
Fact check: More people leave than arrive on current youth mobility schemes
Asked 'how do you know there will be fewer people coming here than leaving?' Mr Reynolds said: 'Well, I've got 13 schemes in action already and that's the evidence of them.'
He later added: 'I tell you the evidence of the current schemes just so you know is that they're a net negative on immigration.'
Around 24,400 youth mobility visas were issued to people wanting to come to the UK in 2024.
Although figures are patchy for how many Britons go abroad, data from just three countries – Australia, New Zealand and Canada – suggests that 68,495 British citizens travelled to those countries in 2024 (the Australian data is for the 12 months to the end of June 2024).
That would suggest that Mr Reynolds is right. However it does not take into account that Britons going abroad on these temporary visas will sooner or later come back, as will those who come to the UK.
It is also not clear that this pattern will repeat in any similar deal with the EU. The UK population is much larger than those of Australia, New Zealand and Canada, so there are more Britons who can go to those countries than can come here. With the EU that is reversed.
How many people come to the UK on a youth mobility visa?
Government data shows there were 24,437 people who were handed a youth mobility visa last year. Most of these were from one of the 13 countries with which the UK has a reciprocal arrangement.
A small handful of visas – 131 in total – were for people from countries other than the 13. The Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford has suggested that these are the result of errors in data recording, or due to people having dual nationalities.
The top three countries that sent people to the UK on youth mobility visas between January and December 2024 were Australia (9,754 visas), New Zealand (4,304 visas) and Canada (3,060 visas).
How many Britons go abroad on youth mobility type schemes?
Figures are patchy on how many British people have gone abroad on a youth mobility scheme. The Department for Business and Trade was unable to share data.
Australia publishes a twice-yearly report into what it calls its working holiday visa programme. That is the Australian equivalent to the UK's youth mobility scheme.
The latest such report covered the 12 months to the end of June 2024. That report showed that Australia issued 48,973 working holiday visas to UK citizens.
Data from New Zealand is available on the website of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. Using its migration data explorer produces a spreadsheet which shows that there were 9,486 working holiday visas granted by New Zealand to UK citizens in between January and December 2024.
Canadian data does not appear to be publicly available, but the figures were provided to the PA news agency by the Canadian Department for Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship.
The data shows that in 2024 there were 9,972 work permits issued to UK and UK overseas territories citizens under the country's working holiday scheme, and a further 64 people had their permits extended.
How do incoming youth mobility visas compare to outgoing?
Net migration is a figure which subtracts the number of people coming into the country from the number of people leaving.
The data cited above suggests that while 9,754 Australians came to the UK on youth mobility visas, 48,973 Britons went in the opposite direction. It must be noted that the time periods measured here are different, the Australian data is for the 12 months ending June 2024, while the UK data is for the 12 months ending December 2024.
Meanwhile the data suggests that 4,304 New Zealanders came to the UK while 9,486 Britons went in the other direction.
Data further shows that 3,060 Canadians came to the UK in 2024, while 9,972 Britons went in the other direction.
This suggests that for each of these three countries the youth mobility schemes are – as Mr Reynolds suggested – reducing net migration. In fact Australia alone appears to receive twice as many Britons (48,973) as all people who the UK receives from all 13 countries added together (24,437).
However, it should be noted that because youth mobility schemes are time-limited, Britons going abroad and people who have come to the UK on such visas will eventually be forced to return.
This means the UK's inbound migration figures should take into account not just Australians and Canadians – for example – coming to the UK, but also Britons returning from Australia and Canada after their youth mobility visas expire.
If it is assumed that everyone returns then over a longer time frame the youth mobility programmes will have a neutral impact on net immigration because every Briton who leaves the UK will come back and every non-Briton who comes to the UK will leave.
This does not take into account the people – both Britons abroad and non-Britons in the UK – who apply for a different visa to stay in their adopted country.
Do these conclusions also apply to the EU scheme?
The impact on net migration of the potential EU scheme will depend on the details of the agreement between London and Brussels.
Madeleine Sumption, director at the Migration Observatory, told the PA news agency that the size of the cap on the programme would be vital for the impact on net migration.
She said the fact the UK sends more people to Australia, Canada and New Zealand than it receives from them 'probably results from the fact that the UK has a much larger population than they do, so we just have more young people potentially interested in moving'.
With the EU scheme, Ms Sumption said, the population sizes are flipped – that is to say the EU's population is much bigger than the UK, leaving more young people who might be willing to come here.
Therefore the smaller the cap on the number of visas is, the more likely both the EU and UK will fill their quotas. If both fill their quotas – and the quotas going both ways are the same – then the impact on net migration will be zero.
However if the cap is large then it is more likely that there will not be as many Britons going to Europe as are coming in the opposite direction, which will bring up net migration.
