More Chinese company expected to list in Hong Kong amid US-China tensions, finance chief says
Chan said at a press conference on Thursday that mainland Chinese companies 'would naturally want to come to Hong Kong for listing, because by coming to Hong Kong, they can access both international and Mainland capital.'
'This is a very interesting value proposition to them, and has been demonstrated by the figures so far this year,' Chan said, adding that there are over 200 companies waiting to be listed.
In May, a Chinese company that Washington has alleged works with China's military made its debut on Hong Kong's stock market. Contemporary Amperex Technology Limited, a mainland battery giant, raised HK$35.7 billion in the world's largest initial public offering of the year.
Chan's comments came as the government issued a report on Thursday titled 'Unique Strengths under 'One Country, Two Systems.'' The report intends to lay out the city's developments in a 'concise' way accessible to the international community, Chan said. The last report of its kind was published in September 2021.
'Given the geopolitical landscape, there has been some misperception about the situation of Hong Kong in the western world. We are trying very hard to reach out to the international community, to explain to them what is really happening here in Hong Kong by sharing facts and data,' Chan said.
The city's two national security laws – one imposed by Beijing in 2020 and the other passed locally last year – have made Hong Kong a 'safe harbour for attracting international capital and investment,' a statement read.
Inflows, growth
Chan also said the city is expected to surpass Switzerland in cross-border wealth management by 2028, pointing to capital flows from Middle East and ASEAN countries in the asset and wealth management sector, as well as from Greater Bay Area residents looking to park their assets offshore.
According to the World Investment Report 2025 released by UN Trade and Development, Hong Kong's foreign direct investment inflow amounted to US$126 billion last year, making it the third-largest investment recipient in the world.
But despite an increase in investment and capital inflows, it would still be 'prudent' to maintain a Gross Domestic Product growth forecast between 2 to 3 per cent, given the uncertainty and volatility under the current geopolitical landscape, Chan said.
Chan also acknowledged that the city's struggling retail and catering sectors were 'under pressure,' having seen several closures of well-known companies over the past months.
He said that the government was making efforts to hold more 'mega events' and attract more tourists to the city.
'Can our tourism, sports and cultural facilities be made more attractive to tourists coming to Hong Kong? Can there be more activities for tourists to stay longer? If more people stay, more spending will be done here. This is the direction that we are working on.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
40 minutes ago
- AllAfrica
US going all in on sea drones to deter Taiwan war
The US is betting on swarming unmanned surface vessels (USVs) to harass China and delay a Taiwan or South China Sea conflict, wagering that drones and allied self‑defense can deter Beijing without triggering a war. By all accounts, the US Navy is moving fast in that direction. Breaking Defense reported in July 2025 that the service has issued a formal call for industry proposals to rapidly prototype modular USVs, following an industry day earlier this summer. Led by the US Navy's unmanned maritime systems office, the solicitation seeks designs that can carry containerized payloads, integrate with existing naval assets and be fielded within 18 months of contract award. It identifies three vessel concepts, prioritizing one capable of carrying two 40‑foot containers—each weighing 36.3 metric tons and drawing 75 kilowatts—over 2,500 nautical miles at 25 knots in NATO Sea State 4. The US Navy emphasizes affordability and scalability, favoring commercial‑standard, non‑exquisite designs to enable construction across multiple shipyards. Though no award timeline has been specified, the service plans to use Other Transaction Authorities (OTAs) to accelerate the contracting process. Rear Admiral William Daly has highlighted the need for a simplified, mass‑producible USV, moving away from earlier bespoke Medium and Large USV programs. The shift underscores the US Navy's urgency to operationalize distributed lethality and containerized modular warfare on affordable, scalable platforms. US planners see USVs as tools to delay or disrupt Chinese operations in a Taiwan contingency. Admiral Samuel Paparo told The Washington Post in June 2024 that the US has adopted a 'hellscape' US strategy that aims to saturate the Taiwan Strait with thousands of unmanned systems—submarines, surface vessels, and aerial drones— the moment China's invasion fleet mobilizes. Paparo said this mass