PM to make 'substantial u-turn' on PIP payments
I understand Starmer's offer to the welfare rebel MPs is to protect PIP payments for all existing claimants forever.
There would be no detriment from the reforms for existing claimants.
This would shave circa £2bn from the reform savings by 2029.
I am pretty clear that with the other reforms I describe, below this ,will persuade enough rebels to back the remaining reforms in next Tuesday's vote.
There will also be 'grandfathering' of the disability top up universal credit for existing claimants. So again no detriment to existing claimants.
My estimate is this would shave another billion pounds or so from the reform savings by 2029.
Finally, and importantly, the rebels – led by Treasury committee chair Meg Hillier – have secured agreement that the Stephen Timms review of how to assess entitlement to disability benefits will be a co-production with disability rights groups.
This is seen by rebel MPs as a major concession.
My assumption is that enough rebel MPs will now drop their opposition to the reforms and Starmer will win on Tuesday.
But make no mistake, this is another substantial government u-turn.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
ALEX BRUMMER: Donald Trump's deals are a global blow
Trump tariff mayhem has not gone away. It will be years before the full impact of a fragmented trading system is known. It is remarkable that despite the random outcome of the process, with many unfinished negotiations, equity markets touched new peaks in recent days. And a resilient American economy grew at an annualised rate of 3 per cent in the second quarter. That doesn't mean all is rosy. The latest US labour market numbers were weaker than expected, with 73,000 new jobs added in July, and the unemployment rate climbed slightly to 4.2 per cent. Economic aftershocks persist. An average tariff of 15 per cent is a large tax burden for the American consumer and ripples will be felt around the globe. At the current level, the tariff impact will be six times higher than the average import duty last year. Ford, which makes more vehicles in the US than its competitors, estimates a £1.5billion hit in 2025. British luxury manufacturer Aston Martin fears that the 100,000-motor car ceiling negotiated by the Starmer government could squeeze it out of the American market. It is evident that politics and prejudice, rather than economics and commerce, have shaped decision-making in Washington. Switzerland is puzzling why it has been singled out for a 39 per cent tariff that is going to be a big hit for Manhattan watch aficionados. Pharma might be the answer. Britain escaped relatively lightly with its 10 per cent tariff. But there is still uncertainty about the barriers which may be faced by the UK's world-leading medicine companies. The lack of rapport between Trump and Mark Carney, prime minister of Canada, means the US's northern neighbour faces a punitive 35 per cent tariff. Mexico's president Claudia Sheinbaum managed a phone call to Trump which stopped the clock for three months, and will bring some relief to the car manufacturers in her country and supermarkets which sell Mexican fruit and vegetables. A deal is better than no deal, for most. But the EU, among others, faces a substantial obstacle with its 15 per cent tariff. There are already signs that Big Tech is switching some manufacturing back to the US. American consumers and businesses will take a direct hit from the trade wars. But it is the US's main trading partners, and global output and prosperity which will suffer most hardship. Relief rally Banks and other lenders have largely been let off the hook by the Supreme Court on car finance compensation. It was feared finance firms could have been on the hook for up to £40billion if an appeals court decision had been upheld. The decision should provide a fillip for shares in Lloyds, Close Brothers and Barclays – all in the eye of the car finance hurricane. They are not alone. Chancellor Rachel Reeves cheekily sought to intervene with the Court on the grounds that if the judgement went the wrong way it could damage lending capacity and crimp her growth plans. The Court told the Treasury to get lost. Nevertheless, a damaging blow to the Square Mile has been averted. Consumers rubbing their hands at the thought of another payout on the scale of the person protection insurance (PPI) scandal will be disappointed. The court struck a serious blow against the UK's over-developed compensation culture.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Bessent says US has 'makings of a deal' with China
WASHINGTON, Aug 1 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Friday that he believed that Washington has the makings of a deal with China and that he was "optimistic" about the path forward. "This week's negotiations in Stockholm have advanced our talks with China, and I believe that we have the makings of a deal that will benefit both of our great nations," Bessent said in a post on X that was subsequently deleted. "I am optimistic about the path forward," he added. A Treasury Department spokesperson said the post was being reposted because the images attached to it had not uploaded correctly. The spokesperson also noted that the language in the post was in line with what Bessent had said in various media interviews this week. In an interview with CNBC on Thursday, Bessent said the United States believes it has the makings of a trade deal with China, but it is "not 100% done." U.S. negotiators "pushed back quite a bit" over two days of trade talks with the Chinese in Stockholm this week, Bessent told CNBC. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals.
ITV News
4 hours ago
- ITV News
PM's plan to recognise Palestinian state could 'harm' hostages, families say
British families of hostages taken by Hamas have urged the prime minister to change course on the governments plans to recognise the state of Palestine, saying the policy could "even hurt" those still being held in Gaza. Earlier this week, Starmer said the UK would take the step of recognising Palestine in September ahead of the UN General Assembly unless Israel meets certain conditions. Members of four British families met with Foreign Office officials on Thursday night seeking clarification on whether conditions would also be placed on Hamas, their lawyers said in a statement. 'However, it was clear from the meeting last night that the British government's policy will not help the hostages, and could even hurt them,' they said. 'We do not say this lightly, but it was made obvious to us at the meeting that although the conditions for recognising a Palestinian state would be assessed 'in the round' in late-September, in deciding whether to go ahead with recognition, the release or otherwise of the hostages would play no part in those considerations. 'In other words, the 'vision for peace' which the UK is pursuing… may well involve our clients' family members continuing to rot in Hamas dungeons.' Starmer said the UK would only refrain from recognising Palestine if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops the expansion of settlements in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire, and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months. While he also called for Hamas to immediately release all remaining Israeli hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza', he did not explicitly say these would factor into whether recognition would go ahead. The families have a range of views on what the future political settlement should look like but their priority is to keep the hostages 'above political games,' their lawyers said. They are now urging the prime minister to 'change course before it is too late'. 'At a minimum, the British hostage families request that the government confirm that without the hostages being released, there can be no peace, and that this will be an important part of its decision as to whether to proceed with recognition and its current plan.' The families of Ms Damari and freed hostage Eli Sharabi were among those who met with the Foreign Office. Also present were relatives of Nadav Popplewell, who died while held captive, as well as those of Oded Lifshitz, who died, and Yocheved Lifschitz, who was released. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has said that the UK will not get into a 'to and fro' with Hamas over the recognition plans and that 'we don't negotiate with terrorists, Hamas are terrorists'. US President Donald Trump disagrees with Starmer plans, as well as those of France and Canada, which have also pledged their countries will recognise Palestine. 'He feels as though that's rewarding Hamas at a time where Hamas is the true impediment to a ceasefire and to the release of all of the hostages,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. The Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office has been contacted for comment.
