DMK treating Vanniyar community as mere vote bank during elections: Anbumani Ramadoss
Leading a demonstration at the municipal ground in Villupuram demanding the implementation of 10.5 % reservation for Vanniyars, Mr. Anbumani alleged that Mr. Stalin betrayed the Vanniyar community by refusing to provide internal reservations for Vanniyars within the MBC quota.
Though 1208 days have passed since the Supreme Court struck down the Vanniyar reservations, the ruling DMK has been consistently misleading the people on this issue, he claimed. The Apex court has observed that reservations for the Vanniyars or any other community can be given based on quantifiable data.
Mr. Anbumani said the plea for reservation for Vanniyars had not been fulfilled for the last 45 years. As many as 21 persons lost their lives during the struggle demanding exclusive reservation for Vanniyars in 1989. Of them, 15 were from Villupuram district.
The former Union minister recalled that he and his father, and party founder S. Ramadoss, had met the Chief Minister on several occasions to press for the implementation of 10.5% reservation, but in vain.
'The DMK and the Chief Minister betrayed the PMK by promising to give 10.5% internal reservation, and after four years, now Mr. Stalin is saying that reservation could be given only after the Union Government conducts the caste census. Mr. Stalin again and again said this lie while States like Karnataka, Telangana, Odisha, and Bihar conducted caste surveys, and now again Karnataka has announced they are going to conduct a second caste survey. While these States have the right to conduct the surveys, why does Tamil Nadu not have that power?' Mr. Anbumani questioned.
Of its total representatives, the DMK has 23 MLAs and five Members of Parliament from the Vanniyar community. 'Did the Dravidian party implement any welfare schemes for the upliftment of the community?' he asked.
Stating not even one vote should go to the DMK in the 2026 elections, Mr. Anbumani said the time to unseat the DMK government has come.
Mr. Anbumani said the party would soon launch a jail bharo agitation across the State in support of its demand. If the DMK government fails to enact a law and ensure 10.5% reservation for Vanniyars, the party would intensify its protest and hold a road roko agitation in the second phase.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
As Ramadoss scuttles son's march amid fresh chill, PMK rifts deepen
A last-ditch hope for reconciliation between the two key figures at the helm of Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) — party founder S Ramadoss and his son A Anbumani — appears to have crumbled this week as Ramadoss moved to block a 100-day padayatra planned by Anbumani across Tamil Nadu, seeking police intervention to halt what he called was his son's 'unauthorised, dangerous political stunt'. Just a week ago, the mood in the PMK's divided circles had turned cautiously optimistic. With the discovery of a surveillance device under Ramadoss's chair at his Thailapuram residence — a revelation that triggered fears of a police investigation amid hints that Anbumani may be implicated in it — a new round of mediation efforts was launched, led by long-time family friend and VIT Chancellor G Viswanathan. For a brief moment, it seemed as though both father and son, locked in a months-long power struggle, might step back to avoid further damage. 'Letting the police into the house would be detrimental to the party,' a senior PMK leader had told The Indian Express at the time. But whatever ground was gained through those backchannel talks has now been undone in full public view. On Thursday, Ramadoss made it clear that negotiations between them had failed. He announced that Anbumani's statewide 'Urimai Meetpu Payanam (Rights Retrieval Yatra)' must be stopped. He claimed that the event, if allowed to proceed, would pose law and order challenges in northern Tamil Nadu and warned that Anbumani had no authority to undertake political campaigns under the PMK banner. 'I am the party. I am the leader. There is no separate faction led by Anbumani within the PMK,' Ramadoss said. He went further, asking the state police to prevent the use of his party's flag, name, or even his own full name in connection with the yatra, claiming he had resumed charge as party president on May 30 and had submitted the updated office-bearers' list to the Election Commission (EC). In an escalation that stunned even seasoned party watchers, Ramadoss warned that anyone posing as an office-bearer without his sanction would be expelled. A fresh complaint was submitted to the Director General of Police (DGP), who subsequently issued orders to district police officials to withhold permission for the march. On Friday, however, Anbumani launched the padayatra — beginning from Thiruporur after offering prayers at a temple and garlanding a statue of B R Ambedkar. Addressing a gathering, he launched an attack on Chief Minister M K Stalin and the ruling DMK, alleging betrayal of the Vanniyar community, neglect of farmers, and rising crimes against women. He made no mention of his father or the party rifts. But in the evening, the DGP's communication to district superintendents said the padayatra was unauthorised, lacking 'written consent or authorisation of the founder/president' of the PMK. Officers were instructed to take steps to prevent the march at any point along its route, citing the risk of clashes between rival factions of the party and the potential threat to public order. The father-son feud has been playing out publicly since early this year, when Ramadoss attempted to sideline Anbumani by elevating his grandson, P Mukundan as the party's youth wing leader, a move Anbumani resisted. In June, Ramadoss formally reclaimed the party presidency from Anbumani, demoting the latter to the working president's post. He also dismissed several of Anbumani's loyalists from key roles, citing mismanagement and unilateral decision-making. Tensions peaked when Ramadoss overruled Anbumani's expulsion of a sitting MLA and declared that the 'working president' title carried no real power. In mid-July, an audio-tapping device found in Ramadoss's home, reportedly sourced from the United Kingdom, prompted fears that party surveillance had gone too far. While no one was directly named, the discovery shook up the party. Ramadoss then filed a cybercrime complaint, with his aides describing the incident as 'the most obnoxious political development in Tamil Nadu'. Anbumani's padayatra, which was billed as a massive mobilisation to reconnect with the party's roots and its Vanniyar base, was initially seen by some insiders as an opportunity for 'healing'. With over 5,000 cadres expected to join, many hoped it would serve as common ground for the fractured family. But Ramadoss saw it instead as a challenge to his authority and a provocation that could destabilise the party's rank and file.
