The US sends third-country deportees to the small African kingdom of Eswatini
The U.S. has already deported eight men to another African nation, South Sudan, after the Supreme Court lifted restrictions on sending people to countries where they have no ties.
In a late-night post on X, Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said the men, who are citizens of Vietnam, Jamaica, Cuba, Yemen and Laos, had arrived in Eswatini on a plane. She said they were all convicted criminals and 'individuals so uniquely barbaric that their home countries refused to take them back.'
There was no immediate comment from Eswatini authorities over any deal to accept third-country deportees or what would happen to them in that country.
The Trump administration has said it is seeking more deals with African nations to take deportees from the U.S. Some have pushed back, with Nigeria saying it is rejecting pressure from the U.S. to take deportees who are citizens of other countries.
The U.S. has also sent hundreds of Venezuelans and others to Costa Rica, El Salvador and Panama.
Eswatini is a country of about 1.2 million people that sits between South Africa and Mozambique. It is one of the world's last remaining absolute monarchies — and the last in Africa — and King Mswati III has ruled by decree since 1986. The country was previously called Swaziland.
Political parties are effectively banned and pro-democracy groups have said for years that Mswati III has crushed any political dissent, sometimes violently.
___
More AP news on the Trump administration: https://apnews.com/hub/donald-trump
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
French bill clears path to return artefacts looted during colonisation
A bill to make it easier for France to return cultural objects taken during the colonial period was presented at a ministerial council in Paris this week by Culture Minister Rachida Dati. Despite a pledge by President Emmanuel Macron in Burkina Faso in 2017, and follow-up reports, only a small number of items have been returned so far. The new bill would allow artefacts to be given back by government decree, without needing a full vote in Parliament each time. It would apply to objects taken from their countries of origin under conditions described as "illicit". A similar bill planned for 2024 was blocked by France's highest administrative court, the Conseil d'Etat, and its review was postponed. On 30 July, the French government said its goal is to speed up restitution. The bill would set out clear rules for what counts as looted, and would cover items acquired between 1815 and 1972. It cites theft, looting or forced transfer as reasons for return. The word "colonisation" is not used, but the references point directly to France's colonial past. France passes law to allow return of Ivorian drum stolen by colonial troops Scientific commission Dati said the bill would apply mostly to African countries, but could be used for objects taken from anywhere. France will be among the first countries to pass such a law, said Catherine Morin-Desailly, a senator and member of the French Senate Culture Committee. "Apart from Belgium so far, such a framework law has not yet seen the light of day," Morin-Desailly told RFI. Asked whether the process would really be faster, she said: "Yes and no". "I'm going to be nuanced because for each object it is also necessary to examine the request and to have a scientific, historical and legal study that allows us to affirm that it is indeed the right object," she explained. What's new in the bill is that objects can only be returned if their acquisition is proven to be illegal. If that hasn't yet been shown, a scientific commission can be set up to help. It would bring together French and international experts to research the object's history and trace its true origin. How an RFI investigation helped return an ancient treasure to Benin "There will be a lot of work [for the] special commission to allow these restitutions. But what is important is that it will avoid specific laws that clutter the parliamentary agenda and make it take time," Morin-Desailly said. She said public attitudes have changed, and that a shift is now possible. "Not all objects from foreign countries were necessarily acquired illicitly," she added. "This is where we will have to look closely." The aim of each return should be either "reparation" or "reappropriation". These terms were not included in the last bill, which was more cautious and referred only to "international relations" or "cultural cooperation". Thousands of requests France has returned only 27 works to African nations in the past six years. This includes 26 royal treasures from Dahomey handed back to Benin in 2021, and one item returned this year from Finland, though it belonged to a French collection. At least 10 countries have filed official requests for thousands of other items, including Algeria, Madagascar and Côte d'Ivoire, based on 2023 data. The new law would allow the principle of "inalienability" to be waived by decree in these cases. That rule normally bars French public museums from giving away state-owned items. Many of the objects are still held in French collections and have never been properly listed or documented. Lack of transparency Experts and lawmakers have criticised the lack of transparency around how these items ended up in France. "France has not yet finished its process of coming to terms with its colonial past," Pierre Ouzoulias, a Communist senator from Hauts-de-Seine and a member of the Senate Culture Committee, said on Wednesday in an interview with France Culture. He wants to see a permanent, independent commission created. 'Titanic' task of finding plundered African art in French museums "It is absolutely essential that these restitutions are carried out with complete transparency," he said, "and that opinions are made public, to assure Parliament and the nation – who own these items – that everything has been done according to the rules and in accordance with a codified code of ethics that will be upheld regardless of future governments." Saskia Cousin, a sociologist and anthropologist at the University of Nanterre, also supports the plan. She has long studied the issue of looted African heritage. Cousin said thousands of artefacts have been returned to African nations from other parts of the world, but that France is "lagging behind". Netherlands prepares to return looted Benin bronzes to Nigeria "This is an issue that goes beyond cultural diplomacy," she told France Culture. "We must return to the primary stakeholders – especially the youth, their heritage and matri-heritage – so they can reclaim not only this history but also a sense of pride." The bill is due to be debated by the French Parliament during an extraordinary session in September, after the summer break.