But, as with the existing schemes, both Britons in Europe and Europeans in the UK will eventually have to leave unless they find another visa, which over the long run should mean that the programme has a neutral impact on net migration.
BBC – Today, 19/05/2025
Migration Observatory – What is the Youth Mobility Scheme and how does it work? (archived)
Gov.uk – Entry clearance visas granted outside the UK (archived page and spreadsheet, using tab Data_Vis_D02)
Australian Department of Home Affairs – Visitor visa statistics (archived)
Australian Department of Home Affairs – Working Holiday Maker visa program report (archived)
New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment – Migration data explorer (archived page and downloaded spreadsheet. To download the correct spreadsheet, instructions can be found at figure.nz (archived): In dataset select 'W1 work decisions', in time period select 'calendar year' and in variables select 'application substream', 'application criteria' and 'decision type')
Canadian data provided to PA news agency (archived)
Madeleine Sumption profile (archived)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
24 minutes ago
- NBC News
Canada rescinds Digital Services Tax after Trump cuts off U.S. trade talks
Canada has walked back on its digital services tax 'in anticipation' of a mutually beneficial comprehensive trade arrangement with the United States, Ottawa announced Sunday night, just one day before the first tax payments were due. The move comes after U.S. President Donald Trump announced over the weekend that he will be 'terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada ' in response to Ottawa's decision to impose a digital services tax on American tech firms. 'Today's announcement will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025, timeline set out at this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis,' Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said in the statement. The first payments from Canada's digital services tax, which was enacted last year and applies retroactively to 2022, were initially set to be collected Monday. The tax would have applied to both domestic and foreign tech companies, including U.S. giants such as Amazon, Google and Meta with a 3% levy. This decision from Ottawa was an about-turn from Canadian officials earlier this month, who said they would not pause the digital services tax, despite strong opposition from the U.S. Canada's Minister of Finance and National Revenue Francois-Philippe Champagne added, 'Rescinding the digital services tax will allow the negotiations of a new economic and security relationship with the United States to make vital progress and reinforce our work to create jobs and build prosperity for all Canadians.' However, the statement from Canada's finance ministry also said that Carney 'has been clear that Canada will take as long as necessary, but no longer, to achieve that deal.' The digital services tax was first introduced in 2020 to address a taxation gap where many large tech companies were earning significant revenues from Canadians, but were not taxed. Ottawa also said that the tax was enacted while it worked with international partners — including the U.S.— on a multilateral agreement that would replace national digital services taxes. Shortly after Trump said that the U.S. was 'terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC's Morgan Brennan that U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would be investigating the tax to 'determine the amount of harm to the U.S. companies and the U.S. economy in general.' 'Canada has this digital services tax. And several other countries do too. We disagree, and we think that they discriminate against U.S. companies,' Bessent said on CNBC's 'Closing Bell: Overtime.' 'Several countries within the European Union have digital service taxes. None of them have done those retroactively,' Bessent added.


The Herald Scotland
26 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Brexit destruction - 'stupidest' and 'unhinged' fair enough
It would surely be easy to make the argument that he hit the nail on the head. After all, it is certainly not wise decision-making which is behind a move to cause major damage to your economy. Mr Bloomberg, who was visiting his eponymous company's Dublin offices exactly nine years after the UK's referendum, added of Brexit: 'It's hard to believe how they did it.' It is indeed difficult to believe, as the nightmare continues. Mr Bloomberg's comments evoked memories of what Professor Sir Anton Muscatelli, principal and vice-chancellor of the University of Glasgow, had to say about Brexit in the aftermath of the vote. Sir Anton told the Scottish Government Brexit Summit for Further and Higher Education back in November 2018: 'I've previously referred to our impending exit from the EU as 'the most unhinged example of national self-sabotage in living memory'. 'Nothing has happened in the last few weeks to change that view. Indeed, with the confusion and uncertainty we are seeing every day in Whitehall, if anything my view has only hardened.' This was before former Conservative prime minister Boris Johnson's administration took the UK out of the European single market at the end of December 2020 in a hard Brexit. This folly saw the ending of free movement of people between the country and the European Economic Area and the loss of frictionless trade with the UK's biggest trading partner. Read more So words such as 'unhinged', from Sir Anton, and 'stupidest', from Mr Bloomberg, seem perfectly measured and proportionate in the scheme of things. What is also hard to fathom, based on any economic rationale, is the Labour Government's 'red lines' of not taking the UK back into the European Union, single market, or even the customs union. That said, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Labour look to be far more focused on politics than economics when it comes to Brexit, and specifically appear terrified of upsetting those red-wall voters who swept Mr Johnson to power in December 2019. It was this general election victory which enabled the incredibly foolish hard Brexit for which we are all paying the price - Leave and Remain voters alike. My column in The Herald last Wednesday - focused on a YouGov poll which surely yielded some interesting findings for Sir Keir and Labour - observed: 'Les Britanniques 'Bregret' beaucoup.' Noting the ninth anniversary, on June 23, of the vote for Brexit, the pollster declared: 'YouGov polling has long since shown that the public are 'Bregretful' about that outcome, with our latest survey showing 56% think it was wrong for Britain to vote to leave the EU.' My column observed: 'There might still be the sounds of 'non, je ne Bregret rien' from those who voted for the folly. And some of those who led voters down the Brexit path continue to bump their gums rather noisily. 