NDTV
7 hours ago
- NDTV
"PM Modi Wants To Make Cholas Global, DMK Keeping Them Local": K Annamalai To NDTV
Chennai: Former president of the BJP's Tamil Nadu unit K Annamalai on Saturday said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi wants to make the Cholas"global". Speaking to NDTV, a day ahead of PM Modi's visit to Tiruchirappalli to attend a mega festival to celebrate the legacy of Chola emperor Rajendra Chola I (1014-1044 CE), Mr Annamalai also slammed the ruling DMK, saying they want to keep Cholas "local". "Tomorrow is going to be a very, very important day, not just for Tamil Nadu, but for the whole Bharat (India)," he said, referring to the event at the Gangaikonda Cholapuram Temple, a UNESCO World Heritage site known for its intricate sculptures, Chola bronzes, and ancient inscriptions. It also commemorates 1,000 years of the maritime expedition of Rajendra Chola I to South East Asia, Mr Annamalai said. He said that PM Modi, who is visiting Tamil Nadu straight after his "successful" trips to the UK and the Maldives, is trying to put Gangaikonda Cholapuram on the global map. He also praised PM Modi for releasing a commemorative coin honouring Rajendra Chola I. Mr Annamalai said Chief Minister MK Stalin-led DMK is "nervous" about PM Modi's tour as they have not done anything for the Chola dynasty. "The DMK has never celebrated Cholas," he said, adding that no chief minister from the party has ever visited Gangaikonda Cholapuram, which was the capital city of the dynasty. "When the PM is trying to take Cholas global, the DMK wants it to be local," he said. Speaking on the Tamil Nadu Assembly elections, which are due next year, Mr Annamalai said the ruling DMK is set for a "historic defeat". "DMK's days are numbered," he said.
New Indian Express
9 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Minorities won't believe Vijay — he was silent during CAA, 370, triple talaq: Salma
Q: There's often a distinction made between mainstream literature and Dravidian literature. Some even dismiss Dravidian literature as not being 'real literature' — reducing it to something merely used for political campaigning. How do you respond to such opinions, and how do you view the literary value of Dravidian literature? We can't define literature in rigid terms and say, 'this alone is literature'. In earlier times, only Sanskrit literature was seen as 'true literature.' But it wasn't something a common person could understand — it spoke to and for only a certain elite section of society. What about the rest? Their experiences were excluded. This gap was bridged by leaders like Kalaignar Karunanidhi and Perarignar Anna. Their works were powerful because they could be understood by the common man. And to me, that is the true purpose of literature — it must reach people, it must speak to them. Kalaignar's writing spanned across poetry, short stories, novels, even screenplays for films. And he had a strong, devoted readership who admired and connected with his work deeply. Today, literature is more inclusive than ever. Writers like Ramanichandran and Jayakanthan have their own dedicated readers. Each writer has a unique voice, a distinct way of telling stories. And each one has an audience that values that expression. That is the beauty of literature. The real problem is when we try to define literature by ranking it — saying, 'this is the best,' or worse, 'this doesn't even qualify as literature'. Who decides that? Every writer brings something different to the table, and that diversity is what makes literature meaningful and alive. Q: As a Member of the Rajya Sabha, what is your primary goal or focus? What do you hope to achieve through your role in Parliament? I come from a party that has always stood firmly for the ideals of social justice. At the heart of our ideology is the belief that everyone in this society should be treated equally, regardless of their caste, religion, gender, or background. To my knowledge, I am the only woman from the Muslim community in the entire country who is going to take charge as a Member of the Rajya Sabha. This, in itself, speaks volumes about the vision and progressive mindset of our party president and Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, M. K. Stalin. I am deeply grateful to him for giving me this opportunity. As an MP, I will faithfully represent the voice and principles of my party in Parliament. It's a responsibility I carry with pride and commitment. Q: Kamala Surayya was known for her bold and explicit writing — even at a time when such topics were taboo. Today, we see many writers exploring similar themes, but often under the label of 'queer literature' or through anonymous platforms. Do you think it's anonymity that gives writers the courage to write openly about these subjects? I've been considering