logo
US Allies Stage War Games Near China

US Allies Stage War Games Near China

Miami Herald04-06-2025
Australia and Japan—both United States allies in the Indo-Pacific region—held a joint military exercise in the East China Sea, where China has conducted controversial activities.
Newsweek has contacted the Chinese defense and foreign ministries for comment by email.
Both Canberra and Tokyo are members of the U.S.-led strategic alignment known as the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad), which coordinates on regional security to counter China. Beijing has criticized the informal grouping, accusing it of fueling regional tensions.
In the East China Sea, China has maintained a Coast Guard presence near a disputed islet group administered by Japan. Tokyo has also lodged protests over a suspected Chinese fossil-fuel facility in the area, claiming it violates a bilateral agreement on gas field development.
The Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force announced on Tuesday that its destroyer JS Haguro conducted a bilateral exercise with the Australian destroyer HMAS Sydney in the East China Sea on Sunday, reinforcing their cooperation to promote a free and open Indo-Pacific region.
Australia is Japan's "special strategic partner," the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force said, highlighting their shared universal values and strategic security interests. It added that it will deepen cooperation with the Royal Australian Navy to promote peace, security, and stability.
Two days after the drill, the Australian warship made a port call at Japan's Yokosuka naval base, according to photos shared by a ship spotter. The vessel visited the base—located near Tokyo—for replenishment and is scheduled to depart on June 14, local media reported.
The Australian Defense Force said the Sydney is on a three-month-long mission—Regional Presence Deployment 25-2—in the Indo-Pacific region, demonstrating the South Pacific country's "ongoing commitment to supporting regional security and stability."
During the deployment, which is scheduled to conclude next month, the Australian warship monitored North Korea's illicit maritime activities—banned under United Nations Security Council resolutions—in waters around Japan last month, the Japanese Foreign Ministry said.
The Australian Defense Force said the United Nations sanctions limit North Korea's imports of refined petroleum and crude oil, as well as its exports of coal, adding that they support the goal of achieving North Korea's "complete, verifiable, and irreversible denuclearization."
The Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force said on Tuesday: "The Self Defense Fleet maintains readiness and contributes to the peace and stability of the Indo-Pacific region, not only for the defense of Japan but also for the realization of a 'Free and Open Indo-Pacific' in cooperation with allied and like-minded navies."
The Australian Defense Force said on May 1: "Australia and its partners share a commitment to upholding the right to freedom of navigation and overflight, other lawful uses of the sea and international airspace, and other maritime rights under international law, particularly in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea."
It remains to be seen how China will respond to the Australian military presence in the East China Sea. The development comes after the Chinese navy circumnavigated Australia.
Related Articles
Exotic Mushrooms Had 'More Flavor,' Woman Who Poisoned Family Tells CourtNetflix Password Theft Leads To Payback Across the World: 'VPN'd to Australia'China Warns US Ally Over Plan To Take Back Strategic PortMap Shows US Command Ship in Pacific Amid China Navy Challenge
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China Reveals Major Boost to Aircraft-Carrier Force
China Reveals Major Boost to Aircraft-Carrier Force

