logo
Sharri Markson: Without endorsing antisemitism report's recommendations, Albanese's words are 'smoke and mirrors'

Sharri Markson: Without endorsing antisemitism report's recommendations, Albanese's words are 'smoke and mirrors'

Sky News AU10-07-2025
The landmark antisemitism report from special envoy, Jillian Segal, has recommended stripping funding from universities which spread antisemitism and working with the public broadcasters to promote social cohesion.
It has nine of the 15 recommendations from our Sky News Antisemitism Summit including screening immigrants for antisemitic views, stripping arts bodies and festivals of government grants if they condone hate and embedding antisemitism in the school curriculum.
Albanese welcomed the report and said he would engage with it - but he stopped short of endorsing it.
In fact, he did not explicitly support a single recommendation, and he brushed off questions about what he'll commit to.
Albanese would only say that he'd consider them carefully.
'We'll now carefully consider the report recommendations," he said.
"There's a number of things in here that we're doing. There's a number of things that can be implemented quickly. There are a number of things that will require work over a period of time.'
But he refused to say what the "things" are that could be implemented quickly.
His comments are, at least, an improvement from his position after our Antisemitism Summit when he refused to consider any of the meaningful recommendations we put forward.
Now he officially has to consider them.
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke was also specifically asked if these recommendations would be put in place within the year - and he was noncommittal.
He said Creative Australia already took antisemitism into account when awarding grants.
This can't possibly be true. Many organisations that employ hate preachers continue to receive ongoing funding.
It's deeply concerning if Burke's attitude is that they're already doing this.
Jewish leaders today, including Alex Ryvchin, Colin Rubenstein and Jeremy Leibler have all said that Segal's report needs to be met with comprehensive action and enforcement.
Ryvchin said it's critical that Albanese expresses whole-hearted support for the plan.
"The Prime Minister should say this is the plan to rescue our country from the scourge of racism directed at Jewish Australians," he said.
And that's exactly right. Albanese needs to officially endorse this report so that university leaders, state governments and cultural institutions get on board and make the necessary changes.
The Israeli Ambassador Amir Maimon echoed this sentiment, saying "the real test now lies in swift and effective implementation.'
But there were some positives from today's press conference.
Albanese and Burke spoke more forcefully about antisemitism than in the past.
The Prime Minister also spoke about the pro-Palestinian protesters who crashed the Melbourne restaurant on Friday night, describing it as criminal behaviour.
He said he "saw on the ABC the other night a woman who participated in the trashing and violence that occurred at the restaurant in Melbourne, justifying that, justifying it. There is no justification for that whatsoever. And what's more, the idea that somehow the cause of justice for Palestinians is advanced by behaviour like that is not only delusional, it is destructive.'
Burke spoke strongly about the prejudice faced by Jewish Australians in society.
'We want people to be safe and to feel safe," he said.
"Being safe and feeling safe is something which antisemitism flies in the face of. And while we might think of this only in terms of some of the more dramatic, violent incidents which we've seen, feeling safe and being safe goes deeper than that.'
The Jewish community is sceptical about why the Albanese Government seems to be only considering action now, 21 months after the racism exploded in the wake of Hamas attacks on Israel on October 7.
There was only one decent question at today's press conference and it came from the Jewish News journalist Carly Adno - who raised this point precisely.
She asked: "Prime Minister, the Jewish community has been experiencing these antisemitic attacks for close to two years now. Why is it that it took another arson attack on the synagogues to adopt some of these?"
Albanese was defensive. "Well, it didn't, is the answer to that. It didn't."
But Adno is correct.