writing a novel that deals with certain sensitive topics. And while thinking about it, the idea of using a different name and going anonymous crossed my mind. There's a certain courage that anonymity offers. When you write under your real name, people who know you tend to judge or misunderstand you based on the content, regardless of the intention behind it. A few years before the death of Kamala Surayya, I had the opportunity to visit her in Kerala, thanks to a friend. She was under police protection in her own home. During our conversation, she said something that stayed with me: 'Writers write to sense freedom, but my writing has curbed my freedom.' She also said she felt lonely — that she couldn't see or find people like her anymore. That sense of isolation weighed on her deeply. We've all witnessed how writers around the world have been arrested for their writing. So, this fear isn't abstract; it's real and close. Q: When it comes to literature, we rarely see Tamil writers coming together as a collective or voicing concerns as a united front unlike in Karnataka and Kerala. Why do you think such solidarity is missing in Tamil Nadu? Also, when it comes to literary recognition, Tamil writers don't seem to receive the higher-ranking national awards as often as writers from Kerala. What could be the reason behind this disparity? There is politics in groups here that stretches beyond political parties. When Kaaval Kottam by Su. Venkatesan got the Sahitya Akademi Award, one group wrote against it. If there is a voice against my literature, especially from conservatives, shouldn't there be collective opposition from writers? They don't need to support me — they could defend literature. Jealousy runs high in Tamil. No one uplifts the other. In Malayalam, at least when I look from the outside, though there is some talking behind the back, it looks positive. Here, there is no such unity. Q: Does it have to do with not getting much recognition? Even for my novels, sometimes I feel bad knowing that the original in Tamil would not receive an award. But they gave the award for the Marathi translation, which can only do half the justice to the original. There is no logic in this. But I don't know how to lobby. Q: You have contributed to the literature through short stories, novels, and poems. What do you think is the essence of your contribution? I can only say that the essence of all my literature is humanity. I see literature as the basis of loving fellow humans. We read so much literature and stories. The pain from reading the sadness or love of others is only possible through literature. Q: In Tamil Nadu, there were only two political sides — DMK and AIADMK. Now Vijay has started a political party. Generally, minorities vote for the DMK alliance. Now there is talk that Vijay will lure minorities, especially youngsters. His speeches also mainly target minority votes. Is there any chance he gets the votes? Minorities always vote for the DMK. The pattern has changed only once, that I know of. Because no one can forget the 3.5% reservation (for Muslims and Christians) introduced by Kalaignar. This helped them to get employment and education. He is standing alone to target minority votes; he knows it won't happen if he is with the AIADMK-BJP alliance. We don't know who is behind him contesting alone. But minorities won't believe him. You should have done something before, and they must believe you will do something for them again. The CAA protests turned the country upside down. If he has true concern for the minorities, he could have spoken in favour of them. Even recently, there were several atrocities against Muslims in North India. But he has not spoken against anything. He has not spoken when Triple Talaq or abrogation of Article 370 became issues. Suddenly, if he says he will save Muslims, it is not believable. The BJP is responsible for all these atrocities. At least he should criticise the BJP, but that is also not happening. He is only targeting the DMK. So, minorities won't believe him. I think only 5,000 people came for the protest in Chennai (against custodial violence). Minorities will think about who has done things for them. They won't support an actor. In many movies, he has also depicted Muslims badly, showing Muslims as terrorists. These will blow up during the elections. (On the other hand), MGR (late AIADMK founder and CM M.G. Ramachandran) was part of the DMK; he went to the field with cadres. (Late CM) J. Jayalalithaa took over AIADMK — she didn't start a separate party and come on her own to capture power. As far as Vijay is concerned, if we take field-level politics, he is not out there yet. You can't identify a leader without him coming to the field. I agree that Vijayakant (late DMDK founder) is one actor who people voted for. But that has ended.