Newsweek

timea few seconds ago

  • Newsweek

China Reveals Major Boost to Aircraft-Carrier Force

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Chinese media reported that the number of fighter pilots recruited for the country's aircraft-carrier fleet hit a record high this year, as part of the East Asian power's rapid naval buildup. Newsweek has reached out to the Chinese Defense Ministry for further comment via email. Why It Matters China operates the world's largest navy by hull count, with over 370 ships and submarines in service, including two aircraft carriers. In June, both aircraft carriers were simultaneously deployed to the broader Western Pacific, demonstrating the country's growing naval power. While the United States continues to possess the world's largest aircraft carrier fleet—with 11 operational vessels—the Chinese navy is set to commission its third and most-advanced aircraft carrier, with reported plans to build the nation's first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier. File photo: The Chinese aircraft carrier CNS "Shandong" sails into Hong Kong on July 3, 2025. File photo: The Chinese aircraft carrier CNS "Shandong" sails into Hong Kong on July 3, 2025. Chan Long Hei/AP Photo What To Know China Central Television reported on Friday that the People's Liberation Army Navy—the official name of the Chinese navy—has recently concluded its pilot recruitment for the year. The intake includes high school graduates, students from naval aviation schools, and recent bachelor's and master's degree graduates from both military and civilian universities, the report said. It described the recruitment sources as "increasingly diverse and optimized." The report said that both the number of candidates meeting the standards for carrier-based fighter pilots and the proportion of qualified applicants have reached record levels. While the report did not provide exact figures, it added that "tens of thousands of young students" across China had "enthusiastically" signed up for naval pilot recruitment, significantly expanding the recruitment and selection base compared to previous years. Citing a military expert, Chinese state media Global Times said that the recruitment performance aligned with the development of the country's carrier-based aircraft, referring to the increasing variety and number of planes designed to operate from aircraft carriers. Last November, the Chinese military officially unveiled two carrier-based fighter jets—the J-15T and the J-15D. Unlike the original J-15 variant, the T model is capable of taking off from all three Chinese aircraft carriers, which use two different aircraft launching systems. Meanwhile, the D variant of the J-15 family is designed to conduct electronic warfare missions, matching its U.S. counterpart—the EA-18G Growler electronic warfare aircraft. The Chinese military is also developing a stealth carrier-based fighter aircraft as one of the variants of the J-35 family, alongside the J-35A, which is designed for the nation's air force. Chinese J-15 carrier-based fighter jets are displayed during the open event of the aircraft carrier CNS "Shandong" in Hong Kong on July 3, 2025. Chinese J-15 carrier-based fighter jets are displayed during the open event of the aircraft carrier CNS "Shandong" in Hong Kong on July 3, 2025. Dai Menglan/China News Service/VCG via AP What People Are Saying Chinese military affairs expert Fu Qianshao told the Global Times on Friday: "The fact that pilot recruitments have reached a new high shows that the intake is steadily increasing, which aligns with the development trend of China's carrier-based aircraft." The Pentagon commented in its report on Chinese military power: "In 2023, the [People's Liberation Army] transferred the majority of [People's Liberation Army Navy] land-based fighter and bomber aircraft, air defense, and airfield units to the [People's Liberation Army Air Force] to refocus [People's Liberation Army Navy] efforts on developing a carrier-based aviation force." What Happens Next Chinese pilots assigned to carrier-based aviation units will need to be capable of both flying aircraft and operating electronic warfare systems in the future, the Global Times reported—raising the bar for professional skills and expanding the demand for talent across disciplines.

Chart Reveals True Cost of Trump's Tariffs
Chart Reveals True Cost of Trump's Tariffs

Newsweek

time30 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Chart Reveals True Cost of Trump's Tariffs

