U.S. forces deploy anti-ship missiles in Philippines and stage live-fire drills near China hotspots
By JIM GOMEZ AND JOEAL CALUPITAN
The U.S. military has deployed an anti-ship missile launcher for the first time on Batan Island in the Philippines, as Marines unloaded the high-precision weapon on the northern tip of the archipelago, just a sea border away from Taiwan.
U.S. and Philippine forces separately unleashed a barrage of missile and artillery fire that shot down several drones acting as hostile aircraft in live-fire drills on Sunday in Zambales province facing the disputed South China Sea.
The mock battle scenarios over the weekend in the annual Balikatan exercises between the U.S. and its oldest treaty ally in Asia, the Philippines, not only simulated real-life war. They were also staged near major geopolitical hotspots, which have become delicate frontlines in the regional rivalry between China and the U.S. under former President Joe Biden and now Donald Trump.
About 9,000 American and 5,000 Filipino military personnel took part in the combat maneuvers. At least 260 Australian personnel also joined, with smaller observer delegations from Japan and other countries.
China has fiercely opposed the combat drills as provocative. Its aircraft carrier group sailed by a few days earlier near Batanes, where the U.S. military had deployed the Navy Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System on Saturday on Batan near the Bashi Channel just south of Taiwan, a critical trade and military route that the U.S. and Chinese militaries have tried to gain strategic control of.
"The introduction of NMESIS into the first island chain for sea denial, sea control is another step in our force design journey,' U.S. Marine Lt. Gen. Michael Cederholm told a small group of journalists, including from The Associated Press, who were invited to witness the transport of the missile system aboard a C-130 Air Force aircraft to Batanes.
'We're not here practicing a war plan,' said Cederholm. 'We're practicing for the defense of the Philippines.'
The U.S. and the Philippines have denied the annual combat maneuvers — which both said would focus on a 'full-scale battle scenario' this year — were aimed at China or any adversary. The lines between what's mock and real, however, have been at times murky.
Asked if U.S. forces would pull out the anti-ship missile system from Batanes after the combat drills, Cederholm did not reply clearly.
'We don't broadcast when we're going in, when we're coming out and how long things are going to stay,' Cederholm said. 'All I'll say is we're here at the invitation and with the support of the Philippine government.'
"But I'm glad it's here,' he said.
Additionally, China had repeatedly expressed its strong opposition to the U.S. Army deployment last year of a mid-range missile system in the Philippines for joint exercises.
The U.S. Army launcher with at least 16 Standard Missile-6 and the Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles was repositioned in January from an international airport in northern Laoag city to a northwestern coastal area facing the Scarborough Shoal, where China's forces have used water cannons and dangerous blocking maneuvers against Philippine coast guard and fishery ships and fired flares near Manila's patrol planes, a Philippine official then told The AP.
The official spoke on condition of anonymity due to a lack of authority to discuss the delicate issue publicly.
Tomahawk missiles can travel over 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers), which places China within their target range.
During the combat exercises from April 21 to May 9, American and Filipino forces will also practice jointly defending Philippine islands by repelling hostile forces attempting to assault from the sea in the western Philippine province of Palawan, which faces the South China Sea, and in northern Cagayan province near Batanes.
Philippine Brig. Gen. Michael Logico said the combat exercises were crucial to strengthening deterrence against aggression in the Bashi Channel.
"A peaceful region can only be maintained through a proper balance of strength between opposing forces until such time that … both countries decide that it's not going to be worth it to fight over this area,' Logico said.
Early this month, the Chinese military staged largescale drills in the waters around Taiwan and renewed a warning to the self-ruled democracy not to seek independence. Chinese navy, air, ground and rocket forces staged the drills.
The Philippines used to host two of the largest U.S. Navy and Air Force bases outside the American mainland. The bases were shut down in the early 1990s after the Philippine Senate rejected an extension, but American forces returned for large-scale combat exercises with Filipino troops under a 1999 agreement.
Cederholm cited the tens of thousands of U.S. military personnel, along with Filipino scouts, buried in the vast American cemetery in Manila as proof of Washington's commitment to help defend the Philippines beyond the U.S. bases era in the Philippines.
"We take our treaty obligations very seriously,' Cederholm said.
