Sharri Markson: Without endorsing antisemitism report's recommendations, Albanese's words are 'smoke and mirrors'
It has nine of the 15 recommendations from our Sky News Antisemitism Summit including screening immigrants for antisemitic views, stripping arts bodies and festivals of government grants if they condone hate and embedding antisemitism in the school curriculum.
Albanese welcomed the report and said he would engage with it - but he stopped short of endorsing it.
In fact, he did not explicitly support a single recommendation, and he brushed off questions about what he'll commit to.
Albanese would only say that he'd consider them carefully.
'We'll now carefully consider the report recommendations," he said.
"There's a number of things in here that we're doing. There's a number of things that can be implemented quickly. There are a number of things that will require work over a period of time.'
But he refused to say what the "things" are that could be implemented quickly.
His comments are, at least, an improvement from his position after our Antisemitism Summit when he refused to consider any of the meaningful recommendations we put forward.
Now he officially has to consider them.
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke was also specifically asked if these recommendations would be put in place within the year - and he was noncommittal.
He said Creative Australia already took antisemitism into account when awarding grants.
This can't possibly be true. Many organisations that employ hate preachers continue to receive ongoing funding.
It's deeply concerning if Burke's attitude is that they're already doing this.
Jewish leaders today, including Alex Ryvchin, Colin Rubenstein and Jeremy Leibler have all said that Segal's report needs to be met with comprehensive action and enforcement.
Ryvchin said it's critical that Albanese expresses whole-hearted support for the plan.
"The Prime Minister should say this is the plan to rescue our country from the scourge of racism directed at Jewish Australians," he said.
And that's exactly right. Albanese needs to officially endorse this report so that university leaders, state governments and cultural institutions get on board and make the necessary changes.
The Israeli Ambassador Amir Maimon echoed this sentiment, saying "the real test now lies in swift and effective implementation.'
But there were some positives from today's press conference.
Albanese and Burke spoke more forcefully about antisemitism than in the past.
The Prime Minister also spoke about the pro-Palestinian protesters who crashed the Melbourne restaurant on Friday night, describing it as criminal behaviour.
He said he "saw on the ABC the other night a woman who participated in the trashing and violence that occurred at the restaurant in Melbourne, justifying that, justifying it. There is no justification for that whatsoever. And what's more, the idea that somehow the cause of justice for Palestinians is advanced by behaviour like that is not only delusional, it is destructive.'
Burke spoke strongly about the prejudice faced by Jewish Australians in society.
'We want people to be safe and to feel safe," he said.
"Being safe and feeling safe is something which antisemitism flies in the face of. And while we might think of this only in terms of some of the more dramatic, violent incidents which we've seen, feeling safe and being safe goes deeper than that.'
The Jewish community is sceptical about why the Albanese Government seems to be only considering action now, 21 months after the racism exploded in the wake of Hamas attacks on Israel on October 7.
There was only one decent question at today's press conference and it came from the Jewish News journalist Carly Adno - who raised this point precisely.
She asked: "Prime Minister, the Jewish community has been experiencing these antisemitic attacks for close to two years now. Why is it that it took another arson attack on the synagogues to adopt some of these?"
Albanese was defensive. "Well, it didn't, is the answer to that. It didn't."
But Adno is correct.
Albanese has done nothing but sit back and watch as hatred festered under his leadership.
He's made our country a dangerous and unsafe place, and it's utterly unforgivable.
He needs to categorically adopt Segal's strong plan, which draws on nine of the 15 recommendations from our Sky News Antisemitism Summit.
They include: A permanent policing cooperation between state and federal governments to investigate threats and incidents, and links to terrorism. Embedding Holocaust and antisemitism education in the school curriculum. A judicial inquiry into antisemitism on campus. The investigation and disclosure of foreign funding to universities, which might drive extremist ideologies. Government grants to festivals and cultural institutions have terms of conditions that the recipient does not promote, facilitate or deal effectively with hate and anti-semitism. Remove deductible gift recipient status from any charitable institution which promotes speakers or engages in conduct that promotes antisemitism. Screen visa applicants for antisemitic views or affiliations and ensure the Migration Act effectively facilitates visa refusals or cancellations for antisemitic conduct and rhetoric. Antisemitism training to those involved in processing visa applications to be able to assess antisemitism. Encourage Australian cultural institutions to re-engage with Jewish creatives and members of the Jewish community.
Jillian Segal's report also states that if threats escalate, she'd recommend emergency coordination measures, including a standing joint task force and potential national security declarations.
