Taoiseach tells Ivana Bacik she 'didn't have the courage' to be in Government
TAOISEACH MICHEÁL MARTIN lashed out at Labour leader Ivana Bacik during Leaders' Questions today, telling her she did not 'have the courage' to be in Government.
The heated exchange came as the Labour leader accused the Government of 'chaotic decision-making' in relation to rental regulation.
Referring to the Government's decision to extend Rent Pressure Zones (RPZs) across the country, Bacik said: 'Of course we support the extension of RPZs across the country, but not a hollowed out version of RPZs that offer no real protections for renters.'
In response to her comments, the Taoiseach said the Government's actions will help increase the supply of rental properties. He then claimed that the Labour Party would not make 'difficult decisions' to increase supply.
'You will not support anything that in any way you perceive to be injurious to your electoral base or might cost you a few votes. That's the prism through which you're looking at our housing crisis,' he said.
Bacik hit back:'I think anyone watching will be wondering when you're going to take political responsibility for the housing crisis.
'You're the Taoiseach, you're in Government, your party and Fine Gael have effectively governed together for the best part of a decade, and yet you're resorting to throwing critiques of the opposition for not building homes.'
The Taoiseach then said that he had 'no difficulty' taking responsibility.
'You're the opposition, you say. You could have been in Government, you could have been a Government.
'You could have been a Government, but you didn't have the courage,' he said.
Advertisement
'You and many in your party didn't have the courage,' Martin said, adding that he knows former Labour leader and TD Alan Kelly did want to go into Government, 'to be fair to him'.
The Labour Party walked away from Government formation talks in December last year after the general election.
At the time, Bacik said it was because the policy gap between her party and Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael
was too large.
Rental regulation
Leaders' questions in the Dáil today focused on the Government's proposed changes to how the rental sector in Ireland is regulated.
Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald accused the Government of implementing changes that will lead to rent hikes for tenants.
She said the changes will be a 'blueprint to boost the profit of the big boys and to screw over renters'.
'That's your plan, and you do this during a persistent cost-of-living crisis, when people are hit with price hikes right across the board. Over the last four years, the cost of the weekly shop has skyrocketed by €3000 a year for many, many families,' she said.
Likewise, Social Democrats TD Jennifer Whitmore used her slot to criticise the Government's changes to rental regulation.
'You've been planning these rental reforms for months, and yet you made an absolute hames of them last week. Even your own Cabinet colleagues couldn't make sense of them,' she said.
'For the avoidance of any doubt, there was one simple thing that these reforms were to do, and that was to drive rents higher,' Whitmore said.
Defending the changes, the Taoiseach said reforms will enhance protection for renters and highlighted the fact that every existing tenant will have their rents capped at 2% once the
emergency legislation to extend the RPZs is passed later this week.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Taoiseach to meet prime minister and lay wreath at Hiroshima on four-day visit to Japan
The Taoiseach is today kicking off a four-day trip to Japan where he will try to strengthen trade and cultural links between the country and Ireland. Micheál Martin is due to meet with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in Tokyo on Wednesday. He will also attend meetings with businesses linked with the IDA and Bord Bia on Tuesday. Mr Martin previously visited Japan as Taoiseach in 2022, meeting with former Japanese PM Fumio Kishida and turning the sod on Ireland House Tokyo. He will officially open the building on Wednesday, with the site playing host to Ireland's embassy in Japan, as well as agencies like the IDA, Enterprise Ireland and Bord Bia. On Thursday, Mr Martin will travel from Tokyo to Osaka, where he is due to attend Expo 2025, where Ireland has a pavilion showcasing Irish culture. For the final day of the visit, the Taoiseach will visit Hiroshima where he is due to lay a wreath at the Cenotaph to mark 80 years since the atomic bombing of the city. Speaking ahead of his visit, Mr Martin said Japan is an 'important strategic partner' amidst the increasingly turbulent geopolitical environment. 'Ireland and Japan are very like-minded on the major issues facing the world and I look forward to exchanging views with Prime Minister Ishiba and discussing how to strengthen the ties between our two countries,' Mr Martin said. 'I am looking forward to opening the new Ireland House Tokyo, a significant milestone in Ireland's relationship with Japan, and to visiting the Irish pavilion at Expo which is showcasing Ireland's creativity and culture. 'I am also honoured to visit Hiroshima to remember all those who died as a result of the atomic bombing 80 years ago. The memorial at Hiroshima is a stark reminder to us all of the devastation wrought by nuclear war and the importance of peace and stability across the world.'
