Scottish Labour MP calls for third UK Government U-turn over Waspi women compensation
A Scottish Labour MP has called for the UK Government to make a third U-turn and compensate Waspi women.
Douglas McAllister said "an apology is not enough" and urged his party's government to "get around the table with the Waspi women and avoid years of court battles".
The SNP also called for the UK Government to go for a hat trick of U-turns and pay the women.
The Labour Government decided against reimbursing women born in the 1950s affected by the changes to state pension age.
This was despite a recommendation from the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman's (PHSO) to give the women between £1,000 and £2,950 each. It would have costed between £3.5 and £10.5 billion, according to the UK Government.
It comes after Labour was recently forced into U-turns over its winter fuel payment and disability benefit cuts.
West Dunbartonshire MP McAllister said during a debate in the House of Commons on Thursday: "The UK Government were right to recognise the injustice suffered by Waspi women in the statement to the House on 17 December, and to apologise for the maladministration that affected women across the UK.
"Of course, the steps set out by the Government to ensure this does not happen again are welcome, but we must learn the lessons and always set a clear timetable for notice of any future state pension age changes.
"However, an apology is not enough. I urge my Government colleagues to look again at the ombudsman's report and all its recommendations.
"Ignoring key elements of the report, by refusing to comply with its instructions and refusing to set up a compensation scheme for maladministration, not only undermines its role and function, but is unprecedented and sets us on a very dangerous path."
He added: "I suggest that we should avoid unnecessary court action. Let us get around the table with the Waspi women and avoid years of court battles, similar to other scandals over the past few decades.
"Let us urgently review and explore what schemes this Government can consider, and offer financial redress to the 1950s women who deserve justice and to be properly compensated for past Government maladministration."
Some Scottish Labour MPs suggested earlier this year that they would vote against the Government on Waspi compensation if they get the chance in the Commons.
More than 330,000 women were impacted in Scotland - 5,000 of which were in McAllister's constituency.
The welfare reforms U-turn earlier this week came after a potential rebellion from backbench Labour MPs.
SNP MSP Clare Haughey said: 'Labour's U-turns on Winter Fuel Payments and disability cuts show they can be forced into doing the right thing. The SNP will continue to hold Sir Keir Starmer's government to account – and now is the time for Westminster to do the right thing for WASPI women.
'Over 330,000 women in Scotland have been left in the dark by unfair and poorly communicated Westminster changes to their pensions. Labour promised action, but now they've gone silent.
'After one year in office, Labour need to deliver justice for the WASPI women in Scotland and across the UK.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
13 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Bus improvements 'at expense of Powys council tax rise'
POWYS councillors have narrowly voted in favour of providing the £1.349 million needed to fund the new bus timetable preferred option. But many opposition councillors felt aggrieved that the extraordinary Powys County Council meeting was held on Friday, July 4, the last possible date to sign the paperwork that allows the new seven-year contracts to come into force on September 1. The preferred option will provide for longer distance services connecting the five 'sustainable Powys' hub towns and then travelling on to larger towns and cities that Powys residents need to get to for health, education and other services that are not available in the county. The changes would provide longer hours and weekend services, This option had been backed by the Liberal Democrat/Labour cabinet last month, and need an extra £2.354 million on top of the basic £5.442 million. To help fund this year's contract the council needed to find £1.349 million from several internal budgets, which were transferred as virements which could only be agreed at a full council meeting. Plaid Cymru group leader Cllr Elwyn Vaughan said: 'Why are we having this discussion at such a late stage? 'It's highly unfortunate and some would say unprofessional that we're having such an important discussion on multi-million-pound contracts at the very last minute. 'It's been known for months when the new contracts would be in place. 'We've been railroaded into a take it or leave it situation, and we should have had more time.' Cabinet member for Highways, Transport and Recycling Cllr Jackie Charlton (Liberal Democrat) said: 'I am really disappointed that you think this is unprofessional. 'I think it's been one of the most professional processes I have seen in this authority. 