That was the first recommendation from our summit - to declare a national emergency and establish a joint counter-terrorism taskforce to mobilise all relevant agencies in the fight against antisemitism before we have a major terror attack in this country.
But Segal's report goes further with bold, new ideas including: Work with platforms to reduce the presence or influence of 'bots' that deliberately sow social discord and to reduce the reach of those who peddle hate behind a veil of anonymity. The Envoy Office will work with the publicly funded broadcasters to encourage them to develop programs that add to social cohesion. Withholding government funding from universities, programs or individuals within universities that facilitate, enable or fail to act against antisemitism.
This final measure has already been implemented by United States President Donald Trump. He has famously stripped funding from Harvard University.
I fully support this idea but it's hard to imagine the Prime Minister committing to such a courageous idea.
Since October 2023, Albanese has not lifted a finger to deal with the rampant antisemitism at campuses. He's hardly going to suddenly strip the universities of funding over antisemitism.
My only criticism with the report is that Segal has worded many recommendations so that the onus is on her to implement them, rather than state and federal government or relevant institutions.
For example, she puts the onus on herself to solve the many problems, like working with social media companies on reform.
She could have simply outlined the reform that's needed in the social media space and then allowed the relevant minister to take charge and deal with the companies.
It's objectively too much work for one individual. Efforts to combat antisemitism would be more successful if the objectives were not the sole responsibility of the envoy or Jewish groups to implement.
Yes, it's Segal's report, but Albanese says she's his adviser on antisemitism and this is the blueprint or action plan the Federal Government is working from, so there should be more onus on specifically what it can do independently of her personal involvement. Having too much on her plate will delay the serious reform that's needed right now.
This is an urgent crisis and we need immediate action.
I'm also concerned the Prime Minister will use this report as cover.
When the next violent attack happens, as we know it will, Albanese will simply say he's working with the envoy on the antisemitism action plan.
And right now, it's all smoke and mirrors.
He has had Segal's report in his possession for a full week prior to the press conference, yet he still couldn't bring himself to commit to a single idea in it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
28 minutes ago
- ABC News
YouTube to be included in social media ban for under 16s after exemption reversed
Children and teenagers will be barred from logging in to YouTube under the incoming social media ban for under 16s after the government reversed its plan to grant the video sharing site an exemption. Rules of how the ban will operate are set to be presented to parliament on Wednesday, including details of the types of platforms that will not be captured, such as those primarily concerned with gaming, messaging, health and education. It comes days after Google, the parent company of YouTube, threatened legal action if the government scrapped its previously flagged exemption on the basis of the platform's educational uses. Over the weekend, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said a decision on whether YouTube would be included was yet to be made — despite the draft rules naming the platform as exempt — and that the government would not be influenced by threats from social media companies. "Our government is making it clear — we stand on the side of families," Mr Albanese said in a statement on Tuesday. "Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it." YouTube differs from other popular social media sites in that it doesn't require users to have an account to access most features and young people will still be able to use the site in a logged-out state after the world-leading laws come into force in December. But including YouTube in the list of social media platforms covered by the ban — which already includes apps like TikTok and Instagram — means under 16s won't be able to access age-restricted content on the video-sharing site. Former communications minister Michelle Rowland initially flagged that YouTube was likely to be exempt from the laws in November last year. But the proposed carve out was thrown into question last month when eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant — who is tasked with implementing the laws — wrote to new Communications Minister Anika Wells formally recommending it be scrapped. She cited eSafety research that found young people used YouTube more than any other social media platform and it was where they were most likely to experience harm online. "When we asked where they were experiencing harm and the kinds of harms they were experiencing, the most prevalent place where young Australians experienced harm was on YouTube — almost 37 per cent," Dr Inman Grant said. "This ranges from misogynistic content to hateful material, to violent fighting videos, online challenges, disordered eating, suicidal ideation." She also argued that YouTube had the characteristics of a platform that should fall under the ban and cautioned against naming specific platforms for carve outs. The platform's competitors had separately campaigned against its exclusion, accusing the government of making a "sweetheart deal" in private submissions. YouTube has previously argued that it is a video streaming platform, rather than a social media site, and therefore should not be captured by the ban, citing evidence that it is widely used in classrooms and by parents. Under the new laws, which are due to come into force on December 10, social media companies will face fines of up to almost $50 million for failing to take "reasonable steps" to bar under 16s from their platforms. "There is no one perfect solution when it comes to keeping young Australians safer online — but the social media minimum age will make a significantly positive difference to their wellbeing," Communications Minister Anika Wells said in a statement. "There's a place for social media, but there's not a place for predatory algorithms targeting children."