deployment is designed to harass and paralyze People's Liberation Army (PLA) forces for about a month, creating a window for US, Taiwanese and allied forces to mobilize a full defense and deny Beijing a rapid 'fait accompli.' The strategy extends to the Philippine theater. USNI News reported in June 2025 that the US is upgrading Naval Detachment Oyster Bay on the Philippine island of Palawan to support USVs, enhancing Manila's South China Sea capabilities. A US‑funded facility there will maintain Devil Ray T‑38 USVs already transferred to the Philippine Navy, alongside conventional boats, enabling rapid deployment to Philippine outposts near disputed waters. The US Department of Defense (DoD) anticipates issuing construction contracts within two months, reinforcing bilateral maritime cooperation. Yet this unmanned push faces technical and operational constraints. Steven Wills wrote in April 2025 for Breaking Defense that USVs have short range, power limitations, and high vulnerability in contested environments. He noted that small platforms require frequent servicing, struggle to endure transoceanic deployments and impose logistical strain on the fleet. He also warned that AI‑driven USV control systems are vulnerable under electronic attack, with long‑range operations susceptible to delay or interception. Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Admiral James Stavridis echoed those concerns in an October 2024 Washington Post article. While acknowledging USVs' disruptive potential, he cautioned against prematurely sidelining conventional warships, which provide endurance, force projection and layered defenses that drones cannot match. Stavridis advocates a high‑low mix: cost‑effective swarms of USVs augmenting—but not replacing—large, manned platforms. He emphasized that in contested environments, human decision‑making and survivability remain essential, demanding a balanced modernization strategy. Geography and strategy would compound these limits in a Taiwan or South China Sea war. Unlike Ukraine, Taiwan and the Philippines cannot rely on overland resupply. China can blockade Taiwan and potentially cut off Philippine access to US reinforcements from Guam using carrier battlegroups in the Philippine Sea. A firm US combat commitment to Taiwan risks eroding the strategic ambiguity that has helped maintain peace in the Taiwan Strait, while unambiguous support for Philippine claims in the South China Sea risks pulling Washington into a wider confrontation over features of marginal strategic value to US interests. This situation has pushed Washington toward ally self‑defense models, in which USVs feature as part of a broader denial strategy. Charles Glaser proposed in an April 2025 Washington Quarterly article a US‑supported 'self‑defense' model for Taiwan: arms sales, training and financing without US combat intervention. He urged Taipei to embrace a porcupine strategy, relying on mobile, survivable systems—coastal defense missiles, naval mines, drones and fast attack craft—to raise the cost of a Chinese invasion. According to Glaser, US support would include Foreign Military Financing (FMF), US$1 billion in drawdown authority and Harpoon and Stinger missile transfers, complementing Taiwan's domestic Hsiung Feng missile production. A parallel logic applies to the Philippines. Sarang Shidore, in a February 2025 Quincy Institute report, argued for a restrained, US‑supported self‑defense posture, with aid, intelligence and training rather than direct combat. He noted that the US has pledged $500 million to modernize the Philippine Navy and Coast Guard, expanded Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) sites, increased joint exercises and deployed surveillance and mid‑range missile capabilities—building deterrence without co‑production or combat entanglement. Reflecting an indigenous turn, the Philippine Daily Inquirer reported in July 2025 that Philippine engineers have proposed a USV concept for maritime interdiction or suicide strikes against enemy warships. In sum, Washington's unmanned gamble is to field swarms of USVs to buy time, blunt China's advance and reinforce allies under a self‑defense framework—all while avoiding a direct slide into full‑scale war. But as Wills and Stavridis make clear, USVs are still more complements than war‑winners. They are fragile in rough seas, maintenance‑intensive and dependent on manned ships and logistics networks. The US Navy's shift to commercial standards, mass production and OTAs reflects urgency over perfection: getting drones in the water within 18 months to enable Paparo's 'hellscape' could buy the month of breathing room that US strategy requires. Whether that month is enough will depend on how fast Taiwan and the Philippines can convert US financing, training and technology transfer into resilient self‑defense—and on Washington's ability to deter China without igniting the war it hopes to prevent and ultimately not lose.
