How To Join Territorial Army Like MS Dhoni, Sachin Pilot, Anurag Thakur
Famous Faces In The Territorial Army
Several well-known Indians have been part of the TA over the years:
MS Dhoni was conferred the rank of Lieutenant Colonel (Honorary) in 2011 with the 106 TA Battalion (Para) of the Parachute Regiment.
Kapil Dev received the same honorary rank in 2008 with the 150 TA (Infantry) Battalion of the Punjab Regiment.
Sachin Pilot, a Member of Parliament, became the first sitting MP to be commissioned as a regular officer in the TA with the rank of Lieutenant.
Anurag Thakur joined as a Lieutenant in 2016 and was later promoted to Captain.
Abhinav Bindra was inducted as Lieutenant Colonel in a TA battalion of the Sikh Regiment in 2011.
These honorary appointments recognise individuals who have made significant contributions to the nation in their respective fields.
What Is The Territorial Army?
The Territorial Army is part of the Regular Indian Army. It is designed for citizens who wish to serve the nation while continuing their civilian jobs. TA personnel support the military during natural disasters, national emergencies, and in essential services.
With around 50,000 personnel, the TA includes both Departmental Units (such as Railways, ONGC, IOC) and Non-Departmental Units (like Infantry and Ecological Battalions, Engineer Regiments).
TA units have participated in major military operations including the 1962, 1965, and 1971 wars, as well as Operation Pawan (Sri Lanka) and Operation Rakshak (Punjab and J&K). They have also assisted during natural calamities like the Latur earthquake, Uttarkashi floods, and the Odisha Super Cyclone.
In addition, the Eco Task Forces under the TA have planted more than 6.65 crore trees across 66,000 hectares, helping to restore degraded and hilly areas.
How To Join The Territorial Army
There are various ways to become part of the TA:
Honorary Commission
Individuals who have made outstanding contributions to the country in fields such as sports, public service, or the arts may be conferred honorary ranks by the President of India, as seen with personalities like MS Dhoni and Kapil Dev. This is a ceremonial role that recognizes national service and distinction.
Join as a Jawan / JCO (Junior Commissioned Officer)
Eligibility
• Age: 18 to 42 years
• Education: Minimum Class 10 (Matriculation); exceptions may apply in some cases
Application Process
Candidates must report to a TA unit or Recruiting Office on scheduled dates. The process includes a physical test, medical board, and police verification. Notifications are usually published in newspapers and on the official Indian Army website.
Join as a Commissioned Officer (For Civilians)
Eligibility Criteria
• Nationality: Indian (male or female)
• Age: 18 to 42 years (as of 10 June 2025)
• Education: Graduate from a recognized university
• Physical Standards: Must be medically and physically fit
• Employment: Should be gainfully employed in government, public, private sector, or self-employed
Selection Process
This entry is through a written exam, followed by a Service Selection Board (SSB) interview, medical examination, and document verification. Admit cards are issued provisionally, and final eligibility is checked only after clearing the exam.
Important Tips for Aspiring Candidates
• Regularly check the Indian Army website for recruitment notifications
• Prepare well for written and physical tests
• Keep all required documents (educational, medical, employment) in order
• Understand that field training and military discipline are part of the role
• Be mentally prepared for temporary deployments when needed
Joining the Territorial Army offers a rare opportunity to contribute to national service while continuing your professional career. Whether you are a civilian, a working professional, or someone admired for national achievements, the TA opens the door to serve the country in uniform - just like MS Dhoni, Sachin Pilot, and many others.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Fewer foreign trips, protocol lapses upset Dhankhar; former Vice President felt he had a diminished role
Former Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar, in his 35-month-long tenure, travelled abroad only four times for bilateral visits, and his office often had complained to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) over protocol issues, official sources told The Hindu. The differences over his MEA assignments were amongst the reasons for the discord between the former Vice-President and the government, and a source of grievance for Mr. Dhankhar, who felt his role, especially on foreign policy issues, was less than that of his predecessors. According to the MEA's website, Mr. Dhankhar's four visits included two that came shortly after he took over as Vice-President in August 2022, and subsequently the frequency of these visits tapered off. In comparison, his immediate predecessor Venkaiah Naidu had 13 foreign tours during his tenure between August 2017-2022, and Hamid Ansari represented India on 28 tours abroad during his decade-long tenure from 2007-2017. Mr. Dhankhar went to Cambodia (November 11-13, 2022), Qatar (November 20-21, 2022), U.K. (May 5-6, 2023) and Iran (May 2024). He was not scheduled for any tours this year, although sources said the MEA had proposed two visits abroad, in February and in June, which were turned down due to health reasons. According to the sources, Mr. Dhankhar had complained about what he saw as several protocol violations to several Opposition leaders over the past few months. One point of contention was that the Vice-President believed he received fewer visits from foreign dignitaries than in the past. The Vice-President's office was reportedly unhappy over his visit to Tehran, where he represented India at the funeral of President Ebrahim Raisi, who had died in a helicopter crash. The Iranian government's protocol officials were apparently overstretched as more than 40 high-level dignitaries attended the ceremonies, and the sources said Mr. Dhankhar was uneasy with the arrangements at Tehran's Parsian Azadi hotel during his day-long trip. Mr. Dhankhar's absence from the official banquet during U.S. Vice-President J.D. Vance's trip in April this year also raised several eyebrows. On April 21, when Mr. Vance landed in Delhi, Mr. Dhankhar was on board a flight to Jaipur and returned to the Capital only after Mr. Vance had left. However, officials privy to the exchanges said that the Vice-President's office had not been informed of the programme of the U.S. Vice-President in advance, nor was he included in the programme. At the time, The Hindu had reported that a meeting between the two Vice-Presidents was not scheduled, as officials said it was not mandated by protocol due to differences in the Indian and U.S. government structure. Sources in the Vice-President's office said that despite the issues and his own health problems, Mr. Dhankhar carried out his diplomatic assignments to the full extent he was required to, pointing out where he felt there were gaps. On May 19, speaking at an event in Delhi, he referred to a protocol lapse in the reception line-up for Chief Justice B.R. Gavai, and said 'I too am a sufferer'. He pointed out that his photograph had not been kept in government offices alongside those of the President and Prime Minister, as he said they should be. 'Once I demit office, I'll ensure that my successor has a photograph,' he said, adding that when such complaints were made, they were 'not personal, but for the position held'.
