
Dave Barry is the eternal class clown
On a special episode (first released on May 25, 2025) of The Excerpt podcast: Nationally-syndicated humor columnist Dave Barry memoir chronicles his life mostly spent joking around.
Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text.
Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here
Dana Taylor:
Hello and welcome to The Excerpt. I'm Dana Taylor. Today is Sunday, May 25th, 2025, and this is special episode of The Excerpt. Think back, do you remember the person voted class clown at your high school? Is that person still doing funny antics in adulthood? One person who can nab that claim to fame is Pulitzer Prize-winning writer Dave Barry. Barry has made a career out of being a jokester, writing a nationally syndicated humor column for two decades. He's also a best-selling author. His latest book is Class Clown: The Memoirs of a Professional Wiseass. Class Clown is on bookshelves now. Thanks for joining me on The Excerpt, Dave.
Dave Barry:
Thanks for having me, Dana.
Dana Taylor:
You've written a lot of books. Why this memoir and why now?
Dave Barry:
Well, I was a little nervous about writing a memoir. Why now is like, I'm 77 years old. If I don't write it now, I don't know when I'm going to write it. And my editor at Simon & Schuster, Priscilla Paton, and I agreed that maybe this would be a good time to write a memoir. I hope she was right. I was a little nervous about talking about myself, which I don't usually. Well, I do talk about myself, but I'm usually kidding. In this case, I'm sometimes telling the truth.
Dana Taylor:
How have your experiences in childhood shaped your career as a humorist?
Dave Barry:
My parents were really funny people. It's weird because both of them had sort of tragic elements to their lives. My dad dealt... fought with alcoholism much of his life. He recovered. My mom committed suicide after my dad died, which was brutal for everybody. But this is going to be weird to say, my mom was the funniest person I've ever known. She had a very dark sense of humor, but it was a real, edgy, strong sense of humor. And despite what I just said, I had a remarkably happy childhood, and both my parents encouraged humor in our family, and so that's kind of where I got started trying to make my family laugh.
Dana Taylor:
I was going to say you didn't shy away from serious matters including intense and vulnerable moments with, as you've said, both your mom and dad. Can you tell us more about one of them and how did these moments change you?
Dave Barry:
Well, I'll take my mom. She dealt with depression all her life, and ultimately it's what she lost to. She had a tough childhood. She grew up in the depression, and she literally lived in a sod house in Nebraska when she was a kid. But she had this ability to always see humor in things and never... it was the one rule in our lives and our family. You don't take anything, especially yourself too seriously. That was our environment as we were kids. Although she had her demons, she didn't let them affect us. What we saw from her was a very funny person who loved us very much, took good care of us. She couldn't beat them in the end, but she passed along that that sense of humor, that edginess, that willingness to not take yourself seriously. That's really what made me.
Dana Taylor:
Dave, I know you were a news reporter before you pivoted to writing humor columns at the Miami Herald. What lessons from your early journalism career have stayed with you?
Dave Barry:
Well, I love journalism. I love to be in a newspaper reporter. I learned everything I knew about journalism at this little newspaper in Pennsylvania, but I also learned the quirks and foibles of the newspaper world, the way newspapers tend to present themselves as authorities on everything. And the fact is, it was really people like me writing the newspapers. So when I switched over to the humor side, I could make fun of newspapers and the news business, but from a position of A, love and B, deep knowledge, I've been there. I've written those stories, and I think that really helped me kind of connect with the newspaper reading audience like they were used to reading newspapers that took themselves pretty seriously, and I was a person who came along and said, "You don't have to take us that seriously. Some of us are clowns. I'm one of them."
Dana Taylor:
You spend a good deal of your book talking about reader feedback, some nice, some not so nice. Why were these important to you? I know you wrote about how you even enjoyed the hate mail.
Dave Barry:
Yeah, my reader... I loved my readers. My readers did not all love me. One of the things you learn if you write in any kind of column, but especially a humor column, is no matter what you write, somebody's going to be really angry at you and want you fired. And so there was a certain percentage of my readers, I called them the humor impaired, who never figured out that I was kidding. Like if I would say, [inaudible 00:04:43] we all know Abraham Lincoln invented the light bulb and then go on and they would write letters to the editor, "Abraham Lincoln did not invent the..." and then usually they would get it wrong. They say, Benjamin Franklin invented the light bulb.