Albanese has done nothing but sit back and watch as hatred festered under his leadership.
He's made our country a dangerous and unsafe place, and it's utterly unforgivable.
He needs to categorically adopt Segal's strong plan, which draws on nine of the 15 recommendations from our Sky News Antisemitism Summit.
They include: A permanent policing cooperation between state and federal governments to investigate threats and incidents, and links to terrorism. Embedding Holocaust and antisemitism education in the school curriculum. A judicial inquiry into antisemitism on campus. The investigation and disclosure of foreign funding to universities, which might drive extremist ideologies. Government grants to festivals and cultural institutions have terms of conditions that the recipient does not promote, facilitate or deal effectively with hate and anti-semitism. Remove deductible gift recipient status from any charitable institution which promotes speakers or engages in conduct that promotes antisemitism. Screen visa applicants for antisemitic views or affiliations and ensure the Migration Act effectively facilitates visa refusals or cancellations for antisemitic conduct and rhetoric. Antisemitism training to those involved in processing visa applications to be able to assess antisemitism. Encourage Australian cultural institutions to re-engage with Jewish creatives and members of the Jewish community.
Jillian Segal's report also states that if threats escalate, she'd recommend emergency coordination measures, including a standing joint task force and potential national security declarations.
That was the first recommendation from our summit - to declare a national emergency and establish a joint counter-terrorism taskforce to mobilise all relevant agencies in the fight against antisemitism before we have a major terror attack in this country.
But Segal's report goes further with bold, new ideas including: Work with platforms to reduce the presence or influence of 'bots' that deliberately sow social discord and to reduce the reach of those who peddle hate behind a veil of anonymity. The Envoy Office will work with the publicly funded broadcasters to encourage them to develop programs that add to social cohesion. Withholding government funding from universities, programs or individuals within universities that facilitate, enable or fail to act against antisemitism.
This final measure has already been implemented by United States President Donald Trump. He has famously stripped funding from Harvard University.
I fully support this idea but it's hard to imagine the Prime Minister committing to such a courageous idea.
Since October 2023, Albanese has not lifted a finger to deal with the rampant antisemitism at campuses. He's hardly going to suddenly strip the universities of funding over antisemitism.
My only criticism with the report is that Segal has worded many recommendations so that the onus is on her to implement them, rather than state and federal government or relevant institutions.
For example, she puts the onus on herself to solve the many problems, like working with social media companies on reform.
She could have simply outlined the reform that's needed in the social media space and then allowed the relevant minister to take charge and deal with the companies.
It's objectively too much work for one individual. Efforts to combat antisemitism would be more successful if the objectives were not the sole responsibility of the envoy or Jewish groups to implement.
Yes, it's Segal's report, but Albanese says she's his adviser on antisemitism and this is the blueprint or action plan the Federal Government is working from, so there should be more onus on specifically what it can do independently of her personal involvement. Having too much on her plate will delay the serious reform that's needed right now.
This is an urgent crisis and we need immediate action.
I'm also concerned the Prime Minister will use this report as cover.
When the next violent attack happens, as we know it will, Albanese will simply say he's working with the envoy on the antisemitism action plan.
And right now, it's all smoke and mirrors.
He has had Segal's report in his possession for a full week prior to the press conference, yet he still couldn't bring himself to commit to a single idea in it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RBA tempers the doves as it sells its slow and steady strategy
RBA tempers the doves as it sells its slow and steady strategy