'We've looked at the really extensive contracts we have with local providers, making sure we can extend wherever possible our existing (bus) network and deliver on what people asked for.' Cllr Charlton stressed: 'It's been through the full democratic process, it's been through scrutiny, cabinet and has been out to engagement.' Cllr Gareth E Jones (Powys Independents) believed that funding the bus services from next year onwards could result in a 'two per cent increase in council tax'. Cabinet member for Finance, Cllr David Thomas said: 'It's a premature to suggest that it will be funded from council tax as we don't know what (financial) settlement we'll receive from the Welsh Government.' He explained that departmental savings, and the government funding floor agreed earlier this year could all be considered to help fund the bus contracts in the longer term. While opposition councillors continued to attack the proposal Liberal Democrat councillors came out to defend it. Cllr Glyn Preston (Liberal Democrat) said: 'One of the largest villages in Wales (Trefeglwys) not served by a bus route, is now going to be served by one.' Cabinet member for legal and regulatory services, Cllr Richard Church (Liberal Democrat) pointed out the 'cross party' Economy Residents and Communities scrutiny committee had supported this option after they discussed the report last month. 'We should be shouting from the rooftops the fact that we are bringing back Sunday and evening services,' said Cllr Church. Eventually a vote was held which saw 25 councillors vote in favour of the virement, 21 vote against it and one councillor abstained.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
No 10 regrets choice of ‘insipid' new cabinet secretary, sources say
Keir Starmer's No 10 increasingly has 'buyer's remorse' about the new cabinet secretary, Chris Wormald, who has only been running the civil service for six months, Downing Street and Whitehall sources have told the Guardian. Wormald, who was the permanent secretary at the Department of Health and Social Care during the Covid pandemic, was chosen by the prime minister from a shortlist of four names. Starmer made his pick in consultation with the head of the civil service and the first civil service commissioner, saying at the time that Wormald 'brings a wealth of experience to this role at a critical moment in the work of change this new government has begun'. However, multiple sources said some people around Starmer were growing to view the choice of Wormald as 'disastrous' for the prospects of radical reform of the civil service and had begun to explore options for how to work around him. One said Wormald was viewed as 'insipid' and prone to wringing his hands about problems rather than coming up with solutions, and too entrenched in the status quo. The Spectator reported on Thursday that Starmer had picked Wormald despite others being looked on more favourably by the expert panel that had shortlisted the candidates. It quoted a cabinet minister as saying: 'If you want to do drastic reform of the state, you don't appoint someone whose grandfather and father were both civil servants.' It is understood the panel did not rank the candidates, so there was no preferred choice, but gave four 'appointable' names who would do the job well and assessments of each one. The shortlist of four also included Antonia Romeo, now permanent secretary at the Home Office, Olly Robbins, the Foreign Office permanent secretary, and Tamara Finkelstein, the permanent secretary at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. A government spokesperson said: 'The appointment decision was made in line with the usual procedures for appointing permanent secretaries. Under this process, a panel proposes a shortlist of appointable candidates for a final decision by the prime minister. 'The cabinet secretary is leading the work to rewire the way government operates, driving efficiency and reducing bureaucracy as part of prime minister's plan for change to renew our country.' The doubts about the choice of Wormald as cabinet secretary are not new but it has been a difficult few weeks for Starmer on domestic policy, with questions over why he became distracted by foreign affairs and missed the implications of a looming rebellion on welfare cuts. The cabinet secretary is the prime minister's most senior policy adviser and also responsible for running the civil service. In the past, prime ministers have attempted to solve problems with how No 10 and the government is run by splitting the role into a cabinet secretary, a Cabinet Office permanent secretary and a separate head of the civil service, as happened under David Cameron. These were merged back into a single cabinet secretary in 2014 after a three-year experiment in dividing power. The Times reported in April that No 10 was considering greater changes to the machinery of government to create more executive power at the centre, with fewer procedural demands on officials' time, a higher bar for public inquiries, and a civil service that better reflects Britain's class diversity. On his appointment, Wormald told civil servants they would have to 'do things differently' and promised a 'rewiring of the way the government works'. His position is likely to come under further scrutiny when the next stage of Covid inquiry reports are published in the autumn on core political and administrative decision-making. The first report found there had been 'a lack of adequate leadership' in Britain's pandemic preparation, saying the civil service and governments 'failed their citizens'.
Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
The Starmiversary is here - where did it all go so wrong?
On May 22 2024, Rishi Sunak stood outside of Downing Street in the pouring rain and announced he was calling a General Election. Six weeks later, Sir Keir Starmer pulled up in his car to No 10 on July 5. As he stepped out, the sun came out. The metaphor was clear. In contrast to the bleak, miserable end to the Tories' time in charge, here was a new leader promising brighter days ahead. During his first speech, he told the nation: 'If you voted for Labour yesterday, we will carry the responsibility of your trust, as we rebuild our country. 'But whether you voted Labour or not, in fact – especially if you did not, I say to you, directly, my government will serve you.' Looking back at that day a year on, it might not be too hard to argue that optimistic idea about Starmer bringing a warm glow to the country was quite a pathetic fallacy. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. Labour's polling numbers have collapsed since that day, and the party is now consistently stuck several points behind Reform. The PM himself is doing only marginally better, with a net favourability rating of -34 according to YouGov. On Tuesday, the government suffered its biggest ever rebellion despite gutting its flagship welfare bill. The following day, the Chancellor wept openly during PMQs. By Thursday evening, one of Starmer's MPs, Zarah Sultana, announced she was leaving the Labour party and would 'co-lead the founding of a new party' with the ex-Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn. He said discussions were 'ongoing' after the announcement. Outlining her reasons for leaving the party, Sultana accused the Labour Government of failing to improve people's lives, and claimed it 'wants to make disabled people suffer' in reference to ministers' proposals to reform welfare – a claim that was rejected by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper. So where did it all go so wrong? It's impossible to pick a particular moment where the trouble started. But if we were going to have a shot regardless, polls wouldn't be a bad place to start looking. They seem to suggest Starmer's approval rating falls off a bit of a cliff around the end of July 2024 – barely three weeks after he started his new job. What was happening politically around the end of July? Well, one big thing happened on July 29: that was the day Rachel Reeves stood up in Parliament and declared a massive cut to the winter fuel payment. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In hindsight, it's a little baffling. Starmer's government was still defining itself to voters, trying to project an image about who they were and what they represented. There's an argument that the Chancellor was aiming to get the tough but necessary decisions out of the way as early as possible, so they would have faded to the back of voters' minds by the next general election. But clearly, first impressions matter. Despite the recent backtrack, in which the payment was returned to everyone receiving a pension who has an income below a £35,000 threshold, this might have been the moment many voters made up their mind about the PM and his ministers. And of course, the Winter Fuel Payment was not the only announcement in this vein. There was inheritance tax on farms, and the retention of the two-child benefit cap. All these 'tough decisions' circled around something else mentioned for the first time in that July 29 speech: the '£22 billion black hole' in the public finances that Reeves said she had found left over by the Conservatives. Many of Labour's woes in government can be traced back to this figure. According to the Parliamentary transcript Hansard, the phrase '£22 billion black hole' has been used in the House of Commons no fewer than 287 times since last July, largely in the context of justifying unpopular choices. Plenty of political goodwill has been spent on filling it but, as might be expected from a black hole, everything else has been sucked into it too. Several of the government's policies enjoy broad public support – charging VAT on private school fees to fund state education; closer alignment with the European Union; and expanding free school meals, for example. More Trending But it's the tricky decisions that the government says it must make to get the country on a firmer fiscal footing that really stick with people. As a result, a year after the party's landslide victory, the Labour government has found itself defined more by the things it didn't want to have to do, than the things it did want to do. This week, the sun was blazing again ahead of the first Starmiversary. But the Prime Minister may well have spent those days wondering how much longer it'll be until the clouds clear for him. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: What we know about Zarah Sultana's new party 'with Jeremy Corbyn' after she quits Labour MORE: From tears to cheers, readers discuss Rachel Reeves and tax rises MORE: Rachel Reeves crying exposes a grim double standard
