
On Taiwan's forgotten front line, all the defensive drills in the world may not matter
Within minutes, the order came over the loudspeaker, and the drills began with a series of huge explosions shaking the ground of this small island, located just two kilometres from China.
The rumbling thunder of rockets being launched towards the water could be heard from the edge of the beach. Seconds later, the sound of machine guns and a howitzer split the air while lasers lit up the night sky with orange lines.
The drills taking place at the Houhu Seaside Park on Kinmen's east coast are part of Taiwan's annual Han Kuang military drills. They are hosted there to showcase its military prowess and prepare its troops in the event of a Chinese invasion.
This year, the exercises are the biggest and longest ever, with more than 22,000 reservists deployed for 10 days of weapons training as well as a wide range of field exercises, which have included running through Taipei's subway system in the middle of the night.
The drills on Kinmen are particularly important, given that its proximity to China has earned it the label of Taiwan's 'front line'.
However, those who live on Kinmen, including the troops, believe that this designation may no longer be valid; with some of the world's most advanced weapons, if China wanted to attack Taiwan today, it could go straight for the jugular and hit the capital, Taipei.
'In the past, the military technology was not that advanced so the Chinese communists could only bomb Kinmen Island, but now they can launch missiles across the ocean, even to the United States,' said Yu-Jen Chen, who represents Kinmen in Taiwan's Legislative Yuan – similar to a member of parliament in the UK.
As part of this year's larger Han Kuang drills, they will also involve 'unscripted' portions to more accurately simulate what would happen in the event of an attack.
On Kinmen, this means that some of the soldiers participating in the night-time drills have not been told key information in advance.
'They will only be deployed to the beach, when they receive the order from their commanders,' said a military source who spoke on the condition of anonymity as they are not authorised to speak to the media.
'Previously they would have a planned mobilisation, but this time they don't have an arranged deployment.'
Similar to the rest of Han Kuang, the drills on Kinmen this year are the largest ever, with all 3,000 soldiers stationed on the island taking part.
Nine M60A3 tanks and four CM21 armoured vehicles were seen lining up before launching a torrent of projectiles towards Taiwan island.
There will also be continuous shooting across the main island, neighbouring Lesser Kinmen and nine surrounding islets, marking the first time all 12 are using live fire.
'This is the biggest one in history. While the islets have been included as part of the annual Han Kuang in the past, this year we made adjustments to have simultaneous live-firing on all of them,' Lt Gen Wang Shi-Tu, commander of the Kinmen Defense Command, told The Telegraph.
'This is because of the threats, especially the threats coming from the other side of the Taiwan Strait.'
China claims Taiwan as part of its territory, a stance which the government in Taipei rejects, and has not ruled out the use of force to 'reunify' the country.
However, those who live in Kinmen don't believe that the drills are all that useful.
'I was joking with a general who said that if a war happens they will mobilise their troops to hide in the mountains so we can avoid escalating the battle and minimise the destruction on Kinmen,' said Wang Song-Wei, who works at the Kinmen county government.
There used to be approximately 100,000 troops stationed on Kinmen Island, but over the years this number has decreased to the 3,000 or so here today – hardly enough to defend the island against China's strength of more than two million. Legislator Chen explained that having fewer troops on Kinmen makes the island less of a target.
The island also doesn't look the way you would imagine a frontline to look.
Former military bases have been turned into museums, with artillery used in tourist showcases and old tanks left outside to rust and decay.
All of this is compounded by the greatest disadvantage facing Kinmen – that it would more or less be left to fend for itself in the event of an attack.
Legislator Chen said that the 'official attitude' from the ministry of national defence in Taipei is that if Kinmen were attacked, its people would have to 'fight for ourselves independently'.
This sentiment was echoed by several residents across the island, including Jason Yang, who was born and raised on Kinmen, but before retiring served as one of the highest officials in the military's combat unit on the main island.
'In the event of a possible confrontation with China, it would not be a priority for Taipei to send troops,' he said.
Mr Wang believes one of the reasons that Lai Ching-te, the Taiwan president, decided to increase the scale of the Han Kuang drills this year was to appeal to the United States and, as the 'frontline', Kinmen needed to be included.
The US has long maintained a principle of strategic ambiguity when it comes to Taiwan, refraining from asserting whether it would come to the country's defence in the event of an attack.
The Pentagon has recently been pushing Japan and Australia to clarify what kind of role they would play if Taiwan was attacked.
One unnamed US official said that this was to ensure that 'the United States and its allies have the military strength to underwrite diplomacy and guarantee peace'.
For his part, Anthony Albanese, the Australian prime minister, rebuffed the efforts, saying that his country would not join a 'hypothetical' conflict with China over Taiwan.
President Donald Trump has echoed this position, while also pushing for Taiwan to do its own part to protect itself, including by increasing its defence budget.
'It is very likely Lai is trying to show off to Trump. He takes action based on loyalty. He wants people to grovel and that is what Lai is doing,' said Mr Wang.
