Map Shows Triple US Spy Flights Near China
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A map by Newsweek shows three United States military aircraft, deployed at a front-line base in the Western Pacific Ocean, conducting spy flights near China on Tuesday.
Newsweek has contacted the U.S. Pacific Air Forces for comment by email. The Chinese Defense Ministry did not immediately respond to a Newsweek written request for comment.
Why It Matters
The U.S. military has frequently deployed its spy aircraft to collect intelligence near the Chinese coastline, prompting strong objections from Beijing, which has demanded Washington put an end to what it called dangerous close-in reconnaissance around China's airspace and waters.
The U.S. Pacific Air Forces previously told Newsweek it flies "hundreds of sorties" per day for training and integration missions, supporting a free and open Indo-Pacific.
"We reserve the right to navigate under international norms," the Hawaii-headquartered command said.
A United States Air Force RC-135S Cobra Ball reconnaissance aircraft descends toward the runway at Travis Air Force Base in California on May 23, 2020.
A United States Air Force RC-135S Cobra Ball reconnaissance aircraft descends toward the runway at Travis Air Force Base in California on May 23, 2020.
Senior Airman Amy Younger/U.S. Air Force
Most of the American spy planes operating near China are deployed on the Japanese island of Okinawa, which is part of the First Island Chain, a U.S. containment strategy aimed at restricting China's military access to the Pacific Ocean using U.S.-aligned territories.
What To Know
According to data captured by the aircraft tracking service Flightradar24, a trio of U.S. Air Force reconnaissance aircraft, which included an RC-135S Cobra Ball, RC-135U Combat Sent, and RC-135W Rivet Joint, departed from Kadena Air Base on Okinawa.
The Cobra Ball is designed for gathering data on ballistic missiles, a U.S. Air Force fact sheet reads. The Combat Sent can locate and identify military radar signals, while the Rivet Joint detects, identifies and geolocates signals throughout the electromagnetic spectrum.
The U.S. spy planes were tracked operating over the contested South China Sea and the Luzon Strait between the northern Philippines and southern Taiwan, a Newsweek map shows. Both countries, which are U.S. allies and partners, are part of the First Island Chain.
Communist China has threatened Taiwan with the use of force, claiming the island is part of its territory, despite never having ruled it. Meanwhile, Beijing has territorial disputes with Manila, which has signed a defense treaty with Washington, over the South China Sea.
The triple American spy flights come as a U.S.-Philippine war game, code-named Balikatan 2025, is being held in the Southeast Asian country, while a Chinese naval strike group led by the aircraft carrier CNS Shandong transited the Luzon Strait twice last week.
What People Are Saying
The U.S. Air Force says: "The RC-135S, equipped with a sophisticated array of optical and electronic sensors, recording media, and communications equipment, is a national asset uniquely suited to provide America's leaders and defense community with vital information that cannot be obtained by any other source."
Mao Ning, spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, previously said: "U.S. aircraft and warships frequently conduct close-in reconnaissance around China, which seriously threatens China's national security and undermines regional peace and stability. The Chinese side has repeatedly voiced our grave concerns. The U.S. needs to put an immediate end to such provocations."
What Happens Next
It is unclear whether the Chinese military dispatched fighter aircraft to intercept the three American spy planes. The U.S. military has previously accused a Chinese fighter jet of performing an "unnecessarily aggressive maneuver" near an American reconnaissance plane.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
‘Kill shot:' GOP megabill targets solar, wind projects with new tax
Senate Republicans stepped up their attacks on U.S. solar and wind energy projects by quietly adding a provision to their megabill that would penalize future developments with a new tax. That new tax measure was tucked into the more than 900-page document released late Friday that also would sharply cut the tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act for solar and wind projects. Those cuts to the IRA credits were added after a late-stage push by President Donald Trump to crack down further on the incentives by requiring generation projects be placed in service by the end of 2027 to qualify. The new excise tax is another blow to the fastest-growing sources of power production in the United States, and would be a massive setback to the wind and solar energy industries since it would apply even to projects not receiving any credits. 'It's a kill shot. This new excise tax on wind and solar is designed to fully kill the industry,' said Adrian Deveny, founder and president of policy advisory firm Climate Vision, who helped craft the climate law as a former policy director for Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer. Analysts at the Rhodium Group said in an email the new tax would push up the costs of wind and solar projects by 10 to 20 percent — on top of the cost increases from losing the credits. 'Combined with the likely onerous administrative reporting burden this provision puts in place, these cost increases will lead to even lower wind and solar installations. The impacts of this tax would also flow through to consumers in the form of higher electricity rates,' Rhodium said. The provision as written appears to add an additional tax for any wind and solar project placed into service after 2027 — when its eligibility for the investment and production tax credits ends — if a certain percentage of the value of the project's components are sourced from prohibited foreign entities, like China. It would apply to all projects that began construction after June 16 of this year. The language would require wind and solar projects, even those not receiving credits, to navigate complex and potentially unworkable requirements that prohibit sourcing from foreign entities of concern — a move designed to promote domestic production and crack down on Chinese materials. In keeping with GOP support for the fossil fuel industry, the updated bill creates a new production tax credit for metallurgical coal, which is used in steelmaking.
UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
Trump cancels U.S.-Canadian trade talks over tech taxes
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney meets with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office at the White House on May 6. Trump on Friday suspended trade talks due to Canada's new Digital Services Tax. File Photo by Francis Chung/UPI | License Photo June 28 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump cited potential Canadian taxes on U.S. tech companies as his reason for ending trade talks with Canada on Friday. The tech taxes on Amazon, Google, Meta and other U.S. tech firms are due on Monday, and Trump said it is a deal-breaker. "We have just been informed that Canada ... has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American technology companies," Trump said in a Truth Social post on Friday. He called the tax a "direct and blatant attack on our country" and accused Canada of "copying the European Union, which has done the same thing." "We are hereby terminating all discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately," Trump said. His administration in the coming week will notify Canadian officials of the tariff that it will have to pay to do business in the United States, Trump added. Trump last week attended the G7 economic trade summit hosted by Canada and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and sought common ground on trade talks, The Washington Post reported. Officials at U.S. tech firms oppose the Canadian tax, the amount of which is based on the revenues generated by Canadians' use of e-commerce sites, social media and the sales of data. All tech companies that generate more than $14.59 million from such services would be subject to the new 3% Digital Services Tax. The tax is retroactive to 2022 and could cost U.S.-based tech firms up to $3 billion, NBC News reported. Upon learning of Trump halting trade talks, Canadian officials on Friday limited U.S. steel imports and placed a 50% surcharge on steel imports that surpass the quota. Canadian Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne said the surcharge will help to protect Canadian steel against what he called "unjust U.S. tariffs." He said the Canadian government is prepared to take additional actions, if necessary.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Does your business have a Plan B for the Trump tariffs?
I have a client in New Jersey who manufactures industrial films. A big source of their supply comes from two Chinese companies. You would think with President Trump's tariffs they would be suffering, right? Luckily, the owner of the company (and her partner) paid attention. Going all the way back to 2023 they knew — like we all knew — that the presidential election would be tight. By mid-2024 it got even tighter. And what was then-candidate Trump saying back then? He was promising significant tax cuts but providing no answers as to how they would be funded. He was promising to overturn many of the Biden administration's regulations, from environmental to DEI to overtime pay. He was promising to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. But more importantly to my client, Trump was planning on handing down big tariffs, especially targeted at China. And they took him seriously. They're not Trump supporters, but they are pragmatists. So back in 2023 they started searching for alternative suppliers. They reached out to nonprofits like the World Trade Center Association and Small Business Development Centers, and they got help from the International Trade Administration. They traveled to India, Malaysia and Brazil. They realized that if Trump was elected, their main source of supply would be seriously threatened. They also understood that the Biden administration was no big fan of China either. You can't run a business that's dependent on such a precarious source of supply that it could be seriously disrupted by a single politician. So they took action. Unfortunately, some business owners didn't. The media has been reporting about small businesses that are now suffering because of Trump's tariffs. A steel products manufacturer in Salt Lake City says his company could be 'devastated.' A flower shop owner in California that buys products from South America laments the significant increase in her costs. Two Iowa business owners, who buy 75-80 percent of their products from overseas, are looking at a 'nightmare' holiday season. According to a CNN report, a high-end electronics manufacturer has had to cut employee hours, and a guitar seller fears the 'mass extinction' of small businesses. I feel bad for these business owners, but life isn't fair. And history repeats itself. Businesses, regardless of their size, are always at the mercy of government interventions. Today is no different. Which is why my client and her partner, having read history, took Trump's tariff warnings seriously. They're smart. And like the many other smart business people I have met, they share one common characteristic: They're always looking ahead. They always have a Plan B. They diversify. Investors know that too much reliance on one party creates risk. There's a reason the SEC requires that companies disclose in their financial statements when a customer represents more than 10 percent of their business. The flower-seller, guitar maker and electronics manufacturer all relied too heavily on foreign supply for their businesses. Fair enough — this model has, until now, worked well for them. But it's a risky model when you rely too much on one source of supply for your livelihood — particularly when you have new leaders telling you that they're going to take actions that will put that source of supply in jeopardy. Of course that's easier said than done. But, like my New Jersey client, those small-business owners should also have been looking ahead and mitigating their potential risk. My client saw the writing on the wall two years ago and took steps to prepare. And they weren't the only ones. The chief strategy officer for a robotics company, for example, said he always 'plans ahead 9-12 months' and had a 'plan B' to produce necessary hardware outside of China, where it was operating before. 'Maybe this is also a good time to say, 'Let's not put all the eggs in one basket,'' he told CNN, 'and, you know, start looking on other kind of territories that will reduce the risk for us going forward.' According to an NPR report, a Maryland business owner — a former Marine (no surprise) — has been stockpiling products for months in advance of looming tariffs, admitting that his 'warehouse was bursting.' But then there are the countless other small-business owners who just like to keep their fingers crossed and hope against hope that nothing bad will happen. That's no way to run a business, especially when there are employees with families who are relying on your decisions. So do I feel bad for those business owners suffering under Trump's tariffs? I do. But this is the game you play when you run a business. You take risks, you reap rewards. And if you don't plan ahead and diversify, you suffer the consequences. Gene Marks is founder of The Marks Group, a small-business consulting firm.
