
Scotland could become first UK nation to criminalise ecocide
The legislation could see individuals found guilty jailed for up to 20 years.
Senior executives at companies where offences occur with their consent or neglect would also be held liable.
As well as custodial sentences, convictions could lead to publicity orders, mandatory environmental remediation and unlimited financial penalties.
READ MORE:
Ms Lennon pointed to pollution in waterways and the legacy of contamination from heavy industry as examples of the damage the Bill seeks to tackle.
Supporters argue the legislation fills a gap in the statute book and would bring Scotland in line with over a dozen countries and the European Union, which recently revised its Environmental Crime Directive to include conduct comparable to ecocide.
An open letter urging MSPs to "seize this historic opportunity" and back the Bill has been signed by more than 100 figures from politics, law, science, business and civil society.
Signatories include journalist George Monbiot, actor Will Attenborough, KC and author Philippe Sands, Ecotricity founder Dale Vince, and former Finnish deputy prime minister Pertti Salolainen.
Their letter states: "With this Bill, Scotland positions itself at the forefront of a global shift in environmental justice.
"It joins a rising number of jurisdictions turning bold words into binding law — strengthening protections at home while helping to shape emerging international norms that reflect both scientific reality and moral necessity.
"The Ecocide (Scotland) Bill sends a clear message: mass destruction of nature is beyond unacceptable — it's criminal. With political will, the law can and must align with public conscience."
Ms Lennon said the Bill would send a strong message to polluters.
'I am delighted to be publishing the Ecocide (Scotland) Bill in the Scottish Parliament today, on a strong foundation of cross-party and public support,' she said.
'With ecocide law, Scotland can take bold and necessary action against severe environmental damage.
'Environmental destruction is not some distant issue for the people of Scotland — it directly threatens health, livelihoods and the future of entire communities.
'From sewage spilling into waterways to toxic pollution left behind by heavy industry, the damage is real and ongoing.
'Ecocide is a crime against the common good, and those who commit widespread or irreversible harm should be held to account.
'This is a vital opportunity for Scotland to become the first UK nation to criminalise ecocide and signal that the destruction of nature will not be tolerated here.'
Monica Lennon's ecocide Bill has cross-party support (Image: Gordon Terris) Mr Vince told The Herald that ecocide should be treated with the same legal gravity as other serious crimes.
'For me, it is a great idea — that it should be illegal to purposely, knowingly and deliberately cause harm to the environment, especially the kind of harm that endures for generations, is perfectly sensible.
'We have not had such a law, and I guess that is why I am backing it as well. And you can see the harm being done around the world in pursuit of money, because there is no law to stop people doing that kind of stuff.
'We have environment regulations and stuff like that, but no actual law that says it is against the law to impact the environment.'
He said Scotland could lead the way and send a message to the UK Government: 'Westminster needs a bit of encouragement to be bold on the environment."
Jojo Mehta, chief executive and co-founder of Stop Ecocide International, said: 'This Scottish Bill is a striking example of how national action can drive global change.
'Around the world, ecocide law is gaining ground as a vital tool — not just to punish environmental destruction, but to prevent it.
'While the ultimate goal is to have ecocide recognised as a serious crime globally, national laws play a crucial role in legitimising that goal, building momentum and providing accountability now.
'They help shape legal norms that are increasingly being reflected in international frameworks.
'From the new Council of Europe Convention, which enables states to prosecute acts 'tantamount to ecocide', to the formal proposal by Vanuatu, Fiji and Samoa to make ecocide a core international crime, momentum is accelerating.
'Scotland's move adds meaningful weight to this shift, reinforcing the growing global consensus that mass destruction of nature must be treated as a crime, in law and in principle.'
Scrutiny of the Bill is expected to begin before the summer recess, with a vote due later this year.
If passed, the Ecocide (Scotland) Bill would require the Scottish Government to report on its operation after five years, including data on prosecutions, convictions and the law's environmental and financial impact.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
37 minutes ago
- Reuters
Indian tech hub state pushes jail terms for 'fake news', sparks worries
BENGALURU, June 30 (Reuters) - Draft legislation by India's tech hub state of Karnataka that would impose jail terms of up to seven years for spreading "fake news" and other misinformation has stirred concerns among free speech activists that it could lead to censorship. With nearly 1 billion internet users, the stakes are high in a sprawling country of many ethnic and religious communities where fake news risks stirring deadly strife and AI deepfake videos have alarmed officials during elections. India's federal government already regulates social media content with legislation empowering it to order takedowns of disputed content. But some states such as Karnataka have begun taking their own measures. Karnataka's bill, the strictest of its kind yet, stipulates that those posting "fake news" and "anti-feminist" content, or "promoting superstition", would face imprisonment along with potential fines. The 11-page Karnataka Mis-Information And Fake News (Prohibition) Bill does not define such offences in practice, but said special courts and a regulatory committee would be set up to implement it. Free speech advocates have cited what they say would be the risk of selective enforcement arising from Karnataka's measure and flagged concerns that people posting memes or making honest mistakes online could be prosecuted. "Misinformation is fairly subjective and every person who uses the internet is susceptible to falling within the dragnet of this law," said Apar Gupta, founder of the Internet Freedom Foundation, a New Delhi-based digital advocacy group which first made the Karnataka draft legislation public. The state government of Karnataka, home to the city of Bengaluru that hosts the offices or branches of many Indian and foreign tech giants, has said the bill will be released for public consultation before implementation. Priyank Kharge, Karnataka's IT minister, said on Friday "there is a lot of misinformation on the proposed Misinformation Bill in public". He later added that the "sole objective is to address the growing digital information disorder" and the government's focus was to tackle misinformation and fake news, "and nothing beyond that". He did not immediately respond to Reuters calls seeking further comment on Monday. Karnataka's move could risk creating multiple regulations imposing conflicting obligations and regulatory challenges for companies, said Aman Taneja, partner at law and policy firm Ikigai. Some Indian media have sharply criticised the draft bill. The Deccan Herald newspaper on Monday titled an opinion piece "A remedy that's worse than the menace", saying the Karnataka government should "do away with the criminal provisions" in the legislation. India has over the years held talks with U.S. tech giants like Google it sees as having been slow to remove fake news posts, and New Delhi in 2019 set up a "Fact Check Unit" to debunk what it sees as misinformation.


