&w=3840&q=100)
Susie Wiles to Stormy Daniels: Trump secrets at risk? Iran-linked hackers claim access to emails of aides
Iran-linked hackers have threatened to disclose more emails stolen from U.S. President Donald Trump's circle, after distributing a prior batch to the media ahead of the 2024 U.S. election.
In online chats with Reuters on Sunday and Monday, the hackers, who go by the pseudonym Robert, said they had roughly 100 gigabytes of emails from the accounts of White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, Trump lawyer Lindsey Halligan, Trump adviser Roger Stone and porn star-turned-Trump antagonist Stormy Daniels.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Robert raised the possibility of selling the material but otherwise did not provide details of their plans. The hackers did not describe the content of the emails.
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi described the intrusion as 'an unconscionable cyber-attack.'
The White House and the FBI responded with a statement from FBI Director Kash Patel, who said: 'Anyone associated with any kind of breach of national security will be fully investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.'
'This so-called cyber 'attack' is nothing more than digital propaganda, and the targets are no coincidence. This is a calculated smear campaign meant to damage President Trump and discredit honorable public servants who serve our country with distinction,' cyberdefense agency CISA said in a post on X.
Halligan, Stone and a representative for Daniels did not respond to requests for comment. Iran's mission to the United Nations did not return a message seeking comment. Tehran has in the past denied committing cyberespionage.
Robert materialized in the final months of the 2024 presidential campaign, when they claimed to have breached the email accounts of several Trump allies, including Wiles.
The hackers then distributed emails to journalists.
Reuters previously authenticated some of the leaked material, including an email that appeared to document a financial arrangement between Trump and lawyers representing former presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. - now Trump's health secretary.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Other material included Trump campaign communication about Republican office-seekers and discussion of settlement negotiations with Daniels.
Although the leaked documents did garner some coverage last year, they did not fundamentally alter the presidential race, which Trump won.
The U.S. Justice Department in a September 2024 indictment alleged that Iran's Revolutionary Guards ran the Robert hacking operation. In conversations with Reuters, the hackers declined to address the allegation.
After Trump's election, Robert told Reuters that no more leaks were planned. As recently as May, the hackers told Reuters, 'I am retired, man.' But the group resumed communication after this month's 12-day air war between Israel and Iran, which was capped by U.S. bombing of Iran's nuclear sites.
In messages this week, Robert said they were organizing a sale of stolen emails and wanted Reuters to 'broadcast this matter.'
American Enterprise Institute scholar Frederick Kagan, who has written about Iranian cyberespionage, said Tehran suffered serious damage in the conflict and its spies were likely trying to retaliate in ways that did not draw more U.S. or Israeli action.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'A default explanation is that everyone's been ordered to use all the asymmetric stuff that they can that's not likely to trigger a resumption of major Israeli/U.S. military activity,' he said. 'Leaking a bunch more emails is not likely to do that.'
Despite worries that Tehran could unleash digital havoc, Iran's hackers took a low profile during the conflict. U.S. cyber officials warned on Monday that American companies and critical infrastructure operators might still be in Tehran's crosshairs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
22 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Rupee slips on Trump's additional 10% Brics tariff; opens lower at 85.57/$
The Indian Rupee fell on Monday as US President Donald Trump threatened to impose an additional 10 per cent on countries aligning with Brics policies. The domestic currency opened 18 paise lower at 85.57 against the dollar on Monday, according to Bloomberg. All Asian currencies traded in the red with Thai Baht leading the fall, as caution loomed over the US reciprocal tariff deadline. The currency has appreciated 0.17 per cent so far this month, after having fallen 0.18 per cent in the first six months of the calendar year. President Trump, on Monday, threatened to levy an additional 10 per cent tariff on any country aligning itself with 'the Anti-American policies of BRICS,' fueling more uncertainty in the markets. 'Any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10 per cent Tariff,' Trump said in a Truth Social post. 'There will be no exceptions to this policy.' The group's leaders, over the weekend, agreed to continue talks on a cross-border payment system for trade and investments, according to a Bloomberg report. Trump had previously threatened to slap 100 per cent levies on Brics in case they drop the dollar in bilateral trade. Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNN that several major agreements are nearing completion, according to reports. As others remain out of reach, he added that some deals may include a three-week extension option. However, India and the US are likely to take a final decision on the 'mini trade deal' in the next 24-48 hours, as per media reports. The Indian Rupee has remained range-bound over the past few days, trading between 85.30 and 85.60, analysts said. Nationalised banks have been buying dollars on dips, while exporters and other inflows have been selling on upticks, according to Anil Kumar Bhansali, head of treasury and executive director at Finrex Treasury Advisors LLP. Exporters are awaiting a move towards 86 to hedge, while importers are eyeing 85, he said. "In the meantime, market participants can cover their daily and weekly requirements. Today's opening is around 85.50, with an expected range of 85.30–85.80."
