logo
Immigration raids targeting workers spark dissent even in Trump-friendly Orange County

Immigration raids targeting workers spark dissent even in Trump-friendly Orange County

As protests broke out in cities across Southern California over President Trump's aggressive immigration enforcement sweeps, the mood in Huntington Beach was celebratory.
'Make America Great Again' and 'Trump 2024' banners waved at the intersection of Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway as the president's supporters turned out at a protest last month. One sign held up by a teen encouraged attendees to 'support your local ICE raid.'
It wasn't a surprise in the conservative beach town where leaders had months earlier declared Huntington Beach a nonsanctuary city. At the time, the city filed a lawsuit against the state over its law limiting cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities, arguing that illegal immigration was to blame for a rise in crime.
'Huntington Beach will not sit idly by and allow the obstructionist sanctuary state law to put our 200,000 residents at risk of harm from those who seek to commit violent crimes on U.S. soil,' Mayor Pat Burns said at the time.
Elsewhere in Orange County, particularly in cities with higher immigrant populations, the conversation about the raids has been much more muted. Republicans who voted for Trump and support his efforts to deport those who have committed crimes expressed hesitation about the sweeps that have targeted workers and longtime residents.
A group of Republican legislators in California, including two who represent Orange County, sent a letter to Trump last week urging him to direct United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security to focus their enforcement operations on criminals and 'avoid the kinds of sweeping raids that instill fear and disrupt the workplace.'
'The fear is driving vital workers out of critical industries, taking California's affordability crisis and making it even worse for our constituents,' wrote the legislators, including Assemblymembers Diane Dixon (R-Newport Beach) and Laurie Davies (R-Laguna Niguel).
They called on Trump to modernize the country's immigration process to give undocumented immigrants with long-standing local ties a path toward legal status.
Jo Reitkopp, a Republican political organizer from Orange, supports Trump's immigration policy, saying that she believes the country has become safer since he began fulfilling his campaign promise to rid the country of criminals.
But her own family's history has softened her opinion about the raids, despite her stance that deportations should continue. Her father, an undocumented immigrant from Sicily, was deported to Italy in the 1950s after he'd met Reitkopp's mother. He later returned to America using a pathway for immigrants to gain legal status, she said.
'I do have a lot of compassion for the people who don't know their home country or came when they were 5,' she said. 'I don't understand why they never became citizens. If they would've, they wouldn't have been deported.'
Although Trump has repeatedly said his administration is focusing deportation efforts on criminals, data show that the majority of those arrested in early June in the Los Angeles area were men who had never been charged with a crime.
In the early days of the enforcement action — between June 1 and 10 — about 69% of those arrested in the Los Angeles region had no criminal conviction and 58% had never been charged with a crime, according to a Times data analysis.
Reitkopp said it's 'sad' when raids sweep up individuals who haven't committed crimes. But the federal government's offer for undocumented immigrants to self-deport and possibly have a chance to return is a silver lining, she added.
'It's a bad scenario, but [Trump] is giving them an opportunity,' she said.
Trump's plans for deportations that he outlined during his campaign aren't particularly popular among many Orange County voters.
Only a third of Orange County residents who responded to a UC Irvine poll published in January agreed with Trump on the issue. Nearly 60% of residents polled preferred that undocumented individuals have an option to obtain legal status.
Although almost half of white respondents supported deportations, nearly three-quarters of Latino respondents preferred an option for legal status, the poll shows.
Orange County is home to roughly 236,000 undocumented immigrants, the majority of whom were born in Mexico, Central America and Asia, according to data published in 2019 from the Migration Policy Institute. Data at the time show that 33% of those undocumented individuals had been in the United States for at least 20 years and that 67% were employed.
Jeffrey Ball, president and CEO of the Orange County Business Council, said he agrees with California lawmakers calling for immigration enforcement to be focused on criminals rather than broader sweeps.
While businesses so far haven't reported significant impacts, Ball said when people don't feel safe working 'it's not the type of positive environment you want from a business standpoint.'
'This immigrant population is an important part of our workforce,' he said. 'We are still in a labor shortage in this region and so to the extent you have people leaving the region out of fear or not feeling comfortable going to work it further exacerbates some of the problems we have related to the efficiency and reliability of the workforce.'
