Supermarket begins selling Christmas themed treats in JULY as Brits jet off on their summer holidays
Pictures on social media show packets of Maltesers Mini Reindeers and Haribo Merry Mix on display at the supermarket five months before the festive season.
One user posted an image of a Cadbury Mini Snowballs chocolate bar they claimed to have bought on July 25. Some of the products were also available to buy on Asda's website.
Retail analyst Richard Hyman says he has never come across Christmas items being displayed so early into the year.
An Asda spokesman explained: 'We know how important it is for our shoppers to be able to spread the cost of Christmas and we start to see searches for Christmas products on Asda.com as early as August. Confectionery in particular is one of those items that can be kept aside for those customers who like to get everything prepared in plenty of time.'
Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Every year we say that Christmas is coming earlier, but starting in August has been the norm for some retailers for years.
'For retailers trying to sell us Christmas gifts, there's less mileage in starting in the summer.
'People will shop early, but once they've bought each present, their list is done and dusted. It's why September will usually see the launch of Christmas departments. For supermarkets, there's a huge opportunity to persuade people they're stocking up early, on the understanding they'll end up eating everything and having to do it all over again.'
The British Retail Consortium predicted food inflation would rise to 6 per cent by the end of the year and 'pose significant challenges to household budgets, particularly in the run-up to Christmas'.
Grocery price inflation rose to 5.2 per cent in July, up from 4.7 per cent and the highest level since January 2024, according to market researchers Worldpanel.
Ms Coles added: 'As long as we're not busting the budget, there's no real harm in getting into the festive spirit early.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
5 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Asda making major improvements to its website and app
The supermarket giant's website and app will undergo "improvements" over the coming months as it makes big system updates. These changes will be rolled out gradually, with the first already available to customers. UK supermarket rankings 2025 The "big" changes being made to Asda's website and app Asda will be introducing four big changes to its website and app over the coming months. It has already rolled out a map, where customers can track their deliveries right to their front door. Shoppers used to be charged for their full shop when it was delivered and were forced to submit a refund request for any unwanted products. Now, Asda will only take payment for the products shoppers receive, scrapping the need for refunds. What are your refund rights? Other changes set to be introduced will include: Faster, more relevant search results No sponsored products in Your Favourites An Asda spokesperson said: "Our online shopping App is having a facelift, and we can't wait for customers to see the changes that are being made. "As part of the changes we've updated our refund process, so customers will now only be charged for their shopping once it's been delivered - which means if customers decline any substitutions they don't need to wait for a refund. "Additionally, a new and updated delivery tracking system is now available- so customers can track their driver's journey right up to the front door." 5 ways to save money on your weekly food shop The Asda website warned customers to expect some "teething issues" while these changes are being made. More improvements are expected once Asda's new website and app are up and running. RECOMMENDED READING: Other changes at Asda in 2025 Asda has made several other major changes already in 2025, including scrapping Blue Light Card Benefits. This came as a result of Asda's partnership with Blue Light Card came to an end on May 27. The supermarket chain also announced in June plans to modernise and expand the menus at 180 of its cafés as part of a £10 million investment programme. Last month, Asda revealed it was looking at major staffing changes, which involved merging key leadership positions.
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Yorkshire Water boss paid 'extra' £1.3 million from firm's offshore parent company despite 'dire' environmental record and hikes to bills
A water company boss was handed more than £1.3 million in 'extra' pay from an offshore firm, despite its abysmal record on pollution and increasing household bills. Chief executive Nicola Shaw pocketed two payments of £660,000 in the last two years from Yorkshire Water's parent company Kelda Holdings, in addition to her salary with the beleaguered utilities firm. Yorkshire Water was allowed to raise average annual household bills by 41 per cent last year, and this summer introduced a hosepipe ban for its 5.5 million customers. It was ordered to pay £40 million in the spring to address its 'serious failures' over wastewater and sewage, and was also separately fined nearly £1 million last month for polluting a watercourse with chlorine, causing the death of hundreds of fish. Yorkshire Water is one of the six water companies currently banned from paying bonuses under Government action designed to prevent bosses who 'oversee poor environmental and customer outcomes' from receiving extra money. But figures showed Ms Shaw received just over £1.3 million between 2023 and 2025 from Kelda, in addition to her Yorkshire Water salary of around £689,000 per year - remuneration which was reduced by about one-third after she decided to forgo her bonus before the Government performance-related pay ban came in. The Kelda money is 'a fixed fee for investor-related work' performed by Ms Shaw for the parent company 'and complies fully with expectations and reporting requirements', Yorkshire Water said. Including the offshore company payments, she has been awarded more than £3 million in total pay over three years since she joined the firm in 2022, according to analysis first reported by the Guardian. Ofwat, the water regulator, is now investigating. Ms Shaw's earnings have infuriated environmental campaign groups. Amy Fairman, head of campaigns for River Action, said: 'Yorkshire Water has just been fined over £900,000 for polluting a watercourse with millions of litres of chlorinated water, killing hundreds of fish, yet its CEO is quietly handed an extra £1.3 million through an offshore firm. 