‘You promised you'd take a nap': Inside Hunter Biden's confrontation with Joe after watching dad flail during Ireland trip
As the president was welcomed to his ancestral homeland, he set off on a busy schedule, including a tree-planting ceremony, the ringing of the Peace Bell, and an honor guard presenting arms, Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson write in Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again.
The room Biden was in at one point during the trip grew empty, with fewer than a dozen people left. Two of them were Illinois Rep. Mike Quigley and then- New York Rep. Brian Higgins. Hunter Biden pushed his father to take a step back.
'You promised you wouldn't do this,' he said, according to the authors. 'You promised you'd take a nap. You know you can't handle all this.'
Biden disregarded his son's concerns and walked to the bar in the back of the room, where a woman handed him a soft drink. He appeared exhausted.
It was at that point that Quigley realized why the moment felt familiar. It reminded him of his father in his last few years before his death from Parkinson's at the age of 92.
Biden and some Democrats alongside him reject that his deterioration occurred.
Earlier this month, Biden appeared on The View, where co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin asked Biden about the 'Democratic sources' who had said that 'in your final year, there was a dramatic decline in your cognitive abilities. What is your response to these allegations, and are these sources wrong?'
'They are wrong. There's nothing to sustain that,' he responded.
Although it wasn't yet announced, Quigley questioned during the trip to Ireland how Biden could run for re-election.
While Biden got a boost from the crowds in Ireland, when they weren't present, he grew deflated, the authors write.
Quigley believed at that moment that Biden needed to rest for the rest of the day and night. He was physically frail and had lost most of his energy. The authors describe his speech behind the scenes as breathless, soft, and weak. Quigley was frequently reminded of his dad during the trip.
The Illinois congressman spoke to Higgins about Biden appearing to have symptoms akin to Parkinson's. However, Higgins viewed the president through a different lens, having lost his own father to Alzheimer 's and believing that he was seeing something similar in Biden's shuffling.
'A diagnosis is nothing more than pattern recognition,' Higgins told Tapper and Thompson. 'When people see that stuff, it conjures up a view that there's something going on neurologically.'
He added that Biden's cognitive decline 'was evident to most people that watched him.'
Quigley wondered why the White House physician didn't attempt to diagnose the president. However, he reasoned that Biden's staff may not have wanted to know.
The president's staff was elated at his 2024 State of the Union performance. Biden was surrounded by Democrats on the floor of the House following the speech. Quigley hadn't been that close to Biden since the Ireland trip the previous year.
When he put his hand on Biden's back, he could feel his ribs and spine. His voice soft and breathy, Biden's eyes darted from side to side. Once again, Quigley was reminded of his late father.
Biden's disastrous debate performance a few months later didn't come as a huge shock to Quigley, the book reports.
'We have to be honest with ourselves that it wasn't just a horrible night,' Quigley told CNN's Kasie Hunt on July 2. A few days later, he became one of the first Democrats to call for the president to step back from the ticket.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Channel 4
3 minutes ago
- Channel 4
Democrat explains why he's fled Texas warrant in redistricting fight
Democratic representatives in Texas' State legislature say they'll continue to fight after Republican governor Greg Abott ordered their civil arrest. Fifty one Texas Democrats fled the state to prevent a vote designed to re-draw the electoral boundaries. The proposed changes to the congressional map would create five more Republican-leaning seats in the US House of Representatives: a potential life line for president Trump facing midterm elections next year with a slim majority. The governor has also threatened the lawmakers with fines and removal. The self exiled state legislators have taken refuge in states controlled by the Democrats: New York, Massachusetts and Illinois. We're joined by John Bucy, one of the Democrat members of the Texas Legislature hiding in Illinois.
