As 2025 Montana Legislature hits halfway point, party leaders point to priorities
As the 2025 Montana Legislature hit its midway point, leaders from both parties spoke on their achievements from the first 48 days and their priorities going into the second half of the session.
Republicans touted bills they have pushed to change the judiciary — a major priority for the party — but Democrats said they'd killed a number of those bills and were prepared to continue.
'For far too long, Montana's judiciary has overstepped its bounds, blocking the will of the people and legislating from the bench,' said Speaker of the House Brandon Ler, R-Savage. 'House Republicans are fighting back.'
House Minority Leader Katie Sullivan, D-Missoula, said the Democrats are active on the battlefield too.
'We're going to do everything we can to knee cap each bill the majority brings that try to take over the courts,' Sullivan said. 'We have independent, impartial courts right now, and we need to keep it that way.'
The 69th Legislature breaks until March 14, and the first half of the session has been punctuated by spats and turbulence in the Senate.
'It's been wild,' said Senate President Matt Regier, R-Kalispell, in a meeting with reporters Tuesday. ' … Honestly, speaking … leadership's job is to deal with a lot of things, not just legislation. But I wish the first half of the session was more focused on legislation.'
Republicans hold a majority in both chambers, though a cohort of nine Senators in that party have formed what equates to a majority coalition with Democrats in the upper chamber.
'We started this session with a commitment to freedom, fairness and affordability,' said Senate Minority Leader Pat Flowers, D-Belgrade. 'We believe, so far, we've been able to deliver on those goals and values. All 18 of our Democratic votes have been critical in passing a number of important bills and defeating many harmful ones.'
In the meantime, the House has churned through its work.
Majority Leader Steve Fitzpatrick, R-Great Falls, said the House has considered a high volume — and high quality — of legislation.
'I think the professionalism in the House has been tremendous,' Fitzpatrick said. 'We've had a few moments, but that's OK.'
Sullivan said there has been 'a lot' of bipartisan work in the House.
'The relationship working across the aisle has been good,' Sullivan said.
Property taxes
Property taxes are one of those bipartisan issues because they have increased substantially across the state.
Three major property tax proposals advanced out of the House, one Republican bill and two from Democrats. Majority Leader Fitzpatrick, R-Great Falls, said the idea was generally to move all of them to the Senate together.
However, Fitzpatrick said House Bill 231, sponsored by Conrad Republican Rep. Llew Jones and supported by Gov. Greg Gianforte, might end up being the most preferred. At least for his urban district, it's a no brainer.
'There isn't a person in my district that isn't going to benefit from (HB) 231 unless you've got some property somewhere else,' Fitzpatrick said.
HB 231 would shift some of the tax burden onto those who are not residents of the state, but own property in Montana.
Since it was introduced, Fitzpatrick said, it was amended to allow for more of a tax cut for homes valued on the lower end of the spectrum.
Most of the discussion around property taxes has been which of the 18 Montana tax classes will have their rates adjusted — with a focus on reductions for residential payers — and if there's a tax credit the two parties can agree on.
Another change to HB 231 is that it is linked with House Bill 154, a bill, from Rep. Jonathan Karlen, D-Missoula. Karlen's bill would create a tax credit to help people who may have been living in their home for years, but end up priced out, while House Bill 155, from Rep. Mark Thane, D-Missoula, would establish a tax rate for residential properties based on market value of the property.
Thane's bill has some support for Republican leadership, with Senate President Matt Reiger saying ideas in it have 'merit.'
Judiciary
In a video update of the first part of the session, Speaker Ler identified two judiciary bills in particular that Republicans had moved forward.
He said House Bill 39, sponsored by Rep. Tom Millett, R-Marion, would bring transparency to races by allowing political parties to support judicial candidates 'so Montanans actually know where they stand.'
Ler also pointed to House Bill 65, sponsored by Rep. Lee Deming, R-Laurel, which would audit the State Bar of Montana to 'shine a light' on how the legal system operates.
'But the most important bills are still yet to come,' Ler said.
One of the biggest debates has been a partisan judiciary. Democrats have wanted to keep partisan politics outside the third branch, but Republicans argue politics are already present, and voters deserve transparency.
House Bill 295, brought by Rep. Paul Fielder, R-Thompson Falls, would have allowed judicial candidates to list their party affiliation and failed to pass the floor. The House also voted down a proposal, House Bill 751, from Rep. Braxton Mitchell, R-Columbia Falls, that would have made the Supreme Court candidates list their party affiliation.
Sullivan called killing those two House bills 'very good.'
Senate Bill 42, which would require justices of the peace, and district and state supreme court judges to run on partisan ballots, passed the upper chamber and will be taken up by the House.
Medicaid Expansion
A major priority for Democrats and some Republicans this session was reauthorizing Medicaid expansion, which insures nearly 80,000 people, and a major proposal to do so, from Rep. Ed Buttrey, R-Great Falls, already passed both chambers.
Legislators from small towns have said the program is critical to keeping little hospitals, which operate on the margins, open, and other supporters have said it's important for the economy.
Although the state supports expansion, the Trump administration is making aggressive moves to cut the federal government, and any decrease could impact Montana.
