Conor McGregor appeal: Court to ask DPP to consider possible perjury concerning fresh evidence
The mixed martial arts fighter's lawyers this week withdrew an application to admit fresh evidence for his appeal against a High Court civil jury finding in favour of Nikita Hand. Ms Hand had sued him over allegedly raping her in Dublin's Beacon Hotel on December 9th, 2018.
In sworn evidence, Samantha O'Reilly, a neighbour of Ms Hand's in late 2018, claimed that, from her home, she witnessed a physical altercation between Ms Hand and her then partner Stephen Redmond in their home on the night of December 9th/10th, 2018.
Mr McGregor claimed this and other evidence bolstered his denial of responsibility for bruising on the body of Ms Hand noted by a doctor on December 10th, 2018. Ms Hand described the evidence as 'lies' and said Mr Redmond never assaulted her during their relationship.
READ MORE
The three-judge appeal court reserved judgment on Wednesday on Mr McGregor's appeal over the civil jury finding he assaulted Ms Hand in the hotel, for which it awarded her €250,000 damages. Mr McGregor denied raping Ms Hand and claimed they had consensual and 'vigorous' sex.
Ms Hand's senior counsel, John Gordon, asked the court to refer the fresh evidence matter to the DPP for consideration of possible perjury, including possible inducement by Mr McGregor of perjury.
After considering material in chambers, Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy said the court intended to refer the matter to the DPP and would inform the parties what materials would be forwarded.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Teacher at Dublin school and ex-partner's relationship deteriorated during alleged romantic involvement with student
Evidence was heard of the severe deterioration in relations between a teacher, who was allegedly romantically involved with a student , and her ex-partner, during the second day of a fitness-to-teach inquiry. The inquiry concerns allegations that the woman, who taught English in Dublin school, was in a romantic relationship with a Leaving Certificate student during the summer of 2018. It is further alleged that she and the student exchanged messages on the social media app Snapchat on a daily basis from June 14th to June 20th, 2018, while he was sitting his Leaving Certificate examinations and subsequently until August 14th, while he awaited his results. The teacher denies these allegations. The director of the Teaching Council also alleges that the teacher had a sexual encounter with the student on a date unknown in early August 2018, to which the teacher has admitted. READ MORE Under cross-examination by Eoghan Cole SC, for the teacher, her ex-partner alleged that the teacher cut the wires to security cameras at their home so that he could not see the student coming to the property, which he said neighbours told him they saw. He also said that the teacher damaged the handles of doors in their home, which he reported to the gardaí, and that she set up a fake account on a dating app from which she messaged him. He also said that he considered the Snapchat messages from the teacher to the student as amounting to grooming. Mr Cole provided evidence of email exchanges between the witness and the teacher from May 2019, involving the payment of bills. The witness made threats that he would put pressure on the Teaching Council and the Board of Management of the school and indicated he would organise a rally outside the school. 'You are evil and greedy. What goes around comes around,' he wrote in one email. The witness responded: 'You must remember things were difficult in the house, I was trying to buy her share in the house, there was bitterness and acrimony.' Mr Cole also put it to him that he had not been consistent regarding the dates he attributed to certain incidents in written statements he provided to the Teaching Council. The incidents included an alleged conversation between the teacher and her ex-partner in which he alleged that she admitted on the day she returned from a post Leaving Cert results trip organised by the school that she spent that night with the student. Mr Cole, who repeated the denial of the teacher that this conversation took place, further put it to the witness that his lack of consistency regarding the dates when these events took place was a basis for contending that they did not take place. The witness replied that the events did take place but that he could not be certain regarding some dates. Further evidence of the emotional toll of the inquiry became apparent when another former colleague of the teacher at the west Dublin school, and who was 'quite' close to her, gave evidence. The witness, along with another colleague who gave evidence on Wednesday, were told in October 2018 by the teacher's then partner that the teacher was or had been having an affair with the student. The witness recalled how she and her colleague then phoned the teacher from a car outside the school building. 