
'Love Jihad' Accused Says He Is A Victim, Wants To Convert Again
A man arrested in a large-scale illegal religious conversion racket has said that he is also a victim and that he wants to convert to Hinduism again, sources told NDTV on Monday. Mohammad Ali is among 10 people who were arrested by the Uttar Pradesh Police from six states in the 'love jihad' case last Saturday.
The probe began in Agra in March after two sisters -- aged 33 and 18 -- were reported missing. Agra Police Commissioner Deepak Kumar had said preliminary investigations found that the sisters were targeted by a gang involved in ' love jihad ' and radicalisation.
"We found clues about their funding originating from the US and Canada," he had said.
. @dgpup श्री राजीव कृष्ण महोदय एवं ADG कानून-व्यवस्था उ0प्र0 श्री अमिताभ यश महोदय के निर्देशन में पुलिस आयुक्त, आगरा @DeepakKumarIPS2 के नेतृत्व में आगरा पुलिस द्वारा देश के अलग-अलग 6 राज्यों से धर्मान्तरण कराने वाले संगठित गरोह के 10 अभियुक्तों को गिरफ्तार किया गया है। इसके लिए… pic.twitter.com/HXNcr4qy2Y
— POLICE COMMISSIONERATE AGRA (@agrapolice) July 19, 2025
Ali, a resident of Rajasthan who was Piyush Panwar before converting, has told the police about the conversion network.
Lodged in an Agra jail, he broke down during the initial interrogation by the police and said that he wanted to return home, sources said.
He also said he wanted to leave Islam and become a Hindu.
He said he wants to apologise to his parents, who broke ties with him after he converted to Islam.
How Piyush Panwar Became Mohammad Ali
The story of Piyush Panwar becoming Mohammad Ali started in 2021, when he first met Shana, a woman from Rajasthan's Tonk. They then fell in love and decided to get married, sources said.
Shana, however, put a condition, saying that Piyush will have to accept Islam. Piyush agreed and changed his name to Mohammad Ali in the same year.
Shana then rejected him after he was converted.
Ali, whose family had cut ties with him, then decided not to convert again and married a Muslim girl from Uttar Pradesh's Bareilly, according to sources.
How Mohammad Ali Became Part Of Conversion Racket
While trying to convert to Islam, he had come into contact with Mohammad Gaus, a member of the Popular Front of India (PFI), which was banned by the Centre in 2022 for its alleged links with global terrorist organisations.
Through Gaus, he met a cleric, Kaleem Siddiqui, in Delhi, who was convicted in a separate conversion case last year.
Ali then went to West Bengal for religious education. He stayed in the madrasas in Asansol, Bardhaman and Katwapara for three months.
About a year ago, he came in contact with a woman, Ayesha, from Goa on Instagram. Ayesha, who is also among the 10 people arrested by the Uttar Pradesh police, used to record the names of the girls who were converted to Islam.
The police have said that Ali is a close associate of Ayesha.
Ali, who was arrested in Jaipur, has also told the police that the members of the PFI and the Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI) are also linked with their network.
Besides Ali and Ayesha, the other accused arrested in the case under 'Mission Asmita', an ongoing initiative aimed at dismantling such illegal syndicates, have been identified as Hasan Ali and Osama from Kolkata, Rahman Qureshi from Agra, Abu Talib from Muzaffarnagar (Uttar Pradesh), Abdur Rehman from Dehradun (Uttarakhand), Mohammad Ali and Junaid Qureshi from Rajasthan, and Mustafa from Delhi.
"The modus operandi of the gang involved illegal conversion and radicalisation bears a signature of ISIS," the police had said.
The arrests come days after another man, Chhangur Baba, alias Jamaluddin, the mastermind of a religious conversion gang, was arrested by Uttar Pradesh Police's Anti-Terrorism Squad.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Agama violation: Two Perur temple staff suspended
COIMBATORE: Two employees of the Arulmigu Patteeswarar Swamy Temple in Perur have been suspended for allowing a superintendent of police (SP) to worship inside the sanctum sanctorum after temple hours on Sunday. The HR&CE department suspended Velmurugan, a staff member, and Saminathan, a priest, on Wednesday after a video purportedly showing the SP's late-night visit went viral on social media. Following the incident, a devotee had staged a sit-in protest in front of the temple along with members of the Hindu Munnani, demanding action against those who permitted the entry. Sources said the temple staff allowed the officer inside based on instructions from a senior HR&CE official. However, access to the inner precincts of temples after 9 pm is considered a violation of the Agama Vidhi (the temple's rituals and practices prescribed in the Agama scriptures). Meanwhile, the HR&CE department has also banned devotees from carrying cellphones inside the temple. The restriction came into effect on Thursday, coinciding with the Adi Amavasai, when thousands of devotees flock to the shrine. A dedicated counter has been set up to collect mobile phones, and tokens are being issued in exchange. However, officials denied that the ban was linked to the SP incident, stating that the move was already under consideration to prevent devotees from photographing the deities.


