Fundrise CFO Alison Staloch talks home affordability and Gen Z's investing trends
As housing affordability challenges persist across the U.S., institutional investors are increasing their presence in the residential real estate market, a trend some see as validation of real estate ownership as a long-term investment vehicle. However, critics argue it risks sidelining individual buyers and has resulted in an affordability crisis. Recently, legislation has been put forth by lawmakers in New York, Virginia, New Mexico and Georgia to limit this growing trend.
Fundrise CFO Alison Staloch, whose firm targets markets where housing demand outpaces supply, sees the momentum as reinforcing the case for real estate as an accessible investment. Her insights on the intersection of institutional capital and home affordability, along with the evolving expectations of Gen Z investors, reflect two trends with significant implications for her business. She also shares her views on cybersecurity as a finance function, reflects on her transition out of public accounting and weighs in on proposed changes to CPA licensure requirements.
CFO, Fundrise
First CFO Position: 2021
Notable previous employers:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
KPMG US
This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity.
ALISON STALOCH: On affordability — more renters means more demand, which is our opportunity. The housing crisis is a supply issue. We invest where more housing is needed, which aligns impact with opportunity. That includes single-family rental communities, build-to-rent developments and multifamily housing. The U.S. is short millions of units — I've seen estimates between three and six million — and that shortage drives affordability issues while reinforcing long-term rental demand.
We focus on markets with job growth and population inflows. This is where affordability challenges create sustained rental need. So when we invest, we're trying to address supply in a way that meets real demand and also makes financial sense. Maybe someone can't buy the house they want right now, but they can rent it and that's valuable too.
As for the bigger institutional investors, we're seeing more of them enter the space, and it validates what we've long believed: residential real estate is durable, attractive and fundamentally strong. Their interest underscores the same drivers we've focused on. Supply shortages, rental demand and appreciation potential.
Austin, Texas is a good example of this. But now, insurance costs and taxes are becoming challenges in places like Texas. We still believe the Sun Belt states are smart plays today, though climate change might shift that over time.
Gen Z isn't anti-investing, they just want to do it differently. They want real assets, not just stocks, and they want early access. They're digital-first and self-directed. They don't want to talk to a traditional advisor. They want to do the research and allocate capital themselves.
They're also drawn to transformative tech. A recent survey we ran showed 68% of retail investors believe AI has the highest growth potential, more than climate tech, e-commerce or crypto. And, two-thirds said they'd be more likely to invest in a product if they could access companies before they go public.
That's something regulators are thinking about too, how to open private markets safely to retail investors. So it's all evolving quickly.
Returns are king. If the returns aren't there, the experience doesn't matter. That said, Gen Z expects a smooth, transparent product experience. They want the information fast and accessible. But, without returns, none of that sticks.
Our [chief technology officer] leads it, but legal, finance and IT collaborate closely on resource allocation and prioritization. Securing investor data and transactions is table stakes. Prevention costs less than a breach, so we invest heavily there. For other areas, we use risk assessments to phase in improvements.
We also embed best practices across the organization. It's part of the culture. For example, our treasury team handles high-dollar wire transfers, so we run regular exercises, like Socratic seminars, to game out threats. One scenario we discuss is deepfakes: a fake CEO asking for a wire transfer. We ask, 'How would we know? How would we stop it?' It keeps everyone alert.
It's a topic that comes up daily. It's woven into everything, even if we're not calling it 'cybersecurity.' It's just part of how we operate now.
Honestly, I thought I'd be a lifer. I respected the career path and the role of auditors. But around that 10-year mark, I was looking for my next move. I thought maybe it would be a rotation to a national office.
Then the opportunity came up to do a fellowship at the SEC. People often return to their firms after, but I loved the experience. I ended up staying on as chief accountant for the Division of Investment Management. Eventually, I met Ben Miller, Fundrise's CEO, and loved his vision. I saw it as a chance to build something new rather than just operate in an institutional system.
Personally, I don't love bright-line rules. My practical experience was far more valuable than any specific class I took. A fun fact, I was pre-med, neuroscience minor, psych major. I took zero accounting classes as an undergrad. I took one accounting class after graduating and thought, 'This is easier for me than science.' So I did a master's in accounting and never looked back.
That said, I think having a more diverse educational background has helped me in leadership. Experience matters more than just racking up 150 credit hours. The real question is whether that extra year is truly the barrier. I think awareness is a bigger issue, because people don't realize how dynamic accounting can be. It's like coming in through the back door of a business, you see everything.