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
UCLA loses federal research funding in administration's ongoing fight with top universities
Race & ethnicityFacebookTweetLink Follow UCLA is the latest major institution of higher learning to see promised research funding snatched away by the Trump administration, the university's leader said in an open letter to students and faculty Thursday. 'This is not only a loss to the researchers who rely on critical grants,' wrote Chancellor Julio Frenk. 'It is a loss for Americans across the nation whose work, health, and future depend on the groundbreaking work we do.' Grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health are included in the suspensions, Frenk said, but did not provide an amount of how much funding is in peril. The Los Angeles Times reported that roughly $200 million in grants awarded to UCLA are being suspended, citing a partial list of suspended grants provided to them by a source. A spokesperson for the National Science Foundation declined to provide specific figures, saying grant awards are being suspended 'because they are not in alignment with current NSF priorities and/or programmatic goals.' 'We will not fund institutions that promote antisemitism,' said a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the National Institutes of Health. 'We will use every tool we have to ensure institutions follow the law.' The Trump administration has repeatedly cited antisemitism – especially in the context of contentious pro-Gaza protests on campuses – as a reason to deny promised funds to universities, including Harvard and Columbia. Harvard is fighting the funding decisions in court, while Columbia agreed to a settlement with the government that restored its grants. The funding cut comes days after the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division announced it found UCLA in violation of federal law by 'acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students.' While the formal notice to UCLA said the federal government 'now seeks to enter into a voluntary resolution agreement,' Attorney General Pam Bondi sounded less conciliatory. 'DOJ will force UCLA to pay a heavy price for putting Jewish Americans at risk and continue our ongoing investigations into other campuses in the UC system,' Bondi said in a statement. It is not just the Trump administration that has tangled with UCLA over charges of antisemitism. A group of Jewish students filed suit against the university last June, saying the school allowed discrimination against Jews to flourish following Israel's military operation in Gaza in response to the October 7 attacks. The lawsuit said UCLA leaders waited days before responding to a group of pro-Palestinian protesters that refused to allow students to enter campus unless they agreed to 'a statement pledging their allegiance to the activists' views.' UCLA settled the lawsuit earlier this week for $6.45 million, with more than $2 million of the total going to designated 'organizations that combat antisemitism and support the UCLA Jewish community.' UCLA also agreed it is prohibited from 'knowingly allowing or facilitating the exclusion of Jewish students, faculty, and/or staff' from university programs and activities.
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Gov. Josh Shapiro joins lawsuit suing Trump Administration over gender-affirming care
Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro is joining with other state leaders to sue the Trump Administration over gender-affirming care after the U.S. Department of Justice subpoenaed several healthcare clinics and providers. More than 20 doctors and clinics that have been involved in transgender medical care were subpoenaed, and now Governor Shapiro is joining with 16 other Democratic officials suing the Trump Administration over restrictions for gender-affirming care for people under the age of 19. The federal lawsuit filed in Boston alleges that attempts to deny medically necessary healthcare to transgender people through an executive order are unlawful. According to the Department of Justice, however, these investigations include healthcare fraud, false statements, and more, saying those involved in performing these types of procedures on children will be held accountable. The lawsuit claims the Trump Administration is targeting these individuals, as well as alleging the administration has intimidated healthcare providers. It says this order is unlawful because there is no federal statute that bans providing care to minors. UPMC was among those subpoenaed along with others in Pennsylvania. "These actions have made it abundantly clear that our clinicians can no longer provide certain types of gender-affirming care without risk of criminal prosecution," a UPMC spokesperson told KDKA-TV. "This includes specific restrictions on puberty blockers and hormone therapy for individuals under 19." While it is unknown what will come from the lawsuit, UPMC has said they will continue to provide necessary healthcare within the bounds of the law.
