logo
Philippine lawmakers revive divorce bill, but will it be passed this time?

Philippine lawmakers revive divorce bill, but will it be passed this time?

Philippine lawmakers have refiled a long-delayed bill legalising divorce in the country just a few days into the new Congress after its passage fell short in the previous term, with divorce advocates hopeful that the legislation will finally see the light of day.
Advertisement
Lawmakers have been trying to pass a divorce law since 2005, but continue to face resistance in the Catholic-majority country.
Nearly 79 per cent of Filipinos are Roman Catholic and the Philippines and the Vatican are the only countries in the world that do not have divorce laws. Annulment exists but is a tedious and often expensive process. Muslims are currently the only Filipinos able to legally divorce under the Code of Muslim Personal Laws.
As the 20th Congress opened on Monday, three representatives filed two measures that aim to revive the absolute divorce bill that the House of Representatives passed earlier but ultimately languished in the Senate as conservative legislators and religious leaders vowed to fight the bill.
Representatives Antonio Tinio and Renee Louise Co of the Alliance of Concerned Teachers and Kabataan partylists filed House Bill 210, while Jonathan Clement Abalos of the 4Ps partylist filed House Bill 108. Both versions establish the grounds for granting absolute divorce. These include physical violence, drug addiction, homosexuality and other factors related to the annulment of marriage under the country's Family Code.
Filipino Catholic devotees jostle to touch the carriage carrying the statue of the Black Nazarene during the annual procession on its feast day in Manila on January 9. Nearly 79 per cent of Filipinos are Roman Catholic. Photo: Reuters
Divorce advocates said lawmakers had neglected the divorce bill in favour of other issues, such as the crimes linked to Philippine offshore gaming operators (Pogos), despite divorce being 'a national issue'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What the Vietnam war can teach us about Trump's Asia policy
What the Vietnam war can teach us about Trump's Asia policy

South China Morning Post

timea day ago

  • South China Morning Post

What the Vietnam war can teach us about Trump's Asia policy

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the end of 'America's war' in Vietnam from 1965 to 1975. The US entered the war in the closing years of an era when it was prepared to fight communist expansion wherever it occurred, a policy initially signalled by the Truman Doctrine. The Vietnam war was a catastrophe in terms of its huge human toll and economic cost, and many Americans viewed it as a tragic folly. However, it proved to be a protective shield against the spread of communism in Southeast Asia . Without direct US military intervention in Vietnam in 1965, the Southeast Asia that we know today may not have existed. Despite the US' setbacks in Vietnam, it has remained a vital component of the Asia-Pacific power balance. However, now the policies of Donald Trump 's administration – to reshape the global trade order and US security posture – have generated uncertainties about the adjustments to come, including the roles of its allies and partners. The domino theory, fashionable in US policy circles in the 1950s and early 1960s in its extreme form, assumed that if Vietnam fell to the communists, the rest of Southeast Asia would follow suit. In the US, the theory had its leftist and progressive critics and establishment figures, who thought it was too simplistic. Huey helicopters carrying US troops land near Plei Ho Drong, Vietnam, in August 1965. Photo: AP Non-communist Southeast Asian governments were also deeply concerned about the potential spread of communism from Vietnam.

Why Singapore's identity demanded distance from China – and its own story of nationhood
Why Singapore's identity demanded distance from China – and its own story of nationhood

South China Morning Post

timea day ago

  • South China Morning Post

Why Singapore's identity demanded distance from China – and its own story of nationhood

In his new memoir Ink and Influence: An OB Markers Sequel, Cheong Yip Seng reflects on the intersection of geopolitics, media, and identity through the lens of his long career as editor-in-chief of The Straits Times. In this excerpt, Cheong recounts a revealing moment during an official visit to China in 1976 with then-prime minister Lee Kuan Yew . Among the officials present was S.R. Nathan, later Singapore 's sixth president, who witnessed Lee subtly rebuff a Chinese attempt to influence the city state's foreign alignment. Advertisement S.R. Nathan was in the delegation. Later, he told me this story: During Lee Kuan Yew's (LKY) talks with the Chinese, his hosts gave him a book, India's China War. It was written by Neville Maxwell, a journalist and Oxford academic. The book was a pro-China version of the border war between India and China. LKY knew the Chinese purpose: It was trying to draw Singapore into its orbit. According to S.R., LKY put the book aside, and responded, saying words to this effect: This is your version. There is another version of the war. That left a deep impression on S.R. 'I was so proud of what the PM did.' Singapore would not be drawn to take sides. It was also a demonstration of LKY's commitment to multiracialism. Veteran diplomat S.R. Nathan in Singapore in 1999, shortly before he became the country's sixth president. Photo: AFP Three-quarters of Singaporeans are ethnic Chinese. Hence, Singapore is seen in some quarters in Indonesia and Malaysia as a subversive Third China.

Philippines-China sea dispute moves to legal battlefield with cyber libel suit
Philippines-China sea dispute moves to legal battlefield with cyber libel suit

South China Morning Post

timea day ago

  • South China Morning Post

Philippines-China sea dispute moves to legal battlefield with cyber libel suit

The Philippines ' maritime dispute with China has spilled into the courts after a top coastguard official filed a cyber libel case against a pro-Beijing influencer over explosive – and, he claims, baseless – allegations that he is a paid asset of the United States. Commodore Jay Tarriela, spokesman for Philippine Coast Guard operations in the West Philippine Sea, lodged a complaint on Friday at the Manila prosecutor's office against Sass Rogando Sasot, a popular vlogger currently based in Beijing. The case is unprecedented: the first known libel lawsuit arising directly from the online information war surrounding the Philippines' increasingly fraught stand-off with China in the contested South China Sea According to Tarriela's complaint, Sasot falsely accused him on social media of receiving a US$4 million 'talent fee' from Washington, and of collecting bags of cash from the residence of House Speaker Martin Romualdez as payment for criticising Beijing's actions in the West Philippine Sea – Manila's term for the part of the South China Sea it claims as its own. She also alleged he had been expelled from the Philippine Military Academy (PMA) for cheating. 02:09 China and Philippines clash over disputed Sandy Cay in the Spratly Islands China and Philippines clash over disputed Sandy Cay in the Spratly Islands In an interview with This Week in Asia, Tarriela said the accusations had taken a deep personal toll. 'Absolutely,' he said, when asked if the claims had affected his family.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store