Dialogue, Dialogue And Only Dialogue Can Teach Pakistan Right Lessons
More than a month after the pause of India's Operation Sindoor on May 10 at 5 PM, time has come to state it in candid terms that our Prime Minister's doctrine of New Normal in respect of relations with Pakistan has failed to convince the major global powers. While strongly defending India in its fight against the terror inspired by Islamabad, the major countries are in favour of bilateral talks to discuss the thorny issues including terror which led to the four day limited war.
The seven all party parliamentary delegations which visited more than 30 countries are back after their interactions with the government leaders, parliament members and Indian diaspora. Officially, they might have expressed their opinion about getting big response to the Indian stand on fighting terror, but they are equally mum on the response they got on the two important components of new Modi doctrine- no dialogue with Pakistan at this stage and any terrorist action inside India will be followed by Indian attack on Pakistan.
South Block has organized post visit favourable propaganda by the participants, but the hard ground reality is that the Pakistan delegation led by former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari made far more impact during their discussions in United Nations headquarters, with U.S. Government officials as also in London at the meeting with the British think tanks as also Parliamentarians.
Indian delegation led by Shashi Tharoor of impeccable diplomatic skills was in Washington and New York at the same time with Bilawal. Tharoor had a meeting with the US vice president J D Vance, but the Congress MP did not give any details of what Vance said about the present situation in India-Pak relations and how to go about it. In fact Vance was the person who spoke to the Indian Prime Minister on May 9 on behalf of President Trump and conveyed the strong message of the U.S. President. Only PM Modi can come out with the details of May 9 talks with Vance to prove that Trump was wrong in claiming that he organized the 'full and permanent' ceasefire which Narendra Modi termed as pause.
That Shashi Tharoor's efforts to market the Prime Minister's doctrine to the Oval office and the White House was a flop is evident from the fact that the commander of the US central command General Michael Kurilla described Pakistan as a phenomenal partner in the counterterrorism world crediting Islamabad with a series of successful operations against ISIS-Khorasan and advocating for continued US engagement with Pakistan and India.
Just imagine the tenor of the speech of this General. This is putting Pakistan above India as a partner in the fight against terror. That is also at a time when India is complaining that Pakistan regime is still backing the terrorists to operate in the Indian soil. General Kurilla also referred to the heavy toll that terrorism has taken on Pakistan itself, noting that in the beginning of 2024, Pakistan had over 1,000 terrorist attacks in the western area, killing about 700 security personnel and civilians apart from 2500 wounded. He also highly praised the present Field Marshall and Chief of Staff Asim Munir who, Indians say, played a key role in attacks on India by Pak backed terrorists.
General Kurilla's is the latest official version of the Trump administration on the current state of India-Pakistan relations. This US position India has to swallow as the Prime Minister Narendra Modi reshaped his foreign policy after coming to power in 2014 and it took a sharper turn during the first term of Donald Trump. Now, where is the escape route? How is the Indian PM going to deal with his dear friend Donald if they happen to meet in Alberta, Canada during G-7 summit beginning June 15.
It is not a coincidence that the same day General Kurilla was testifying in Washington, Bilawal Bhutto was addressing a meeting of the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London and talked about the same issue about terrorist attacks in Pakistan mentioned by the US general.
'The delegation I lead has been given a mission of peace,' he declared at IISS. 'We are advocating to the international community to play their role in encouraging a dialogue, a comprehensive dialogue between India and Pakistan, where Pakistan is ready to talk about all issues.'
He explained, 'As it stands today, if there's a terrorist attack anywhere in India, proof or no proof, we go to war. That is the de facto position of the new abnormal that India is trying to impose on the region. The equivalence would mean that if there's a terrorist attack in Pakistan, we have to go to war with India. That is a very untenable situation to be in.'
He went on to say that Narendra Modi's new doctrine is 'lowering the threshold for conflict, a potentially nuclear armed conflict'. He suggested the issues between the two nations can 'only be solved by dialogue'.
Pakistan leaders including Bilawal Bhutto can not be trusted on the basis of what they say. But in international politics and diplomacy, dialogue and negotiations are the buzzword for bringing two contending sides to the negotiating table. Narendra Modi himself told President Putin relating to Ukraine war that this was not the time for war. He was speaking the truth.
US secretary Marco Rubio has told the Pakistani side that the U.S. will persuade India to participate in bilateral talks in a neutral venue. He must have told that to Indian external affairs minister Dr. S. Jaishankar also. China and Russian leaders are also suggesting bilateral talks. India should on its own agree to the dialogue with Pakistan rather than be persuaded by others like the U.S. to take part.