While the threat of an invasion looms over many in Taipei, for those on Kinmen, they don't believe China would attack 'its own family', as one resident put it.
Kinmen and Xiamen, the Chinese city closest to the island, are very close culturally and many residents on both sides have family on the other.
No one understands this better than Xi Jinping, the Chinese president, who served as vice-mayor of the coastal city during the 1980s.
The government in Beijing has been capitalising on these ties in recent years, adopting what has become known as the Kinmen Model. This refers to Chinese coast guard activities aimed at furthering legal cross-strait relations by removing Taipei's authority over the Taiwan Strait.
China has deployed many vessels – both officially and unofficially – into the strait over the years as part of its 'grey zone' efforts to intimidate and coerce Taiwan.
Given this, it came as little surprise to those gathered on the beach that the island's largest drills to date began with the encroachment of a Chinese fishing boat.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
PETER VAN ONSELEN: Wait, what did Albo just say? Unsettling quote proves PM has become a mouthpiece for China - as mysterious power struggle in Xi's palace puts world at risk of WAR
Anthony Albanese is still in China, deep into a six-day diplomatic tour that was supposed to reset relations but is fast becoming a masterclass in strategic submission. With each passing press appearance, the Prime Minister looks less like a leader navigating a complex bilateral relationship, and more like a compliant visitor reciting his host's lines. Take his response to the latest flashpoint: Chinese military exercises skirting Australian waters, which defence officials here say pose a risk to our personnel. When asked whether Beijing had asserted a right to operate so close to our coastline, and whether Australia had sought better lines of communication to avoid future incidents, Albanese's reply was telling: 'President Xi said that China engaged in exercises just as Australia engages in exercises.' That's not an explanation, it's an endorsement. A Chinese official couldn't have put it better, from their perspective. This isn't careful diplomacy, it's parroting Beijing's preferred narrative while sidestepping the serious strategic implications for Australia. Albo didn't challenge the characterisation, but nor did he signal any unease at the situation. He certainly didn't defend the principle of Australian sovereignty, which he's done repeatedly when countering US requests for higher defence spending. Instead, he lent credibility to a line that serves China's interests -- not ours. While the PM makes carefully stage-managed appearances while in China, the Middle Kingdom's domestic politics appear anything but stable. Rumours are swirling that Xi Jinping's grip on power is fraying. Another senior figure, Defence Minister Li Shangfu, has vanished from public life, apparently purged in an escalating internal power struggle. Analysts are increasingly unsure whether Xi is consolidating control or flailing in the face of growing dissent inside the Communist Party's ranks. Whichever it is, the risks of turmoil are clearly rising. Beijing's military posture over Taiwan has only grown more aggressive in recent times, with Western analysts now openly warning of miscalculations that could tip into open conflict. Against this backdrop, what does Albo offer? Deference. He walks the halls of Chinese power, echoing lines that downplay its provocations. He dodges hard questions about trade coercion, cyberattacks and political interference. The trip, of course, is being spun as a diplomatic success - but only if 'success' means avoiding offence to the Chinese Politburo. And, as if to confirm how well he's sticking to the script, China's state-controlled China Daily newspaper is lavishing praise on Albanese. When an authoritarian regime publicly congratulates a visiting democratic leader, it usually means the latter left his principles at the airport. What we're seeing is part of a larger pattern. This is a Prime Minister who governs by hedging: on tax reform, on climate ambition, on anything politically fraught. In foreign policy that risk-averse instinct translates into ambiguity. But ambiguity, when misapplied risks becoming appeasement. And right now our PM isn't just being careful, he's being co-opted. Australia faces an increasingly unpredictable power in its region, one led by a man who may no longer be as unchallenged as he once seemed. The risk of conflict is therefore rising.


Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Trump's Nvidia U-turn ‘will boost Chinese military'
Donald Trump's decision to let Nvidia sell powerful artificial intelligence (AI) microchips to China has sparked fears that the technology could be used to boost Beijing's military. Charles Parton, from the think tank Rusi, said there would 'inevitably' be sales of semiconductors 'which have the possibility of military use'. 'Once exports reach China, the Communist Party can direct their use,' he told The Telegraph. Luke de Pulford, of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, said: 'Given Beijing's stated policy of civil-military fusion, it has to be presumed these chips will be used for military applications, and is likely to facilitate the modernisation and expansion of the People's Liberation Army.' On Tuesday, Nvidia said it had begun filing new applications to sell its advanced chips in China again. 'The US government has assured Nvidia that licences will be granted, and [we] hope to start deliveries soon,' the company said. The decision to allow Nvidia's most advanced H20 chips to be sold to China reverses an earlier ban by Donald Trump. The US introduced new restrictions in April amid concerns the technology could be used to build cutting-edge supercomputers in China. However, a charm offensive by Jensen Huang, Nvidia's boss, appears to have prompted Mr Trump to change his position. This has included attending a $1m (£744k)-a-head dinner at Mr Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort and promising to build new factories in the US. Mr de Pulford said: 'This is a regrettable decision which suggests the US now believes it can no longer prevent China from acquiring the technology.' Theo Zenou, a research fellow at the Henry Jackson Society, said it remained a 'definite possibility' that US chips could end up in Chinese military technology. 'The danger remains, and we should expect China to try and use the chips for military applications,' he added. Under the Biden administration, the US stepped up efforts to block the sale of advanced AI microchips to China. Nvidia's processors are used to power the most advanced AI products and are being installed in their thousands in vast new supercomputers. 'Well-established concern' US security officials have long warned China could use American-made AI technology for military purposes, while thousands of processors have already been smuggled into the country. Last week, Democratic senators Elizabeth Warren and Jim Banks wrote to Nvidia's Mr Huang ahead of his trip to China, warning him of 'well-established concern' that Nvidia's chips could be used to 'support Chinese military and intelligence activities'. Mr Huang this week downplayed concerns about the use of Nvidia chips by China's military. 'They don't need Nvidia's chips, certainly, or American tech stacks in order to build their military,' he told CNBC. He told reporters in Beijing: 'We believe that every civil model should run best on the US technology stack, encouraging nations worldwide to choose America.' Nvidia's H20 chips were designed to be used by Chinese customers and swerve export controls on its most advanced technology, such as its H200, which remained banned from export to China.