Christopher Granucci, an independent, acknowledged that although illegal immigration has become a problem for many in Southern California, he's troubled by the indiscriminate nature of the deportations.
'We have millions and millions of people who came in, but I think they need to be laser-focused on the real criminals,' Granucci said. 'I think for those criminals, everyone in the country agrees that they should be kicked out.'
As a teacher, Granucci has seen students whose parents aren't legal residents or are on a path to obtaining residency.
'If they could be more strategic about who is being removed, that would be so much better,' Granucci said. 'Right now, everyone is freaked out. Students are freaked out and parents are freaked out because of it.'
In areas of Little Saigon — which encompasses parts of Westminster, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove and Santa Ana — news of the raids has hit the community harder than ever before.
There are many undocumented Vietnamese residents who call the largest ethnic enclave outside of Vietnam home. But many weren't concerned about facing deportations for years, activists say, because of a 2008 agreement between the United States and Vietnam that allowed most Vietnamese immigrants who entered the United States before 1995 — mainly refugees who fled violence following the Vietnam War — to stay in the country.
An updated memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Vietnam in 2020 created a process for deporting such immigrants.
'What we're seeing is the people who are immigrants themselves that support Trump's deportation agenda only support it until it affects them,' said Tracy La, executive director of VietRISE. 'Trump isn't just going after undocumented Latino immigrants — he's going after Vietnamese, other Southeast Asians, Chinese, Indian and many other communities. That's something that I think a lot of people who supported it have been grappling with.'
In Fountain Valley, a city with a large Vietnamese American population where 32% of residents identify as being foreign-born, Mayor Ted Bui hasn't seen much public pushback for the raids. Many of the Vietnamese Americans who live there value law and order, and see the raids as federal law enforcement simply carrying out their duties, he said.
He feels the same, he said.
Bui's family fled Vietnam after the fall of Saigon, first heading to France, where his grandfather was a citizen. He later came to the United States to study under a student visa. He fell in love with the graciousness he felt among Americans and went through the process to become a citizen, he said.
'What are we saying if we allow people to break the law?' Bui said. 'If we allow people to break the law, then why have laws in the first place? There would be no meaning behind it, and we'd be a country of chaos.'
Three decades ago, Orange County was the birthplace of Proposition 187, a statewide ballot initiative that would have denied schooling, nonemergency healthcare and other public services to immigrants living in the country illegally.
The measure, which passed 59% to 41% in 1994, would have also required teachers to tell authorities about any children they suspected of being in the country illegally. But the act never took effect after being blocked by federal judges.
Anti-illegal immigration sentiment in Orange County still ran deep into the early 2000s. In Costa Mesa, then-Mayor Allan Mansoor presented a plan in 2005 to train city police officers to enforce immigration law.
As the demographics of Orange County continued to change — transitioning from a reliable Republican stronghold to a politically competitive locale — immigration became a more nuanced issue even in Republican circles.
In the 2024 presidential election, Kamala Harris won Orange County, but by a much tighter margin than either Hillary Clinton in 2016 or Joe Biden in 2020, cementing the county's position as a suburban battleground.
In Santa Ana, a Latino immigrant hub in the center of Orange County, immigration sweeps sparked days of protests downtown. City officials have demanded that National Guard troops at the federal courthouse leave and have been working on ways to help those swept up and their families.
Santa Ana City Councilmember Thai Viet Phan, a Democrat, said even those who agree with Trump about better border protection are unnerved by raids outside Home Depots and at car washes.
'People have a lot of sympathy,' Phan said. 'People voted for Trump based on a variety of things, principally the economy. But I don't think they anticipated it would be like this.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrat Jeffries Delays House Vote on Trump Tax Bill With Marathon Speech
Democrat Jeffries Delays House Vote on Trump Tax Bill With Marathon Speech

Bloomberg

time16 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Democrat Jeffries Delays House Vote on Trump Tax Bill With Marathon Speech

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries is blocking a final vote on Republicans' tax and spending package with a lengthy floor speech bashing the bill. The New Yorker is using his unlimited floor speech privileges to ensure Democratic criticisms of the bill air on popular morning news shows. He began speaking before 5 a.m. in remarks that have gone well beyond a speech expected to last an hour. The longer he talks, the more attention he is likely to draw.