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Consumer inflation data has yet to reveal any major cost effects of President Donald Trump's trade policies, leading many to downgrade their predictions of a tariff-induced price spiral in the near future. But a working paper, entitled "Tracking the Short-Run Price Impact of U.S. Tariffs," has charted those that the administration's trade policies have already affected. One of its authors told Newsweek that the impacts, though delayed for now, may begin to significantly impact household budgets later this year. Newsweek reached out to the Commerce Department and the Council of Economic Advisers via email outside of regular hours for comment. Why It Matters The so far muted impact of tariffs on inflation and consumer spending has puzzled certain economists and led political commentators, notably talk show host Bill Maher, to recant their previous criticisms of the president's economic strategies. Citing this fact, and the over $100 billion in tax revenue tariffs have accrued, the administration has declared these to be both harmless and a resounding success for the United States economy and its global trade leverage. However, many experts still caution that the full effects of tariffs will be gradual rather than immediate. Due to a range of interrelated factors—inventory buffers, supply chain adjustments and amendments to announced or threatened duties—they argue that the costs to the American consumer will surface more clearly over time. What To Know The paper was authored by Alberto Cavallo of Harvard University, alongside Paola Llamas and Franco Vazquez of Universidad de San Andrés. As shown on the chart below, based on data from the four largest retailers in the U.S., the trio found that the price of imported goods has risen sharply since February. Domestic goods also saw an increase, albeit "more gradual and steady," which the authors said was due to the reliance of even U.S.-made products on imported components subject to new tariffs. A chart showing how prices of imported and domestic goods have changed amid President Trump's tariff announcements, from the working paper entitled "Tracking the Short-Run Price Impact of U.S. Tariffs." A chart showing how prices of imported and domestic goods have changed amid President Trump's tariff announcements, from the working paper entitled "Tracking the Short-Run Price Impact of U.S. Tariffs." Albert Cavallo, Paola Llamas, Franco Vazquez "We observed rapid price responses to trade war and tariff-related news, with average price increases of about 3 percent for imported products since February," said Alberto Cavallo, a professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School. "These increases were largely driven by goods from China, particularly in categories such as household goods, furniture, and electronics." However, Cavallo told Newsweek that the retail price impacts have so far remained modest when compared with the actual size of the tariffs that were announced over this period. Despite confusing some, Cavallo said this is in line with trends observed during the U.S.-China trade war in 2018-2019, when "prices at the border rose quickly, but pass-through to retail prices was slow and uneven." "A similar dynamic appears to be unfolding now," he said. "U.S. firms are experiencing higher import costs, as suggested by stable or rising import prices, but have not yet passed most of these increases on to consumers." The researchers identified several reasons why higher import costs may not have yet translated into higher prices. These include retailers "front-running" or stocking up on inventory ahead of a scheduled tariff hike, the uncertainty surrounding the duration and level of the tariffs that have been subject to constant revision and negotiation, as well as the potentially disastrous "consumer backlash" companies could face if they immediately raised prices to mitigate higher import costs. "The high level of uncertainty is likely leading firms to delay price adjustments. Overall, we expect the passthrough to retail prices to be gradual and uneven," Cavallo said, adding that firms are likely to pass on costs to consumers "gradually over time, which means that the inflation rate can be higher for several months." What People Are Saying White House economic adviser Stephen Miran, earlier this month on Fox News: "What we did is we looked at every category in the inflation what we find imported goods are actually getting cheaper." Alberto Cavallo, Thomas S. Murphy Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School, told Newsweek: "As the graph shows, each time there was news suggesting rising trade tensions, prices tended to increase. When the news pointed to easing tensions (e.g., with the China pause), prices generally stabilized or declined. So I do expect announcements about trade deals to continue influencing prices. Whether that accelerates passthrough to consumers will depend on how high and how long-lasting the tariffs are expected to be." What Happens Next As Cavallo noted, trade deals recently signed and the prospect of a more fully-fledged agreement with China could lessen the overall impact of tariffs on imported goods prices. However, alongside these negotiations, Trump has continued to threaten higher tariffs on countries such as Brazil, while also stating that the global baseline rate on countries unable to secure a deal could rise to between 15 and 20 percent.

Jeffrey Epstein Had 'Dirt' on Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Brother Says
Jeffrey Epstein Had 'Dirt' on Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Brother Says

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Jeffrey Epstein Had 'Dirt' on Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Brother Says

