Dartford Crossing fee rises are ‘revenue raiser', motoring groups claim
Motoring groups have criticised the decision to increase Dartford Crossing charges by 40%.
Transport minister Lilian Greenwood announced fees for the crossing, which features a bridge and two tunnels connecting Thurrock in Essex with Dartford in Kent, will rise from September 1 to 'manage traffic'.
Examples of increases for one-off payments in from £2.50 to £3.50 for cars, from £3 to £4.20 for coaches and vans, and from £6 to £8.40 for lorries.
It is the first time prices have gone up since 2013.
With up to 180,000 vehicles using the crossing on the busiest days, Ms Greenwood described the traffic levels as 'well in excess of the crossing's design capacity, causing delays for drivers using the crossing, congestion and journey disruption to drivers on the M25 and a range of knock-on impacts for local communities'.
Steve Gooding, director of the RAC Foundation, said: 'The claim that this 40% increase in the charge is all about managing traffic will raise more than a few eyebrows given that those making the crossing have little alternative but to do so.
'Most people will, understandably, and probably rightly, see this move as nothing else but a revenue raiser.'
Edmund King, AA president, said: 'Long-distance travellers from the UK and Europe, freight, business and regional users have all been sold down the river by successive governments through the unnecessary perpetuation of tolls and lack of future capacity at Dartford.
'Tolling was supposed to pay for the Dartford Bridge and then end, which would have been in 2003.
'However, it became a nice little earner which raised tens of millions of pounds every year.
'Ramping up the tolls by an extra pound, when the majority of users have no alternative about the time and place they cross the Thames, is simply road charging and a bridge too far.'
James Barwise, Road Haulage Association (RHA) policy lead, said: 'Dartford remains the only practical Thames crossing for HGVs and coaches in the South East.
'It's therefore regrettable that the charge increase has been so significant.
'This adds to running costs at an already financially challenging time for many businesses in our sector (HGVs, coaches and vans) and ultimately pushes up prices for consumers.'
The Government has given the go ahead for the Lower Thames Crossing, which it hopes will reducing congestion on the Dartford Crossing
The new crossing will connect the A2 and M2 in Kent to the A13 and M25 in Essex via a 2.6-mile tunnel under the Thames, which would be the UK's longest road tunnel.
Work on the project has been ongoing since 2009, and more than £800 million of taxpayers' money has been spent on planning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'Labour is sucking the confidence out of business,' says Ex-BoE chief economist
Andy Haldane is demob happy. He's ready to get on the road, first to his holiday home on the Kentish coast and then to France and Italy before finishing off the year in the southern hemisphere to catch the cricket. His six-month break has been a long time coming – it's about five to ten years too late, Haldane, 57, laughs. It's the first extended time off he has had since joining the Bank of England as a graduate trainee, rising to become chief economist and something of a rock star in the dry world of central banking. His provocative speeches made world headlines as he shot down much of the orthodoxy of the financial system, drawing on evolutionary biology, and even coming out for the Occupy movement after the 2008 crash. Then in a surprise – some would say premature – move he left the Bank in the pandemic to lead the Royal Society of Arts, as well as to give him room to shoot the breeze, free from 'central bank shackles' and engage in broader policy-making. Which he did, advising the Tories on Levelling Up, and he still sits on the Treasury's Economic Advisory Council. Now he's off again. We met at his office at the Royal Society of Arts, where the bookshelves are already empty and his desk is clear. This time he's taking the break to 'cleanse his brain' to work out what to do next after 32 years in the saddle. He says: 'I like change, and I love ambiguity – it creates opportunity.' But there's no ambiguity about Haldane's long list of ways to get Britain back on its feet. For a start, if he were still on the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee, he would have voted for a cut at its last meeting. More pertinently, Haldane would have voted for base rate cuts going back to the start of last year, well before the MPC's first cut in August. 'That was too late. It would have been less painful if rates had been lower. The economy has been crabbing sideways for at least three years, and lower rates would have cut households some slack.' He accepts most MPC members voted against a cut due to fears the Middle Eastern conflict will fuel inflation, saying: 'It's tricky. When you have missed out on the upside, there can be a bit of scarring.' Scarring for the MPC or economy? 'Both,' he replies, grimacing. 'Some members of the MPC are not looking closely enough at the quantitative data. It's clear the labour market is shedding jobs. We can't miss getting it right again.' Famously, Haldane is one of a handful of economists who did not miss out on the upside. He warned that the inflation genie was escaping the bottle in late 2020, calling for rate rises when his peers dubbed rising prices post-Covid and post-Ukraine 'transitory'. His prescience is just one reason why so many in the City, across the political divide, say Haldane is the smartest Governor we never had, and should have been appointed instead of Andrew Bailey. What does he say? 