AU Financial Review

time8 hours ago

  • AU Financial Review

RBA tempers the doves as it sells its slow and steady strategy

A lot can happen in nine months. When National Australia Bank executive Cathryn Carver introduced Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock to deliver the annual Anika Foundation address on Thursday, she gave a snapshot of the world in September last year. That was the last time the function was held to raise money to address youth depression. Kamala Harris had momentum in her run for the White House, while in Australia, the Albanese government's grip on power looked shaky. The main act, Bullock, was yet to cut interest rates even as her central banking peers were lowering their settings. Australians were still feeling the strains of higher prices as cost-of-living pressures mounted.

Beef order appears to come with side of appeasement
Beef order appears to come with side of appeasement

Sydney Morning Herald

time9 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Beef order appears to come with side of appeasement

It will take a lot to convince me that relaxing long-standing, science-based biosecurity protections on US beef is anything other than political appeasement toward Donald Trump (' Albanese accused of appeasing Donald Trump with move to allow US beef in ', July 24). How can we now be confident we will stand firm to protect our Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme against the same bullying interference? After that, what next? Meanwhile, we continue to pay billions in the deluded hope nuclear submarines and some filtered intel will defend us in 20 years' time. This behaviour in a romantic relationship (rather than a political one) would probably be deemed 'coercive control' and wise heads would be encouraging us to distance ourselves from it. We are probably better off spending our time, money and energy with more respectful, less self-serving partners. Mark Sapsford, North Turramurra Let us hope it's just a coincidence that Australia's removal of the US beef ban has occurred just days before President Trump's latest tariff deadline. It would be disappointing if the government was appeasing the Trump administration in any way that threatened Australia's biosecurity. No more coincidences before August 1, please, Mr Prime Minister. Paul McGee, Springwood As tempting as it may seem, giving in to a spoilt toddler who consistently wants their own way may seem like a good idea at the time, but let me tell you, it's simply not. It'll only reinforce negative behaviours and impede healthy development. The toddler will become increasingly demanding and objectionable. Setting clear boundaries for the toddler is essential. You need to show that there are consequences for their demands and tantrums. The toddler needs to learn to manage their emotions to truly appreciate what they have already. Albo, you need to be strong and not be a pushover for that out-of-control child. Kathleen Molloy, Thornleigh Maybe I'm economically naive, but why does Australia need to both sell beef to the US and buy their beef? Surely this just adds to the costs for both countries and to our carbon footprint. And, for most of us, one cow tastes much the same as another, even if they are raised in different countries. It seems to me that trade in all goods should simply be selling our excess, and buying things we don't produce enough of ourselves. Judy Christian, The Ponds I would rather heed the advice of the Farmers Association biosecurity committee chair as to what is safe for us. At least he knows which end of the beast to feed, rather than the stuff from the other end possibly being fed to us at ministerial level. David Sayers, Gwandalan Metal misdeeds It was interesting to read in Stephen Bartholomeusz's analysis that US domestic producers are using the price rises on imported products resulting from Donald Trump's tariffs to opportunistically raise the prices of their locally produced goods (' Trump sparks a $6.4 billion wipeout for a US icon ', July 24). The example given was of US steel and aluminium producers increasing their prices by 16 per cent to match the imported metals, dealing a huge blow to US manufacturer General Motors and adding to America's rising inflation. Great economic management, Trump. Mark Berg, Caringbah South Trump's panic over the Epstein files could not be more obvious (' Trumps accuses Obama of 'treason' ', July 24). He is jumping from conspiracy to conspiracy in a vain attempt to distract from these files. However, accusing Obama of treason is a stretch even for him. Trump in panic mode is not a pretty sight. He is unable to maintain focus and his speech becomes garbled. He accused Obama of being 'sedatious' (seditious). His latest attempt to distract from the Epstein files may bring cheers from the usual toadies, such as Fox News, but will have the opposite effect on those seeking transparency and truth. If Obama had even a minor misdemeanour on his record, Trump would have pounced on it long ago. Dare we hope that Tump may finally get his comeuppance? Graham Lum, North Rocks I, too, have had letters printed in the Herald that were critical of Trump and was a tad nervous about how far the US Homeland Security tentacles reached when we arrived at US customs in May (' Trump is becoming the Basil Fawlty of American tourism ', July 24). Having lived in Pennsylvania, and having made multiple visits over the decades, we stayed with friends and family, all booked and paid for before Trump was re-elected. It's a great pity that this beautiful country is being trashed by its leader. Despite not encountering problems, we will not be visiting again in the foreseeable future. Sally Spurr, Lane Cove Sub-normal behaviour The second AUKUS payment takes Australia's contribution to $1.6 billion (' Australia quietly pays US another $800 million for AUKUS despite review ', July 24). The problem with this is that there is no guarantee AUKUS will continue. Given the state of the federal debt, I believe both sides of politics should seriously consider pulling out of the venture and putting the money into more productive endeavours such as housing and health. These submarines will not be ready until at least 2040, and given the past issues with building these things, that date is probably very optimistic. Given the advances with warfare technology, my view is that they will almost obsolete by 2040. Just look at the way cheap drone technology is reaping havoc in Ukraine and the Middle East, costing, in comparison, practically nothing. Just image how easy it will be to detect submarines and blow them out of the water with the rapid pace of technology. The reality is the next big conflict will be all over before a submarine can get into position to do any good. Norman Arnott, Forestville The article in the Herald says it all. Just like a dog that always gets a kick, we are always there for the US, our tails wagging. What a nice present Scottie from marketing left for the current government. Joe Weller, Mittagong Rabbi off the mark Rabbi Marcus Solomon expressed shock in his article, and I am shocked at his response (' When I visited Sydney, I was shocked by the antisemitism I encountered ', July 24). He was happy to receive sympathy for antisemitism in Ireland from