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Jeffrey Epstein said he had "dirt" on President Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton serious enough that it could have canceled the 2016 presidential election if revealed publicly, according to his brother. Mark Epstein said he was never told what the "dirt" was and does not have any evidence linking Trump to Jeffrey Epstein's criminal sexual abuse and trafficking of young girls. Newsweek contacted the White House and Hillary Clinton's office out of office hours for comment. Why It Matters Trump has experienced a widespread backlash, including from parts of his MAGA base, since a memo by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI in July stated there was no evidence of a blackmail plot by Jeffrey Epstein and there would be no new charges against the financier's associates. Some commentators have suggested they were led to believe there would be major new revelations following public statements from Trump administration officials, including Attorney General Pam Bondi. U.S. President Donald Trump talks to the media at Trump Turnberry golf club in Scotland on July 28, 2025. U.S. President Donald Trump talks to the media at Trump Turnberry golf club in Scotland on July 28, to Know Mark Epstein told BBC Newsnight: "In the 2016 election, we were talking about the election and Jeffrey told me that if he said what he knew about the candidates, they would have to cancel the election." Trump and Hillary Clinton were the candidates for the Republicans and the Democrats, respectively, in 2016. Trump and Hillary Clinton's husband, former President Bill Clinton, have always denied knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal sexual abuse of minors. Newsweek is unable to verify Mark Epstein's claims. Mark Epstein gave an interview to the BBC's Newsnight in the U.K. on Friday, July 25, in which he argued the New York financier did not commit suicide in his jail cell in 2019, contrary to the official decision by Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Barbara Sampson. He was then asked whether he thought Jeffrey Epstein "knew things about powerful people," by interviewer Matt Chorley. "Absolutely," he replied, "I believe so, yes. Jeffrey mentioned he had dirt on people. He didn't tell me what he knew. But he led me to believe that he had dirt on people. "In the 2016 election, we were talking about the election and Jeffrey told me that if he said what he knew about the candidates, they would have to cancel the election. "That's a quote, that's exactly what he told me. He said, 'If I said what I knew about the candidates, they'd have to cancel the election.' He didn't tell me what he knew. But that's what he said." Chorley suggested he did not have "any evidence to place Donald Trump in the category of offense that your brother was accused of." "I have no evidence of that, no," Mark Epstein replied. "I can neither confirm nor deny that. I wasn't there, I didn't hang out with them in those days." However, he said Trump and Jeffrey Epstein "were very close, they used to fly in each other's planes. "Donald Trump was in Jeffrey's office many times and there's witnesses that could point that, could testify that they saw Trump in Jeffrey's office. So, I don't know why he said he never was in Jeffrey's office. That was a just blatant lie. I couldn't believe he actually said that because it's so provable that he was there." The White House has denied that Trump visited Jeffrey Epstein in his office, CNN reported. Donald Trump's Jeffrey Epstein Denials Quoted by PBS, White House communications director Steven Cheung said in a statement last week: "The fact is that the president kicked him [Jeffrey Epstein] out of his club for being a creep." And in Scotland on Monday, Trump told journalists he did not visit Epstein's private island, Little St. James: "I never had the privilege of going to his island, and I did turn it down, but a lot of people in Palm Beach were invited to his island. "In one of my very good moments, I turned it down. I didn't want to go to his island." In 2019, after Jeffrey Epstein was arrested by the FBI, Trump said he "knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him." Quoted by Sky News, he added: "I had a falling out with him. I haven't spoken to him in 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you." "The reason doesn't make any difference, frankly," he said. In a 2002 interview with New York magazine, Trump said: "I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. "It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it—Jeffrey enjoys his social life." The DOJ and FBI Memo The DOJ and FBI memo released in July referenced "300 gigabytes of data and physical evidence" gathered during the Trump administration's review of the Epstein case. "Only a fraction of this material would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial," the memo read, "as the seal served only to protect victims and did not expose any additional third-parties to allegations of illegal wrongdoing. "Through this review, we found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials and will not permit the release of child pornography. This systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list.' "There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. "We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties." Jeffrey Epstein's Death in Jail Jeffrey Epstein's death was officially ruled a suicide, but there have long been questions over whether there could have been foul play. In July, the DOJ released a tape recording of the camera in his prison cell leading to allegations there were some missing minutes, three according to an examination of the metadata by Wired. Mark Epstein said that on first learning his brother was dead, he assumed it was a suicide, but began to have doubts after two pathologists told him it could have been murder. "The thing I don't want to see," he told Newsnight, "I don't want to see people just writing this off as a suicide, which it wasn't." He said the pathologists "both came out of the autopsy saying they couldn't call it a suicide because it looked too much like a homicide. And that doesn't appear in any of the records or nobody talks about that—that the two pathologists, two highly qualified pathologists, say this looks more like a murder." "It was never investigated as a potential homicide because if it was there was a lot of things they should have done that were not done," he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store