logo
Christopher Nolan's ‘The Odyssey' Trailer Leaks Online And It Looks Pretty Bad

Christopher Nolan's ‘The Odyssey' Trailer Leaks Online And It Looks Pretty Bad

Forbes3 days ago
Matt Damon in The Odyssey
Ever since we learned that Oppenheimer director Christopher Nolan was making an adaptation of The Odyssey, I've been overcome by doubt. At first, the news was pretty exciting. I'm not a Nolan fanatic, but I loved his Dark Knight trilogy and many of his other films, like Memento, Inception and Interstellar.
Then I found out that Matt Damon had been cast as Odysseus, the protagonist of Homer's classic adventure. Damon has done some great work in the past, especially in films like his breakout Good Will Hunting, but he felt wrong for this role. Someone like Ralph Fiennes – who starred in last year's The Return, also about Odysseus – fits the part much better.
More casting news kept rolling in and the more I learned, the more I worried. Tom Holland will play Odysseus's son, Telemachus. And if that wasn't Spider-Man enough for you, Zendaya is also on board. I like Jon Bernthal, but between him, Damon and Zendaya this entire production was starting to feel decidedly American. It's probably just personal taste, but I prefer foreign historical epics to either have the regional language or accent, or to have British accents. (The exception to this rule is for more comedic or fantastical projects like Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves).
Robert Pattinson is a Brit, just like Holland, but both speak with American accents in the newly leaked trailer for the 2026 film. Pattinson (seemingly) narrates the opening, channeling his Lighthouse co-star Willem Dafoe.
'Darkness. Zeus' laws smashed to pieces. A kingdom without a king since my master died,' he says as the camera pans over a dark ocean. 'He knew it was an unwinnable war, and then somehow…somehow he won it.'
The trailer, which is currently playing in theaters but has leaked onto TikTok, X, Reddit and elsewhere, gives us what appears to be glimpses of the Trojan Horse, then moves to a scene between Holland's Telemachus and Bernthal's mystery character. Bernthal appears to be playing a soldier of some sort, perhaps an old companion of Odysseus. 'I know nothing of Odysseus, not since Troy,' he says.
'I have to find out what happened to my father. When did you last see him?' Telemachus replies. They sit together with other men gathered nearby. 'Interested in rumor, huh? Gossip. Who has a story about Odysseus, huh?' Bernthal's character hollers at the surrounding men. 'You? You have a story?'
Bernthal continues in voice-over as we see shots of a cavern, men walking toward a city at night, flags waving. 'Some say he's rich or some say he's poor,' Bernthal says. 'Some say he perished. Some say he's imprisoned. What say you?'
'Imprisoned?" Telemachus replies. 'What kind of prison? Good, old man like that,' Bernthal says. We see the ocean again, and Odysseus floating on a makeshift raft. The date 17.07.26 appears.
Many things bother me about this trailer and about the film in general. I have trouble explaining why I dislike celebrity-ridden, star-studded casts like this, and perhaps it is just personal taste, but here are some of the other cast members: Anne Hathaway, Lupita Nyong'o, Charlize Theron, Elliot Page, Himesh Patel, Benny Safdie, John Leguizamo, Mia Goth, Corey Hawkins, Cosmo Jarvis and more. Many of these are excellent actors, and some aren't what I would call 'celebrities' but I assume even excellent, lesser-known – but incredibly talented – British actors like Jarvis will have an American accent here.
