Advancing trustworthy AI globally: TELUS is the first Canadian company to embrace newly-launched Hiroshima AI Process (HAIP) Reporting Framework
Contributions of early reporting framework respondents are critical to ongoing global discussions, including the G7 Leaders' Summit and the OECD's Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence Plenary later this year
TORONTO, April 30, 2025 /PRNewswire/ - TELUS today announces its submission to the Hiroshima AI Process (HAIP) Reporting Framework, sharing its proven approaches and best practices for safe and trustworthy AI development in alignment with the G7 AI Code of Conduct. As one of 20 companies worldwide that participated in the OECD Pilot of the Reporting Framework, TELUS is proud to contribute to global collaborative efforts to develop human-centric AI extending its long-standing commitment to building trust in TELUS and the digital world.
'This collaboration between G7 nations and industry partners is vital to developing human-centric AI that builds trust in technology,' said Pam Snively, Chief Data & Trust Officer, TELUS. 'As Canada prepares to host the G7 meetings later this year, TELUS is participating in the B7 discussions this May, where it will champion responsible AI adoption that prioritizes fairness, safety, and transparency. Our long-standing commitment to ethical data and AI practices positions us well to contribute to this important work, which will help our global community realize the transformative benefits of this technology in a way that is safe and responsible.'
Driving collaboration for trustworthy AI systems around the world
The Hiroshima AI Process (HAIP) is a framework for organizations developing advanced AI systems to align with the G7 AI Code of Conduct. The first-of-its-kind HAIP Reporting Framework offers organizations the chance to present comparable information on their AI risk management actions and practices, thereby supporting transparency, accountability, and interoperability, across various industries and jurisdictions. These actions will help enhance trust in AI while mitigating risks related to the technology.
The HAIP framework was first announced as an international initiative in May 2023 by the G7 member countries, after which TELUS was invited to contribute its insights and expertise to the development of responsible AI. TELUS shared how it has implemented comprehensive AI risk management practices and transparency measures, educated its team members through AI and data literacy programs, and aligned its AI governance with existing international standards.
Homegrown leadership, global impact
TELUS is the first Canadian organization to commit to the Reporting Framework. The organization is recognized for its leadership in developing and deploying responsible AI, becoming the first company in the world to be internationally certified in Privacy by Design (ISO 31700-1) and one of the first to sign the Government of Canada's voluntary code of conduct for generative AI. The company's efforts in AI literacy were recently acknowledged as the sole Canadian case study in a Business at OECD report, Boosting Productivity and Business Growth: The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Skills.
In March 2025, TELUS announced that it is partnering with NVIDIA to launch a series of Sovereign AI Factories, providing Canadian businesses and researchers with advanced technology to drive innovation while keeping all data and computing power in Canada. Importantly, TELUS' AI Factory is built in one the world's most sustainable. AI-ready data centres, in Rimouski, Quebec.It utilizes 99% renewable energy and is three times more energy efficient for excess power usage.
For more information about TELUS' commitment to responsible AI, visit telus.com/responsibleAI.
About TELUS
TELUS (TSX: T, NYSE: TU) is a world-leading communications technology company, generating over $20 billion in annual revenue with more than 20 million customer connections through our advanced suite of broadband services for consumers, businesses and the public sector. We are committed to leveraging our technology to enable remarkable human outcomes. TELUS is passionate about putting our customers and communities first, leading the way globally in client service excellence and social capitalism. Our TELUS Health business is enhancing 76 million lives worldwide through innovative preventive medicine and well-being technologies. Our TELUS Agriculture & Consumer Goods business utilizes digital technologies and data insights to optimize the connection between producers and consumers. Guided by our enduring 'give where we live' philosophy, TELUS, our team members and retirees have contributed $1.8 billion in cash, in-kind contributions, time and programs including 2.4 million days of service since 2000, earning us the distinction of the world's most giving company. For more information, visit telus.com or follow @TELUSNews on X and @Darren_Entwistle on Instagram.
