logo
Date set for return of assisted dying votes after MP's bid takes step forward

Date set for return of assisted dying votes after MP's bid takes step forward

Daily Mirror16-05-2025
Kim Leadbeater's bid to legalise assisted dying took a step forward on Friday as a key change was backed by MPs.
After a five-hour debate, momentum still appeared behind the Labour MP in her attempt to allow terminally ill adults with six months left to apply to end their lives. The Commons supported Ms Leadbeater's amendment to allow health workers to opt out of helping with assisted dying. A change put forward by an opponent to the Bill was defeated.
MPs will debate the law once again on June 13 with over 100 amendments tabled. There will then be a crunch vote on the highly sensitive issue.
The debate on Friday was the first time the proposed legislation had returned to the Commons since a historic vote in November saw a majority of MPs support the principle of assisted dying. Bringing her Bill back to Parliament, Ms Leadbeater said assisted dying must be legalised to avoid terminally ill people acting out of desperation or making "traumatic" trips to Dignitas, in Switzerland.
The Labour MP for Spen Valley said: "Put simply, if we do not vote to change the law, we are essentially saying that the status quo is acceptable. Over recent months, I have heard hundreds of stories from people who have lost loved ones in deeply difficult and traumatic circumstances, which show that that is clearly not the case.
"Too many have seen their terminally-ill loved ones take their own lives out of desperation, or make the traumatic, lonely and costly trip to Switzerland, and then face a police investigation while dealing with their grief and loss."
On Friday grieving families watched the debate from the public gallery of the House of Commons as the Bill was debated in the chamber. Louise Shackleton, who is being investigated by police for taking her husband Anthony, 59, to Diginitas, to die in December, was among them. She has previously said Anthony, who was suffering from Motor Neurone Disease, had a "beautiful death".
Speaking to The Mirror, she praised Labour MP Ms Leadbeater. Louise, 58, said: "I think Kim's speech was very measured, very articulate, and she got the point of what people with a terminal illness want from an assisted death.I think she was absolutely spot-on." But she said MPs repeatedly bringing up problems with palliative care "simply have no understanding of what someone who wants an assisted death actually wants".
She added: "They seem to be under the impression that everyone that's terminally ill wants to die. They're not, they want to live. Our motor neurone community has the strongest, most amazing people, and all of them want to live. However what they don't want, when their time comes, they do not want to suffer an appalling, grotesque death."
The at-times emotional and impassioned debate saw supporters of changing the law argue the Bill has returned with strengthened safeguards after being amended in committee earlier this year. Ms Leadbeater's amendment will allow medics to excuse themselves from being involved in an assisted death. Doctors already had an opt-out but the new clause extends that to anyone, including pharmacists and social care workers.
Tory MP Rebecca Paul, who sits on the bill's committee, saw her amendment defeated. It called for employers opposed to assisted dying to be allowed to prevent their workers from providing the service. Ms Paul, who is against a change in the law, argued assisted dying 'will harm far more people than it will help and those people that will be harmed are the most vulnerable in our communities'. "It really is life or death so please don't accept anything that isn't good enough,' she said.
During the debate, multiple MPs raised concerns that patients could 'shop around' for different doctors to grant their assisted dying request if they are initially rejected for the procedure. But Ms Leadbeater assured the Commons that a report would be produced by a doctor if they felt the patient did not meet the criteria. This would then be passed onto the patient, the co-ordinating doctor and an assisted dying commissioner overseeing the case.
Other MPs said the UK's 'broken' NHS, social care and palliative care systems needing addressing before assisted dying was accepted. Opponents also complained the Bill does not have enough protections and has been rushed through. Labour MP Naz Shah claimed she did not realise her amendment ensuring better protections for those who voluntarily stop eating or drinking had been accepted until she was sitting in Parliament. She described the parliamentary process as 'chaos', adding: "We shouldn't be playing games with people's lives like this."
Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here - Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn.
Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
Or sign up here to the Mirror's Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox.
And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday.
Jess Asato, a Labour MP who opposes the bill, was among MPs to hit out at a letter from broadcaster Dame Esther Rantzen claiming that those who have concerns about the bill have "undeclared religious beliefs'.
She says she found she and her colleagues found this "distasteful and disrespectful". The daughter of Dame Esther, who has stage four lung cancer and sparked a national conversation on assisted dying, said her mum is "terrified" her family will see her go through a "traumatic death".
Speaking at a demonstration outside Parliament, Rebecca Wilcox said: "She's terrified that our memories of her - and they are such good memories - will be destroyed by a bad death, and so she's asking for choice for everybody. Unfortunately, it won't be in time for her."
Opponents of the bill also gathered in Westminster, including actor and disability campaigner Liz Carr. Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of Care Not Killing, said assisted dying was "really dangerous". Once you put assisted suicide or euthanasia into medicine, which is what's being proposed, there are lots and lots of vulnerable people at a huge risk of pressure or abuse, perhaps, by partners or, alternatively, just feeling a burden,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Please, Sir Keir, racing is being battered and we NEED your help before it's too late
Please, Sir Keir, racing is being battered and we NEED your help before it's too late