'However, the quieter majority clearly knows what is actually going on. YouGov's latest findings show, as its polls have for years now, a clear majority believes the UK was wrong to leave the EU. Only 31% now think the UK was right to leave.' Read more The YouGov poll found most people in the UK want to see the country return to the EU - 56%. This is way ahead of the 34% opposing such a move, with 10% of those polled saying they do not know. Sir Nick Harvey, chief executive of the European Movement UK campaign group, said on June 22: "Labour's 'red lines' on its relationship reset with the European Union, including no return to the single market or the EU customs union, must now be revisited and revised. The reasons why will not have escaped the Government's notice, even if it does not want to look in their direction." His observation about Sir Keir's administration not wanting to look at the reasons is an astute one. Not only is Labour sticking with its red lines but it continues to refuse to acknowledge the scale of the Brexit damage. My column last Wednesday, noting another finding of the YouGov poll, observed: 'The fact that 56% of those who voted for Labour last July consider rejoining the EU to be the right priority, right now, raises the question of why Sir Keir and his colleagues seem hell-bent on going along with the views of the minority in their policymaking. Labour has made it clear that it is absolutely intent on maintaining its 'red lines', a truly lamentable state of affairs.' Sir Nick said: "Nine years have passed since the United Kingdom voted to leave the European that time, the consequences for the British people have become increasingly stark. This latest polling not only reinforces that - it shows that more and more people see the benefits of much closer ties with the European Union - having felt the pain of Brexit. "Leaving the EU has delivered a sustained and worsening blow to the UK economy - one that is especially pronounced for the small and medium-sized enterprises that form the backbone of our commercial and industrial landscape who are living with the consequences every day. That has made us all poorer, depleted our economy and weakened our country with a thousand tiny cuts.' There is surely much food for thought in these comments, is there not Sir Keir?


JAMnews
an hour ago
- JAMnews
UK warns: businesses in Georgia and Armenia aiding Russia's sanctions evasion will be sanctioned
UK to Georgia and Armenia regarding Russia sanctions The UK government has published special guidance for non-British businesses operating in Georgia, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan. The document aims to help local entrepreneurs understand the UK's sanctions against Russia and how violations could affect their business operations, including outside the UK. The document, available on the UK government's official website, outlines practical steps and provides concrete examples of what constitutes assistance in evading sanctions. It clearly states: anyone helping Russia circumvent sanctions will themselves be subject to sanctions. The British Embassy in Georgia published a post on its Facebook page, stating: 'The UK has published new sanctions guidance to support businesses in Georgia. The guidance aims sets out Georgian and UK laws relevant to sanctions and identifies practical steps for businesses to manage sanctions risks and promote compliance.' Summary of the UK's new guidance on sanctions compliance regarding Russia The document outlines several tactics used by Russia to circumvent sanctions, including: Indirect delivery routes Falsification of end-user destinations Professional evasion networks According to the guidance, this may involve the following scenario: A company operating in Georgia receives an order from a Russian importer for goods that fall under UK sanctions and therefore cannot be delivered directly from the UK. The local company then orders the goods from a UK supplier without informing the supplier—or other relevant parties such as banks, insurers, or freight companies—that the final consumer is in Russia. The UK supplier exports the goods to the local company, which subsequently re-exports them to Russia. The guidance also outlines the risks that may affect local businesses. While only UK nationals are legally required to comply with UK sanctions, non-UK nationals who help circumvent them face certain risks, including: The UK may impose sanctions directly on you as an individual or on entities you own or control if you are involved in activities that support Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Even if you are not a UK national, being sanctioned by the UK can have serious consequences for your business and financial operations. UK sanctions apply to UK citizens and entities worldwide. Every UK bank—and many international banks—may freeze your assets and deny you any services. If UK companies are part of your insurance or shipping/freight supply chain, they will also refuse to work with you if you or any related party or goods are under sanctions. According to the guidance, as a result of the above, many UK companies will refuse to do business with such individuals or entities unless they can prove they have taken effective steps to prevent any goods or services from being forwarded to Russia or to Russia-linked parties. News in Georgia News in Armenia