Recommended Reading
Gen Z's financial approach includes salary transparency, sports gambling and average pay
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
Gen Z Burnout Is Impacting 83% — Here's How Managers Can Reduce Stress
Gen Z burnout is taking a toll on productivity, but managers have the power to make a difference. Is Gen Z burnout real? According to the United States Department of Labor, 83% of this generation of employees experience the highest level of work-related stress, and 54% report that occupational burnout is significantly impacting their personal lives. Now, Gen Z is not the only generation going through corporate stress. However, they are burning out at considerably higher rates than any previous generation. Why? Why is one generation burning out at such a massive rate? Several factors contribute to this issue facing Gen Z. Why Gen Z Burnout Is Different (And Worse) One of the most significant factors is that 74% of managers view this generation as problematic and challenging. So, when a Gen Z worker who is exceptional and talented comes through the doors for an interview, it's no wonder that they feel compelled to combat the stereotype of their generation. Over 70% of managers already view Gen Z as a problem. So, imagine being from this generation and trying to prove yourself in the workplace? It can't be easy. When you step into the office, you already have all the cards stacked against you. If a Gen Z worker wants to stand above the assumptions that encircles them, they need to work above and beyond the job requirements. This means that instead of finding balance, they overwork to prove their worth to the company. After all, when 42% of hiring managers consider age during resume reviews and 4 in 10 claim to have an outright bias against Gen Z candidates, it's no surprise that employees from this generation feel like they have to work twice as hard to secure their job and to prove themselves as valuable to managers. Having to work above and beyond and feeling like you can never say no or establish boundaries at work is the surest way to set yourself up for burnout. According to a 2025 report from meQ., a people analytics software company, many are feeling deep uncertainty, pessimism, and disconnection. When they surveyed US-based employees, they found that nearly half (42%) of workers report a high degree of stress due to job uncertainty. Among those who experienced a high degree of uncertainty-related stress, 68% showed signs of higher productivity impairment due to burnout. Jack Kelly, a senior contributor to Forbes, discusses the impact of uncertainty on the stress levels of Gen Z. In his article, he suggests, 'The promise of the American Dream, once touted as the reward for academic success and higher education, has turned sour for many Gen Z. Parents encouraged their children to excel in school and pursue college degrees, assuring them of a bright future. However, this path has led many young adults into a financial quagmire.' The job market is constantly shifting for Gen Z, and many of them are tired of trying to navigate the rising tides of change. A recent article in Fortune highlighted this phenomenon, finding that many employees are highly stressed about world affairs, with almost 70% stating that it's impacting their productivity in the workplace. Let's stop for a moment and let this sink in. If you're a manager right now, there's a massive chance that more than half of your employees are unable to give 100% because they're doom-scrolling world events and ending up stuck in fear. So, what can you do differently? How can managers reduce Gen Z burnout? Here are three ways you can help reduce their stress by 40% this week. Three Immediate Actions That Work 1) Micro-Feedback Systems. I know what you're thinking. What exactly are micro-feedback systems? Well, they're small-dosed systems that give you the ability to understand where your employee is coming from and how you can support them in real-time. These can take the form of short surveys, emoji reactions to questions, or even thumbs-up/down buttons. Micro-feedback gives you and your team the chance to converse and get to the heart of the problem, without overwhelming them with a long form to fill out. 2) Vulnerability-Based Leadership I like to refer to this practice as a go-first methodology. Vulnerability-based leadership gives your team the confidence to open up because they have the chance to watch you do it first. Employees, especially those in Generation Z, are often reluctant to open up about their stress levels immediately. But when you lead by example, it empowers them to share about what they're going through because they feel supported. 3) Transparent Salary Progression Paths Gen Z is pragmatic. They want to work for companies where they can excel and see a future. When you allow this generation of workers to see how they can do that with a salary blueprint, they feel like they can trust the process and work toward a tangible goal. Being transparent about salary progression is key to retaining Gen Z for the long haul. So, What Now? How do you combat Gen Z burnout? Well, traditional management methodology has been the standard approach for years. Even during the Stone Age, Fred Flintstone still had to answer to a higher authority before he could leave his 9-5 and enjoy the weekend. But what if we shook it up a little? What if you could reduce the stress level of your Gen Z employees by 40%? If you try out these three strategies, you might find yourself with a happier, more constructive, and dare I say, less stressed Gen Z workers.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gen Z men with college degrees now have the same unemployment rate as non-grads—a sign that the higher education payoff is dead