Associated Press journalist Aaron Favila contributed to this report.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Japan, after 101 Tough Days, Learns a Hard Lesson about U.S. Alliance
It was only five months ago that President Donald Trump heralded the 'fantastic relationship' between the United States and Japan, as he sat alongside Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, the first Asian leader to visit him in his second stint in the White House. This week, Ishiba was again first in line – but not in a good way. He became the first foreign leader to receive a scathing letter from the U.S. president, threatening steep new tariffs if Tokyo didn't meet Trump's new deadline for a trade deal. The letter stunned some officials in Japan, a security ally for seven decades and a key partner in U.S. efforts to counter an increasingly assertive China. But the deadlocked trade negotiations have frustrated the American president – who recently called Japan 'so spoiled.' Now, Tokyo is learning that being one of Washington's best friends doesn't carry much sway in Trump's second term, analysts say. 'They're coming to a very hard realization that Japan is not special enough to Trump,' said Mireya Solís, director of the Center for Asia Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution. 'At the end of the day, when Trump sees deficits, he's not thinking, 'This is my close security partner.' He sees deficits.' It seemed like Japan was on good footing when it became one of the first countries to begin negotiations, in April. Washington wanted to strike a swift deal with Tokyo to use as leverage against China, which runs its biggest trade deficit, analysts say. Trump even showed up to the first round of talks and gave Japan's trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa a signed red 'Make America Great Again' cap, which Akazawa wore in the Oval Office as he posed for a photo with two thumbs up. 'A Great Honor to have just met with the Japanese Delegation on Trade. Big Progress!' he wrote on Truth Social after speaking with Akazawa. But there was not much progress at all. Japan did not readily give in to the Trump administration's demands, not least because of the domestic political considerations that constrained Ishiba's administration from making concessions on key industries, such as autos, steel and rice. Ishiba faces a tough parliamentary election on July 20 that could cost the ruling party its majority in the upper house – and Ishiba his premiership. Japanese officials hoped Trump would carve out a tariff-rate quota, like he did for some allies during his first term. But the president quickly made it clear no one would be exempt this time around – not even Japan. 'Japan is being treated the same as other Asian nations, and that is not making policymakers here happy,' said Tokuko Shironitta, Japan country director at the Asia Group, a consultancy. As trade talks dragged on, Ishiba repeatedly stressed his nation's unique standing as the largest foreign investor in the United States since 2019, creating 1 million jobs. After all, touting those investments had worked with Trump before. This time, it hasn't resonated. 'It feels like we're still in a dense fog,' Akazawa told reporters on June 10. They've now completed seven rounds of talks. Hiroshi Oe, former chief trade negotiator who worked on the Trans-Pacific Partnership deal with the Obama administration, said Trump is making 'even more hard-line' demands than expected. 'Unfortunately, they no longer seem to operate under the assumption that they should treat [Japan] with any special consideration.' Japanese officials may have underestimated Trump's deep-seated skepticism toward the country and relied too heavily on good will, experts say. Some Japanese newspapers and prominent thinkers are now calling on Japan to reconsider its tactics. 'I believe this was essentially a strategic mistake on the part of the Japanese government and the Ishiba administration,' said Kenji Minemura, senior research fellow on Japanese foreign policy at the Canon Institute for Global Studies, in Tokyo. 'We're now in a completely different phase from the first Trump administration. The U.S. wants different things now.' Some analysts suspect this shift may reflect how Trump has felt about Japan all along. He developed an antipathy toward Japan when, as a real estate developer in the 1980s, he witnessed Japan's rise to become the world's second-largest economy and an existential threat to the U.S.'s economic dominance. That was tempered in his first term, when former prime minister Shinzo Abe forged a personal friendship with Trump. Now, in the absence of Abe, who was assassinated in 2022, Tokyo no longer has that bridge. 'He's from the Japan-bashing generation,' Minemura said. 'That's why Trump's inherent suspicion of Japan has come back to the surface.' Trump's attacks on Japan don't seem to be letting up anytime soon. In Tokyo, there are concerns that the allies are locked in a trade fight when they should instead be banding together, given security threats in the region. 'When our relations are sour, or seem to be sour from other countries' [view], I think that would only encourage Russia, North Korea and China,' said Ichiro Fujisaki, former Japanese ambassador to the United States. Tokyo must find a way to negotiate with Trump, even if a perfect 'win-win' solution is not possible. The resolution, Fujisaki said, may be one where 'the U.S. win is a capital-letter 'Win,' and our win is a small-letter 'win.'' Such a resolution has proved elusive. Trump has been fixated on two matters with Japan: Autos and rice. These are also the two areas where Tokyo isn't willing to budge. 