But anyway, I love those people. They enabled me to write whole columns about the reaction I got to my columns. Then of course, the vast majority of my readers did get the joke, and that's why I was able to stay in the news. That's why they didn't fire me when they were told to by the humor impaired readers. So my readers made my column work. I got so much from them. I got so many ideas from them, and they would send me clippings about weird things happening. I wrote a million columns based on that stuff. So I put a lot of my readers into this book. I mean, they're a big reason why I made it, I was successful as a columnist.
Dana Taylor:
What's your take on humorous power to change the national conversation, which has become so partisan with last November's election?
Dave Barry:
I don't think that humorists have that much power to change anything, to be honest, if I'm being brutally honest. I mean, I think some of us would like to think we do, but we don't really. I kind of don't like where we've gone with humor, political humor in this country. I talk about this in the book, how I kind of grew up in the era of Johnny Carson and Art Buchwald, people like that who were very funny, but you didn't really know their politics or it didn't matter what their politics were because they laughed at whoever was in charge, whoever was running the country, and everybody got that that if you laughed at the leader, didn't mean you hated your country, would mean you were an evil person or whatever.
And a lot of the humor, I think now, a lot of political humor is basically tactical. It's like it's aimed at one side or the other side so the people who agree with you can laugh at it, but the people who don't agree with you hate you for it. There's just a lot of anger in the humor now, and I think that's unfortunate. I was happier with the way it worked when people kind of agreed, "Well, we're all on the same side. We may disagree politically, but we are on the same side." We sort of lost that I think.
Dana Taylor:
I'm sure some of our listeners and viewers are very inspired by your unique career path. What's your advice for writers who'd like to become humorous?
Dave Barry:
Oh man. Well have a day job for sure. It's tough. I used to hear all the time from people who wanted to be newspaper columnists. There's not that many anymore because there's just not that many newspapers anymore. So people who want to do humor have to sort of go more toward the internet, some stack and places like that, or stand-up comedy or writing for television, whatever. And my advice is always the same thing. If you're funny, eventually people will discover you. They will recognize that you're funny, but it's going to take a while usually for that to happen, and while you're waiting for it to happen, you kind of have to be able to support yourself somehow. So that's the most important thing. Don't give up, but don't be too optimistic that it's just going to suddenly happen for you.
Dana Taylor:
When people sit down to write their memoirs, it often makes a person introspective about their lives. Looking back, is there anything you'd do differently, a moment that gives you pause or an inflection point for you?
Dave Barry:
More inflection point than regret. I've really been very, very lucky. I mean, I did not ever think until I was in my mid-30s it didn't occur to me I would be able to make a living writing humor. I was doing other things. I was working as a newspaper reporter. I was teaching effective writing seminars to business people, but I was writing humor whenever I could, but I didn't think that would ever become a real job. I got several big lucky breaks along the way. I wrote a couple of stories that just caught the attention of a bunch of editors to the topics I happened to be on and got launched that way. I still feel just like that. I've been very, very lucky more than anything else. I had this incredible career where I never had to do anything from my mid-30s on. I never had to work. I just had fun basically.
Dana Taylor:
What's next for you Dave?
Dave Barry:
After this memoir? I guess continued immaturity, followed by death. Not in any hurry, but I mean, that's what I see coming.
Dana Taylor:
That's the most unique ending I've had to an interview. Dave, thank you so much for being on The Excerpt.
Dave Barry:
It's my pleasure, Dana. Thanks for having me.