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Ukraine war briefing: Don't bomb Moscow, Trump says, after reportedly giving Zelenskyy the idea
Donald Trump has said Volodymyr Zelenskyy should not bomb Moscow. His statement came soon after the Financial Times (£) reported he had asked Zelenskyy whether he could bomb Moscow, and privately encouraged Ukraine to step up deep strikes on Russia. 'No, he shouldn't target Moscow,' the US president said on Tuesday when asked if the Ukrainian president should attack the Russian capital. Asked if he intended to supply Ukraine with weapons that could reach deeper into Russian territory, Trump replied: 'We're not looking to do that.' Ukraine on Tuesday was waiting for further details of the 'billions of dollars' worth of US military equipment promised by Donald Trump, amid confusion as to how many Patriot air defence systems will be sent. On Monday, Trump said an unnamed country was ready to immediately provide '17 Patriots'. Ukraine is believed so far to possess six functioning Patriot air defence 'batteries' – the truck-based radar and launch systems that fire the missiles. It was unclear if Trump was referring to the launch systems, the interceptor missiles that are their ammunition, or whether he understood the difference. Several European countries said they were willing to buy US arms for Ukraine as outlined by Trump but did not yet know what was being asked of them. Washington officials have suggested that European countries will give up some of their own stocks of weapons for Ukraine and then buy replacements from the US. It would get weapons to Ukraine more quickly, but leave the donor countries waiting for new systems for their own defence. Some US lawmakers voiced concern that Trump's latest deadline – 50 days this time – for Putin to make peace gives him time to grab even more Ukrainian territory. Thom Tillis, a Republican senator from North Carolina, said: 'The 50-day delay worries me that Putin would try to use the 50 days to win the war, or to be better positioned to negotiate a peace agreement after having murdered and potentially collected more ground. Tillis and Jeanne Shaheen, a Democrat from New Hampshire, lead a US Senate group that facilitates work between Congress and Nato. Russian drones and missiles attacked widely separated areas of Ukraine, officials said in the early hours of Wednesday, with at least two people reported killed. National emergency services reported two deaths in drone strikes east of the north-eastern city of Kharkiv near the town of Kupiansk. In Kharkiv itself, the regional governor, Oleh Syniehubov, said at least 17 explosions were recorded in a 20-minute drone attack in which three people were injured. The head of the military administration in the south-eastern town of Kryvyi Rih, Oleksander Vilkul, said an extended missile and drones attack knocked out power and water supplies and caused injuries. The Kyiv mayor, Vitali Klitschko, said air defence units had gone into action in the capital. Earlier, a Russian attack on Tuesday afternoon killed three people in Kupiansk and Sumy, Ukrainian authorities said. Russian officials said a Ukrainian drone attack on the western city of Voronezh wounded 27 people. The Institute for the Study of war assessed that Ukrainian forces recently advanced in northern Sumy oblast; while Russian forces recently advanced near Kupiansk, Borova, and Toretsk. The EU was unable to approve a new package of sanctions against Russia on Tuesday as Slovakia demanded more guarantees that it would not be harmed by a separate EU plan to phase out Russian gas. The EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said she was 'really sad' the sanctions did not get approved, adding that 'the ball is in Slovakia's court' and she hoped a deal could be reached on Wednesday. Ukrainians celebrated Melania Trump on social media after Donald Trump suggested the first lady played a key role in pointing out to him Vladimir Putin's duplicity, Luke Harding writes. 'I go home, I tell the first lady: I spoke with Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation. She said: Really? Another city was just hit,' Trump said. One social media user posted a photo of 'Agent Melania Trumpenko' looking surreptitious in a big hat and wearing a blazer with Ukraine's trident insignia. Others depicted her being presented with a Ukrainian military cap and wearing the blue and yellow of Ukraine's flag.