'Japan really doesn't have that many concessions to offer and the ones that it could offer, they're very reluctant to grant,' said Marcel Thieliant, Singapore-based head of Asia-Pacific research at Capital Economics. Trump has repeatedly complained about the lack of American-made cars entering Japan compared to the volume of Japanese cars moving in the other direction. In 2024, Japan exported 1.4 million cars to the United States and imported just 16,074, Japanese government figures show. Japanese auto experts say U.S. cars have long been unpopular in Japan, because they are too big for its narrow roads and parking spaces. The auto industry is the backbone of Japan's economy, and negotiators have been unwilling to bend on car tariffs. Japan may revisit auto safety standards that the U.S. says are making it harder for its imports to enter Japan. But it has so far unsuccessfully pushed the U.S. to roll back the 25 percent tariffs on cars and auto parts. Rice is also a complicated issue for Japan, partly because of an affection for farming, partly because of taste. The homegrown Japonica grain – known for its plump, round shape and natural sweetness – has been long cherished in Japan. It also becomes soft and sticky when cooked, and is considered an ideal grain for traditional Japanese foods such as sushi and rice balls. But for Trump, rice has come to symbolize Japan's unfair trade barriers, experts say. 'Rice is the easiest way for him [Trump] to show that Japan has a closed market. It's symbolic,' said Oe, the former Japanese negotiator, who previously handled U.S.-Japan agricultural talks. Trump has indeed been hammering this point home. 'Japan, our friend, charges us 700 percent [on rice], but that's because they don't want us selling rice and other [products],' Trump said during a tariff announcement on April 2. Japanese officials say that's not entirely accurate. Under a World Trade Organization agreement, Japan has established a 'minimum access' system for rice imports, allowing up to 770,000 tons of rice to enter tax-free. The United States is the biggest exporter of rice to Japan, and the vast majority of it enters tax-free, trade statistics show. Another factor helping open up Japan's rice market: A recent rice shortage that has sent prices soaring had forced Japan to accept more imported grain. Still, dramatically increasing imports could leave farmers vulnerable to competition and draw the ire of the powerful agriculture lobby, making it politically difficult for Ishiba to move from his stance that protecting Japanese rice is a matter of 'national interest,' experts say. But some say it may be time to reconsider that position, given the rice crisis and the stalled trade talks. Because foreign rice is cheaper, increasing imports can help more lower-income families as they cope with higher prices – and with proper messaging, voters may understand, analysts say. 'I believe it actually serves the national interest' to accept more U.S. rice, Oe said. 'It doesn't undermine Japan's position – in fact, it can create a win-win outcome for both Japan and its partners.'
Japan Today
11 hours ago
- Japan Today
Trump threatens to revoke Rosie O'Donnell's U.S. citizenship
FILE PHOTO: Presenter Rosie O'Donnell speaks on stage about Madonna during the 30th annual GLAAD awards ceremony in New York City, New York, U.S., May 4, 2019. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz/File Photo U.S. President Donald Trump on Saturday said he might revoke talk show host Rosie O'Donnell's U.S. citizenship after she criticized his administration's handling of weather forecasting agencies in the wake of the deadly Texas floods, the latest salvo in a years-long feud the two have waged over social media. "Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, invoking a deportation rationale the administration has used in attempts to remove foreign-born protesters from the country. "She is a Threat to Humanity, and should remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland, if they want her. GOD BLESS AMERICA!," he added. Under U.S. law, a president cannot revoke the citizenship of an American born in the United States. O'Donnell was born in New York state. O'Donnell, a longtime target of Trump's insults and jabs, moved to Ireland earlier this year with her 12-year-old son after the start of the president's second term. She said in a March TikTok video that she would return to the U.S. "when it is safe for all citizens to have equal rights there in America." O'Donnell responded to Trump's threat in two posts on her Instagram account, saying that the U.S. president opposes her because she "stands in direct opposition with all he represents." Trump's disdain for O'Donnell dates back to 2006 when O'Donnell, a comedian and host on The View at the time, mocked Trump over his handling of a controversy concerning a winner of the Miss USA pageant, which Trump had owned. Trump's latest jab at O'Donnell seemed to be in response to a TikTok video she posted this month mourning the 119 deaths in the July 4 floods in Texas and blaming Trump's widespread cuts to environmental and science agencies involved in forecasting major natural disasters. "What a horror story in Texas," O'Donnell said in the video. "And you know, when the president guts all the early warning systems and the weathering forecast abilities of the government, these are the results that we're gonna start to see on a daily basis." The Trump administration, as well as local and state officials, have faced mounting questions over whether more could have been done to protect and warn residents ahead of the Texas flooding, which struck with astonishing speed in the pre-dawn hours of the U.S. Independence Day holiday on July 4 and killed at least 120, including dozens of children. Trump on Friday visited Texas and defended the government's response to the disaster, saying his agencies "did an incredible job under the circumstances." © Thomson Reuters 2025.