Dana Taylor:
Thanks to our senior producers, Shannon Rae Green and Kaely Monahan for their production assistance. Our executive producer is Laura Beatty. Let us know what you think of this episode by sending a note to podcasts@usatoday.com. Thanks for listening. I'm Dana Taylor. Taylor Wilson will be back tomorrow morning with another episode of The Excerpt.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geek Tyrant
an hour ago
- Geek Tyrant
Jamie Lee Curtis Confirms She Will Star in MURDER, SHE WROTE Feature Adaptation That is Officially in the Works — GeekTyrant
Academy Award-winning actress Jamie Lee Curtis ( Everything Everywhere All At Once , The Bear ) has confirmed that a film reboot of the classic series Murder, She Wrote is in the works at Universal, and Curtis is set to star. The actress revealed that she's 'a minute away' from taking over the late Angela Lansbury's beloved middle-aged mystery writer and amateur sleuth role, Jessica Fletcher, in a feature adaptation of the CBS series that ran for 12 seasons from 1984 to '96. 'Oh, it's… happening,' Curtis playfully confirmed to Entertainment Tonight. 'We're a minute away, but yeah, [I'm] very excited. Very excited. But I'm tamping down my enthusiasm until we start shooting. I have a couple of other things to hustle, but then I'll get to enjoy that work.' The script was written by Lauren Schuker Blum and Rebecca Angelo, with producers Lord Miller and Amy Pascal. Lansbury starred from 1984 to 1996 in what became one of the most successful and longest-running shows in TV history. Her Jessica Fletcher was a retired schoolteacher turned successful mystery writer, who proves to have an uncanny knack for solving real-life murders. The show was primarily set in the seaside town of Cabot Cove, Maine, though Jessica often travels to other locales as cases unfold. I love Curtis, and I think she will be great in this role. Stay tuned for updates. via: Deadline


Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
New Jonathan Demme biography spotlights director's clashes with powerful stars — and his humanity
Before he set his sights on Hollywood, Jonathan Demme studied to become a vet. Movies may have mesmerized him since childhood, but animals were his 'parallel obsession,' writes film journalist David M. Stewart in 'There's No Going Back,' an uneven biography of the Oscar-winning director of 'The Silence of the Lambs.' In the end, chemistry classes proved too hard, and only one animal sustained Demme's interest long enough: the Alligator, the University of Florida newspaper that let him contribute film reviews. A career as a veterinarian was abandoned in favor of the movies. Demme, who died in 2017, forged a career defined by films that centered voices from society's ever-shifting margins. He spotlighted women ('Swing Shift'), Black people ('Beloved') and HIV-positive gay men ('Philadelphia') in narratives that celebrated their trials through an empathetic camera lens. Interspersed among Hollywood projects were documentaries such as 'The Agronomist,' on Haiti's only independent radio station; 'Right to Return,' about Hurricane Katrina victims fighting to access their homes again; and 'Stop Making Sense.' Demme himself witnessed the difficulty those at society's fringes faced entering spaces men (often white) had claimed and refused to relinquish. His grandmother retold rose-tinted stories of building aircraft equipment during World War II before being forcibly relegated back to her domestic life. Growing up Miami's Overtown neighborhood, Demme saw how Black people created their own unique 'music and communal energy' during segregation, a culture he would repeatedly honor in his own films. After college, Demme landed a publicity job at United Artists. During a chance encounter chauffeuring François Truffaut around, the master auteur told the desperate factotum that he had an eye for directing. Demme insisted he wasn't interested in being a director, even after the French filmmaker inscribed his copy of 'Hitchcock.' 'Yes, you are,' was Truffaut's reply. Despite these early protests, Demme moved west to Hollywood, working for B-movie producer Roger Corman on films such as the 1971 bike picture 'Angels Hard as They Come' and the salacious 1973 prison escape story 'Black Mama White Mama' before he directed 'Caged Heat' with a feminist take on the women-in-prison film that embraced satire and progressive politics. Demme directed socially conscious projects during the 1970s, tackling the disenfranchised and forgotten through action and comedy tales. 'Crazy Mama,' about a housewife intent on exacting vengeance on the men who murdered her husband, highlighted Demme's desire to recognize women's ongoing struggles against a patriarchal world. 'Fighting Mad' and 'Citizens Band' (subsequently titled 'Handle with Care') touched on corporate greed, ecological destruction and finding human connection in small-town America. 