
The most exclusive credit cards are about to get even more expensive
When JPMorgan Chase said it was raising the annual fee by 45% on its popular Sapphire Reserve credit card, longtime cardholder David O'Brien didn't notice.
'My eyes glaze over with this stuff," said the 36-year-old New York lawyer.
Until a reporter told him that the fee will soon rise to $795, from $550, he assumed he had been paying less than $100 a year. A brief shock, acknowledged with an expletive, gave way to acceptance.
Top credit card companies have stumbled on a winning formula at odds with almost every other sector of America's inflation-obsessed economy: Raising their prices is good for business. Already sold by the status the cards convey, a large number of customers are willing to eat the costs.
This is JPMorgan's third and largest increase to its annual fee for the Sapphire Reserve card since it was launched in 2016 at $450 a year. It takes effect Monday for new customers and in October for existing customers.
American Express, whose Platinum card usually carries the heftiest fee in its market segment, is expected to raise its $695 fee—even higher than the Sapphire Reserve's—in its fall refresh, analysts say.
'I've been surprised at the ability to continue to extract higher pricing," said Moshe Orenbuch, a managing director at TD Securities. When the Sapphire Reserve launched, analysts doubted there was much appetite for triple-digit annual fees. 'Issuers have been positively surprised at how many of those folks there are."
Price hikes make the cards appear more exclusive. Except rather than offering a luxury good such as a diamond ring or fancy ride, the companies offer the chance to spend more.
The cards' allure 'can lead to behaviors that you can't justify" based on function alone, said Derek Rucker, a marketing professor at Northwestern's Kellogg School of Management. 'That's where the math doesn't have to make sense," he said.
Theoretically, the math can make sense. Chase touts the more than $2,700 in annual value on its refreshed Reserve card, including hotel and dining credits and travel perks. Amex Platinum offers similar benefits for frequent travelers.
O'Brien, the New York lawyer, said that despite the fee increase, he expects the math to work out for keeping his Sapphire Reserve card. He regularly uses points from the card to book flights and hotel stays, and says lounge access offsets the cost of a few pricey airport cocktails.
But many perks go unredeemed. According to the latest data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, cardholders earned over $40 billion in rewards in 2022, yet more than $33 billion went unclaimed—a 40% jump since before the pandemic. The average account sat on $150 in unused perks.
A dining room at the American Express Centurion New York restaurant.
Redemption now requires more effort than ever before.
Jacob Moon, a 36-year-old investment banker in Los Angeles, didn't mind the fee increase, but bristled at the fine print. Many perks are delivered in increments and expire monthly. For instance, Chase is advertising a $500 hotel credit as a new benefit with the Sapphire Reserve. But half of the credit must be used in the first six months of the year, and half of it in the last six months.
'For the amount I spend, I want freedom, not a schedule," Moon said. 'This card is giving me homework."
Such complexity favors users who track every point and benefit—and banks know that. Regardless of whether perks are redeemed, the card issuer collects the fee.
'The vast majority of people will see all that as a headache," said Greg Davis-Kean, founder of travel website Frequent Miler.
Chase has taken steps to streamline its rewards. Cardholders now earn eight points per dollar on all travel booked through its portal—previously, different rates applied to flights and hotels. Chase also shows unclaimed benefits in its app.
'We're all about getting customers to redeem 100% of their benefits," said Allison Beer, CEO of card and connected commerce at Chase.
The higher fees will inevitably be too much for some customers to swallow. That might be the point, said Patrick Mrozowski, the founder of Atlas, a credit card company that charges a $1,000 annual fee and offers cardholders access to a concierge service, including help securing hard-to-get reservations at such restaurants as New York's The Corner Store.
'Maybe their overall number of customers drops, but the level of engagement from the core base increases, and that's a better way to grow," Mrozowski said.
Chase said it doesn't expect significant attrition from its Sapphire Reserve revamp, but acknowledged that some customers might decide to downgrade to the lower-fee Preferred card or opt out entirely.
A Bank of America Global Research survey earlier this month found that only 9% of Chase cardholders said they would cancel their most-used premium card if the annual fee increased by $100.