The Wire
17 minutes ago
- The Wire
At UNSC, India Hits Back After Pakistan Raises Kashmir, Indus Waters Treaty
New Delhi: India on Tuesday (July 22) pushed back against Pakistan at the UN Security Council after Pakistani foreign minister Ishaq Dar used a high-level debate on peaceful dispute resolution to raise the Kashmir issue and criticise the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, describing Pakistan as 'steeped in fanaticism and terrorism' and a 'serial borrower from the IMF'. Dar, who chaired the meeting as part of Pakistan's rotating presidency of the Security Council, alleged that India has been violating UN resolutions and international law. He also accused New Delhi of unilaterally disrupting long-standing water-sharing arrangements under the Indus Waters Treaty, and reiterated Pakistan's demand for the implementation of UN Security Council resolutions on Kashmir. Responding later in the meeting, India's permanent representative to the UN, P. Harish, dismissed Pakistan's comments. 'On the one hand, there is India which is a mature democracy, a surging economy and a pluralistic and inclusive society. At the other extreme is Pakistan, steeped in fanaticism and terrorism, and a serial borrower from the IMF,' Harish said. Without naming Pakistan initially, Harish argued that the council must take a firm position on cross-border terrorism. 'It ill-behoves a member of the council to offer homilies while indulging in practices that are unacceptable to the international community,' he said. Harish defended India's recent military action under the aegis of 'Operation Sindoor' carried out in the wake of the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam. He said that India's strikes targeted terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, and were 'focused, measured and non-escalatory'. He added that India halted operations once its objectives were met, 'at the request of Pakistan'. The Indian envoy argued that there must be 'serious cost to states who violate the spirit of good neighbourliness and international relations by fomenting cross-border terrorism'. India had put the World Bank-brokered Indus Waters Treaty 'in abeyance' a day after the Pahalgam terror attack. India has maintained that Jammu and Kashmir is an internal matter, and that bilateral issues with Pakistan must be addressed without third-party interference. However, New Delhi has grown increasingly uneasy with US President Donald Trump's repeated public statements claiming a role in brokering the ceasefire following the four-day escalation between the two countries earlier this year. India has maintained that the cessation of hostilities was the result of direct communication between military leaderships. Harish reaffirmed India's commitment to peaceful dispute resolution under the UN Charter, but insisted that 'national ownership and consent' must remain central to any peace process. He also called for urgent reforms of the UN Security Council to address growing doubts about its representativeness and effectiveness. 'The continuing UN Security Council impasse also shows the increasing challenges to its functioning,' Harish said In his broader remarks, Harish noted that the nature of conflicts has changed in recent decades, with the rise of non-state actors backed by state sponsors, and the spread of radical ideologies facilitated by digital platforms. There were new pressures on UN peacekeeping operations, he said, adding that peacebuilding has also acquired greater salience. At the start of the meeting, the 15-member body adopted the Pakistan-drafted resolution for strengthening mechanisms for the peaceful settlement of disputes. It also called on member states to make full use of diplomatic tools such as negotiation, mediation, conciliation and arbitration to resolve disputes peacefully.
India.com
17 minutes ago
- India.com
Pakistan, China, or US; who is India's biggest enemy? Report reveals 41% Indians..., answer will shock you
(File) The recent India-Pakistan conflict laid bare the reality of India's alliances with various countries, and exposed those who had earlier maintained the facade of friendly ties with our nation. During Operation Sindoor, Pakistan received explicit support from China, Turkey, and Azerbaijan, while countries like the United States, a strategic ally of New Delhi, leaned more towards the Pakistani narrative, while merely issuing a token condemnation of the Pahalgam terror attack. While India tries to maintain cordial relations with every country on the planet, the recent conflict with Pakistan was a sour experience for Indian citizens, as they realised which countries are friendly towards India, and which ones are their enemies. But who among Pakistan, China, and the US are considered India's biggest enemy by Indians? Let us find out. Who is India's biggest enemy? According to a recent survey by US-based Pew Research Center, around two percent of Indians consider the US as India's biggest enemy, while 33 percent believe China is the prime nemesis, and an overwhelming 41 percent are of the opinion that Pakistan is biggest foe India is faced with. This means that a combined 74 percent of Indian population considers Pakistan and its 'all-weather ally' China as the ultimate threat for the country. Why Indians consider China and Pakistan as enemies? The feeling of hatred and animosity for Pakistan and China among Indians stems from historical incidents of deceit, war, and terrorism, that Beijing and Islamabad have perpetrated against India since 1947. India has fought four wars with Pakistan and one with China since independence as both countries maintain claim on territories within our nation. Additionally, Pakistan supports, arms and fund cross-border terrorism that has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives in India in innumerable terror attacks over the last five decades. China, a close ally of Pakistan, often defends Pakistan's stance on global forums like the United Nations, and has repeatedly used its veto in the UN Security Council to prevent sanctions on dreaded Pakistan-based terrorist leaders who are wanted by Indian law enforcement agencies.