North Wales Live
43 minutes ago
- North Wales Live
DWP welfare reforms could dramatically change the lives of 150,000 people
Around 150,000 people will be pushed into poverty by 2030 as a result of the Government's welfare cuts despite Sir Keir Starmer being forced into a partial U-turn. The figure is down from the 250,000 extra people estimated to have been left in relative poverty after housing costs under the original proposals. Modelling published by the Department for Work and Pensions said the estimate does not include any "potential positive impact" from extra funding and measures to support people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into work. Join the North Wales Live WhatsApp community group where you can get the latest stories delivered straight to your phone Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced last week that changes to the personal independence payment (Pip) will only apply to new claimants from November 2026, and ministers also rowed back on plans to cut the health-related element of Universal Credit after 126 Labour MPs signed an amendment that would have effectively killed the Government's Bill. The changes will reduce the amount of money the reforms will save, adding to Chancellor Rachel Reeves' headaches as she seeks to balance the books for day-to-day spending. Ms Kendall will update MPs on the changes later on Monday, with the Labour leadership still braced for a substantial revolt despite the changes aimed at averting a Government defeat in the Commons on Tuesday. A No 10 spokesman said: "The broken welfare system we inherited is failing people every single day. It traps millions, it tells them the only way to get help is to declare they'll never work again and then abandons them. "No help, no opportunity, no dignity and we can't accept that. For too long, meaningful reform to a failing system has been ducked." The Prime Minister is expected to continue talking to would-be rebels in the lead-up to Tuesday's vote, when the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Bill faces its first Commons test. The No 10 spokesman said the poverty modelling was "subject to uncertainty" and showed "the effect of these measures on poverty in isolation in 2029-30, it doesn't reflect the full picture". He added: "You have to look at the record levels of investment in the health and care system, £29 billion more day-to-day funding in real terms, than in 2023-24, to help people get the treatment they need on time to return to work." An additional £1 billion a year by the end of the decade to help people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into jobs "will directly help people move into work and become financially independent".


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Welfare reforms could push 150,000 into poverty, official modelling suggests
The figure is down from the 250,000 extra people estimated to have been left in relative poverty after housing costs under the original proposals. Modelling published by the Department for Work and Pensions said the estimate does not include any 'potential positive impact' from extra funding and measures to support people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into work. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced last week that changes to the personal independence payment (Pip) will only apply to new claimants from November 2026, and ministers also rowed back on plans to cut the health-related element of Universal Credit after 126 Labour MPs signed an amendment that would have effectively killed the Government's Bill. The changes will reduce the amount of money the reforms will save, adding to Chancellor Rachel Reeves' headaches as she seeks to balance the books for day-to-day spending. Ms Kendall will update MPs on the changes later on Monday, with the Labour leadership still braced for a substantial revolt despite the changes aimed at averting a Government defeat in the Commons on Tuesday. A No 10 spokesman said: 'The broken welfare system we inherited is failing people every single day. 'It traps millions, it tells them the only way to get help is to declare they'll never work again and then abandons them. 'No help, no opportunity, no dignity and we can't accept that. 'For too long, meaningful reform to a failing system has been ducked.' Government whips are expected to continue talking to would-be rebels in the lead-up to Tuesday's vote, when the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Bill faces its first Commons test. The No 10 spokesman said the poverty modelling was 'subject to uncertainty' and showed 'the effect of these measures on poverty in isolation in 2029-30, it doesn't reflect the full picture'. He added: 'You have to look at the record levels of investment in the health and care system, £29 billion more day-to-day funding in real terms, than in 2023-24, to help people get the treatment they need on time to return to work.' An additional £1 billion a year by the end of the decade to help people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into jobs 'will directly help people move into work and become financially independent'. Downing Street would not be drawn on whether any Labour rebels will face losing the party whip. Baroness Jacqui Smith – who served as a chief whip under Sir Tony Blair – said it was not 'constructive' to talk about potential punishments for rebels. The education minister said it was important to keep talking to Labour MPs about the legislation. She told Sky News: 'I don't think talking about punishments, even as a former chief whip, is the constructive way forward here.' The Labour revolt has centred around support for a 'reasoned amendment', which would have halted the Bill, tabled by Dame Meg Hillier. But she has welcomed last week's concessions and the threat of a revolt on a scale big enough to defeat the Government appears to have receded. However, experts believe the Government still faces a 'non-trivial rebellion', an extraordinary situation as Sir Keir prepares to mark a year in No 10. According to analysis by Professor Philip Cowley of Queen Mary University of London, the largest revolt so far under Sir Keir has been 16, on the Planning and Infrastructure Bill. The largest rebellion in the first year of the Blair administration was 47, and in the course of his first parliament, it was 67 – both on welfare reform issues. The largest rebellion by Labour MPs at second reading of a Bill is 72 – shared by votes in 1947 on national service and 2004 on university fees. If the 126 Labour MPs signed up to Dame Meg's amendment did vote against the Government on Tuesday, the revolt would have been of a scale similar to the 139 who voted against the Iraq War.