logo
'Get on with it': next move key with rate cut baked in

'Get on with it': next move key with rate cut baked in

Yahoo06-07-2025
As the Reserve Bank's July cash-rate meeting gets under way, traders will be just as interested in the tone of the board's decision as they will be in its substance.
A consensus of economists and bond traders predict the central bank board will deliver its first back-to-back interest rate cut in more than five years when its meeting wraps up on Tuesday.
Inflation seems to be under control and the ongoing uncertainty of tariffs is adding to soft consumer spending, tipping the scales in favour of the RBA looking to provide more stimulus.
The rates market is almost fully pricing in a 25 basis point cut.
While the central bank could still decide to shock the market, past experience suggests the board tends not to move counter to such a strongly held opinion.
Westpac chief economist Luci Ellis said a cut was no "shoo-in", but the board would have no clear rationale to hold until August as even a hotter-than-expected June inflation outcome would be unlikely to change the equation.
"A decision to cut in July is one of timing and tactics, not whether to cut at all," said the former Reserve Bank economist.
"If the question is now or in five weeks' time, the juice is not worth the squeeze. Just get on with it."
Economists are much less unified in their expectations for August.
The markets have priced in a better-than-even chance the board will go back-to-back-to-back, but Ms Ellis doesn't expect the next cut after July to come until November.
ANZ, NAB and CBA all believe the central bank will cut again in August, as does AMP chief economist Shane Oliver, who expects governor Michele Bullock to fuel market hopes with more dovish commentary post-meeting.
But JP Morgan economists Ben Jarman and Jack Stinson think slightly more hawkish messaging could correct some overconfidence in the market, which would push assets lower.
"Assuming a cut next week, in the inevitable press conference question about what's to come in August, we expect the governor to acknowledge a third consecutive move is possible, but list a swathe of criteria that will be relevant," they said.
"Such an open-ended response would implicitly push back a bit on the August pricing."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bond Traders Step Up 2026 Fed Cut Bets After Trump Bashes Powell
Bond Traders Step Up 2026 Fed Cut Bets After Trump Bashes Powell

Bloomberg

time19 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Bond Traders Step Up 2026 Fed Cut Bets After Trump Bashes Powell

Bond traders are boosting bets that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates more aggressively next year, as speculation mounts that an eventual change of leadership at the central bank will deliver the easier monetary policy that President Donald Trump is demanding. Their conviction is showing up in the yield spread between SOFR futures maturing in December 2025 and December 2026, which reflect expectations of how deeply the Fed will cut rates in that period.

UK Supreme Court quashes convictions of 2 bank traders after deciding their trials were unfair
UK Supreme Court quashes convictions of 2 bank traders after deciding their trials were unfair

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

UK Supreme Court quashes convictions of 2 bank traders after deciding their trials were unfair

LONDON (AP) — Britain's Supreme Court on Wednesday quashed the convictions of two financial market traders accused of manipulating benchmark interest rates in one of the biggest scandals to come out of the global financial crisis in 2008. The charges against Tom Hayes, a former Citigroup and UBS trader, and Carlo Palombo, who worked for Barclays, centered around alleged efforts to influence the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, or Libor, and its euro currency equivalent Euribor, which were used to set the interest rates on trillions of dollars of loans and other financial products around the world. The court ruled that the convictions of Hayes and Palombo were unfair because the judges in their separate cases gave inaccurate instructions to jurors. That effectively prevented jurors from considering the key question of whether the traders had acted dishonestly. 'That misdirection undermined the fairness of the trial,' Judge George Leggatt wrote in an 82-page decision backed by all five members of the panel that heard the case. Hayes was convicted in August 2015 and sentenced to a maximum of 14 years in prison, which was later reduced to 11 years. Palombo, convicted in March 2019, was sentenced to four years in prison. Both men were released in 2021. 'It destroyed my family, I missed most of my son's childhood,' Hayes told the BBC. 'For so long I've been an international fugitive … and now I can move on with my life, or try to,' he added. The decision came after the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeal in 2022 overturned the convictions of two traders charged with similar crimes in the United States. Hayes and Palombo, whose appeals were repeatedly rejected by British judges, were allowed to take their case to the U.K. Supreme Court after that ruling. The U.K.'s Serious Fraud Office began investigating alleged efforts to manipulate Libor in 2012. That ultimately led to the conviction of nine bankers. 'We have considered this judgment and the full circumstances carefully and determined it would not be in the public interest for us to seek a retrial,' the SFO said in response to the Supreme Court ruling. Libor and Euribor were critical benchmarks that were once used to set the interest rates on everything from business loans to home mortgages and credit card debts. As a result, they also became central to more complex financial transactions such as those used by banks and businesses to bet on interest rate fluctuations. The benchmarks were vulnerable to manipulation because they were set by banks that could profit from swings in interest rates. Each day, major international banks were asked to submit the interest rate at which they could borrow money from other banks. An average of those submissions was then used to set the daily Libor and Euribor rates. During the financial crisis, regulators became aware that some banks were making artificially low Libor submissions to make their institutions seem more creditworthy. Some traders also sought to influence the submissions made by their banks as even small moves in the benchmark rates could boost their profits. Those risks became even more pronounced during the financial crisis, when lending dried up and bankers had to base their daily submissions on a subjective assessment of the market rather than actual loans. Libor and Euribor were phased out in recent years, in part because they were seen as worsening the financial crisis. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store