RTHK
an hour ago
- RTHK
No 'backdoors' in our chips, says Nvidia
No 'backdoors' in our chips, says Nvidia Nvidia says it "does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them". File photo: Reuters Nvidia chips do not contain "backdoors" that allow remote access, the US tech giant has said, after Beijing summoned company representatives to discuss "serious security issues". The California-based company is a world-leading producer of AI semiconductors and this month became the first company to hit US$4 trillion in market value. But it has become entangled in trade tensions between China and the United States, and Washington effectively restricts which chips Nvidia can export to China on national security grounds. "Cybersecurity is critically important to us. Nvidia does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them," Nvidia said on Thursday. A key issue has been Chinese access to the "H20" – a less powerful version of Nvidia's AI processing units that the company developed specifically for export to China. Nvidia said this month it would resume H20 sales to China after Washington pledged to remove licensing curbs that had halted exports. But the tech giant still faces obstacles – US lawmakers have proposed plans to require Nvidia and other manufacturers of advanced AI chips to include built-in location tracking capabilities. Beijing's top internet regulator said on Thursday it had summoned Nvidia representatives to discuss recently discovered "serious security issues" involving the H20. The Cyberspace Administration of China said it had asked Nvidia to "explain the security risks of vulnerabilities and backdoors in its H20 chips sold to China and submit relevant supporting materials". (AFP)
AllAfrica
2 hours ago
- AllAfrica
US-China trade talks threaten to explode over Russia oil
The United States has urged China to halt its purchases of oil and gas from Russia, threatening it with secondary sanctions, including possible 100% tariffs. The warning came after the US reached trade deals with the European Union and Japan that set tariffs at 15%. In meetings in Stockholm, Sweden, earlier this week, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent expressed to trade negotiators led by Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng Washington's displeasure with China's continued purchases of sanctioned Russian as well as Iranian oil. Bessent also complained about China's sales of over US$15 billion worth of dual-use technology goods to Russia that have reputedly supported Moscow's war against Ukraine. In a briefing on Wednesday (July 30), Bessent told the media that Chinese officials responded to his call by stating that China is a sovereign nation with its own energy needs and that oil purchases would be based on the country's internal policies. 'The Chinese take their sovereignty very seriously. We don't want to impede their sovereignty, so they'd like to pay a 100% tariff,' Bessent said, sarcastically. He told the press that US and Chinese officials did not strike a deal to extend their 90-day tariff truce, which is set to expire on August 12. He said that US President Donald Trump would decide whether the US would extend the deadline, typically by 90 days, or reimpose punishing tariffs. During his presidential election campaign, Trump vowed to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of becoming president. Since Trump took office on January 20, he has tried to bring Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table. On March 14, Trump admitted that he was being 'a little bit sarcastic' when he said he could end the Ukraine war within a day. In early July, reports said he came to the realization that Putin had no intention of engaging in negotiations. On July 14, Trump set a 50-day deadline for Moscow to end the war, or the US will send billions of weapons to Ukraine, impose a 100% tariff on Russian goods, and also on products coming from countries that bought Russian oil. On July 22, Bessent said that he would discuss China's oil purchases from Russia and Iran with Chinese officials. On Monday, Trump said Putin's new deadline to end the war would be 10 or 12 days. That would be a few days before the US-China tariff truce ends on August 12. The world's spotlight is now on whether Beijing will distance itself from Russia to avoid 100% US tariffs. 'China will take energy supply measures that are right for China based on our national interests. Tariff wars have no winners,' Guo Jiakun, a spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said Wednesday. 'Coercion and pressuring cannot solve problems. China will firmly safeguard its own sovereignty, security, and development interests.' Chinese commentators said the China-Russia-Iran alliance will not be broken by US pressure. Chen Fei, an associate professor of international relations at Central China Normal University, says in an article that the United States' wish to break China's ties with Russia and Iran is unlikely to succeed. 