'This is business as usual in a system that rewards environmental destruction and shields those responsible. 'Until executives are held criminally accountable, not just cushioned by shareholders, nothing will change. 'And unless we see a complete overhaul of the water industry, one that finally ends the failed privatisation experiment, this scandalous cycle will continue.' The Ilkley Clean River Group has now written to Kelda chairman Vanda Murray, asking her to justify Ms Shaw's pay given Yorkshire Water's dismal record under her watch. The campaigners wrote: 'To the customer, the additional payments to Ms Shaw look like a way of "working around" the fact that bonuses were causing public outrage and subsequently banned by government. 'There is in effect no change to eye-watering salaries at the top of Yorkshire Water.' A Yorkshire Water spokesman said Ms Shaw's work for Kelda Group included 'investor engagement, financial oversight, and management of the Kelda Group, which is recognised by a fee of £660,000 paid by shareholders'. He added: 'This is a conscious governance decision: we do not believe that work done on investor-related activities should be paid for by Yorkshire Water customers' bills. 'This fee, which has remained unchanged year on year, reflects the critical importance of the work during this period that was led by Nicola in securing long-term investment for Yorkshire Water. 'We remain focused on our long-term commitment to delivering better outcomes for customers, communities, and the environment across the region.' It was reported tonight that Ofwat's chief executive David Black is due to resign, ahead of the watchdog's planned abolition by ministers.
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Are online travel agents cleaning up their acts?
On Thursday I will fly on British Airways from London to Denver. The return trip cost £621. But I could have bought the same flights for around £30 cheaper going through an online travel agent (OTA). Odd though it may seem, the practice of selling some seats at deep discounts through a middleman has some merit from the airlines' point of view. The roots of the practice lie in the bad old days of heavily regulated fares. On many routes airlines could not be seen to sell tickets cheaper than the official fares. So they sold through companies called 'consolidators' who punted out cheap seats though retail agencies known as 'bucket shops'. Often the ticket would show an official fare that bore no relation to the amount paid – eg £1,200 for a trip that actually cost £500. That maintained the fiction that every airline was adhering to super-high fares. Thankfully, these days – in most circumstances – airlines can charge what they like. Yet they still often pay a modest commission to online agents who undercut them. Airlines use intermediaries to provide additional sales power. They want to be relevant in the intensely fare-sensitive part of the market, such as people who search on Skyscanner and other price-comparison sites. Take my flight from London to Denver this week. BA knows that there are plenty of us who will book direct, in order to minimise problems when things go wrong – and, in the case of buying on the benefit of a cooling-off spell of 24 hours in which to cancel for a full refund. To meet this demand, the airline can apply a modest premium. But for those who are simply interested in the lowest fare, BA seats are likely to be available more cheaply through an OTA. My rule is only to use an online travel agent if the saving is 10 per cent or more. In this case, it was under five per cent. Not enough to persuade me to agree to the online agent's terms and conditions. The OTA reserves the right to apply credit card surcharges, and has a 'confirmed quotation' stage – after which point, fares could be increased, with little choice but to pay the extra. What if the airline cancels the flight? The online agent doesn't even mention the word 'refund', even though this is the traveller's legal right in the event of a cancellation. As we discovered during the Covid pandemic, many OTAs took a cut of the airline's refund (and some just hung on to the customer's cash, blaming the carrier). In the EU, though, the rules are being redrawn in the traveller's favour. This week, the European Commission said that it had agreement from two giants, Expedia and that money will be handed back in full within two weeks of the cancellation. Similar undertakings have been made by other big OTAs, including Etraveli. You may not know this Swedish firm, but its brands include GoToGate and MyTrip. I used the latter to buy a ticket for a JetStar flight from Singapore to Melbourne earlier this year – which was cancelled at the gate. The cash took 17 days to come back. In contrast, still holds some of my money for a booking that fell victim to Covid five years ago. I shall revisit that transaction and see if the new agreement works to my advantage. It may be that UK travellers get a windfall from the EU's work – despite our bold decision to reap the many benefits of Brexit that we are now enjoying.