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Government proposal on triple Lock gives an Irish solution to an Irish problem
I welcome the Government's latest proposals to fully restore Irish sovereignty over decisions to deploy Irish troops on armed missions overseas. It's time to unlock the triple lock. The rejection by the Irish people of the Nice referendum on the June 7, 2001, was a uniquely Irish generated crisis. The treaty was aimed at preparing the then 15-member state union for its biggest enlargement to 27 member states by 2007. Crucially, it had to be ratified by all member states but only Ireland was obliged to conduct a referendum. In effect, the failed referendum had blocked — or at least threatened to seriously derail — one of the most ambitious projects of the European Union. The news was most keenly felt by the 8,000 Irish citizens living and working in Brussels, particularly the approximately 100 Irish diplomats and civil servants attached to the Irish Permanent Representation to the EU. After almost 30 years of hard work, Ireland's reputation as a model EU member state had evaporated overnight. From model state to pariah state, Ireland was seen to have benefitted greatly from EU handouts and then stabbed the union in the back. The international media feasted with a frenzy on the carcass of Ireland's EU reputation. Those of us Irish working in the Brussels bubble were detached from the reality of politics at home. It was realised in Dublin that if we continued to block the expansion, the EU would do us no favours There was still time to run another referendum, but new parameters had to be included to mollify the ideologues of neutrality. Taking inspiration from former health minister Charles Haughey's solution to the problem of legalising contraceptives in 1979, the Nice Treaty required 'an Irish solution to an Irish problem'. In the end, however, instead of a doctor's prescription, all we needed was UN approval. The triple lock was born. It was rushed from the Rotunda to Leinster House, quickly baptised, and greeted by the people. Within a year, the bonny baby triple lock, a child genius at age one, secured the second Nice referendum. The day was saved. Ireland was saved. Former states that had emerged from communism were able to join the EU. Peacekeeping missions For the first few years, the child grew and was doted on by everyone. Its tantrums were gently tolerated, even when it insisted that any one of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council — China, France, Russia, US, and Britain — can effectively withhold UN approval on Irish participation in overseas peacekeeping missions. One of the unintended possible consequences of retaining the triple lock limits the State's capability to rescue Irish citizens in trouble abroad. The obvious example is in crisis-prone countries, such as countries in Africa, where thousands of Irish missionaries and NGO staff are working. The competition among UN permanent members is such that, in almost every conflict in Africa, they are pitted against each other to the extent that security council approval is very difficult or impossible. In the event of the EU mounting an armed rescue mission, where UN approval could not be achieved, the triple lock would block Irish troops' participation in missions aimed at saving the lives of our own people. The triple lock undermines Irish sovereignty and should have been constitutionally challenged years ago. Why should we be subservient to any foreign power when it is not even reciprocated? It was a self-imposed straitjacket. Another restriction was that the maximum number of armed Irish troops that could be sent abroad without Dáil approval was set at 12. Why 12? Was somebody over influenced by that Second World War action film The Dirty Dozen? The one where tough guy, cigar-chomping Telly Savalas toured military prisons to recruit 12 military psychopaths for a special operation. Recently, in the Letters to the Editor column of the Irish Examiner,fellow veteran Tim O'Connell explained why 50 was the right number for small unit operations abroad. Based on the infantry platoon of 34, the remaining 16 would be specialist support elements selected for the specific mission. Even Luxembourg has sent more troops abroad than that without external approval. Irish neutrality was never dependent on the triple lock. The neutrality policy preceded the triple lock by 60 years. In reality, the triple lock undermines Irish neutrality by empowering five foreign powers to veto the sovereign will of our Government and the Dáil. At last, Houdini himself has come back from the dead to unravel the straitjacket. The Government's proposed legislation has realistically broadened its application to most of the situations we can foresee at this stage. In practice, the changes effectively decouple future governments neatly from the permanent members' veto. Times have changed. The blissfully unaware Irish public should no longer be kept in the dark on security and defence matters. A properly informed public in 2001, would most probably have passed the first Nice referendum and avoided the need for the triple lock in the first place. Colonel Dorcha Lee (ret) is a former Irish military advisor and military representative in Brussels.
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Govt to consider housing, planning memos
The Government is due consider a number of memos on housing and planning being brought to Cabinet today by Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage James Browne. Among them will be the text of the bill that will allow for planning permissions to be extended for up to three years if development is being held up by judicial review proceedings. Pre legislative scrutiny of the bill has been waived and the minister aims to have the bill enacted before the summer break. A plan to significantly cut red tape for local authorities will also be presented. It will simplify the current four step process to just one step. In addition, Minister Browne will present a plan to regularly publish figures for local authorities that will show how many social houses are being delivered compared to the targets set. Ministers are also expected to get an update from Tánaiste Simon Harris on the progress of trade talks with the United States. Mr Harris will say that while the expected baseline 10% tariff will pose challenges for the Irish economy, there is positive momentum in the talks as they approach the 9 July deadline. Any deal that is made will have to be assessed against what exclusions from the 10% tariff can be secured, including scope for zero to zero arrangements that may be agreed for key sectors. However, he is also expected to tell ministers that nobody can predict what will happen with certainty. Today's Cabinet meeting will take place in the absence of Taoiseach Micheál Martin, who is due to arrive in Japan for a four day visit.