Haitian immigrant high schooler detained by ICE despite legal status
Haitian immigrant high schooler detained by ICE despite legal status

USA Today

time18 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Haitian immigrant high schooler detained by ICE despite legal status

A 20-year-old NY high school student, whose dad is a U.S. citizen, arrived legally from Haiti, but has been held in ICE detention for weeks. A 20-year-old from Haiti has been held in immigration detention for weeks, missing the end of his junior year of high school, although he is in the country legally and his father is a United States citizen. Spring Valley High School student Alan Junior Pierre was picked up by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in early June and is being held at the Delaney Hall Detention Facility in Newark, New Jersey, his lawyer said. The Haitian national, who has no criminal history, had been provided parole by ICE in January, when he sought asylum at the United States-Mexico border, his lawyer Vince Sykes told The Journal News/lohud, part of the USA TODAY Network. The status was based on humanitarian considerations and family support. Pierre is one of a growing number of migrants who entered the United States legally, have broken no laws, but are detained by ICE after showing up at court hearings related to their immigration status. "He applied for admission using the legal procedure that was in place," Sykes said. He followed all the rules, but now, his lawyer said, Pierre sits in an ICE facility; he missed the last weeks of school; he cannot see his family. In the same situation: Boy with leukemia held in detention, threatened with deportation Finally safe, until a May 5 appointment Haiti is so dangerous the state department has issued a "do not travel" warning for the country, saying the risk of kidnapping, crime and civil unrest is too high. Gangs exceed government control in the poorest nation in the region. Alan Pierre appeared to finally be safe from those dangers — his parole status continues through January 2026, according to documents. Now his family is fearful he could end up back in Haiti amid the violence there, said his father, Dutan Pierre of Nanuet, New York, near the New Jersey border. The dad went to Newark, New Jersey, 35 miles away, to try and meet with his son, but was turned away and told to come back on a visiting day. When the father returned, he was told there were no more visitor slots open that day. With translation help and emotional support from the Rev. Jean Claude Dorcelly of Rock Apostle Church in Spring Valley, Dutan Pierre told The Journal News/lohud that his son is a kind and smart kid. If he was sent back to Haiti, the young man would be all alone and at grave risk, Dutan Pierre added. A routine appointment leads to detention Dutan Pierre is a United States citizen and filed a US 1-130 "Petition for Alien Relative" application and adjustment of status on behalf of his son. That allows a relative to stay and apply for permanent residency status, commonly called a green card. Alan Pierre could be eligible for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status because he is a full-time student and under age 21. Despite those factors, ICE took him into custody June 3 after a routine appointment at a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Application Support Center. 'He received a fingerprint application in the Bronx about four weeks ago,' his attorney, Vince Sykes said. 'He went for his fingerprint appointment and got picked up by ICE.' Sykes also has been unable to meet with Alan Pierre, although he has now set up a video meeting. Meanwhile, ICE officials presented paperwork to Alan Pierre to sign and voluntarily be deported, Sykes said. But, the young man didn't sign. "This is why you want people to have counsel immediately," the lawyer said, citing the Sixth Amendment right to prompt legal representation. Sykes said he believes there's no legal basis for ICE's actions. "It is ironic — and deeply troubling — that his compliance with the immigration process triggered his detention," Sykes wrote in a June 24 letter to the ICE Field Office director in Newark, which was obtained by The Journal News/lohud. How a complex system foils Alan Pierre A quick resolution has been frustrated, Sykes said, by Alan Pierre's efforts to follow the rules. Because Alan Pierre presented himself at the United States-Mexico border and was granted parole status by Customs and Border Patrol, ICE has jurisdiction over his case. That means the case operates outside the federal immigration courts. 'It means the immigration judge doesn't have jurisdiction to release him on bond,' Sykes said. 'Any immigration judge would release him; he's got no criminal record. It makes absolutely no sense that he should be detained.' Born in Nyack, stuck in Haiti: Family finally wins fight to prove woman's U.S. citizenship Even if he was able to get a Rockland Family Court proceeding scheduled to seek special juvenile status in his father's home state, Alan Pierre wouldn't be able to show up for court because he remains detained in New Jersey. Sykes said a habeas corpus petition could be filed in federal court — basically a last-ditch civil effort to challenge the legality of Pierre's detention. "It's very exhaustive and involved," Sykes said. Meanwhile, there's a concern that Alan Pierre could be moved to a different facility, which would mean the judicial proceedings would have to start over with a new judge. When asked about what could happen if Alan Pierre does get deported, Dutan Pierre became too emotional to get out more than a couple words in English. "This is so sad," the father said in Haitian Creole. "If he does go to Haiti he would be by himself. The bandits destroyed everything."