India.com
29 minutes ago
- India.com
Donald Trump Threatens 10% Tariff On Nations Backing Anti-American BRICS Policies
New Delhi: Former U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday warned that countries supporting what he called the "anti-American policies" of BRICS would face an additional 10% tariff, further escalating his confrontational stance on global trade. 'Any country aligning themselves with the anti-American policies of BRICS will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Trump wrote in a post on his platform, Truth Social. Trump did not elaborate on what constituted 'anti-American policies,' nor did he specify which countries might be targeted under the proposed tariff rule. The BRICS bloc—originally formed by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and later South Africa—has significantly expanded its reach in recent years. In 2024, it welcomed new members including Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Indonesia. Trump's statement came just hours after BRICS leaders jointly issued the Rio de Janeiro Declaration, which criticised U.S. trade practices. The declaration warned that Washington's use of reciprocal tariffs and "indiscriminate rising of tariffs" risked destabilising global trade frameworks. Would you like this in headline-meta format for digital or a shorter version for social media?
The Wire
40 minutes ago
- The Wire
At Rio Summit, BRICS Hits Out at Tariffs, Iran Attacks and Gaza, but Stops Short of Naming US
New Delhi: As the United States prepares to notify its trade partners of revised tariff rates on their imports, the BRICS grouping of emerging economies, several of whom are engaged in trade talks with Washington, voiced 'serious concerns' over 'unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures,' but stopped short of directly naming Washington. US President Donald Trump has, meanwhile, issued a stark waring from White House. 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy,' he posted on his social media platform, Truth Social. The leaders' joint statement, issued after the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday, reflected the difficulty negotiators from the 11 members faced in agreeing on language that could reconcile competing national interests across a range of issues, from US trade policy and UN Security Council expansion to condemning Israel for Gaza conflict and the recent Iran-Israel escalation. India is among the five founding members of BRICS, alongside Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa. In 2024, the bloc expanded to include Indonesia, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia and the United Arab Emirates. Next year, India will be hosting the BRICS summit for the second time. While the heads of state of nearly half the member countries stayed away, key leaders present in Rio included Indian prime minister Narendra Modi, Indonesian president Prabowo Subianto, South African president Cyril Ramaphosa and Ethiopian prime minister Abiy Ahmed. Russian president Vladimir Putin and Chinese president Xi Jinping were both absent. This was Xi's first time skipping a BRICS summit since becoming president in 2013, while Putin's absence was linked to an International Criminal Court warrant. India and terrorism While global attention was largely fixed on how the BRICS bloc would respond to US tariff measures, India was more focused on the language in the joint statement concerning terrorism and United Nations Security Council reform. The leaders' declaration 'condemn[ed] in the strongest terms' the terror attack at Pahalgam on April 22, which India had blamed on Pakistan. The incident led to a four-day military exchange between the two countries, with India targeting what it described as terror infrastructure across the border. Although the BRICS statement did not explicitly name Pakistan, it reaffirmed the group's commitment to addressing the cross-border movement of terrorists, terror financing and safe havens. This language closely reflected the wording used in last year's Kazan declaration. Both statements called for 'zero tolerance' towards terrorism, rejected 'double standards' in its handling, reiterated support for the long-pending UN Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism proposed by India, and underlined that terrorism should not be associated with any religion, nationality or ethnic identity. In his statement during the session on peace and security, Modi said that 'condemning terrorism must be a matter of principle, and not just of convenience'. 