India has nothing to lose by agreeing to bilateral talks. The Indian delegation may forcefully demand the actions which it wanted to be taken by the Pak government. India can send that list and proposed actions to the US and other countries. India is better placed militarily and morally. Why then give advantage to Islamabad to project itself as a seeker of dialogue and peace? India can be a darling of global diplomatic community again if it seizes this opportunity. (IPA Service)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Netanyahu slams Macron recognition of State of Palestine
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu slammed French President Emmanuel Macron for his decision on Thursday to recognise the State of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September. "We strongly condemn President Macron's decision to recognize a Palestinian state next to Tel Aviv in the wake of the October 7 massacre. Such a move rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became," Netanyahu said. "A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel — not to live in peace beside it. Let's be clear: the Palestinians do not seek a state alongside Israel; they seek a state instead of Israel."
Arabian Post
6 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Why SCO Summit At Tianjin On August 31 Is Crucial For India-China Relations?
By Nitya Chakraborty The recent months have not been comfortable for India with its two neighbours Pakistan and India, but as regards the third most powerful neighbouring county China, th scenario has turned different. India-China ties which became bitter at the time of clashes in Galwan valley in 2020, started softening from last year and the process of normalization got more effective after the bilateral meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Chinese President Xi Jinping at the BRICS meeting in Kazan, Russia in October 2024. There are hopes in New Delhi that this normalization process may get further boost after the coming meeting between the two leaders at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit at Tianjin in China on August 31 and September 1. Only on Wednesday, July 23, India announced resumption of tourist visas for Chinese nationals which were stopped since the 2020 clash. This was long overdue but the decision as also China's satisfaction at the outcome of India-China diplomatic talks on border situation, have created an environment for further improvement of bilateral relations in a situation of global turmoil. Already China has given permission for the Kailash Mansarovar yatra. This people to people approach agreed to by both governments has definitely prepared the base for a much bigger breakthrough in sorting out some of the other issues on which differences persist. The coming bilateral summit between Narendra Modi and Xi Jinping may give some positive direction to that end. SCO dominated by China and Russia has presently ten members-China, Russia, India, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Iran and Belarus. The observers are Iran, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Mongolia, Qatar and UAE. China is hosting the SCO meeting for the fifth time and the most important thing is that Russian President Vladimir Putin is also expected to attend the August summit. That way, PM Modi can have a bilateral meeting with President Putin also. President Putin is scheduled to visit India by the end of this year. The SCO summit will give the Indian PM an opportunity to discuss India-Russia elations in the context of the latest global developments. As China sees SCO 2025 summit as a host, the Summit will stay true to its founding mission and carry forward the Shanghai Spirit. Mutual trust, mutual benefit, equality, consultation, respect for diversity of civilisations and pursuit of common development illustrate what a new type of international relations should be. The deliberations at the Summit will focus on the consolidation of the security of the member nations. Interestingly, Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi hinted at USA without naming it by saying that a certain country puts its own interests over the international public good, undermining the common interests of the international community. The SCO should take the 80th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations (UN) as an opportunity to champion the common values of humanity, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of member states, and work for a more just and equitable global governance system. The SCO declaration is expected to contain a charter for the next development decade. On July 15 at a meeting with the SCO foreign ministers, President Xi Jinping said that China has always prioritised the SCO in its neighbourhood diplomacy and is committed to making the SCO more substantive and stronger, safeguarding regional security and stability, promoting the development and prosperity of member states, and building a closer community with a shared future. Xi Jinping stressed that in the face of a turbulent and changing international landscape, the SCO must stay focused, remain confident, act efficiently and play a more proactive role in injecting greater stability and positive energy into the world. Xi is expected to have a meeting with President Putin also at the Tianjin Summit. Similarly, Indian PM Narendra Modi will have the opportunity to talk to President Putin also and discuss India-Russia relations in the context of latest global developments. Significantly, the Chinese media is taking a positive view of the India- China bilateral relations in recent days. The Chinese official daily Global Times said in its July 23 issue that the resumption, in June, of Indian pilgrims visiting Xizang Autonomous Region's 'sacred mountain and lake' reflects the goodwill and reliability of the Chinese side. India's easing of tourism visa restrictions is also a natural, reciprocal step. Official sources indicate that relevant departments in both countries are working toward the resumption of direct air links, and the routes will reopen soon. Lifting unreasonable restrictions on