'We were concerned for [the teacher's first name]. She answered but she was quite incoherent,' the witness said, and who after trying to compose herself before the panel, was allowed to leave the room for a time, before resuming her evidence. The chairman, Fergal McCarthy, reassured the witness: 'We understand how emotionally charged this is.' The witness, whose relationship with the teacher was now 'over', further outlined how she and her colleague, after finding out that the teacher had not informed the principal of the sexual encounter with the student in early August 2018, went to the principal with this information. 'We couldn't sit on the information, we thought we'd get into trouble. We were very naive as regards whether he was still a student in the school,' she said. The inquiry continues on Friday.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
US government asks court to detain George Gibney until Irish extradition case is concluded
Former Irish national team swimming coach, George Gibney , was facing such serious criminal charges in Ireland he had an incentive to flee if granted bail and should remain in custody pending his extradition, the United States attorney for the Middle District of Florida has said. In a submission to the United States district court in Orlando, Gregory W Kehoe has urged the court to deny Gibney (77) access to bail as 'he cannot meet his burden of showing that he poses no risk of flight or danger to the community'. Gibney (77) was arrested in Florida on Tuesday on foot of an extradition request from Ireland, where he is facing 78 charges or indecent assault, and one charge of attempted rape. The alleged victims were aged between eight and 14 or 15 years when they say they were abused by Gibney, who was their swimming coach in South Dublin at different times between 1971 and 1981. 'Gibney is a flight risk and a danger to the community,' said the legal submission, obtained by The Irish Times, seeking his remand in custody in Florida until the extradition request has been full disposed of. 'As an initial matter, Gibney is alleged to have sexually assaulted at least four minor girls, abusing his authority as their swimming coach, over a period of several years. The seriousness of the offences for which Gibney is charged in Ireland heightens his risk of flight.' READ MORE George Gibney: why did it take decades for the alleged sexual abuser to face new charges? Listen | 19:02 George Gibney was arrested on Tuesday in Florida after a Garda request was made to the US State Department to extradite him to Ireland to face charges relating to alleged historical child sex 77-year-old former swim coach, who avoided trial on sexual abuse charges in 1994 after successfully challenging his prosecution in the High Court, is now accused of 78 counts of indecent assault and one count of attempted rape relating to four girls; and the alleged attempted rape of one of the four were minors, aged between eight and 15, and were coached by made complaints to the Garda between 2020 and 2022 after the BBC and Second Captains podcast Where is George Gibney? was aired in why did it take over 30 years for Gibney to face fresh charges - and what happens next?Irish Times crime and security editor Conor Lally explains the by Bernice Harrison. Produced by Declan Conlon It said, in the case of elderly suspects facing extradition, their advanced years carries an additional incentive to flee in a bid to avoid justice. 'This is particularly true given that Gibney is more than 70 years old and thus faces the real prospect of spending the remainder of his life in jail,' the submission said. It said the circumstances of Gibney previously avoiding going on trial in the Republic – in the 1990s – should also be taken into consideration and, it said, adds to the case for his being denied bail. 'In relocating to the United States after the first set of allegations was dismissed, Gibney was able to evade the investigation of these allegations in Ireland,' Mr Kehoe's submission states.' Accordingly, allowance of bail in any amount would not guarantee the fugitive's presence in court and would invite the possibility of embarrassing the United States in the conduct of its foreign affairs. [ Why has it taken so long to arrest George Gibney in the US to enable extradition? Opens in new window ] 'Either Gibney's danger to the community or flight risk would be enough, standing alone, for the court to deny any forthcoming application for bail.' In 1993 Gibney appeared before the courts in Dublin charged with 27 sexual crimes. However, he took a High Court challenge to his prosecution and was successful. The court effectively ruled, in 1994, the allegations were too old, and many details too vague, to warrant a prosecution. Gibney left Ireland, settling in the US in 1995, and remained there for the past 30 years, residing in Florida in recent years. However, between 2020 and 2022 the BBC published a podcast, Where is George Gibney? It prompted the four women now accusing him to come forward and give statements to the Garda. A fresh criminal investigation was launched, with the DPP directing in May, 2023, he should face 79 charges. Last October the Irish embassy in Washington formally made a request to the US authorities to arrest Gibney for the purpose of extraditing to the Republic to stand trial. He was detained by US marshals in Florida on Tuesday and remains in custody there.