Scottish Sun

timea minute ago

  • Scottish Sun

Please, Sir Keir, racing is being battered and we NEED your help before it's too late

Crowds are flocking back to tracks but developments off it could wreck our sport's future MATT CHAPMAN Please, Sir Keir, racing is being battered and we NEED your help before it's too late SIR KEIR, are you listening? Do you know what is going on? Has anyone talked to you? Tax nightmares. Affordability checks. Labour peer frustrations. 1 Racing is booming at the moment with punters returning to tracks - but huge headwinds in the shape of harsh taxation lie in wait Credit: PA It appears racing is being battered in every direction. Who is listening? It remains hard to know. I've written before and I'll write it again. Considering horse racing is loved by the King and Queen downwards, it's quite extraordinary that it seems anyone who is part of the sport seemingly finds it impossible to get the ear of the Prime Minister. But while everyone is shouting from the rooftops about the current mayhem and possible nightmares around the corner, whether those in charge of Government have any idea what is happening behind the scenes is just a guessing game. We know Sir Keir Starmer and his wife, Victoria, like horse racing. Remember the day after the General Election? Victoria was having a day out at the Eclipse at Sandown. Not so long ago Sir Keir was also at Doncaster for the St Leger to watch Jan Brueghel land his victory for Aidan O'Brien. And yet, there is every chance the Labour Government is on the verge of lumping a huge taxation on the Sport of Kings that could be the beginning of the end. For those of you who don't know, that's because there is a current Treasury proposal to harmonise remote gambling tax rates, which could result in a raise to the rate on sports betting (including horseracing) from 15 per cent to 21 per cent. It all comes at a time when racing attendances are up - although no doubt partly due to good weather - allowing the sport to remain as the second most watched in the country. Above all that, though, horse racing already contributes over £4billion to the national economy and supports in the region of 85,000 jobs. Why would you even contemplate wrecking that? All this is going on at the same time Lord Allen continues to sit on the bench while he decides whether he wants to become BHA chairman. Many in racing think he is sent from God to make everything all right, although as of yet I've seen nothing on paper to back that up. That all said, everyone knows the governance needs a massive change. We really only hear one side of the Lord Allen 'will he join or won't he join' saga. But I'm led to believe he's put forward a proposal which basically says accept it or I walk. I am also led to believe he wants a hefty salary for whoever he makes CEO in place of Brant Dunshea. I can't back this up. It's just the word on the street. If Lord Allen is the Messiah, though, you would have thought he'd have already been talking to Sir Keir and messages would be coming back to racing about the tax issue. It's been silent as far as I am aware. So Sir Keir. The question is simple. Do you hear us? Do you know what is going on? FREE BETS - GET THE BEST SIGN UP DEALS AND RACING OFFERS Commercial content notice: Taking one of the offers featured in this article may result in a payment to The Sun. You should be aware brands pay fees to appear in the highest placements on the page. 18+. T&Cs apply. Remember to gamble responsibly A responsible gambler is someone who: Establishes time and monetary limits before playing Only gambles with money they can afford to lose Never chases their losses Doesn't gamble if they're upset, angry or depressed Gamcare – Gamble Aware – Find our detailed guide on responsible gambling practices here.

State pension age to be reviewed by UK Government amid fears that 45% of workers are not saving
State pension age to be reviewed by UK Government amid fears that 45% of workers are not saving

Daily Record

time31 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

State pension age to be reviewed by UK Government amid fears that 45% of workers are not saving

Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, warned "unless we act, tomorrow's pensioners will be poorer than today". The state pension age is to be reviewed by the UK Government amid fears half of workers are not saving anything at all for their retirement. ‌ Westminster is required by law to review the state pension age - currently 66 - every six years but has launched a fresh inquiry earlier than planned, as the previous one concluded in 2023. ‌ The review will examine whether the current age is still appropriate and consider factors such as rising life expectancy. ‌ It comes as experts warn that people looking to retire in 2050 are on course to receive £800 per year less than current pensioners,. The DWP said 45 per cent of working age adults are currently saving nothing for their pensions, amid fears the cost of living crisis has led to some households left with nothing to put aside. Kendall said Labour is reviving the pensions commission because the 'job is not yet done'. ‌ She added: "Put simply, unless we act, tomorrow's pensioners will be poorer than today's, because people who are saving aren't saving enough for their retirement. 'And crucially, because almost half of the working age population isn't saving anything for their retirement at all,' the Work and Pensions Secretary said during a speech to launch the move. The commission is expected to provide recommendations for how to boost retirement income in 2027. ‌ She also announced the next statutory government review into the pension age. She said she was 'under no illusions' about how difficult it would be to map out plans for pensions for the coming decades amid cost-of-living pressures. She conceded that 'many workers are more concerned about putting food on the table and keeping a roof over their heads than saving for a retirement that seems a long, long way away, and many businesses face huge challenges in keeping profitable and flexible in an increasingly uncertain world'. ‌ The shortfall is also worse among women and some ethnic groups, with only one-in-four people of Pakistani or Bangladeshi background saving in a private pension. People drawing their pension 25 years from now are set to be £800 or 8% worse off per year than their counterparts today, the department said, with four in 10 people currently not saving enough for their retirement. Rather than launching a new commission from scratch, the government said it was reviving the "landmark" Turner Pension Commission which reported in 2006, under the last Labour government, and led to the roll-out of automatic enrolment into pension saving. As a result 88% of eligible employees are now saving, up from 55% in 2012, the DWP said.

Will Labour's water 'revolution' work?
Will Labour's water 'revolution' work?

New Statesman​

time31 minutes ago

  • New Statesman​

Will Labour's water 'revolution' work?

Photo byWhy did the Conservatives lose the last general election so badly? Sewage is an underrated reason. The state of England's waterways became an emblem of national decline – raw sewage was discharged into rivers and seas for a record 3.61 million hours in 2024 – and a hazard for a burgeoning wild swimmer population. As Environment Secretary, Steve Reed has the unenviable task of cleaning up this mess. 'Loyalty and gratitude are the hallmarks of politicians. And that's the only way I can account for being rewarded with the department for sewage and angry farmers,' he quipped at a recent Parliamentary Press Gallery lunch. Since entering office, aides say, he has focused on 'three Rs'. The first – 'reset' – saw Labour pass the Water (Special Measures) Act, which introduced new criminal penalties for polluting water company bosses and banned the payment of bonuses to those who fail to meet high standards. The second – 'rebuild' – saw Reed secure £104bn of planned private sector investment that he says will allow the government to halve sewage pollution by 2030. The third is 'revolution'. Today's 465-page report by Jon Cunliffe, the former Bank of England deputy governor, calls for the abolition of Ofwat (a recommendation Reed has accepted) and the creation of a new regulator to ensure water companies 'act in the public as well as the private interest'. After its fraught first year in government, Labour senses a political opportunity. Action against water companies is both salient – polling by More in Common, shared with the New Statesman, shows that 95 per cent of people regard reducing sewage pollution as important or very important to them – and unifying. Reform voters (73 per cent) and Green voters (75 per cent) alike view it as a high priority. Yet for all the talk of revolution, some will be disappointed by Labour's reformism. Though England is one of only two countries in the world with a fully privatised water and sewage system (the second being Wales), Cunliffe's report did not assess the case for nationalisation, which Reed ruled out of scope. The revival of public ownership under Labour – the railways, GB Energy, steel (almost) – has prompted new demands to 'take back water'. But Reed insists that this is neither feasible nor desirable. 'The franchises for rail are seven years long and then they come to an end, so [renationalisation] is possible without having to buy them back. If you wanted to buy back the water companies, it would cost in excess of £100bn – and that's money that would have to be taken away from schools and the health service,' he told me earlier this year, arguing that weak regulation was the greatest problem. Reform, by contrast, in its populist guise, has vowed to bring 50 per cent of the water industry under public ownership. Nigel Farage's struggle yesterday to explain how much this would cost ('I don't know') gave Labour much pleasure but water remains a paradigmatic example of the challenge this government faces. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe An industry that was neglected under the Conservatives now requires emergency intervention. Bills, like taxes, will rise – by an average of 36 per cent in England and Wales over the next five years – to fund investment in creaking infrastructure. Reed, seeking to put himself on the side of the public, has declared himself 'furious'. But as they pick up the tab, will they accept his solidarity? Reed hopes that water will become a visible example of the difference Labour has made. 'This beautiful, iconic lake will once again be pristine and full of fish,' he told me of a recent visit to Windermere (sewage discharges have turned the lake green). 'It's by focusing on the politics of place that we can start to rebuild trust and address the challenge from the extremes.' But in an age of outrage, the risk for Labour is that no amount of delivery trumps Reform's raw populism. This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here [See also: The decline and fall of Great Britain] Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store