logo
'Love Jihad' Accused Says He Is A Victim, Wants To Convert Again

'Love Jihad' Accused Says He Is A Victim, Wants To Convert Again

NDTVa day ago
Agra:
A man arrested in a large-scale illegal religious conversion racket has said that he is also a victim and that he wants to convert to Hinduism again, sources told NDTV on Monday. Mohammad Ali is among 10 people who were arrested by the Uttar Pradesh Police from six states in the 'love jihad' case last Saturday.
The probe began in Agra in March after two sisters -- aged 33 and 18 -- were reported missing. Agra Police Commissioner Deepak Kumar had said preliminary investigations found that the sisters were targeted by a gang involved in ' love jihad ' and radicalisation.
"We found clues about their funding originating from the US and Canada," he had said.
. @dgpup श्री राजीव कृष्ण महोदय एवं ADG कानून-व्यवस्था उ0प्र0 श्री अमिताभ यश महोदय के निर्देशन में पुलिस आयुक्त, आगरा @DeepakKumarIPS2 के नेतृत्व में आगरा पुलिस द्वारा देश के अलग-अलग 6 राज्यों से धर्मान्तरण कराने वाले संगठित गरोह के 10 अभियुक्तों को गिरफ्तार किया गया है। इसके लिए… pic.twitter.com/HXNcr4qy2Y
— POLICE COMMISSIONERATE AGRA (@agrapolice) July 19, 2025
Ali, a resident of Rajasthan who was Piyush Panwar before converting, has told the police about the conversion network.
Lodged in an Agra jail, he broke down during the initial interrogation by the police and said that he wanted to return home, sources said.
He also said he wanted to leave Islam and become a Hindu.
He said he wants to apologise to his parents, who broke ties with him after he converted to Islam.
How Piyush Panwar Became Mohammad Ali
The story of Piyush Panwar becoming Mohammad Ali started in 2021, when he first met Shana, a woman from Rajasthan's Tonk. They then fell in love and decided to get married, sources said.
Shana, however, put a condition, saying that Piyush will have to accept Islam. Piyush agreed and changed his name to Mohammad Ali in the same year.
Shana then rejected him after he was converted.
Ali, whose family had cut ties with him, then decided not to convert again and married a Muslim girl from Uttar Pradesh's Bareilly, according to sources.
How Mohammad Ali Became Part Of Conversion Racket
While trying to convert to Islam, he had come into contact with Mohammad Gaus, a member of the Popular Front of India (PFI), which was banned by the Centre in 2022 for its alleged links with global terrorist organisations.
Through Gaus, he met a cleric, Kaleem Siddiqui, in Delhi, who was convicted in a separate conversion case last year.
Ali then went to West Bengal for religious education. He stayed in the madrasas in Asansol, Bardhaman and Katwapara for three months.
About a year ago, he came in contact with a woman, Ayesha, from Goa on Instagram. Ayesha, who is also among the 10 people arrested by the Uttar Pradesh police, used to record the names of the girls who were converted to Islam.
The police have said that Ali is a close associate of Ayesha.
Ali, who was arrested in Jaipur, has also told the police that the members of the PFI and the Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI) are also linked with their network.
Besides Ali and Ayesha, the other accused arrested in the case under 'Mission Asmita', an ongoing initiative aimed at dismantling such illegal syndicates, have been identified as Hasan Ali and Osama from Kolkata, Rahman Qureshi from Agra, Abu Talib from Muzaffarnagar (Uttar Pradesh), Abdur Rehman from Dehradun (Uttarakhand), Mohammad Ali and Junaid Qureshi from Rajasthan, and Mustafa from Delhi.
"The modus operandi of the gang involved illegal conversion and radicalisation bears a signature of ISIS," the police had said.
The arrests come days after another man, Chhangur Baba, alias Jamaluddin, the mastermind of a religious conversion gang, was arrested by Uttar Pradesh Police's Anti-Terrorism Squad.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mohammad Hidayatullah: The only Indian vice-president who also officiated as President and CJI
Mohammad Hidayatullah: The only Indian vice-president who also officiated as President and CJI

First Post

time28 minutes ago

  • First Post

Mohammad Hidayatullah: The only Indian vice-president who also officiated as President and CJI