'I loved the job I was doing. I didn't want to be Governor,' he answers, politely. Leaving the Bank has certainly allowed him to fire more missiles from the sidelines, most recently criticising Rachel Reeves' Budget as full of 'mistakes, rookie errors'. He blames her policies – especially the increase in employers' National Insurance, and harping on about the black hole left behind by the Tories – for sucking the confidence out of British business. The Chancellor's non-dom policy – already driving the wealthiest out of the country – should be refined or reversed, because it will lead to net fiscal losses for the Treasury, he says. So too would Reform UK's Britannia card idea, which is too lax. A 'better balancing point' needs to be struck. What drives him to distraction is the lack of serious soul-searching on the big issues, such as tax or welfare spending. He says: 'The poor level of debate at Westminster, in think-tanks, the civil service, academia and elsewhere is deeply depressing. Politics doesn't seem to be growing great thinkers like the late Nigel Lawson, the last great tax reformer, any more.' Instead, politicians should go 'big, bold, plural and at scale'. He adds: 'We need to supercharge supply-side reforms. There must be greater incentives for entrepreneurship and businesses.' Reconfiguring the 'onerous' tax code is not enough. Scrapping stamp duty on housing would help. He says: 'It glues up the housing and jobs market – we have the lowest level of people moving jobs since the financial crisis. We are taxing mobility, and so preventing living standards from rising.' Why, he asks, do we give capital investment exemptions on machinery but not on training people? And why is debt favoured over equity? How mad is that? 'Shiny billion-pound projects like new nuclear power stations or railways are great but if we don't have the skilled workforce, what's the point? Why do so many of our universities not have graduate apprenticeship schemes?' Apprenticeships are down by a third, he adds, so the apprentice levy needs to be made workable with business urged to play a bigger role. And change is possible. 'Look at the amazing job Jesse Norman MP is doing at Hereford with his New Model Institute for Technology & Engineering and the launch in Manchester of a new technical baccalaureate.' Spending on skills is falling: the latest international league tables show the UK's expenditure on training is in the relegation zone. 'How can it be that we have a million 'Neets' – those aged 16 to 24 not in education, employment or training? It's an economic blight, but also a personal blight.' His solution? Scrap GCSEs, exams designed for the late Victorian age. 'If a third of youngsters are emerging functionally illiterate and innumerate from school, then something is very wrong. We need a broader-based system of education based on hands and hearts, and creativity, where we smash the ceiling internationally.' Britain's 'economically inactive' – the nine million people of working age who are not in work – must be helped back into the workplace. 'The impact on their mental health, families and communities is enormous,' he says. 'We need to scrap Jobcentres. That's where people used to go for benefits.' Yet, Haldane remains an optimist. The reset button for growth, he says, could come from higher spending on defence and security, which could prove 'jobs-rich, skills-rich across the country'. 'The country would understand that,' he says. 'The bond markets would understand that.' After all, growth is the great redeemer for bond markets, he says. 'They know tomorrow's growth pays for today's borrowing. But it requires politicians to go big and be bold. If not, forget it.' Is he worried that bond yields – the interest the Government pays on its debt – are back up to levels last seen during the Liz Truss era? The Truss period, he points out, coincided with bond yields shooting up around the world after an anomalous 20-year period of low inflation and low interest rates. 'The global cost of money has gone up. Reality has been reasserted in the markets. We are back up to the UK batting average.' Haldane may be footloose but still has a clutch of 'passion' projects: he's the new chancellor of Sheffield University, where he read economics, and chairs the Glasshouse International Music Centre in Gateshead – homage to his spiritual roots in Sunderland, where he was born, and his family's brass band tradition. Will he be looking for a new desk job after his break? 'Who knows? I might love daytime TV and dog-walking,' he says with the biggest of laughs. 'Or, come December, I might decide to manufacture cider by the champagne method.' And when the Governor's job comes up again in three years' time, would he be interested? He smiles. Judging by the look in his eye, of course he would.
The Sun
31 minutes ago
- The Sun
Barbie star Margot Robbie reveals surprising activity she loves to do when she's in London
BARBIE actress Margot Robbie says she loves traipsing round London looking for ghouls. The Aussie, 34, revealed she gets spooked at The London Dungeon — but is too old for her former nightclub haunts. 1 She told a crowd at Glastonbury: 'Do you know what I do when my family comes down? The London Dungeons Tour. 'Has anyone else done that? Isn't it so good? It's so fun. I just love it — I have probably done it like four times.' Margot added: 'Then there is also a Ghosts, Galleries and Ghouls walking tour, which I highly recommend. 'It is so amazing — you'll be somewhere you walk around all the time and they will be like, 'There are 3,000-year-old skeletons under your feet right now.'' Margot, who was at Glastonbury with husband Tom Ackerley, revealed she no longer goes to her favourite London club Infernos in Clapham, where she used to live. She said at the Pilton Palais cinema: 'I'm 34 and I don't think they'd let me in. "They would be like, 'No go away old lady'. "Our roommate has a 99-year ban.'