'As one of the world's largest crude oil importers, China maintains close energy cooperation with Russia and Iran,' he writes. 'The US tried to include this issue in the Sino-US trade negotiation framework and intended to exert pressure on China, attempting to use energy issues as a bargaining chip. This is a strategic test of Sino-Russian and Sino-Iranian relations.' He opines the US played this 'energy card' because it faced an unfavorable political and economic situation within its country. 'China will not change its foreign policy and the direction of international cooperation due to unilateral pressure from the US. It will continue to work hand in hand with like-minded countries to respond to global challenges jointly,' he adds. Xin Qiang, a professor at China's Fudan University, said China would not allow the US to make non-tariff issues the focus of the trade negotiations or bundle trade matters with non-trade issues. A Shandong-based columnist argues that the US cannot intervene in China's purchases of Russian and Iranian oil products, as all these transactions are settled in renminbi, rendering US sanctions a 'paper tiger.' Citing Customs data, the writer says that Russia has been China's top crude oil supplier for 20 consecutive months, delivering 2.16 million barrels daily via pipeline, approximately 600,000 barrels more than those from Saudi Arabia. He says Iran also ships 1.8 million barrels of crude oil to China daily at peak times. 'The US wants to use secondary sanctions to force China to stop buying Russian and Iranian oil and shift to buy its shale oil,' he says. 'China has not bought shale oil from the US for three consecutive months. The US seemed tough but exposed its anxiety about falling oil exports.' He says the US will only fuel its inflation if it imposes an additional 100% tariff on Chinese imports. He says that European countries, including Germany and France, will not follow the United States' call to reduce oil and gas imports from Russia and Iran, respectively. Trump said he decided to shorten Putin's deadline to end the Ukraine war from 50 days to 10-12 days because he saw no progress being made toward achieving a ceasefire. His decision followed two significant developments. On July 23, Trump announced that the US had agreed to a 'massive' trade deal with Japan where Tokyo committed to invest $550 billion in the US, while the US will only impose a 15% tariff on Japanese imports. On July 27, Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen met in Scotland and agreed on a similar 15% US tariff on all EU goods. 'I think that the Chinese were surprised by the magnitude of the Japan deal, and by the magnitude and the terms of the European deal,' Bessent said Wednesday. 'I believe they were in more of a mood for a wide-ranging discussion. The discussion centered on the two economies.' He said the US side expressed its concern about Chinese overcapacity globally and its impact on other countries within the next few years. He said he would not be surprised if Europe, Canada and Australia followed in the United States' footsteps and imposed anti-dumping tariffs on Chinese goods at some point. The fact that the Trump administration had reached trade deals with the EU, Japan and some ASEAN countries before the meeting with the Chinese side has created some pressure on Beijing, said Yang Shuiqing, a researcher at the Institute of American Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. He said that under their trade deals with Washington, the EU and Japan will open their markets to US companies, while their tariffs will hurt Chinese firms' competitiveness. Additionally, the EU and Japan have pledged to increase investment in the US, potentially leading to a reduction in investment in China. Yang said that, fortunately, China has a 'rare earth card' to play, making America unable to ignore its demands. Yuyuan Tantian, a social media account affiliated with the state-owned China Central Television, reported on Wednesday that Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao met with representatives from approximately 10 American companies in Beijing. It stated that Wang discussed business opportunities for US firms in China. Some other Chinese commentators also believed that the US would not escalate its trade war with China in the short term, as Trump does not want to jeopardize his chance to visit China on September 3, when China celebrates the 80th anniversary of its victory in the War against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War. Read: China-EU play nice despite widening cracks