Michael Andeberhan, a 44-year-old who works in asset management, carries both the Sapphire Reserve and the Amex Platinum and keeps a close eye on whether he's getting his money's worth from each. But with the prospect of higher annual fees on both cards, he's starting to question whether two is too many.
Having two cards divides his spending, and each credit card company reserves its best perks for customers who spend the most on their cards. For example, cardholders who charge more than $75,000 a year on a Chase card unlock top-tier status at IHG Hotels and Resorts.
'Is it worth having two premium cards?" Andeberhan said. 'Because you can only spend your money on one card."
Write to Imani Moise at imani.moise@wsj.com and Jacob Passy at jacob.passy@wsj.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
5 hours ago
- Business Standard
Front-loaded, then flat: JPMorgan Index fails to sustain FAR bond inflows
Mumbai Listen to This Article Foreign inflows into India's Fully Accessible Route (FAR) government bonds following the phased entry into JPMorgan's GBI-EM index have fallen well short of projections so far. When JPMorgan announced in September 2023 that Indian bonds would be phased into the index starting June 28, 2024, and reaching the full 10 per cent weighting by March 31, 2025, at 1 per cent per month, analysts predicted passive inflows of $20 billion - $25 billion, with bullish scenarios extending up to $30 billion, including active repositioning. However, between June 2024 and March 2025, total foreign purchases under the FAR route had reached just ₹1.09 trillion, which is


Mint
a day ago
- Mint
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon bets on THESE skills to beat GenZ's entry-level job uncertainty
The GenZ job market is ever-changing, especially with the AI revolution but JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has some good news and advice for jobseekers. For freshers, the job market has been full of mixed signal. One moment, AI is being expected to wipe out most entry-level jobs, and the next moment leaders are seen complaining about talent shortage across industries. However, according to Jamie Dimon, the key to job security is not a mystery but only requires studying the right things. Speaking at Business Roundtable's CEO Workforce Forum earlier this month, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon revealed that there are still come areas where businesses are short on skills and require young people to fill that gap. Companies need young experts in fields like cyber, coding and programming, as well as financial and program management, the billionaire said. 'We are short on labour,' he agreed. However, Dimon added that 'We all have needs for cyber, we all have needs for coding, we all have needs for programming, we have needs for financial management and programme management, things like that.' The CEO's comments come at a time when Amazon admitted to soon cutting corporate ranks due to focussing more on AI and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei warned that technology could eliminate half of the entry-level white collar jobs. Dimon also noted that many educational institutions are not providing enough of this specialised training so that the GenZ could become the next generation of coders or program managers. The 69-year-old billionaire had previously highlighted that classrooms should put more focus on their pupils getting jobs right after they graduate rather than in traditional education. 'If you look at kids they gotta be educated to get jobs,' he told Indianapolis-based WISH-TV last year. 'Too much focus in education has been on graduating college… It should be on jobs. I think the schools should be measured on, did the kids get out and get a good job,' Dimon added. However, the JPMorgan Chase CEO is not the only one who flagged this need for more focus on jobs. Microsoft's Satya Nadella, Airbnb's Brian Chesky, and Salesforce's Marc Benioff came together to write a letter, demanding access to computer science and AI education for all students.