As India's second-highest office falls vacant with the resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar, history recalls the only man to have held the top three read more In an unprecedented development in India's constitutional history, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar tendered his resignation, citing health-related reasons. His exit from the second-highest constitutional office marks the first time a sitting vice president has voluntarily stepped down before completing the term. The resignation has created a temporary vacancy in the Rajya Sabha chair and prompted fresh discourse on constitutional succession. The Ministry of Home Affairs confirmed the resignation under Article 67A of the Indian Constitution, with immediate effect. Following the announcement in the Rajya Sabha by BJP MP Ghanshyam Tiwari, Deputy Chairman Harivansh Narayan Singh assumed responsibility for chairing proceedings. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This development brings to mind a moment from 1969, when India faced a similar constitutional gap and a remarkable figure—Mohammad Hidayatullah—rose to fill it. A stalwart of the Indian judiciary and polity, Hidayatullah remains the only individual in Indian history to have held the offices of Chief Justice of India (CJI), Acting President, and Vice President. A star in the Indian judiciary Hidayatullah was elevated to the position of Chief Justice of India in February 1968, under Article 124 of the Constitution. He was the first Muslim to hold the post and earned respect for his sharp constitutional insights and erudition. Assuming the presidency in a time of crisis The summer of 1969 brought a constitutional conundrum. President Zakir Husain passed away in office and Vice-President VV Giri stepped in as acting president. However, when Giri resigned to contest the presidential election, both the top posts stood vacant. Under the provisions of Article 65 and the President (Discharge of Functions) Act, 1969, Chief Justice Hidayatullah was called upon to act as the President of India from July 20 to August 24, 1969. This was a moment of historical significance. It was the first and only time the chief justice had to act as the president due to vacancies in both the president and vice-president's offices. The Constitution, in its foresight, allowed for such an eventuality, highlighting the depth and resilience of India's legal framework. Vice-presidential tenure After retiring from the judiciary, Hidayatullah remained an influential figure in public life. In 1979, he was elected unopposed as the sixth Vice President of India, serving until 1984. His election was guided by Articles 63 to 68 of the Constitution, which regulate the post. During his tenure, he again briefly served as 'Acting President' in 1982 when President Zail Singh was abroad, reiterating his unique role in India's constitutional machinery. Landmark judgments and legal philosophy Hidayatullah's legacy as a jurist is rich with landmark cases and scholarly judgments. In the Golaknath vs State of Punjab case, he opposed Parliament's unrestrained power to amend the Constitution, especially concerning Fundamental Rights. His judgment in Ranjit D Udeshi vs State of Maharashtra also set important boundaries around freedom of expression and obscenity laws. His opinions combined legal precision with literary elegance, reflecting his vast intellectual horizon. Beyond the courtroom Hidayatullah remains a towering figure whose constitutional journey is unmatched. His ability to serve in the judiciary's highest post, temporarily hold the presidency and later serve as vice president highlights the flexibility of India's constitutional provisions and the depth of leadership they can foster. At a moment when India's vice-president's office stands vacant, reflecting on Hidayatullah's legacy provides both historical perspective and institutional reassurance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Rush Hour: Assam constable's son held as suspected Bangladeshi, blasts acquittal challenged and more
Rush Hour: Assam constable's son held as suspected Bangladeshi, blasts acquittal challenged and more

Scroll.in

time28 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Rush Hour: Assam constable's son held as suspected Bangladeshi, blasts acquittal challenged and more