Yomiuri Shimbun
a day ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
State Department Lays Off over 1,300 Employees under Trump Administration Plan
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. State Department fired more than 1,300 employees on Friday in line with a dramatic reorganization plan from the Trump administration that critics say will damage America's global leadership and efforts to counter threats abroad. The department sent layoff notices to 1,107 civil servants and 246 foreign service officers with assignments in the United States, according to a senior department official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss personnel matters. Notices said positions were being 'abolished' and the employees would lose access to State Department headquarters in Washington and their email and shared drives by 5 p.m., according to a copy obtained by The Associated Press. As fired employees packed their belongings, dozens of former colleagues, ambassadors, members of Congress and others spent a warm, humid day protesting outside. Holding signs saying, 'Thank you to America's diplomats' and 'We all deserve better,' they mourned the institutional loss from the cuts and highlighted the personal sacrifice of serving in the foreign service. 'We talk about people in uniform serving. But foreign service officers take an oath of office, just like military officers,' said Anne Bodine, who retired from the State Department in 2011 after serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. 'This is not the way to treat people who served their country and who believe in 'America First.'' While lauded by President Donald Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and their Republican allies as overdue and necessary to make the department leaner and more efficient, the cuts have been roundly criticized by current and former diplomats who say they will weaken U.S. influence and the ability to counter existing and emerging threats abroad. The layoffs are part of big changes to State Department work The Trump administration has pushed to reshape American diplomacy and worked aggressively to shrink the size of the federal government, including mass dismissals driven by the Department of Government Efficiency and moves to dismantle whole departments like the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Education Department. USAID, the six-decade-old foreign assistance agency, was absorbed into the State Department last week after the administration dramatically slashed foreign aid funding. A recent ruling by the Supreme Court cleared the way for the layoffs to start, while lawsuits challenging the legality of the cuts continue to play out. The department had advised staffers Thursday that it would be sending layoff notices to some of them soon. In a May letter notifying Congress about the reorganization, the department said it had just over 18,700 U.S.-based employees and was looking to reduce the workforce by 18% through layoffs and voluntary departures, including deferred resignation programs. 'It's not a consequence of trying to get rid of people. But if you close the bureau, you don't need those positions,' Rubio told reporters Thursday during a visit to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 'Understand that some of these are positions that are being eliminated, not people.' Foreign service officers affected will be placed immediately on administrative leave for 120 days, after which they will formally lose their jobs, according to an internal notice obtained by AP. For most civil servants, the separation period is 60 days, it said. Protesters gather to criticize the job cuts Inside and just outside the State Department, employees spent over an hour applauding their departing colleagues, who got more support — and sometimes hugs — from protesters and others gathered across the street. As speakers took to a bullhorn, people behind them held signs in the shape of gravestones that said 'democracy,' 'human rights' and 'diplomacy.' 'It's just heartbreaking to stand outside these doors right now and see people coming out in tears, because all they wanted to do was serve this country,' said Sen. Andy Kim, a New Jersey Democrat who worked as a civilian adviser for the State Department in Afghanistan during the Obama administration. Robert Blake, who served as a U.S. ambassador under the George W. Bush and Obama administrations, said he came to support his peers at a very 'unjust time.' 'I have a lot of friends who served very loyally and with distinction and who are being fired for nothing to do with their performance,' Blake said. Gordon Duguid, a 31-year veteran of the foreign service, said of the Trump administration: 'They're not looking for people who have the expertise … they just want people who say, 'OK, how high'' to jump. 'That's a recipe for disaster,' he added. The American Foreign Service Association, the union that represents U.S. diplomats, said it opposed the job cuts during 'a moment of great global instability.' 'Losing more diplomatic expertise at this critical global moment is a catastrophic blow to our national interests,' the AFSA said in a statement. 'These layoffs are untethered from merit or mission.' As the layoffs began, paper signs started going up around the State Department. 'Colleagues, if you remain: resist fascism,' said one. An employee who was among those laid off said she printed them about a week ago, when the Supreme Court cleared way for the reductions. The employee spoke to the AP on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation. She worked with about a dozen colleagues to put up the signs. They focused on bathrooms, where there are no security cameras, although others went in more public spaces. 'Nobody wants to feel like these guys can just get away with this,' she said. The State Department is undergoing a big reorganization The State Department is planning to eliminate some divisions tasked with oversight of America's two-decade involvement in Afghanistan, including an office focused on resettling Afghan nationals who worked alongside the U.S. military. Jessica Bradley Rushing, who worked at the Office of the Coordinator for Afghan Relocation Efforts, known as CARE, said she was shocked when she received another dismissal notice Friday after she had already been put on administrative leave in March. 'I spent the entire morning getting updates from my former colleagues at CARE, who were watching this carnage take place within the office,' she said, adding that every person on her team received a notice. 'I never even anticipated that I could be at risk for that because I'm already on administrative leave.' The State Department said the reorganization will affect more than 300 bureaus and offices, as it eliminates divisions it describes as doing unclear or overlapping work. It says Rubio believes 'effective modern diplomacy requires streamlining this bloated bureaucracy.' The letter to Congress was clear that the reorganization is also intended to eliminate programs — particularly those related to refugees and immigration, as well as human rights and democracy promotion — that the Trump administration believes have become ideologically driven in a way that is incompatible with its priorities and policies.
