is unrealistic and contains "multiple fatal flaws beyond its fundamental implausibility," including questions about Oregon landowners' water rights in addition to some Oregonians paying a sales tax in Idaho for the first time in their lives. Senator Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, said during a town hall in 2023 that "there are a whole set of barriers that would make the process very difficult."
