logo
Republican appears to refer to Trump as ‘President C***' at NRCC dinner

Republican appears to refer to Trump as ‘President C***' at NRCC dinner

Independent09-04-2025

Minnesota Congressman Tom Emmer appeared to make a Freudian slip as he seemed to refer to Donald Trump as 'President C***' before the commander-in-chief took to the podium at a key fundraising dinner.
Emmer made remarks at the National Republican Congressional Committee 's annual gala in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday evening before making the slip-up.
'President C***,' he appeared to say before quickly correcting himself.
'President Donald Trump is counting on us. The American people are counting on us, and our friends in this room and grassroots supporters across the country are counting on us.'
Social media users were quick to pounce on Emmer's flub, with the anti-Trump PAC, The Lincoln Project, tweeting that he 'had it right the first time.'
'Freud just chuckled in his grave,' another X user added.
Emmer, the House Majority Whip, made the gaffe in front of GOP benefactors who paid upwards of $300,000 to attend the dinner. House Republicans Campaign Chair Richard Hudson said the committee raised $35.2 million ahead of the event, a source told The Hill.
Trump later confirmed the figure on stage and said he hopes to raise $50 million at next year's event.
Moments before the blunder, Emmer stumbled his way through his opening speech as he greeted the GOP guests.
'Hello, fellow Republicans,' he said. 'No! Hello, feb... feh... fellow Republicans! Where are ya?' he continued, speaking more loudly after adjusting his microphone.
'I know this is the uh, this is the cheap time. You get to hear from me. Then, you're gonna get energy out of, Steve Scalise. And you're gonna get some energy out of our Speaker, Mike Johnson. But guess what? The show is Donald J. Trump. So get ready.'
Emmer then heaped praise on the president's first few months in office, failing to address global markets, which continued their sell-off Tuesday. The sell-off began when Trump announced the duties against every nation—bar Russia—in his ' Liberation Day ' last week.
'In just 100 days, President Trump has delivered endless wins for the American people,' Emmer said. 'Whether it is ending the invasion at our southern border or rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse – one thing is clear: America is back!'
Later in the evening, the president boasted that world leaders panicked by his gargantuan global tariffs are 'kissing my a**' in desperate bids to reduce the levies.
'Please, Sir, make a deal. I'll do anything. I'll do anything, Sir,' he said mockingly in a simpering voice.
Trump also touted his efforts for what he called America's 'most successful 100 days in this country's history.'
He then resurfaced one of his more unusual remarks from the 2024 campaign trail: pining over the 'late, great Hannibal Lecter.'
'They used to go crazy when I talked about... The late, great Hannibal Lecter. Right?' he said. 'Why does he talk about that? He's a fictional character.' He's not. We have many of them that came across the border. He's actually not.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EPA employees put names to 'declaration of dissent' over agency moves under Trump
EPA employees put names to 'declaration of dissent' over agency moves under Trump

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

EPA employees put names to 'declaration of dissent' over agency moves under Trump

A group of Environmental Protection Agency employees on Monday published a declaration of dissent from the agency's policies under the Trump administration, saying they 'undermine the EPA mission of protecting human health and the environment.' More than 170 EPA employees put their names to the document, with about 100 more signing anonymously out of fear of retaliation, according to Jeremy Berg, a former editor-in-chief of Science magazine who is not an EPA employee but was among non-EPA scientists or academics to also sign. The latter figure includes over 70 Nobel laureates. The letter represents rare public criticism from agency employees who could face blowback for speaking out against a weakening of funding and federal support for climate, environmental and health science. Scientists at the National Institutes of Health made a similar move earlier in June. 'Since the Agency's founding in 1970, EPA has accomplished (its) mission by leveraging science, funding, and expert staff in service to the American people. Today, we stand together in dissent against the current administration's focus on harmful deregulation, mischaracterization of previous EPA actions, and disregard for scientific expertise,' the letter read. Agency spokespeople did not immediately respond Monday to messages seeking comment. Employees want the EPA get back to its mission 'I'm really sad. This agency, that was a superhero for me in my youth, we're not living up to our ideals under this administration. And I really want us to,' said Amelia Hertzberg, an environmental protection specialist at the EPA who has been on administrative leave since February from the Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, while the administration works to close down her department. Hertzberg's work focused on the most vulnerable groups impacted by pollution: pregnant and nursing people, young children and babies, the elderly, people with preexisting and chronic health conditions and people living in communities exposed to higher levels of pollution. That wasn't supposed to be controversial, but it's become so in this political climate, she said. 'Americans should be able to drink their water and breathe their air without being poisoned. And if they aren't, then our government is failing,' she said. Berg, who also directed the National Institute of General Medical Sciences at NIH from 2003-2011, said the dissent isn't motivated by partisan criticism. He said the employees hope it will help the EPA get back to the mission for which it was established — which 'only matters if you breathe air and drink water.' The letter outlines what the EPA employees see as five main concerns: undermining public trust; ignoring scientific consensus to benefit polluters; reversing EPA's progress in America's most vulnerable communities; dismantling the Office of Research and Development; and promoting a culture of fear, forcing staff to choose between their livelihood and well-being. EPA has cut funding and rolled back federal regulations Under Administrator Lee Zeldin, EPA has cut funding for environmental improvements in minority communities, vowed to roll back federal regulations that lower air pollution in national parks and tribal reservations, wants to undo a ban on a type of asbestos and proposed repealing rules that limit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Zeldin began reorganizing the EPA's research and development office as part of his push to slash their budget and gut their study of climate change and environmental justice. And he's seeking to roll back pollution rules that an Associated Press examination found were estimated to save 30,000 lives and $275 billion every year. 'People are going to die,' said Carol Greider, a Nobel laureate and professor of molecular and cellular biology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who also signed the letter. She described last week's East Coast heat wave as evidence of the ways people are feeling the effects of climate change. 'And if we don't have scientists at the EPA to understand how what we do that goes into the air affects our health, more people are going to die,' she added. Berg said the declarations of dissent from both the NIH and EPA employees are noteworthy because they represent scientists speaking out as their careers are on the line. Even non-agency employees have to consider whether the government will withdraw research funding. Greider, asked about fears of repercussions or retaliation, said she's 'living the repercussions of everything.' She regularly meets with graduate students who are worried about pursuing scientific careers as labs lose funding. It's a long-term problem if we aren't supporting the next generation of scientists, she said: 'That's decades worth of loss.'