For more information:
Emily Piccinin
TELUS Public Relations
[email protected]
View original content to download multimedia: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/advancing-trustworthy-ai-globally-telus-is-the-first-canadian-company-to-embrace-newly-launched-hiroshima-ai-process-haip-reporting-framework-302442362.html
SOURCE TELUS Communications Inc.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
17 hours ago
- The Hill
There's a better approach for Trump to change Putin's calculus
On Monday, President Trump set a new 10 to 12-day ultimatum for President Vladimir Putin to enter peace talks over Ukraine or face a new tariff regime intended to halt global sales of Russian energy products. Trump is promising a 100 percent 'secondary tariff' on any country that imports Russian energy products, targeting India, China, Turkey and others. He's right to recognize that pressuring the Kremlin's main cash cow is a way to grab Putin's attention, but his approach is counterproductive and incomplete. There are two ways to change Putin's plans in Ukraine. The first is to stop Russia's ability to wage its war of choice by constraining its finances. Oil and gas sales account for about a quarter of the Kremlin's budget. The G7, including the U.S., has taken steps since the onset of the war to lower Russia's energy revenues. Last month, the Kremlin's tax proceeds from energy sales were at their lowest since January 2023; however, the Russian government still pocketed about $6 billion. This shows the tradeoff in the G7's initial goal — dent Russian revenues without fully blocking the sale of Russian oil. The G7 has attempted this balancing act because Russian oil exports still make up 7 percent of global oil supply and a full shut-in would roil energy markets across the world. Trump's new plan proposes to do exactly that. To stave off the threat of U.S. tariffs, importing countries may stop accepting Russian oil. Without Russia's 7 million barrels per day of oil exports on the market, global crude oil prices could shoot up almost 25 percent, even assuming other suppliers like OPEC have the capacity and desire to pick up half the slack. Prices at the pump in America would then climb just as tariff-induced inflation hits the economy at a time when nearly two-thirds of Americans disapprove of Trump's handling of inflation. The other scenario, in which some importers defy Trump's threat, is not much better. The imposed secondary tariffs would further ignite inflation in America, especially if they target Chinese imports. Another ratcheting up of tariffs timed simultaneously with increases we saw in bilateral tariffs yesterday could destabilize Wall Street's equity markets again, all while quickening price increases on Main Street. Putin understands these dynamics; that's why the secondary tariff threat won't bring him to the table. It's true that blocking the sales of Russian oil would be a massive hit to the Kremlin, but he sees this as an empty threat because the plan is costly not just to Russia but to the whole world and, in particular, America. Instead, Trump can implement a different tariff to attack Russia's revenues without causing collateral chaos. With existing authorities, the Trump administration can impose sanctions on any company or individual in the world involved in a Russian oil and gas sale. Wanting to maintain access to America's financial system, most will seek to avoid sanctions. The U.S. could permit transactions if Russia pays a shipment fee on each sale — a Russian universal tariff — to the Treasury Department. From there, the U.S. could ratchet this tariff up month by month if Putin drags his feet on negotiating. Financially squeezed over time, Putin will feel increasingly boxed in. The second way to change Putin's calculus is by fortifying Ukraine financially and militarily. Right now, the Kremlin sees global support for Ukraine waning, with citizens in America and Europe fatigued of funding a foreign war. But we don't need to rely on our own taxpayers to back the Ukrainian people. Instead, the U.S. and G7 should seize the $300 billion worth of Russian sovereign assets already frozen in our countries and commit them to supporting Ukraine's defense and reconstruction. Doing so will foil one of Putin's main strategies. Despite a standstill on the battlefield, he thinks he can bring Ukraine to its knees by destroying its economy. That will prove much harder if Ukraine can access Russia's frozen assets. In addition to financial support, Trump and Congress should commit to providing Ukraine with the military resources it needs to continue defending itself. After the 2024 election, Putin thinks he can wait out Ukraine's limited arsenal. Trump needs to flip the script and make clear that a war of attrition is not winnable for Russia. His decision to unpause previously approved military assistance was a good first step. But to force a rethink from Russia, Trump must go further. Committing to arming Ukraine with the weapons made by American workers and companies until Russia agrees to and upholds a ceasefire will do just that. After years of prolonged conflict and unnecessary death, there is a clear need to force Putin's hand. President Trump's instinct is right, but his approach is wrong. To get Russia off the battlefield and to the table, he must delineate a plan that makes negotiating Putin's best option, and that is one that hinders the Russian war machine, helps Ukraine and garners support from Americans and our allies.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Surviving retirement: Where do older Europeans get their money?