Mint
a day ago
- Mint
US economy shrugs off trade war and soldiers on
President Trump is still issuing tariff threats, consumer spending is weakening, and the Mideast is in turmoil. So why did the S&P 500 hit a record high Friday? Investors may not think the economy is taking off, but they are probably relieved that the worst-case scenarios feared in recent months haven't come to pass. Trump's tariffs, deportations, and cuts to the federal bureaucracy have bent the economy but haven't broken it. The S&P 500 plummeted 19% from its previous high in February to its 2025 low on April 8. Behind the drop: fears that Trump's threatened tariffs of as high as 145% on China and 50% on other major trading partners would send inflation and interest rates up, sap business and consumer confidence, and spark a recession. Instead, Trump has significantly dialed back the tariffs from what he first proposed. Although tariffs did come into effect starting in February on China, Canada and Mexico, as well as on autos, steel and aluminum, the effect on inflation to date has been milder than feared. Oil prices leapt when Israel attacked Iran and the U.S. joined in, but have since fallen back. Even after President Trump's rollbacks, the average tariff in the U.S. is 18.8%, the highest since the 1930s. Economists at JPMorgan Chase put the probability of recession starting in the next four quarters at about one-third, down from 60% in early April. In recent months, business confidence fell amid tariff threats. Yet that sentiment never fully translated into behavior: businesses kept investing in equipment, factories and technology. They kept adding jobs, albeit at a slower pace than last year. 'The macro economy is doing decently," said Jason Furman, a Harvard economics professor who was an adviser to President Barack Obama. Especially when it comes to tariffs, the market is now more confident 'that Trump will back off if necessary," he added. 'In April I think the fear was he would just plow ahead no matter what. Now there is a sense that there are realities he won't try to blow past." Consumer confidence has also recovered a bit. The University of Michigan's consumer sentiment index rose 16% in June from May, though it remains 18% lower than in December. Wall Street analysts expect earnings at retailers and other S&P 500 consumer discretionary companies to fall in the second quarter from a year earlier. Earlier this year, 'consumers were really on a downward trend, they really were worried that the high levels of tariffs threatened and policy volatility could lead to very dire consequences," said Joanne Hsu, director of consumer surveys for the University of Michigan. Now, 'consumers don't think we're out of the woods, but they're less worried about the worst-case scenario.' Still, while consumer spending never collapsed, new data shows that it has weakened significantly. The labor market also appears to be softening. Annualized growth in gross domestic product is likely to average 0.8% over the first two quarters of 2025, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence, down sharply from 2.5% in 2024. The stock market isn't the economy, but it does capture in real time how investors feel about growth, profits, interest rates, and risk. While companies were cautious about the outlook a few months ago, their recent profit guidance has tended to be better than analysts expected, according to FactSet. The policy landscape has also become less unpredictable, easing investors' fears. Republicans' massive tax and spending bill remains up in the air, but that sort of risk is more familiar than the tariffs and steep cuts to the federal bureaucracy by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency that regularly emanated from the White House in previous months. 'If you look at the beginning of the year, the main action economically was tariffs and DOGE, and both of those were very dramatic, very fast and of debated lawfulness," Furman said. 'Now the main thing going on is this fiscal bill, which I think is problematic. But it's sort of normal…things have moved more into the legislative arena, which is weirdly more predictable." In a recently released report, the White House Council of Economic Advisers predicted the Senate draft of Trump's 'one big beautiful bill" will significantly boost investment, wages and employment in the next four years relative to a scenario in which the 2017 tax cuts expire this year, as scheduled. This past week, Fed chairman Jerome Powell acknowledged there has been little evidence of tariffs pushing up inflation broadly thus far, and some Fed officials have said a rate cut should be on the table as soon as next month. That has caused some bond yields to drop, which is also good for the stock market. Still, tariffs' full effect could still lie ahead. A 90-day pause on Trump's steepest tariffs is to end July 9. Officials have said that deadline could slip as the U.S. and some partners close in on deals. But Friday, Trump said he had broken off talks with Canada and would issue new tariffs soon, and the administration is also carrying out probes that could yield new tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. Trump's tariff threats spurred car sales earlier this year. Even after Trump's rollbacks, the average tariff in the U.S. is 18.8%, the highest since the 1930s, versus 2.4% in 2024, according to Preston Caldwell, chief U.S. economist at Morningstar. He thinks that will push inflation based on the index of personal-consumption expenditures to 3.2% in early 2026, versus 2.3% now. The biggest risk to the outlook appears to be the consumer. This past week, the Commerce Department sharply revised down consumption growth. That softness has persisted in the second quarter, with inflation-adjusted consumption slipping 0.3% in May from April, leaving the level of spending below December's. Particularly notable was softness in discretionary categories including air travel and hotels, which are especially sensitive to moods about the economy. Wall Street analysts now expect earnings at S&P 500 consumer discretionary companies, which includes retailers, restaurant chains and carmakers, to slip by 5.1% in the second quarter from a year earlier, according to FactSet, down from a 2.2% gain at the end of March. Write to Jeanne Whalen at Justin Lahart at and Te-Ping Chen at