I had this same issue with Dennis Villeneau's Dune films. This many big names, especially in big epics like this, detract from the immersion. I don't want to recognize everyone. I want smaller, lesser-known actors to have a chance to make their names in big ensemble casts. Even films like Robert Eggers' The Northman would have benefited from fewer big names. Nothing takes me out of a violent Norse epic like Nicole Kidman. There are so many talented, lesser-known actors out there to fill these kinds of roles. I love that Quentin Tarantino, when assembling his 'star-studded' Pulp Fiction used mostly lesser-known stars or actors who had dropped off the face of the earth since their heyday, like John Travolta (and what a comeback he had).
I try to explain this by recasting Lord Of The Rings using really famous actors from the early 2000's (which already had a handful of big stars). Brad Pitt as Aragorn. Russell Crowe as Boromir. Leonardo DiCaprio as Pippin . . . and so on and so forth. Great actors, sure, but right for the cast? I prefer more newcomers and more established character actors who aren't necessarily household names. Aren't we glad that Viggo Mortensen was given Aragorn? That an established but still lesser-known actor like Sean Bean was given Boromir? I've made my peace with Elijah Wood as Frodo, but at the time I really wished they'd cast someone less recognizable.
Watching a leaked trailer can only tell you so much about a film, of course, but I'm not loving the look of the costumes, either. Or the muted aesthetic, drained of color.
I'm also worried about Nolan himself and his tendencies as a filmmaker. Again, I have thoroughly enjoyed many of his movies, but unlike most people I found Oppenheimer to be needlessly complex. The big 'reveal' toward the end and the way he fiddled with chronology were at once confusing and unnecessary. I wasn't shocked by the twist. I was nonplussed. Great performances aside, the movie was too long and too muddled. It was visually and sonically astonishing, but Nolan's focus on crafting another mind-bending plot instead of prioritizing his characters and their personal journey made it feel emotionally empty. It was heavy but without heft. Will we get a similar treatment in The Odyssey? Does an adventure story like this need multiple timelines or big twists? Does it need to be dark and colorless?
Of course, I'd still rather see Nolan at the helm than Ridley Scott. Scott has made some great films also, but his more recent efforts have fallen short. Napoleon, Gladiator II . . . what tremendous disappointments. Or Zack Snyder, for that matter. I shudder at the thought.
We shall see a year from now, and probably several trailers later. What do you think? And before you say this isn't fair, that I should not – must not! – judge a movie by its trailer: This is how the world works. We all judge movies by their trailers. A movie studio is tasked with putting its best foot forward in its marketing. They are trying to sell us a thing. We are allowed to have opinions about the thing they're trying to sell us. I grow very weary of fans acting like the only opinion allowed is glee and frothing excitement. A critical eye never hurts. If nothing else, setting our expectations lower can help us enjoy the final product more when it comes out.
Let me know your thoughts on Twitter, Instagram, Bluesky or Facebook. Also be sure to subscribe to my YouTube channel and follow me here on this blog. Sign up for my newsletter for more reviews and commentary on entertainment and culture.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Coca-Cola's STAR WARS Short Film Is a Joyful Tribute to The Fans — GeekTyrant
Coca-Cola's STAR WARS Short Film Is a Joyful Tribute to The Fans — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time20 minutes ago