ABC News
28 minutes ago
- ABC News
India says three militants involved in shooting attack in India-administered Kashmir killed in firefight
The Indian government says its military has killed three Pakistani militants involved in the shooting attack on tourists in Kashmir which left 26 men dead and sparked a conflict between the two nuclear-armed states in April. The attackers, who New Delhi said were Pakistani nationals backed by Islamabad, had opened fire in a valley popular with tourists in Kashmir's scenic, mountainous region of Pahalgam, before fleeing into the surrounding pine forests. Pakistan has always denied involvement in the attack. The attack led India to target what it called "terrorist infrastructure" in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, leading to four days of intense fighting between the nuclear-armed neighbours before they agreed to a ceasefire. Home Minister Amit Shah discussed the conflict in India's parliament on Tuesday. "I want to tell ... the entire nation that these were the three terrorists who killed our citizens ... and now all three have been killed," Mr Shah said The Indian army said the three people were killed in an intense gun battle in a Kashmir forest on Monday. Mr Shah said that India had a "lot of proof" that the dead "terrorists" were Pakistanis. He said security forces had recovered Pakistani voter identity cards of two of them and chocolates made in Pakistan. The riles involved in the fire-fight on Monday had been forensically tested, he said, with results showing they were the same that were used in the April attack. Pakistan's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the remarks. The Himalayan region of Kashmir is at the heart of the hostility between India and Pakistan, who have fought two of their three wars over the region, which they both claim in full but rule in part. New Delhi accuses Islamabad of helping Islamist separatists battling security forces in its part of Kashmir, but Pakistan says it only provides diplomatic and moral support to Kashmiris seeking self determination. Reuters/ABC

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
YouTube to be captured by social media ban
YouTube will be captured by Labor's world-leading social media ban for under 16s, the Albanese government has confirmed. The videostreaming giant was initially set to be exempt, with the Albanese government arguing it could be educational. But the online safety watchdog has since advised YouTube should be included, warning it causes the most harm to kids. 'Our government is making it clear – we stand on the side of families,' Anthony Albanese said in a joint statement with Communications Minister Anika Wells. 'Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms so I'm calling time on it. 'Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.' Echoing the Prime Minister, Ms Wells said it would give 'kids a reprieve from the persuasive and pervasive pull of social media while giving parents peace of mind'. 'We want kids to know who they are before platforms assume who they are,' she said. 'There is no one perfect solution when it comes to keeping young Australians safer online – but the social media minimum age will make a significantly positive difference to their wellbeing. 'The rules are not a set and forget, they are a set and support.' Last month, the brains tasked with finding a way to enforce the ban said it is possible but that there is no 'silver bullet' and firms would need to use a range of measures. One option, according to the project's chief, is successive validation – a series of tests designed to firm up a user's age. With the advice saying enforcement is possible, Ms Wells noted in the joint statement that there are 'heavy penalties for companies who fail to take reasonable steps to prevent underage account holders onto their services'. Those penalties include a fine of up to $49.5m. 'There's a place for social media, but there's not a place for predatory algorithms targeting children,' Ms Wells said. The decision to include YouTube in the ban comes after eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant warned kids were using YouTube more than any other social media platform. 'It's almost ubiquitous that kids are on social media,' she said last month, speaking to the ABC. 'By far the most prevalent social media site they're on is YouTube. 'And when we asked where they were experiencing harm and the kinds of harms they were experiencing, the most prevalent place where young Australians experienced harm was on YouTube – almost 37 per cent. 'This ranges from misogynistic content to hateful material, to violent fighting videos, online challenges, disordered eating, suicidal ideation.' The decision to include YouTube in the ban comes after eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant warned kids were using YouTube more than any other social media platform. 'It's almost ubiquitous that kids are on social media,' she said last month, speaking to the ABC. 'By far the most prevalent social media site they're on is YouTube. 'And when we asked where they were experiencing harm and the kinds of harms they were experiencing, the most prevalent place where young Australians experienced harm was on YouTube – almost 37 per cent. 'This ranges from misogynistic content to hateful material, to violent fighting videos, online challenges, disordered eating, suicidal ideation.' The Coalition also called for YouTube's inclusion, with opposition communications spokeswoman Melissa McIntosh saying it is 'a logical thing to do'. The social media ban is set to come into force in December. While other countries have mulled similar actions, Australia is the first to make the leap, receiving both praise and criticism.