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Leslie Buckley questions way that corporate enforcer investigated INM saga
Former Independent News & Media (INM) chairman Leslie Buckley has hit out at the State's corporate watchdog after it quietly closed the file on long inquiries into the governance scandal in the company. The Corporate Enforcement Authority (CEA), led by chief executive Ian Drennan, on Thursday ended 12 months of silence on a High Court report into INM, now Mediahuis Ireland , by saying it had resolved not to take enforcement action over the affair. At issue was an unlawful breach of company data relating to 19 named individuals, among them journalists and former company officials. Some had come into conflict with the main INM shareholder at the time, Denis O'Brien. Mr Buckley was a close business associate of Mr O'Brien and represented his interests as chairman of INM. Mr Buckley said there were 'serious questions' over the investigation because the CEA's predecessor – the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement (ODCE) – heard only one side of the story before seeking the High Court inspection. READ MORE 'It is regrettable that the director did not offer me the opportunity of a meeting or an interview prior to initiating the High Court inspection process,' Mr Buckley said in response to questions from The Irish Times about the CEA decision. [ Leslie Buckley files court action against Allianz Opens in new window ] 'This is a highly questionable approach, to say the least, from an organisation that holds itself out as a custodian of good corporate practice.' INM was the publisher of the Irish Independent and Sunday Independent, among other titles. The affair was highly damaging to its reputation, culminating in IMM's takeover by Mediahuis of Belgium in 2019. INM blamed Mr Buckley for the affair and started court action against him but he always denied any wrongdoing. His statement said the then ODCE never met him before seeking the inspection, but met with former INM chief executive Robert Pitt and former chief financial officer Ryan Preston. The CEA did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Mr Buckley's remarks. 'I was not afforded an opportunity to meet with the ODCE in relation to that or any other matters, so the ODCE did not hear both sides of the story,' Mr Buckley said. 'Had the director done so, that may have given him pause for thought. The ODCE may well have received advice not to proceed with a High Court-appointed inspection process and in doing so, saved the taxpayer in excess of €5.6 million and €40 million overall in legal costs.' Senior counsel Seán Gillane and UK solicitor Richard Fleck were appointed in 2018 by then High Court president, Mr Justice Peter Kelly, to investigate INM after confidential disclosures from Mr Pitt and Mr Preston. The court was told INM backup computer tapes went to third parties for 'data interrogation' relating to 19 people. Among them were journalists Sam Smyth, Brendan O'Connor and Maeve Sheehan, and former INM chief executive Vincent Crowley. The 19 also included two Moriarty Tribunal barristers during its investigation into the award to Mr O'Brien of the State's second mobile phone licence 30 years ago. The inspectors made their final report last July, saying 'technical breaches of the Data Protection Acts by INM were established' and that inside information was disclosed to Mr O'Brien by Mr Buckley. However, they found such matters did not amount to the affairs of INM being conducted in breach of the Companies Acts. They said it would not be appropriate to 'speculate' on how the interrogation of data came to include the 19 names. Mr Drennan's office published the report on July 31st, 2024. But in the months since then it repeatedly declined to say what action, if any, would be taken on foot of the conclusions. The CEA finally set out its stance on Thursday in its 2024 annual report: 'Having considered the matter with great care and deliberation, the CEA ultimately determined that enforcement action will not be taken arising from the report.' There was no comment from Mediahuis Ireland. Mr O'Brien's spokesman also declined to comment.