Gen Z is increasingly slamming their degrees as useless, and new research indicates there may be some truth when it comes to the job hunt. In fact, the unemployment rate of males aged 22 to 27 is roughly the same, whether or not they hold a degree. It comes as employers drop degree requirements and young men ditch corporate jobs for skilled trades. Gen Z is struggling to break into the entry-level job market—but young male college graduates may be hurting the most. The most recent data from the Federal Reserve indicates that the unemployment rate among recent college graduates is on the rise, at about 5.5%. Although it remains lower than the 6.9% rate among all young workers between 22 and 27 years old, men with a college degree now have roughly the same unemployment rate as young men who didn't go to college, according to an analysis of U.S. Current Population Survey data by the Financial Times. In comparison, around 2010, non-college-educated men experienced unemployment rates over 15%, whereas the rate among college graduates was closer to 7%. It's a stark sign that the job market boost once promised by a degree has all but vanished—and that employers care less about credentials than they once did, when hiring for entry-level roles. Young men and women are facing diverging employment rates While 7% of college-educated American men are unemployed, for women this drops to around 4%, according to the Financial Times analysis, and the growth in fields like healthcare are likely to credit. Over the next decade, healthcare occupations are projected to grow much faster than the rate for all occupations, translating to about 1.9 million openings each year—according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Moreover, the industry is largely considered to be among the safest from any sort of cyclical changes: 'Healthcare is a classic recession-resistant industry because medical care is always in demand,' Priya Rathod, career expert at Indeed, previously told Fortune. Men and women also tend to differ on whether they'd be willing to accept a job that doesn't quite fit into their career goals. 'Women tend to be more flexible in accepting job offers, even if they're not perfectly aligned with their career goals or are part-time or they are overqualified for,' Lewis Maleh, CEO of the global recruitment agency Bentley Lewis, previously told Fortune. 'Men, on the other hand, often hold out for roles that align more closely with their ideal career path or offer what they perceive as adequate compensation and status.' Gen Z men are skipping college—and turning to the skilled trade industry Many Gen Zers have learned the hard way about the challenges of today's job market. In fact, some 11% of all young people are considered NEET—meaning not in employment, education, or training. And while there are a myriad of reasons why they might have lost interest in work or education, for those who are college-educated, the struggles often come down to feeling hopeless after months—or years—on the job search. Young men in particular are especially seen as falling into this category of NEET. But some young people have seen the writing on the wall and decided to change paths. The overall share of young college students has declined by about 1.2 million between 2011 and 2022, according to Pew Research Center analysis. But this decline has a stark gender divide, with there being about 1 million fewer men and about 200,000 fewer women students. Part of this shift may be credited to the rise in skilled trade career paths—which tend to be male-dominated. Enrollment at two-year vocational public schools have increased by about 20% since 2020, a net increase of over 850,000 students, according to the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. It's a trend that even billionaires have suggested will be a growing part of the future. Daniel Lubetzky, the founder of KIND bars and the newest judge on Shark Tank says that vocational careers, like being a carpenter or mechanic, are 'huge opportunities that pay really, really well.' 'Vocational training and learning how to be a carpenter or a mechanic or any of those jobs is a huge field with huge opportunities that pays really, really well,' Lubetzky told Fortune earlier this month. 'For those people that have great ideas or great opportunities and don't want to go to college, I don't think college is an end-all, be-all or required thing.' This story was originally featured on Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
2 in 5 workers say personal social media use poses a career risk
This story was originally published on HR Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily HR Dive newsletter. In a survey, 44% of U.S. workers said an active social media presence could more likely hurt someone's career than help it, according to a July 17 report from the American Staffing Association. In contrast, 37% said an active social media presence is more likely to be advantageous to someone's career, the survey found. 'An active social media presence has the ability to make or break years of hard work in the blink of an eye,' Richard Wahlquist, CEO at ASA, said in a news release. 'While younger generations may see social media as a platform for personal expression as well as a tool to advance their careers, it's important to keep in mind that any post you make will likely be seen by potential employers,' he added. In the survey of more than 2,000 Americans, attitudes differed somewhat by generation. While 48% of employed baby boomers said a social media presence can negatively affect someone's career, 51% of Generation Z workers said it can positively influence it. In addition, 56% of Gen Z workers said they believe their social media presence has helped their own personal career, as compared to 44% of millennials, 28% of Gen X and 20% of baby boomers. In some contexts, personal social media use can lead to significant workplace concerns and conflicts. For instance, an Israeli former vice president of engineering in August 2024 brought an unlawful termination and retaliation lawsuit against Intel, which referenced a supervisor's social media posts in support of Hamas. He agreed to dismiss the lawsuit earlier this year. In another lawsuit, an actor fired from 'The Mandalorian' series has alleged wrongful termination and discrimination due to her conservative posts on social media. Although she cited a California labor code that protects workers' rights to be politically active, the case could hinge on nuances around free speech and workers' political rights, law experts told HR Dive. Recommended Reading