We're building a brand-new studio to bring you bold ground reports, sharp interviews, hard-hitting podcasts, explainers and more. Support Scroll's studio fund today. The Maharashtra government moved the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order on Monday acquitting all 12 persons accused in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case. The High Court said that the prosecution had 'utterly failed' in establishing the guilt of the 12 men. This came nearly 10 years after a special court had sentenced five of them to death and others to life imprisonment. It remarked that while punishing the perpetrators of a crime is an essential step, creating a 'false appearance of having solved a case' leads to a misleading sense of resolution. The Supreme Court will hear the matter on Thursday. The Supreme Court refused to examine the legality of the directives issued by the Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments requiring eateries along the Kanwar Yatra pilgrimage route to display quick response codes with their owners' identities. The bench reiterated that the eateries must display their licences and registration certificates as required by law. The petitioners had argued that the governments' orders violated the court's 2024 interim order that prohibited vendors being forced to disclose their identities. The pleas had contended that the directives not only undermine the spirit of the court's stay, but also risks discriminatory profiling, particularly of vendors from minority communities, under the guise of public safety and licencing requirements. Read on. An Assam Police constable has said that his son is among nine Muslims of Bengali origin who have been detained in Gurugram since Sunday on suspicion of being undocumented Bangladeshi immigrants. Sannat Ali, a constable in the Assam Industrial Security Force, told Scroll that his son, 23-year-old Ashraful Islam, is a resident of Barbala village in Barpeta district. He had gone to Haryana on July 11 to work at a construction site, said Ali. Ali said that his son had submitted his voter ID card, school certificates, Aadhaar card and PAN card, which were not accepted by the police. 'They call them illegal Bangladeshis,' Ali alleged. He added: 'We have sent more documents like my service identity card and voter cards. Senior police officials have contacted me this morning. They are working to release him.' An assistant commissioner of police-rank in Gurugram told Scroll that the action was taken as per the Union home ministry's guidelines to verify the credentials of persons suspected to be undocumented migrants from Bangladesh and Myanmar. Read on. A day after Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned as the vice president, Prime Minister Narendra Modi wished him good health and said that the Rajya Sabha chairperson had 'got many opportunities to serve our country in various capacities'. Dhankhar had cited medical reasons for stepping down with immediate effect on Monday, which was the first day of the Monsoon Session of Parliament. Several Opposition leaders raised questions about the timing of Dhankhar's resignation. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said that there were 'far deeper reasons' behind Dhankhar's decision.

‘No UPI, No Payment': Bengaluru Man Walks Away Without Paying Auto Fare
‘No UPI, No Payment': Bengaluru Man Walks Away Without Paying Auto Fare

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

‘No UPI, No Payment': Bengaluru Man Walks Away Without Paying Auto Fare

Last Updated: The IT hub of India has made headlines once again, this time due to an ugly fight between a resident and an auto driver about payment methods. It's Bengaluru once again! The IT hub of India has hit headlines, this time due to an ugly fight between a resident and an auto driver over payment methods. Taking to X, the man faced harsh criticism online after revealing that he walked away without paying after an autorickshaw ride when the driver refused to accept payment through UPI and insisted on taking cash only. What Happened? 'Auto guy denied UPI this morning. I said, I am not going to pay cash. He threatened a bit. He had already marked paid on the app for the ride. I said either UPI or I will not pay," the man added. He added that the driver had already marked the trip as 'paid' on the app, indicating that the autorickshaw was booked using a car service app such as Uber or Ola. 'I said either UPI or I would not pay. He called someone and asked what to do. The man on the phone wanted to speak to me. I said I wouldn't talk to any random person," the Bengaluru man further wrote. After failing to reach a conclusion, the man threatened the driver to walk away without paying the bill. To which, the autowala, thinking he was bluffing, told him to walk away if he 'had the guts'. 'I walked away," the man concluded his X post. How Did Social Media React? The post instantly grabbed the attention of the viewers, prompting several reactions, with the majority of them calling out the passenger for not paying in cash. An X user commented, 'Congrats. You've become a cheap thief by accepting service and refusing to pay, taking his labour. Why didn't you clarify this before proceeding with the ride and refusing to continue if he didn't have UPI?" Another individual wrote, 'You are legally compelled to pay for the services provided. The automan is not legally needed to have UPI. 'You are not a hero here." Some of them tried to give a solution for this issue. A person said, 'It's simple, before getting into the auto, just ask if they take UPI, same way you would at a shop without a visible QR code." 'Harassing poor drivers is the new norm in digital India. Whereas industrialists are getting loans worth thousands of crores at none," a comment read. Someone also mentioned, 'You can't deny paying by cash if he doesn't accept UPI. UPI is a convenient way to pay. But it is not equivalent to legal tender when it comes to refusing UPI payment. Refusing to pay is plain rude and bad." However, this isn't the first time and such incidents of a passenger's fight with an auto driver have made the headlines before. Recently, a Bengaluru man was left furious and helpless when his auto driver slowed down mid-ride to look through an actress' Instagram profile. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store