Tesla announces launch date for game-changing new service: 'That's how progress works'
According to Bloomberg, Tesla is eyeing Thursday as the official launch date — with several caveats. For one, that timeline could still change. Secondly, only 10 self-driving electric vehicles will be in operation, with Teslarati reporting riders will need an invite from the company.
If realized, Tesla's robotaxi could be a major win for a brand reinventing itself around driverless vehicles and artificial intelligence. The company has found itself on bumpy roads at the outset of 2025, with plummeting stocks and a 13% year-over-year dip in EV deliveries in the first quarter of the year.
While a growing number of automakers are entering the lucrative electric vehicle market, giving consumers more options than ever when choosing an EV, CEO Elon Musk's polarizing involvement in politics did the brand no favors and contributed to the decline.
As for the robotaxi, several media reports suggested that Tesla hadn't begun testing it at all, as Teslarati noted, causing a flurry of speculation that a June launch was another one of the company's pipe dreams. However, at the end of May, Bloomberg reported that a Tesla robotaxi had completed its first test run on public roads without someone in the driver's seat.
Tesla didn't respond to the publication's request for comment, but on May 28, Musk said on the social platform X that Tesla had been testing for multiple days.
When it launches, Tesla won't have the first autonomous taxi service in Austin. Waymo, which completes around 250,000 self-driving rides each week across multiple cities, tested a prototype in Austin in 2015 and began a limited rollout of its self-driving service in the city in March 2024 before opening it to the public.
Critics of Tesla's robotaxi worry that a June launch may be premature, as the automaker has well-documented struggles with its autonomous driving features. Recently, a pair of Business Insider writers had their Tesla robotaxi proceed through a red light in San Francisco.
If those reported issues are addressed, though, having more EVs on the roadways would be a positive development, contributing to healthier air quality, as they don't release heat-trapping, asthma-linked pollution when driven the way gas-powered vehicles do.
EV drivers also report significant savings on energy and maintenance. Many are maximizing their savings by installing solar panels, which are cheaper to use than relying on public charging stations or the grid. EnergySage can save homeowners up to $10,000 in installation costs.
Would you ride in a self-driving Tesla Robotaxi?
Heck yes
Probably
Not anytime soon
No way
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
However, if you're not ready to invest in a system, Palmetto's LightReach solar panel leasing program is another way to tap into the benefits of solar. Its no-money-down plans will lock you into a low monthly rate, protecting you against volatile pricing associated with dirty fuels.
Meanwhile, commenters on the Teslarati article had mixed reactions to the robotaxi launch.
"They've only tried to run without safety driver for a few days," one person wrote. "If FSD [Full Self-Driving] is really so great, why did it take so long for them to even dare trying this so late, and months after having hundreds of cars roaming around Austin with safety drivers?"
"That's how progress works. Lots of minor steps to the end goal," another suggested.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
5 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Tesla wants to bring its robotaxis to San Francisco. Here is what's standing in the way.
Tesla is launching an even-more-limited version of its early robotaxi service in San Francisco this weekend, according to Business Insider, after an initial rollout began last month in Austin, Texas. The company plans to send invites to Tesla owners to test the service, according to the report. Depending on how and if Tesla proceeds, its actions could violate state regulations — and even if there's a human safety driver sitting behind the wheel while its vehicles operate autonomously. Two state agencies regulate aspects of autonomous vehicles in California. The California Department of Motor Vehicles regulates the testing and deployment of autonomous vehicles, and requires permits for all three stages: testing with a driver, testing without a driver, and driverless deployment. Tesla holds a permit for testing autonomous vehicles with a human safety operator behind the wheel. It doesn't have a permit for driverless testing or deployment. And as of Wednesday it had not yet applied for additional permits, according to the DMV. (Mercedes-Benz, Nuro, and Waymo are the only three companies that hold driverless deployment permits.) Nor does Tesla have the proper permits from the California Public Utilities Commission, which regulates the commercial aspects of ride-hailing and chartered transportation by humans as well as those steered by autonomous vehicle systems. Tesla has a Transportation Charter Party permit, which allows a human driver to drive a traditional vehicle (not an AV) for charter services with the public, CPUC spokesperson Terrie Prosper told TechCrunch in an email. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW This is distinctly different from an autonomous vehicle permit for passenger transportation, according to Prosper. So-called AV authorizations, which Tesla doesn't have, allows for the testing and deployment of autonomous vehicles with or without a driver. Tesla has not received approval from the CPUC to offer autonomous passenger service to customers, paid or unpaid, with or without a driver (nor has the company applied), Prosper explained in the email. Tesla also doesn't hold a 'Drivered Pilot AV permit' from the CPUC, so it cannot even use an autonomous vehicle with a human operator behind the wheel for passenger service. This means that if Tesla deploys its robotaxis and the autonomous systems are engaged it will be violating state regulations even if the rides are free and there is a human safety operator behind the wheel. The push into California comes as the DMV is currently trying to stop Tesla from selling vehicles in the state as part of a years-long lawsuit over the promises the company has made about its cars' self-driving abilities. Tesla is also currently on trial in a lawsuit over deaths related to the use of its less-capable driver assistance system, Autopilot. Tesla has been running an invite-only version of its robotaxi service in Austin since June 22. It's so far been a far cry from what Musk has spent years teasing. The service is mostly limited to Austin's downtown core and main corridors. There is a safety operator in the front passenger seat who can intervene if the car is about to do something wrong or dangerous. While the service launched with around 10 vehicles, it's not clear how many Model Y SUVs are in operation in the city, nor is it clear how many times those safety operators have had to intervene. That's a long way from the 'general solution' that Musk said Tesla was working on for a decade. Musk was once so confident in the autonomous software Tesla was developing that he said it would take a car from Los Angeles to New York — a stunt that never happened. Musk said this week that Tesla is also trying to expand to Florida and Arizona. TechCrunch reported earlier this month that Tesla had begun the required certification process to test and operate with and without a driver in Arizona.