'With all the talk about Medicaid and Medicare potentially being cut significantly, it has put the community into a tailspin,' said Rep. Mary Caferro, D-Helena. 'People are very afraid of losing their services.'
Social Issues
Republicans also celebrated the quick movement of some bills aimed at protecting women and girls, which Democrats have fought against and criticized Friday as discriminatory.
'When it comes to protecting Montana's children, House Republicans are standing strong against extreme gender ideology,' Speaker Pro Tempore Katie Zolnikov, R-Billings, said in a video update.
Zolnikov pointed to a couple of bills in particular, both sponsored by Rep. Kerri Seekins-Crowe, R-Billings.
Zolnikov said House Bill 300 ensures girls' sports locker rooms and private spaces 'remain for biological females.' The bill also aims to keep 'biological men' out of athletic programs for females. She also touted House Bill 121, to designate bathroom use for strictly males and females, as furthering the same protections.
'Parents, not politicians, should decide what's best for their children,' Zolnikov said. 'We will never stop fighting for Montana's families.'
Democratic legislators have fired back during floor sessions and in committees, with many of the bills drawing significant debate, including arguments some legislation is attacking people who are transgender.
Sullivan spoke on the topic Friday, saying Republicans were focusing on the wrong things.
'Montana sent us here to fund schools, fix roads, cut their taxes, and instead, the other party has been pretty obsessed on the floor with social issues,' Sullivan said. 'Voters, I think, would be disgusted to know just how many bills we have had on the floor that have been regulating people's bodies.'
Daily Montanan reporter Micah Drew contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Got Instantly Fact-Checked On Live TV After Bragging About His Poll Numbers
President Donald Trump repeatedly boasted that he has 'the best poll numbers [he's] ever had' in an interview with CNBC on Tuesday morning, even though the majority of Americans disapprove of his performance in the job. Asked whether he would run for a third term in office despite the fact that the US Constitution's 22nd Amendment bars him from doing so, Trump replied 'probably not,' before going on to say he would like to do so. Related: 'I'd like to run. I have the best poll numbers I've ever had. You know why? Because people love the tariffs and they love the trade deal and they love that foreign countries aren't ripping us off anymore. For years they ripped us off, friend and foe,' Trump said, even though voter surveys suggest otherwise. Kernen interjected, clarifying that the president enjoys high support among Republican voters, but not the overall electorate. Trump didn't seem to blink. 'I have the best poll numbers I've ever had,' Trump said. 'I have poll numbers where I'm 71%.' 'Those are among Republicans,' Kernen replied. Related: Related: Trump would not relent, insisting Kernen was wrong. Trump also claimed that polls that showed him faring poorly with voters were 'fake.' The source for the figures cited by Trump is unclear. His approval rating currently stands at 44%, according to an average of polls compiled by the New York Times. Related: An issue that has garnered much attention in recent weeks appears to be a thorn in Trump's side as a majority of Americans disapprove of his administration's handling of documents related to the investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to an Economics/YouGov poll conducted late last month. You can watch the whole exchange here. This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Washington Post
17 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Mike Flood met with anger at Nebraska town hall
LINCOLN, Nebraska —Nebraska was anything but nice. Rep. Mike Flood (R-Nebraska) faced about 750 voters during a contentious town hall here on Monday night. The two-term Republican lawmaker was there to explain his vote for President Donald Trump's signature achievement: the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' that extended the 2017 tax cuts and plowed billions into immigration enforcement while slashing health care and food programs for the poor.


Boston Globe
18 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Epstein's ex, Ghislaine Maxwell, doesn't want grand jury transcripts released
Advertisement A message seeking comment from prosecutors was not immediately returned. Government attorneys have been trying to quell a clamor for transparency by seeking the transcripts' release — though the government also says the public already knows much of what's in the documents. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Most of the information 'was made publicly available at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses,' prosecutors wrote in court papers Monday. They noted that the disclosures excluded some victims' and witnesses' names. Prosecutors had also said last week that some of what the grand jurors heard eventually came out at Maxwell's 2021 trial and in various victims' lawsuits. There were only two grand jury witnesses, both of them law enforcement officials, prosecutors said. Advertisement Prosecutors made clear Monday that they're seeking to unseal only the transcripts of grand jury witnesses' testimony, not the exhibits that accompanied it. But they are also working to parse how much of the exhibits also became public record over the years. While prosecutors have sought to temper expectations about any new revelations from the grand jury proceedings, they aren't proposing to release a cache of other information the government collected while looking into Epstein. The filing aimed to support their request to release the usually secret records amid a public clamor for more transparency about the investigation into Epstein, six years after the financier died in prison. Maxwell, his former girlfriend, was later convicted of helping him prey on underage girls. The transcript face-off comes six years after authorities said Epstein killed himself while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges and four years after Maxwell was convicted. Some of President Donald Trump's allies spent years suggesting there was more to the Epstein saga than met the eye and calling for more disclosures. A few got powerful positions in Trump's Justice Department — and then faced backlash after it abruptly announced that nothing more would be released and that a long-rumored Epstein 'client list' doesn't exist. After trying unsuccessfully to change the subject and denigrating his own supporters for staying interested in Epstein, the Republican president told Attorney General Pam Bondi to ask courts to unseal the grand jury transcripts in the case.