Trump goes ‘woke' in report on antisemitism at Harvard
Trump goes ‘woke' in report on antisemitism at Harvard

Boston Globe

time19 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump goes ‘woke' in report on antisemitism at Harvard

What the administration mainly offers in its finding, though, is a litany of sit-ins, walk-outs, and group letters organized by pro-Palestinian student groups — with remarkably little evidence of any intention to harass or discriminate against Jewish peers. Take, for example, the government's finding that 'Jewish and Israeli students at Harvard were repeatedly denied access to … libraries.' That sounds like an accusation of intentional discrimination. In fact, though, the only evidence for several of these 'denials of access' consists of Advertisement The answer is that the administration could classify that behavior as discriminatory only by embracing an especially radical version of an effects-based theory of discrimination. Specifically, the implicit argument proceeds in two steps. First, Jews or Israelis are much more likely than others to be offended by this kind of anti-Israel rhetoric — and so to feel unwelcome or uncomfortable in spaces where it is present. Second, when certain behavior (here, certain expression) has that kind of disproportionate impact on one group, engaging in that behavior amounts to discrimination against the disparately affected group — even absent any intent to single out its members. The legal term for this kind of discrimination theory is 'disparate-impact liability,' although that legal theory is usually seen only in domains such as employment and housing — not as a basis for speech regulation, let alone for mandating how peers should interact on college campuses. Advertisement And hence the rich irony: Not only is disparate impact widely recognized as a progressive idea, it is intensely embattled — thanks in no small part to President Trump. Just months ago, Trump issued a landmark executive Advertisement But somehow the anti-Harvard legal team, alone among federal officials tasked with enforcing civil rights, didn't get the memo. When it comes to people of color who are excluded from voting by ostensibly neutral requirements, the administration's position is that there can be no discrimination without proof of intent. Likewise for women excluded from public-safety jobs by physical capacity tests, or Black citizens who bear the brunt of police violence or decrepit public infrastructure. But if a college student's political activity disproportionately affects Jewish or Israeli peers — even just by causing offense or making them feel alienated — the administration deems that inherently discriminatory, no intent required. Could the administration claim instead that hostility toward Israel or Zionism is inherently antisemitic because many Jews see Zionism as part of their Jewish identity? Not really. Because Title VI does not cover religion, Jewishness is protected by the law only insofar as it constitutes a 'race' — a fact about one's ancestry. Under existing law, however, culturally salient practices or beliefs can play no role in the definition of racial categories. That is why judges have ruled that bans on dreadlocks and cornrows are not racially discriminatory, even if Black employees view these hairstyles as expressive of their racial identity. Advertisement The irony, once again, is that the contrary view — the culture-oriented conception of race that Trump's legal theory in the Harvard case would require the courts to embrace — is a well-known tenet of critical race theory, the 'woke' school that Trump and his allies have ridiculed for years. Maybe it is a mistake to scrutinize the legal analysis in what is evidently a political document. Yet if anyone still doubts the sham quality of this 'civil rights' action, there is no better proof than the lawyers' shameless reliance on ideas about discrimination that, when enlisted in the service of traditional civil rights concerns, the administration purports to find fundamentally un-American.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store