Lara Trump is ‘taking a strong look' at running for now-open North Carolina Senate seat
Lara Trump is ‘taking a strong look' at running for now-open North Carolina Senate seat

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Lara Trump is ‘taking a strong look' at running for now-open North Carolina Senate seat

Months after saying she 'would seriously consider' taking over Marco Rubio's Florida Senate seat, only to instead jump over to Fox News to host a weekend show, Lara Trump is now 'taking a strong look' at running for Senate in North Carolina after incumbent Republican Thom Tillis announced he was not seeking re-election. Amid a falling out with President Donald Trump over the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' which Tillis says he opposes due to the massive cuts in Medicaid, the conservative lawmaker announced this past weekend that he would be stepping down next year rather than seek another term. 'I respect President Trump, I support the majority of his agenda, but I don't bow to anybody when the people of North Carolina are at risk and this bill puts them at risk,' Tillis told The Independent. With the president celebrating the pending retirement of Tillis, who has long faced anger from MAGA for his attempts at bipartisanship and occasional criticisms of fellow Republicans, speculation quickly arose over who would run for the soon-to-be open seat. And the president's daughter-in-law appears to be front of the line on the Republican side. Lara Trump, who served as the Republican National Committee co-chair through the 2024 election, 'is 'taking a strong look' at the race and will have the family's support if she chooses to run,' according to Politico. NOTUS' Reese Gorman additionally stated that a source told him she is 'seriously considering a bid' for Tillis' seat. NBC News' Vaughn Hilyard also reported that a source close to the Trump family said that the current Fox News host is 'strongly considering jumping in the race,' adding that the odds of her throwing her name in the ring are 'as high as one could be considering it.' On top of that, if she decides to run, the source noted the 'race will be over before it begins.' If Lara Trump would decide to stay at her cushy Fox News gig rather than run for the Senate, which would entail her having to quit her show and the conservative cable giant releasing her, other GOP hopefuls have been floated as possibilities. The current RNC Chair Michael Whatley, who previously led North Carolina's GOP, is seen as a 'strong candidate' by the White House. Elsewhere, Reps. Pat Harrigan and Richard Hudson are also being propped up by Republicans as 'solid' choices. Democrats, meanwhile, are hoping to convince popular former Gov. Roy Cooper to jump into the race. He is expected to make an announcement on his intentions later this summer. Ex-Congressman Wiley Nickel has already launched his campaign for the Democratic nomination. Lara Trump has made no secret of her ambitions for political office over the years. After Richard Burr revealed in 2021 that he would not seek re-election for his North Carolina Senate seat, she was reportedly eyeing a run to succeed the moderate Republican. Burr had run afoul Trump loyalists after he was one of seven GOP senators who voted to convict the president in his impeachment trial over the January 6 Capitol attack. 'It would be an incredible thing. It's my home state, a state I love so much, and look, I think we need some strong Republicans in Washington, DC. We had a great run with the Senate and the House this go-round, but you know, let's see what happens,' she told Fox News in 2022. With it looking likely that Tillis could step down in 2026, and the MAGA wing of the party considering a primary race against him if he didn't, Lara Trump's name was floated for the seat after her father-in-law won the presidential election last November. A poll in December found that she would trounce Tillis in a one-on-one primary for the GOP nomination. However, after Donald Trump chose Rubio to be his secretary of state, leaving an open Senate seat in Florida to be filled, the president's daughter-in-law – who had just left her position with the RNC – was seen as a likely choice. Especially since the president wanted her to replace Rubio at the time. Instead, she decided she'd rather 'shape narratives' than craft legislation and headed over to Fox News, where she had been engaged in negotiations with network chief Suzanne Scott to host her own show. The hiring of Lara Trump came on the heels of the administration hiring roughly two dozen former Fox News staffers and was seen as a way of further tightening the already close relationship between the right-wing network and the president. With the president irate with Tillis over his non-support for his signature legislation, he spent much of the weekend vowing to back a primary challenger before the senator announced that he would not seek re-election. 'Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the Primary against 'Senator Thom' Tillis,' Trump groused on Truth Social. 'I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America.'

Photos show how extreme heat is affecting parts of Europe
Photos show how extreme heat is affecting parts of Europe

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Photos show how extreme heat is affecting parts of Europe

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store