Older people had lower average disposable incomes than the total population in 28 European countries in 2022, according to the OECD. Luxembourg was the only exception among the 29 countries included in the analysis. Pensioners face financial difficulties in many countries and some people aged 65 and over continue to work as a result. But how exactly do the income sources of older people vary across nations? According to OECD data, two-thirds (66%) of the income of people aged 65 and over in Europe comes from public payouts, which are mainly state pensions and benefits. That's on average across 27 countries in 2020 or the latest available year. Work is the largest income source after public transfers, accounting for 21% of disposable income for older citizens. Capital income, such as personal pensions and savings, follows at 7%, and private occupational pensions at 6%. The share of public payouts in incomes ranges from 41% in Switzerland to 86% in Belgium. Public transfers also account for at least three-quarters of income for older people in Luxembourg (83%), Austria (82%), Finland (80%), Czechia (76%), Italy (76%), and Portugal and Greece (both 75%). Besides Switzerland, this share is below 50% in the UK (42%), the Netherlands (43%), and Denmark (45%). Among Europe's five largest economies, France has the highest share of public transfers in older people's incomes at 78%, while the UK has the lowest at 42%. The share is 76% in Italy, 72% in Spain, and 68% in Germany. With the exception of Finland, the Nordic countries have lower shares of public transfers. The share is 52% in Sweden, and 58% in both Norway and Iceland. In Turkey, an EU candidate country, 57% of older people's income comes from public transfers. Private occupational transfers exist only in 7 countries Private occupational pensions (pensions, severance payments, death grants, etc.) are not common across Europe. Among 27 countries, only seven note them as a source of income for older people. The Netherlands has the highest share, where they account for 40% of income, followed by the UK at 33% and Switzerland at 29%. Three Nordic countries also include private occupational pensions. They make up 19% of income in Sweden, 15% in Denmark, and 14% in Norway. Germany is the last country in this group, with private occupational pensions accounting for just 5% of income. How does the share of capitals vary? The portion of income that comes from capital — mainly private pensions and personal savings — varies significantly across Europe, ranging from less than 1% in Slovakia to as much as 23% in Denmark. In several countries, this share is at least 10%. These include Turkey and Switzerland (both 16%), France (15%), Sweden (12%), the UK (11%), and Finland, Norway, and Iceland (each at 10%). The share of capital in older people's income is less than 5% in several countries. Work remains a key income source for older people The share of work in the income of older people is significant in many European countries, exceeding one-third in several. It ranges from 7% in France to 40% in Latvia. Work accounts for over 32% of income for older people in Slovakia (36%), Lithuania (35%), Estonia and Poland (both 34%), and Iceland (32%). Work still makes up at least one-fifth of older people's income in several countries, including Turkey (27%), Hungary (26%), Slovenia (23%), Ireland and Czechia (22% each), and Greece, Portugal (21% each), and Spain (20%). Older people in France, Luxembourg, Finland, and Belgium are among the least reliant on work, with employment income accounting for less than 11% of their total income. Key findings: Varied social security systems Varying levels of the four income sources for older people, most of whom are pensioners, show the diversity of social security systems across Europe. Key insights from the data include: Western Europe (such as Belgium, France, Austria) relies heavily on public pensions as the primary income source. Nordic countries (such as Denmark and Sweden, not Finland) have more diversified income sources, including strong private pension schemes. Eastern and Southern Europe (including Poland, Slovakia, Greece, and Turkey) tend to have higher shares of work-related income. Private occupational pensions remain underdeveloped in many Eastern and Southern European countries. Old age poverty remains a significant issue in several European countries, and major pension disparities continue to exist across the continent. As life expectancies increase, policymakers face growing challenges to ensure adequate support for ageing populations while keeping deficits at economically sustainable levels. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Surviving retirement: Where do older Europeans get their money?