'Melvin and Howard' won two Oscars and was nominated for a third. But in an experience that would unfortunately repeat itself, the Goldie Hawn-produced 'Swing Shift' was a deeply demoralizing project for Demme. He had wanted to make a 'feminist perspective of women during wartime,' writes Stewart, while Hawn had imagined the film as a sugary rom-com. The veto power Hawn had meant the entire ending was reshot, mostly sapping Demme's dream of its political message. A decade later, Demme would suffer similar strife on the set of 'Beloved,' quarreling with Oprah Winfrey over aspects of characterization in the supernatural slavery epic. ( Winfrey told Stewart that she was banned from viewing the dailies for a brief period.) But creative comfort was found, as Demme repeated over the years, in music. There was his Talking Heads concert film 'Stop Making Sense' and several Neil Young concert films; 'Something Wild,' a Melanie Griffith movie he made after 'Swing Shift,' prominently featured Jamaican singer Sister Carol and her cover of 'Wild Thing.' Still, it was his passion for female protagonists who were 'reliable in a world of lying men' that also fueled his output, if only partly dealt with in Stewart's shorthand approach. 'The Silence of the Lambs,' 'Rachel Getting Married' and 'Ricki and the Flash' each etched, in equal parts, the strength and vulnerability of a different women — battling the criminal justice system, besieged by addiction and estranged from family — who reject victimhood as an option. 'There's No Going Back' stresses it's not a definitive biography but an effort to 'understand Demme as a filmmaker.' If Stewart can be forgiven for the light detail on Demme's upbringing for this reason (only a few pages), he is less absolved for his inconsistent, often abridged, treatments of Demme's films and what messages to glean from a long view of the director. Patchy approaches — 'Rachel Getting Married' gets some dissection with minimal production detail, while 'The Silence of the Lambs' gets extensive production detail with no film analysis — doesn't help extract Demme's thematic throughlines as a filmmaker. To end the book with his passing and without any final remarks only compounds this problem. What does somewhat redeem 'There's No Going Back' is the detail given on Demme's lifelong activism. Starting first with the freedom of expression movement, Demme moved to documenting Haiti's transformation from a dictatorship to a democracy in several energized documentaries. If political connections aren't always made back to his dramatized films, appreciating how Demme championed voices from the likes of Haiti and in the aftermath of Katrina does at least highlight his lifelong advocacy of society's most forgotten — on- and off-screen. When Demme was a young boy, his mother told him to write about the movies he so ardently watched 'to uncover the secrets behind the magic.' It may be an unfortunate irony then that this same advice Stewart recounts proves largely absent in 'There's No Going Back.' While well-intended and admiring, the biography often proves facile, showing difficulty reckoning with Demme's oeuvre and its deeper political and cinematic lessons. The book has still set some of the groundwork for a future project that may more adeptly synthesize life with art. Smith is a books and culture writer.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Who is Venus Williams' fiancé? Andrea Preti supports her during DC Open win
Venus Williams, in a testament to resilience, returned to the court and became the second-oldest woman to win a tour-level singles match in professional tennis, her first since August 2023, with her fiancé in the stands cheering her on. At the age of 45, Williams, with her impressive serves and agile movements, defeated World No. 35 Peyton Stearns with a score of 6-3, 6-4 at the DC Open. In a post-match interview, Williams addressed the rumors surrounding her personal life and confirmed her relationship with her soon-to-be husband, Danish-Italian actor Andrea Preti, who was watching her play for the first time. As Venus Williams continues to shine on the court, let's take a moment to get to know her fiancé, Andrea Preti. More: Venus Williams wins again at 45 years old in magical night for tennis Who is Andrea Preti? Andrea Preti grew up in Copenhagen before returning to Italy, where he worked as a fashion model, according to Tennis365. He then decided to pursue a career in acting and moved to New York to study at the Susan Batson Academy. Today, he is recognized as one of the most successful film stars in Denmark. Preti was first linked to Williams after being spotted together in Italy in July 2024. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Venus Williams' fiancé Andrea Preti supports her at DC Open win