the Irish couple, but not happy to receive political criticism of Israel from the man he asked directions from. Apparently, he is unable to distinguish the latter from antisemitism. He seems to be calling Australian critics of Israel 'idiots'. Here was an opportunity for an Australian Jew to express horror at the carnage being inflicted on Gazans by the Israeli government, but he didn't follow it up. To simply describe it as a 'tragedy that has befallen the Palestinian people' doesn't go nearly far enough. I am sorry he was shocked by the father calling out 'Free Palestine', but he needs to reflect on how other Australians view morality. Bob Hinchcliffe, Wahroonga Richard Abram writes that Jewish Australians don't deserve persecution for the actions of a foreign state, namely Israel (Letters, July 24). That's certainly right, but they do deserve criticism if they support the actions of that foreign state, which is engaged in the mass slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza. Gay O'Connor, Manly One size definitely does not fit all in the voting-age argument (Letters, July 24). During my long teaching career I have taught many outstanding 16-year-olds who are mature, responsible and thoughtful, with an understanding of political issues and problems. I have also taught many who are virtually the opposite, with either zero interest in politics or else an impressionable, superficial or misinformed one. Our commendable mandatory voting system would give these young, easily influenced people political power, which could be easily abused or misdirected. Listen to their concerns and perspectives by all means, but the vote needs a few more years of life experience behind it. Robert Hickey, Green Point If the voting age is lowered to 16, the curriculum should include a mandatory civics unit in year 10. While some teenagers are passionate about issues such as the environment, all would benefit from understanding how our political system works. A school trip to Canberra at a younger age is merely sightseeing. Learning about the roles of the different levels of government and the election process (special shout out to Taswegians) closer to the action would be more likely to attract their attention and help inform their decisions. Judith Campbell, Drummoyne While we're discussing changes to the voting age, can we consider removing compulsory votes for aged care residents? My 95-year-old mother is bright and engaged for her age; however, she informs me that it's difficult to engage in intellectual conversations as most residents in her non-dementia section have some degree of dementia, or are simply not following the political debate. This leaves them vulnerable to undue influence. It would also make life easier for aged care residents and carers. Anne Matheson, Gordon Bad gas … deal Chevron's exit from Barrow Island has left WA taxpayers with a $500 million clean-up bill – all because of a deal most people have never heard of (' Taxpayers face $500 million bill to clean up Chevron's WA oil field ', July 23). It turns out that once production stops, the company actually gets its gas royalties refunded. For years we were told gas would be a win for the economy. But now we're not just stuck with the environmental mess – we're literally paying the companies back after they've made their money. And this isn't some one-off blunder. It shows just how much influence the gas industry has had over governments for decades. These kinds of deals don't get made out in the open – and they certainly don't get made with public support. But they happen anyway because the industry has always been able to get what it wants. Barrow Island makes it clear: we've never really known what we're getting out of these gas projects. What we do know is what we're left with – and it's not looking like a great deal. Karen Lamb, Geelong (Vic) Finish the job Completing the partially built station in Woollahra is in line with my view that the government should first utilise sites it already owns before imposing rezoning on residential and other land whose residents or owners do not want it – even with the prospect of an uplift in the value of their asset (' NSW Libs wicked problem: Housing ', July 24). In my own municipality of Ku-ring-gai, which is under pressure to change low-rise dwellings into high-rise, there are several cuttings on the rail line big enough to be developed. This would help to reach the housing target and avoid aggravating residents. For this to happen, the government needs to create a platform for such development to occur. Similar opportunities can be found all over Sydney. Peter Thornton, Killara Alexandra Smith's article overlooks one of the biggest contributors to the housing crisis – population growth. Surely the time has come when we can discuss population without being called xenophobic, racist or selfish. Given Australia's low fertility rate of 1.5, and the 50,000 or so people who leave every year, there is still good scope for refugees, essential workers and family reunions in a migrant intake of about 100,000. Returning to our pre-COVID growth rate of 1.6 per cent would mean we shall have 100 million people in 90 years' time. Our disastrous environmental record over the past 130 years, with an average population of some 10 million, is surely another reason to have a proper talk about population. It's not only the housing crisis but also many aspects of our environmental and social future that are at stake. Ignoring the effect of exponential population growth on future generations really is selfish. John Burke, Wahroonga A new investment When looking at government handouts and the effect on productivity, let's not forget the handout of negative gearing (Letters, July 24). It encourages investment in a totally non-productive area and denies permanent homes to millions. Let's get the money invested in real estate, propped up by this insidious form of welfare, back into the economy where it can be effective, and the government money saved back into social housing, so people can live in our major cities and start economically producing. Elisabeth Goodsall, Wahroonga Decent proposal Ross Gittins correctly identifies the elephant in the room ('HECS cuts the least PM should do', July 23). Gittins correctly identifies one of the main hurdles in overcoming the 'fair go' that most Australians aspire to – 'by making a percentage cut, rather than a flat dollar amount'. In the current proposal for a cut in HECS, 20 per cent of $100,000 is much more than 20 per cent of $5000. It would be fairer if the government instead took 20 per cent of the median debt and subtracted that amount from all debts. Some people would even get a refund. With tax reform on the table, all changes similar to this should be scrutinised for who benefits the most. Philip Jirman, Wallabi Point Once upon a time, many Australians were able to attend university free, in some cases even receiving an allowance for books or childcare (Letters, July 24). I was one of them; so were many of my 'mature age student' friends who were already parents. We studied nursing, teaching and social work, and worked and paid taxes for the next 30 years or more. Thanks, Gough. Margaret Wilkie, Peregian Beach (Qld)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store