Older people had lower average disposable incomes than the total population in 28 European countries in 2022, according to the OECD. Luxembourg was the only exception among the 29 countries included in the analysis. Pensioners face financial difficulties in many countries and some people aged 65 and over continue to work as a result. But how exactly do the income sources of older people vary across nations? According to OECD data, two-thirds (66%) of the income of people aged 65 and over in Europe comes from public payouts, which are mainly state pensions and benefits. That's on average across 27 countries in 2020 or the latest available year. Work is the largest income source after public transfers, accounting for 21% of disposable income for older citizens. Capital income, such as personal pensions and savings, follows at 7%, and private occupational pensions at 6%. The share of public payouts in incomes ranges from 41% in Switzerland to 86% in Belgium. Public transfers also account for at least three-quarters of income for older people in Luxembourg (83%), Austria (82%), Finland (80%), Czechia (76%), Italy (76%), and Portugal and Greece (both 75%). Besides Switzerland, this share is below 50% in the UK (42%), the Netherlands (43%), and Denmark (45%). Among Europe's five largest economies, France has the highest share of public transfers in older people's incomes at 78%, while the UK has the lowest at 42%. The share is 76% in Italy, 72% in Spain, and 68% in Germany. With the exception of Finland, the Nordic countries have lower shares of public transfers. The share is 52% in Sweden, and 58% in both Norway and Iceland. In Turkey, an EU candidate country, 57% of older people's income comes from public transfers. Private occupational transfers exist only in 7 countries Private occupational pensions (pensions, severance payments, death grants, etc.) are not common across Europe. Among 27 countries, only seven note them as a source of income for older people. The Netherlands has the highest share, where they account for 40% of income, followed by the UK at 33% and Switzerland at 29%. Three Nordic countries also include private occupational pensions. They make up 19% of income in Sweden, 15% in Denmark, and 14% in Norway. Germany is the last country in this group, with private occupational pensions accounting for just 5% of income. How does the share of capitals vary? The portion of income that comes from capital — mainly private pensions and personal savings — varies significantly across Europe, ranging from less than 1% in Slovakia to as much as 23% in Denmark. In several countries, this share is at least 10%. These include Turkey and Switzerland (both 16%), France (15%), Sweden (12%), the UK (11%), and Finland, Norway, and Iceland (each at 10%). The share of capital in older people's income is less than 5% in several countries. Work remains a key income source for older people The share of work in the income of older people is significant in many European countries, exceeding one-third in several. It ranges from 7% in France to 40% in Latvia. Work accounts for over 32% of income for older people in Slovakia (36%), Lithuania (35%), Estonia and Poland (both 34%), and Iceland (32%). Work still makes up at least one-fifth of older people's income in several countries, including Turkey (27%), Hungary (26%), Slovenia (23%), Ireland and Czechia (22% each), and Greece, Portugal (21% each), and Spain (20%). Older people in France, Luxembourg, Finland, and Belgium are among the least reliant on work, with employment income accounting for less than 11% of their total income. Key findings: Varied social security systems Varying levels of the four income sources for older people, most of whom are pensioners, show the diversity of social security systems across Europe. Key insights from the data include: Western Europe (such as Belgium, France, Austria) relies heavily on public pensions as the primary income source. Nordic countries (such as Denmark and Sweden, not Finland) have more diversified income sources, including strong private pension schemes. Eastern and Southern Europe (including Poland, Slovakia, Greece, and Turkey) tend to have higher shares of work-related income. Private occupational pensions remain underdeveloped in many Eastern and Southern European countries. Old age poverty remains a significant issue in several European countries, and major pension disparities continue to exist across the continent. As life expectancies increase, policymakers face growing challenges to ensure adequate support for ageing populations while keeping deficits at economically sustainable levels.