The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
What does Texas redrawing its voting maps mean and why have Democrats left the state? Explained
At the insistence of Donald Trump, Republicans in Texas are pushing ahead with an effort to redraw their congressional map to pick up as many as five additional Republican seats. The decision has set off a cascading legal battle. State lawmakers have fled Texas as part of an effort to stop Republicans from passing the map. Democrats in other states have said they will retaliate, setting the stage for a nasty and prolonged redistricting tit-for-tat that could last for years. After a nationwide census every 10 years, all 50 US states are required to redraw their congressional districts to account for population shifts. The US constitution entrusts the power to draw congressional lines to the state legislatures in each state. Since the 18th century, politicians have tried to use this line drawing power to punish their political rivals. In the 19th century, the practice of manipulating district lines for political lines became known as gerrymandering. While states are required to redistrict every 10 years, the constitution contains no explicit ban on redrawing boundaries before the decade is up. Republicans currently hold an extremely slim 219-212 majority in the US House (there are four vacancies, three of which are seats previously held by Democrats). Republicans know they will probably lose seats in next year's mid-term elections, when all members of the US House will stand for re-election and the sitting president's party typically does not perform well. Republicans have complete control of state government in Texas, which has 38 US House seats (second only to California's 52 seats). Republicans currently hold 25 of those seats. Seeking to shore up the Republican advantage in the US House, Trump urged the Texas governor Greg Abbott to redraw the state's lines to add additional Republican-friendly districts. Abbott called a special session to draw the districts last month. Last week, Republicans unveiled a map in which they could pick up five additional seats, giving them a 30-8 advantage in the state's delegation. Texas also undertook a mid-decade redistricting in 2003. In 2006, the US supreme court said that nothing in the US constitution prohibited Texas from redrawing its district mid-decade. The US supreme court has also given states virtually unlimited leeway to gerrymander districts for partisan gain. In a 5-4 decision in 2019, it said that federal courts could not do anything to stop the drawing of districts for partisan advantage, no matter how severe. There are still legal protections that prohibit states from diluting the influence of minority voters when they draw districts or explicitly sorting them based on their race. But the supreme court has made those cases extremely difficult to win and they can take years to resolve in court. Democrats are in the minority in the Texas state legislature. But the body's bylaws require the presence of two-thirds of its lawmakers to conduct business. There are 150 members of the Texas house of representatives, 62 of whom are Democrats. More than 51 fled the state on Sunday to Illinois, Massachusetts and New York to deny that quorum, halting the legislature from moving forward on the maps. This isn't the first time Democrats have fled the state to break quorum to try to stop Republicans from passing legislation. In 2021, Democrats fled to Washington DC as Republicans were poised to pass sweeping new voting restrictions. That standoff lasted several weeks, but Democrats eventually returned to the state and the legislation passed. Democrats also fled the state in 2003 to try and stop mid-decade redistricting. The Texas house voted on Monday to authorize arrest warrants for the members who fled the state. Such warrants are unlikely to be enforced while the members are out of the state. Abbott and the Texas attorney general Ken Paxton have pledged to aggressively pursue the Democrats. Abbott has cited a 2021 non-binding opinion from Paxton's office to suggest that the lawmakers who broke quorum could be removed from office. But such an extraordinary action would need to go through the Texas courts and would likely be tied up in state court for some time. Rules enacted by the House in 2023 subject state lawmakers to a $500 daily fine for each day they are absent. Lawmakers are paid about $600 a month. While the rules prohibit lawmakers from using campaign funds to pay the fines, there are loopholes Democrats can use to have someone else cover them. The current special legislative session runs through 19 August but Abbott can continue to call more sessions, and it's unclear how long Democrats are willing to wait out returning. As Texas has moved ahead with its effort to implement a new map, Democrats have threatened to retaliate by redrawing districts in states where they have complete control. Most notably, California Governor Gavin Newsom is leading an effort to redraw California's 52 districts to drastically reduce the number of Republican seats (Democrats already hold 43 seats). Democratic governors in Illinois and New York have also pledged to retaliate. Democrats face significant legal obstacles to achieving this goal. In California, voters approved a referendum in 2010 that strips lawmakers of their redistricting power and instead hands it to a bipartisan and independent citizens commission. Newsom and California Democrats are reportedly moving ahead with a plan to have voters approve a new map through a referendum this fall. In New York, the state constitution bars mid-decade redistricting absent a court order, but Democrats are reportedly considering putting a constitutional amendment on the ballot that would allow them to redistrict later in the decade. 'I'm tired of fighting this fight with my hand tied behind my back,' Kathy Hochul, the governor of New York, said on Wednesday. Trump is reportedly urging Republicans in Missouri to redraw their congressional map to pick up an additional GOP seat. Ron DeSantis, the Florida governor, has also suggested that his state, where Republicans hold 20 of 28 seats, should redraw districts, which would likely lead to additional GOP gains. Ohio, where Republicans hold 10 of 15 seats, is required to redraw its map this year because of a unique state law. That is likely to also lead to additional Republican seats.
Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Reform's prison tsar 'more than happy' to open door to death penalty debate - despite Nigel Farage saying he could 'never support' capital punishment
Reform's new prison tsar has said she is 'more than happy' to discuss MPs thoughts on the death penalty - after Nigel Farage ruled the punishment out. Vanessa Frake, the former head of security at HMP Wormwood Scrubs, was revealed yesterday as the party's adviser on crime. The 62-year-old was quizzed today on her capital punishment stance - and while she denied personally backing a change in the law, Ms Frake opened the doors to a debate. She told LBC: 'Look, I'm more than happy to discuss the death penalty… 'If you'd have asked me that question 20 years ago, I'd have said absolutely, no hesitation - I support the death penalty. 'But, you know, a lot has changed over the years with convictions being unsafe. 'And is it really a deterrent? Is it a deterrent in the United States, in the states that have the death penalty? 'No, it's not. I'd much rather those people spent whatever life they have behind bars.' The prison Tsar, who previously oversaw Rose West, told LBC: 'Look, I'm more than happy to discuss the death penalty…' The prison tsar went on to clarify she was 'open to discussion' but 'not an advocate of it (the death penalty) full-blown.' Ms Frake, who has been brought in by Reform UK to help boost their prison and justice policy, oversaw a number of notorious inmates during her time in the prison service. Among these were serial killer Rose West, Moors murderer Myra Hindley and Libertines frontman, Pete Doherty. Her comments today came despite Mr Farage previously insisting 'nothing on the death penalty will be part of party policy'. In June, he told The Sun: 'These are issues of conscience, just as the assisted dying debate will be when it comes up on Friday, just as the abortion limit. 'These are all issues of conscience. Nothing on the death penalty will be part of party policy. 'I have to say, personally, given there have been 500 quite serious miscarriages of justice in this country since the early 1970s, I don't think I could ever support it. But I understand why others take a different point of view. 'Although I do think it's quite interesting there's a younger generation coming through who seem to increasingly support the death penalty. 'And I suspect it will be back within the next decade as an issue of major national debate. Not quite yet, but it's coming. 'But, certainly, these things will not be party policy, far, far from it.' A poll from More in Common UK released in January found a majority of Brits supported reinstating the death penalty in the UK, with Millennials offering the strongest support. Three in five (58 per cent) of Millennials born between 1981 and 1986 said they believed capital punishment should be reintroduced. Reform names like David Bull - the new party chairman - have backed looking at the death penalty, as well as Lee Anderson - one of the party's five MPs - who is a long-standing supporter. The party says its focus over the summer will be on crime and immigration as bosses attempt to flesh out policy platforms. Ms Frake said Reform UK is 'refreshing' following her work under various parties over the years in the prison service. She said: 'You can either stand by and moan about the state of things or you can stand up and speak about them. 'And I received a phone call from Reform last week asking for my opinion on prisons, the first time that anybody has ever asked me from a political party. 'I'm not saying we'll agree on everything, we probably won't, but that's politics, that's policy making. And I think that, you know, I spent 27 years in the prison service and I am greatly saddened by how things are run now. 'I feel for the prison staff who have to do a very difficult job on a daily basis in very difficult circumstances. 'Finally, somebody has asked somebody from the Prison Service who's actually lived that experience to share their knowledge, and I'm more than happy to do so.' Ms Frake said she had only been contacted by Reform about the role four days before it was announced. She said she would like to see funding for prisons restored alongside attempts to extend sentences and lock more people up. The appointment comes as Mr Farage yesterday failed to commit to banning transgender women from female prisons - after Ms Frake said the inmates should not be automatically barred. Ms Frake had argued the decisions should be made on an 'individual basis'. Asked for his views on her comments yesterday, the Reform UK leader told the Daily Mail: 'I've personally never worked in a prison so I can't answer [the question] but I think you'll find that the answer that you'll get from somebody who has worked in prisons at the highest possible level is, I think, basically it's about risk assessment, isn't it? 'But in terms of the problems in prisons, it's a relatively small one.' A Reform spokesman later added of Ms Frake: 'An ex-prison governor... has a different opinion. That does not constitute party policy.' In the interview to mark her appointment, Ms Frake had said decisions about transgender prisoners should be made on a case-by-case basis. But she told The Times that sexual offenders may need to be held in male prisons. 'It's all about the risk assessments for me, and each has to be done on an individual basis,' she said. She added the transgender prisoners she had overseen were 'accepted' by other inmates, saying: 'People who want to just say a blanket ban clearly have never stepped foot in a prison and seen how prison runs and how risk assessments on individuals happen.' The prison tsar told LBC today the biggest lesson she had learned over the years was 'how to compartmentalise' what she saw on a daily basis. Ms Frake said: 'I looked after Rose west for about four or five months. The woman's a typical psychopath. 'You know, she has absolutely no emotional intelligence. And, you know, people who are of that ilk, they don't have it tattooed on their forehead. And that is why they are psychopaths. 'But at the end of the day, they're nobody special, they're prisoners.'