India Today
14 minutes ago
- India Today
RCB pacer Yash Dayal in more trouble, faces another sexual harassment case
Yash Dayal, the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) pacer, faces a serious new allegation of rape. An FIR has been registered against him at the Sanganer police station in Jaipur, with the victim accusing the cricketer of repeatedly raping her over a period of two years while emotionally blackmailing her and luring her with promises of a cricketing to the complaint, the victim first came into contact with Dayal when she was a minor, just 17 years old, during an IPL match in Jaipur. Dayal allegedly invited her to a hotel in Sitapura under the guise of offering career advice, where the first sexual assault took victim claims that this pattern continued for two years, beginning when she was still a minor, which has led the police to register the case under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, a stringent law against sexual crimes involving Dayal's previous harassment case Earlier this year, Dayal was booked under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) after a woman from Ghaziabad accused him of sexual harassment and exploitation. The FIR was registered at Indirapuram police station following a preliminary inquiry into a complaint filed through the Chief Minister's grievance portal (IGRS).According to the complaint, the woman claimed she was in a five-year relationship with Dayal, during which he allegedly exploited her mentally, physically, and financially under the false promise of stated that Dayal introduced her to his family and acted as though they were married, which deepened her trust. However, when she questioned his intentions, he allegedly became violent and continued to harass response, Dayal filed a written complaint via his lawyer at a police station in Prayagraj. In his statement, Dayal claimed that the woman, who had lodged an FIR in Ghaziabad, was attempting to blackmail said their connection began on Instagram and remained platonic, but she later began coercing him into marriage. Thereafter, the Allahabad High Court stayed Dayal's arrest in connection with the FIR.A bench comprising Justices Siddhartha Varma and Anil Kumar issued the stay while hearing Dayal's petition challenging the FIR. The court directed the state counsel to file a counter affidavit and issued notices to the complainant to submit her response.- EndsMust Watch


Scroll.in
44 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
No plan to remove ‘secular', ‘socialist' from Preamble: Centre
The Union government has no plans or intention to remove the words 'secular' and 'socialist' from the Preamble to the Constitution, Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal told Parliament on Thursday. Meghwal acknowledged that 'certain groups' were seeking the removal of the two words from the Preamble. 'Any discussions regarding amendments to the Preamble would require thorough deliberation and broad consensus, but as of now, the government has not initiated any formal process to change these provisions,' Meghwal told Rajya Sabha. The words 'socialist' and 'secular' were not part of the Constitution adopted in 1950 and were added in 1976 through the 42nd constitutional amendment. In November, the Supreme Court dismissed petitions filed by Bharatiya Janata Party leaders Subramanian Swamy and Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, in addition to a separate plea by a man named Balram Singh, challenging the 1976 amendment. Citing this ruling, the Union law minister said: 'The court clarified that 'socialism' in the Indian context signifies a welfare state and does not impede private sector growth, while 'secularism' is integral to the Constitution's basic structure.' The court had said in its order that there was no legitimate justification for challenging the constitutional amendment several decades later. The minister's response to Samajwadi Party MP Ramji Lal Suman's questions in the Rajya Sabha came about a month after a political row erupted about the inclusion of the words in the Constitution. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in June called for a review of the two terms. The RSS is the parent organisation of the ruling BJP. A day after the comment by RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale, Jagdeep Dhankhar, the vice president at the time, had said that the addition of the words 'secular' and 'socialist' to the Preamble of the Constitution during the Emergency was a ' sacrilege to the spirit of sanatana '. Sanatana dharma is a term some people use as a synonym for Hinduism. Union ministers Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Jitendra Singh had also voiced their support for a review. Chouhan had claimed that the words 'secular' and 'socialist' are not core to Indian culture and called for a discussion on their removal from the Constitution. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi had criticised the RSS for seeking a review of the two words in the Preamble, saying that the Hindutva organisation's ' mask had come off again '. In 2015, a controversy erupted after the BJP-led Union government's newspaper advertisements on Republic Day featured a Preamble with the two words omitted. In September 2023, Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury claimed that the two words were missing from the Preamble