What the Vietnam war can teach us about Trump's Asia policy
Vietnam from 1965 to 1975. The
US entered the war in the closing years of an era when it was prepared to fight communist expansion wherever it occurred, a policy initially signalled by the Truman Doctrine.
The Vietnam war was a catastrophe in terms of its huge human toll and economic cost, and many Americans viewed it as a tragic folly.
However, it proved to be a protective shield against the spread of communism in
Southeast Asia . Without direct US military intervention in Vietnam in 1965, the Southeast Asia that we know today may not have existed.
Despite the US' setbacks in Vietnam, it has remained a vital component of the Asia-Pacific power balance. However, now the policies of
Donald Trump 's administration – to reshape the global trade order and US security posture – have generated uncertainties about the adjustments to come, including the roles of its allies and partners.
The domino theory, fashionable in US policy circles in the 1950s and early 1960s in its extreme form, assumed that if Vietnam fell to the communists, the rest of Southeast Asia would follow suit. In the US, the theory had its leftist and progressive critics and establishment figures, who thought it was too simplistic.
Huey helicopters carrying US troops land near Plei Ho Drong, Vietnam, in August 1965. Photo: AP
Non-communist Southeast Asian governments were also deeply concerned about the potential spread of communism from Vietnam.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump's tariff letters to 12 nations set to land on Monday, with rates up to 70%
President Donald Trump said he had signed letters to 12 countries outlining the various tariff levels they would face on goods they exported to the United States , with the 'take it or leave it' offers to be sent out on Monday. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One as he travelled to New Jersey, Trump declined to name the countries involved, saying that would be made public on Monday. The president had earlier on Thursday told reporters that he expected a first batch of letters to go out on Friday, a national holiday in the US, though the date has now shifted. In a global trade war that has upended financial markets and set off a scramble among policymakers to guard their economies, Trump in April announced a 10 per cent base tariff rate and additional amounts for most countries, some hitting as high as 50 per cent. US President Donald Trump unveils his planned tariffs on April 2. Photo: Reuters However, all but the 10 per cent base rate were subsequently suspended for 90 days to allow more time for negotiations to secure deals. That period ends on July 9, although Trump early on Friday said the tariffs could be even higher – ranging up to 70 per cent – with most set to go into effect on August 1.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
What more can Japan give? Tokyo braces for Trump's tariffs as talks hit deadlock
With just days to go before the 90-day pause on steep US tariffs expires on Wednesday, Japanese policymakers and the public are growing increasingly frustrated over stalled negotiations and what one observer described as the 'sheer capriciousness' of President Donald Trump's escalating trade threats. Advertisement Tokyo's scramble to secure an agreement before next week's deadline comes amid growing concern that the window for diplomacy is narrowing, with many US officials away for the Independence Day holidays. While Japanese officials prepare for an eighth round of ministerial-level talks in Washington over the weekend, critics say Trump 's hardline tactics are already testing the limits of trust between the two allies – and may ultimately prompt a broader rethink in Japan over how it manages both its economic and security partnerships. 'The Japanese government has done all that it can in its talks on tariffs with the US and to give more would just weaken our economy to a dangerous point,' Japanese businessman Ken Kato said. Japan's chief tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa (right) leaves the US Department of Commerce in Washington after holding talks with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on June 27. Photo: Kyodo Kato, who owns a company that trades internationally, describes himself as a conservative and was initially supportive of Trump's return to the White House.
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
What the Vietnam war can teach us about Trump's Asia policy
This year marks the 50th anniversary of the end of 'America's war' in Vietnam from 1965 to 1975. The US entered the war in the closing years of an era when it was prepared to fight communist expansion wherever it occurred, a policy initially signalled by the Truman Doctrine. The Vietnam war was a catastrophe in terms of its huge human toll and economic cost, and many Americans viewed it as a tragic folly. However, it proved to be a protective shield against the spread of communism in Southeast Asia . Without direct US military intervention in Vietnam in 1965, the Southeast Asia that we know today may not have existed. Despite the US' setbacks in Vietnam, it has remained a vital component of the Asia-Pacific power balance. However, now the policies of Donald Trump 's administration – to reshape the global trade order and US security posture – have generated uncertainties about the adjustments to come, including the roles of its allies and partners. The domino theory, fashionable in US policy circles in the 1950s and early 1960s in its extreme form, assumed that if Vietnam fell to the communists, the rest of Southeast Asia would follow suit. In the US, the theory had its leftist and progressive critics and establishment figures, who thought it was too simplistic. Huey helicopters carrying US troops land near Plei Ho Drong, Vietnam, in August 1965. Photo: AP Non-communist Southeast Asian governments were also deeply concerned about the potential spread of communism from Vietnam.