  • Geek Tyrant

Coca-Cola's STAR WARS Short Film Is a Joyful Tribute to The Fans — GeekTyrant

Coca-Cola and Disney just dropped a new short film/commercial that feels like a thank you letter to Star Wars fans. Set in a movie theater during a full-on Star Wars marathon. It features Cantina aliens hang out in the lobby of the theater, cosplayers reenact the legendary Vader vs. Obi-Wan duel, and there's even a Force-fueled tug-of-war over a Coke bottle between Rey and Kylo, straight out of The Last Jedi . As you'll see, it unapologetically it celebrates fandom. This is about the passionate fans of the franchise. It's silly, charming, and heartfelt all at once, exactly what you'd want from something aiming to capture what it feels like to love Star Wars this much. The short taps into the reason Star Wars still matters, the fans who keep showing up. And with over 30 character-themed cans out this summer, it's a pretty fun excuse to stock up. Watch the short below, and may your thirst be with you, always.

Ask not for whom the Louvre of Bluesky tolls, it tolls for thee
Ask not for whom the Louvre of Bluesky tolls, it tolls for thee

TechCrunch

time24 minutes ago

  • TechCrunch

Ask not for whom the Louvre of Bluesky tolls, it tolls for thee

It's a sad weekend over at Bluesky, where one of the best accounts has disappeared — although we can still hope for its resurrection. Known as The Louvre of Bluesky, the account in question struck fear into the hearts of bad posters everywhere. While it posted commentary and jokes of its own, its most brutally funny and haunting work came in the form of screenshots capturing rogue Bluesky posts in all their unhinged glory. It's hard to write a proper appreciation now that the Louvre has vanished, and it's truly impossible to create a full taxonomy of the all varieties of poster's disease it managed to capture in the wild. Perhaps the defining characteristic of a Louvre of Bluesky post — beyond the simple failure to get a joke — was its scolding tone, along with a sense of absolute outrage that someone, somewhere might be having fun on the internet. Maybe I'm projecting too much onto a screenshot-filled anonymous social media account, but to me, it always felt like the exact opposite of the tedious, ad nauseum complaints that Bluesky is a liberal echo chamber. This wasn't someone who'd spent a few minutes on the site just to confirm their suspicions and write the umpteenth version of the same op-ed. Whether they loved Bluesky or hated it, whoever operated the account clearly knew the site's darkest corners; they understood what absolute weirdos its users could be. The account also felt, at times, like a warning — that any of us, in a moment of weakness, could post something clueless or cringe. Just knowing the Louvre of Bluesky was out there was enough to scare me (not often enough, I'm sure) into deleting a couple of dumb or obvious replies. So where has the Louvre of Bluesky gone? In a post on Patreon, the account's author said it would be taken down 'temporarily' due to 'a loser and a coward' emailing their bosses and their wife's bosses. They added that they're 'not sure if the account will stay closed.' It's not much to go on. I can only hope that like the real museum, the Louvre of Bluesky will be able to reopen soon. But even if it doesn't, its spirit will continue haunting all of us who remember we're just a few keystrokes away from being immortalized for a bad post. Techcrunch event Save $450 on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $450 on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW

Today's NYT Strands Hints, Answer and Help for July 6 #490
Today's NYT Strands Hints, Answer and Help for July 6 #490

CNET

time28 minutes ago

  • CNET

Today's NYT Strands Hints, Answer and Help for July 6 #490

Looking for the most recent Strands answer? Click here for our daily Strands hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles. Today's NYT Strands puzzle is a fun one. The category offers some creative answers, and once you understand the theme, the unscrambling comes easily. If you need hints and answers, read on. I go into depth about the rules for Strands in this story. If you're looking for today's Wordle, Connections and Mini Crossword answers, you can visit CNET's NYT puzzle hints page. Read more: NYT Connections Turns 1: These Are the 5 Toughest Puzzles So Far Hint for today's Strands puzzle Today's Strands theme is: My hero! If that doesn't help you, here's a clue: Marvel and DC. Clue words to unlock in-game hints Your goal is to find hidden words that fit the puzzle's theme. If you're stuck, find any words you can. Every time you find three words of four letters or more, Strands will reveal one of the theme words. These are the words I used to get those hints but any words of four or more letters that you find will work: PEST, PETS, PITH, BILE, SUED, POWER, BITE, LIGHT, TOPS, SPOT, GENT, FEED, FEET, RENT, RENTS Answers for today's Strands puzzle These are the answers that tie into the theme. The goal of the puzzle is to find them all, including the spangram, a theme word that reaches from one side of the puzzle to the other. When you have all of them (I originally thought there were always eight but learned that the number can vary), every letter on the board will be used. Here are the nonspangram answers: SPEED, FLIGHT, HEALING, STRENGTH, INVISIBILITY Today's Strands spangram The completed NYT Strands puzzle for July 6, 2025, #490. NYT/Screenshot by CNET Today's Strands spangram is SUPERPOWER. To find it, look for the S that's four letters to the right on the bottom row, and wind up.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store