'If our response depends on where or against whom the attack occurred, it shall be a betrayal of humanity itself,' he added. In this image released by @MEAIndia via X on July 6, 2025, Prime Minister Narendra Modi addresses a session on 'Peace and Security and Reform of Global Governance' during the 17th annual BRICS Summit, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Photo: Via PTI. India and UNSC The other issue highlighted by India is the UN Security Council reform. While BRICS declarations have routinely supported 'comprehensive reform' of the United Nations, this year's statement added that such reform should result in 'the amplified voice of the Global South'. It referred back to earlier declarations from the summits in Beijing and Johannesburg, which recorded the support of China and Russia – both permanent members of the Security Council, for the "aspirations of Brazil and India to play a greater role in the United Nations, including its Security Council." However, the declaration again stopped short of endorsing their candidacy for permanent seats. Negotiations over this paragraph were reportedly among the most difficult in the run-up to the BRICS summit, largely due to the group's recent expansion. Until 2023, South Africa had consistently been listed alongside Brazil and India as an aspirant for 'greater role' in UN. But with Egypt and Ethiopia now part of BRICS, African representation on the issue has become more complicated. Both Egypt and Ethiopia pushed for a formulation that acknowledged that the African Union had yet to decide on the continent's candidates for permanent seats, consistent with the Ezulwini Consensus and Sirte Declaration. Trump The Rio summit also unfolded under the shadow of the United States' planned reimposition of tariffs, set to kick in from July 9. President Donald Trump had earlier warned of 100% duties on imports from BRICS countries if they pushed forward with alternatives to the dollar in global trade. In April, he announced new 'reciprocal' tariffs calibrated by country, including 26 percent for India, 30 percent for South Africa and 84 percent for China. These were put on hold for 90 days, during which several countries, including India, have accelerated trade talks to limit the impact. The BRICS countries voiced "serious concerns about the rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures," warning that such actions are illegal and arbitrary. The joint statement described the 'indiscriminate rising of tariffs and non-tariff measures' as part of a wider trend of trade-restrictive practices that risk reducing global trade, disrupting supply chains, and creating uncertainty in the global economy. Despite the strong language, the declaration did not explicitly blame the United States. Analysts believe this omission reflected the host country Brazil's reluctance to provoke Washington. ' Brazil wants the least amount of damage possible and to avoid drawing the attention of the Trump administration to prevent any type of risk to the Brazilian economy,' Ana Garcia, a professor at the Rio de Janeiro Federal Rural University, told Associated Press. However, this cautious approach did not appear to placate Trump. In a social media post issued shortly after the summit, he threatened to impose fresh 10% tariffs on BRICS members. It is uncertain which 'anti-American' policies he was targeting. Earlier in the year, his warnings were triggered by reports of a proposed BRICS currency – an initiative that now appears sidelined, as there was no reference to it in the final text. 'Genocide' and other wars The BRICS joint statement also avoided identifying either Iran or the United States when it referred to recent attacks on Iranian 'civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities' as a 'violation of international law and relevant resolutions of the IAEA'. Nevertheless, this marked a slight shift in tone from the bloc's earlier statement issued on June 25, which had only expressed 'grave concern over the military strikes' against Iran. In contrast, the Rio de Janeiro declaration used the term 'condemn'. On the war in Ukraine, the declaration once again avoided any direct criticism of Russia. Instead, it backed diplomatic initiatives led by Brazil and China, and a group of African nations. The statement also referred to attacks on Russian regions such as Bryansk and Kursk, but did so without assigning blame or identifying the perpetrators. The most direct criticism in the statement was aimed at Israel. The leaders expressed 'grave concern' over the military operations in Gaza and 'denounced the Israeli attacks against humanitarian operations, facilities, personnel and distribution points.' Although the host Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva had referred to the situation in Gaza as ' genocide ' in his remarks during the summit, that term did not appear in the final declaration. The BRICS joint statement echoed the language of a recent United Nations General Assembly resolution by condemning 'all violations of international humanitarian law, including the use of starvation as a method of warfare.' India had unexpectedly abstained on that resolution, which had led the opposition to accuse the government of losing moral compass. In addition, the bloc called on all parties to engage 'in good faith' to secure an 'immediate, comprehensive and permanent ceasefire in Gaza,' ensure the release of all hostages, withdraw Israeli forces fully, and allow unhindered access of humanitarian aid. The declaration also reaffirmed support for full UN membership for Palestine and reiterated BRICS' 'unwavering commitment to the two-state solution.' However, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi later stated on his official Telegram channel that Tehran had registered reservations about the reference to the two-state solution, as Iran does not recognise Israel. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