Times
44 minutes ago
- Times
SNP's ‘student politicians' snub submarine welding centre
Sir Keir Starmer's government is expected to step in to fund an ambitious defence facility on the Clyde after the SNP's 'student union' politicians refused grant funding on ideological grounds. A £2.5 million grant from Scottish Enterprise, the national economic development agency, for a submarine welding centre was withheld due to a party ban on 'munitions' funding. Rolls-Royce, which is ready to support the project by providing £11 million worth of specialist equipment, expressed 'dismay' at the news last week. It said the project had been classified as a 'munitions' scheme solely on the basis that it would 'support the construction of naval vessels'. • SNP ban on 'munitions' funds puts Scottish shipbuilding on the line In a letter seen by The Times, Steve Carlier, president of submarines at Rolls-Royce, warned John Swinney, the first minister, that the project 'cannot continue' without the public funding and was at risk of being formally cancelled within days. The funding, which Scottish Enterprise said had not been formally applied for, is believed to have been rejected as the Scottish government's definition of 'weapons or ammunition' would include a 'military submarine', rather than directly relating to any arms. Rolls-Royce has disputed that it is a 'munitions' company. All UK military submarines are powered by nuclear propulsion, regardless of whether or not they have the capacity to carry nuclear weapons, and Rolls-Royce technology is not used for firing warheads. John Healey, the UK defence secretary, told The Sunday Show, on BBC1 that he could 'hardly believe' a Scottish nationalist government would stand in the way of skills development in Scotland. He said: 'We have a long-term partnership with Rolls-Royce who are central to some of the military equipment that keep us all safe. Rolls-Royce want to set up a new welding skills centre, not just to support its munitions business but also to support Scotland's shipyards [to offer] essential skills, new opportunities for young people. 'If the Scottish SNP government won't step up to support skills and the future of jobs in Scotland then we will. It really strikes me as student union politics. This is not a serious government concerned about the opportunities for young people in the future or the skills base for Scotland, or indeed the industry and innovation for the future.' The SNP also has an ambition to rid Scotland of nuclear weapons, which are based at Faslane naval base on the Clyde. Healey added: 'This is a deterrent that for over 70 years has been our guarantor of security in the UK. It is what Putin fears most and the UK is the only country that commits its nuclear deterrent in full to the defence of our Nato allies. Strong deterrence is required and vital to keep people safe in the future.' • Most Scots want to keep UK's nuclear deterrent, poll shows Britain is also engaged in highly sensitive talks to purchase fighter jets capable of firing tactical nuclear weapons, in a major expansion of the deterrent intended to counter the growing threat posed by Russia. The move would represent the biggest development in the UK's deterrent since the Cold War and a recognition that the world has entered a more dangerous nuclear era. Healey would not reveal where the new fighters would be based but the prospect of nuclear-armed jets being deployed from RAF Lossiemouth, or on manoeuvres at the air force's ancillary training and support bases in Scotland, will incense the SNP and its core anti-nuclear supporters. Mairi Gougeon, the Scottish rural affairs secretary, told the BBC that the welding centre was never eligible for funding thanks to the 'long-standing' policy of the SNP government. She said: 'I think the key difference here between ourselves and the UK government is that when we have principles, we stick to them.' Gougeon said Scottish ministers 'completely understand' the 'really unprecedented threats' the UK faced on the world stage and confirmed the SNP supported the increased defence spending announced by the prime minister. She added: 'That doesn't mean that we can't also still maintain the policy positions that we've had for quite a long time and have been long standing within our party, that we don't support the use of public finance for the manufacture of munitions and neither do we support that for nuclear weapons.' A Scottish government spokesman said: 'We are committed to ensuring Scotland is the home of manufacturing innovation, but the Scottish government's long-standing policy position is that it does not use public money to support the manufacture of munitions. 'We recognise the important role of the aerospace, defence, security and space sectors in the Scottish economy and we regularly engage with a range of companies, alongside ADS Scotland as the industry body. 'We are investing up to £2 million to develop engineering skills in the Glasgow city region, designed by the Clyde Maritime Cluster in partnership with Skills Development Scotland. 'The Scottish government has yet to see the detail of the Defence Spending Review, but we remain firmly opposed to the threat, use and basing of nuclear weapons as a deterrent in Scotland.'