Chinese students, scholars and journalists, as well as removing investment and operational barriers for Chinese companies in India, must also be prioritized without delay by the Indian side, says Global Times editorial. According to GT, India's move is only a starting point. Therefore, while this 'progress' is welcomed, it remains important to watch whether India will take more substantial steps in areas such as visa approval rates, tourist services and safety, and the possible relaxation of visa requirements going forward. India should do more to build mutual trust, bridge perception gaps, and foster goodwill among the two peoples. The main issue in India-China relations is trust and perception. This can be tackled only at the highest level of the leadership of the two countries. If both Narendra Modi and Xi Jinping can initiate a process for further normalizing the bilateral relations, that will be a major event in the Asian diplomacy. (IPA Service)
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
Parliament demands recognition of Palestinian state 'before it's too late'
British MPs have called on their government to declare Palestine an official country while 'there is still a state to recognise'. In strongly worded report the Foreign Affairs Committee has accused Whitehall of dithering by waiting for the 'perfect time for recognition'. It said that was unachievable and that meanwhile illegal settlers were annexing much of the occupied West Bank, with Gaza in their sights too. The call came as French President Emmanuel Macron announced that he would recognise Palestine at a meeting in New York in September, in a move that he has described as a "moral duty" and a "political necessity." Mr Macron hopes that the UK will follow suit. Speaking to the House of Commons earlier this month, the French president said that "working together in order to recognise the dtate of Palestine and to initiate this political momentum is the only path to peace." An inalienable right should not be made conditional House of Commons Despite the increasingly grim humanitarian crisis, with the death toll approaching 60,000, Israel was still refusing to listen to calls to bring about a ceasefire with Hamas. 'It seems that the Israeli government is not listening to the UK,' the Foreign Affairs Committee (Fac) stated, adding that while it did pay attention to Washington, 'it only does so sporadically'. The MPs will hope that Downing Street listens to their urging that, along with France, they take the significant step of recognising a Palestinian state, to put even greater pressure on Israel. 'The UK, along with France – the co-signatory of the 1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement – should now recognise the state of Palestine while there is still a state to recognise,' the MPs wrote. 'An inalienable right should not be made conditional.' That message appeared to have been picked up by Prime Minister Keir Starmer who suggested that a Hamas agreeing a ceasefire could rapidly lead to the UK recognising statehood that he repeated was the 'inalienable right of the Palestinian people'. 'A ceasefire will put us on a path to the recognition of a Palestinian state and a two-state solution which guarantees peace and security for Palestinians and Israelis,' he said in a statement issued by Downing Street. But the 'unspeakable and indefensible' starvation in Gaza has led Britain to host an emergency call with the E3 partners, Britain, Germany and France, on Friday. 'While the situation has been grave for some time, it has reached new depths and continues to worsen,' he said. 'We are witnessing a humanitarian catastrophe.' The E3 meeting will discuss what the European countries can to 'urgently stop the killing and get people the food'. 'We all agree on the pressing need for Israel to change course and allow the aid that is desperately needed to enter Gaza without delay,' he stated. Whitehall sources have told The National that exasperation with Israel has led to serious consideration by the UK of Palestinian state recognition, but that has yet to be announced. Further pressure has been put on Prime Minister Keir Starmer after London Mayor Sadiq joined a growing number of senior Labour figures demanding that the government 'immediately recognise Palestinian statehood', arguing that there 'can be no two-state solution if there is no viable state left to call Palestine'. While the government has said it 'plans' to defy Israel and join the other 147 countries who have declared Palestine a state, it will only do so 'at the point of maximum impact'. But the Fac report argued that the government 'cannot continue to wait for the perfect time' because experience showed 'that there will never be a perfect time, and in hindsight it is possible to see times when it should have occurred'. However, the National Jewish Assembly, an organisation of British Jews, told the MPs that premature recognition of Palestinian statehood would be 'a catastrophic error' which would legitimise 'a leadership that has failed its people for decades'. Emily Thornberry, the Fac chairwoman, said immediate recognition would 'signal the UK's desire to work urgently towards a two-state solution'. Her committee's report on the Israel-Palestine conflict urged Mr Starmer 'to kick-start urgently the process of preparing the ground for negotiation of a long-term two-state resolution to the conflict, without waiting for a ceasefire'. 'There is undoubtedly huge frustration among many of the British public that the government has consistently acted too little, too late,' she said. 'And there is huge frustration that the far-right government currently in charge in Israel is refusing to listen to its historic friends and allies. 'But we must not shrug our shoulders in despair and say that there is nothing we can do. This report puts forward practical suggestions for how the British government can make a real difference.' She added that the UK government must also use its historic Middle East legacy as a convening power 'to bring together conflicting and diverse parties' and 'must act more boldly and bravely' to leverage Britain's influence.