Bloomberg
6 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bordlemay: Good Start to Earnings Season
Bloomberg Markets: The Close Katherine Bordlemay, Goldman Sachs Co-Head of Americas Client Portfolio Management for Fundamental Equities, says the big stocks will get bigger, but focus should go beyond the Magnificent 7. She speaks with Romaine Bostick and Scarlet Fu on 'The Close.' (Source: Bloomberg)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
If Trump Wants American Businesses To Thrive, He Should Get Rid of Government Subsidies
Do American businesses require government subsidies to thrive? In a Thursday post on Truth Social, President Donald Trump wrote: "Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon [Musk's] companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large scale subsidies he receives from the U.S. Government. This is not so!" He added, "I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before!" It's not entirely clear if Trump will cut subsidies to Musk's companies. But during a press briefing a day earlier, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, "I don't think so. No." when asked if the president supports agencies contracting with Musk's xAI. The federal government spends $181 billion a year on "direct cash subsidies" and "indirect industry support" for private businesses, according to a March study by Chris Edwards, the Kilts Family Chair in Fiscal Studies at the Cato Institute. In June, during a public feud between the two men, Trump posted that the easiest way to cut spending would be "to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," adding he was "always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" Musk's Tesla Model S was launched with a $465 million Department of Energy loan, and his company has received $11.4 billion in state and federal subsidies, according to a February report by The Washington Post. It's not just Musk's companies, though—the government trough is open for businesses from all industries, including agriculture, aviation, broadband, energy, education, hospitality, housing, manufacturing, transportation, and others. The $42.5 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program, which aims to provide internet access to underserved and rural areas, has connected zero people. Annual farm subsidies can range "between about $15 billion to $30 billion per year," according to a Cato Institute report. Recent spending bills are littered with government subsidies that overpromise and underdeliver. This includes $684 million spent on eight nonoperational coal carbon-capture plants over the past 15 years, $387 million spent on a failed "clean coal" power plant in Mississippi, and $200 billion stolen from the Small Business Administration's Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDLs) and Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) programs. "Everyone wants the United States to be at the leading edge of industry," Edwards tells Reason, "but the way to do that is for the federal government to get it out of the way and to provide an open playing field for everyone." Yet the administration has a mixed record on subsidies in recent weeks. As part of the $9.4 billion rescissions package, Congress recently voted to cut subsidies for public broadcasting. Now, NPR and PBS have to obtain all, rather than most, of their funding from donors and sponsorships. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act claws back $500 billion in energy subsidies but also includes $52.3 billion in spending on the farm safety net, the most significant agricultural subsidy provided by the government. Trump's tariffs are also "akin to corporate subsidies as well", says Edwards, with industries already facing the effects of protectionism lobbying in Washington for favorable treatment. It's consumers who get the short end of the stick in all this, although the administration seems to be OK with this outcome. Worryingly, Trump has at times attempted to assert the executive branch's power over private companies, such as his executive order to "combat illegal private-sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities," and those targeting various law firms. When companies hitch their wagon to federal funding, it makes it easier for the government to wield the power of the state against them. Edwards argues that "protecting U.S. businesses through subsidies or tariffs makes them complacent and less competitive." True competitiveness, he adds, comes from being "subjected to the full rigors of the market." If Trump wants American businesses to "THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before!" he could act on his promise to "cut Hundreds of Billions of Dollars in spending," by calling on Congress to cancel all federal subsidies and allow American businesses to thrive, or fail, on their merit. The post If Trump Wants American Businesses To Thrive, He Should Get Rid of Government Subsidies appeared first on
