Letters to the Editor: Ardern, AI and Dunstan health
My huge respect for Sir Ian Taylor took a nosedive when I read his article on Jacinda Ardern's legacy (ODT 4.7.25).
Triggered by a photo of the prime minister in a designer outfit he suddenly decides she has given up kindness in favour of ''brand management''. He thinks her book is written for that purpose. This is not only piffle, it is baseless vilification.
Sir Ian seems now convinced that Jacinda was heartless in trying to save the country from an international plague. He blames her for causing pain to the many who missed out on important events because of the lockdown. He claims other means of controlling the border were rejected because they didn't fit ''narrative''.
And now he insinuates that the book was written for financial gain and self-glorification. Did he read it?
The book, written from the heart, simply lays out the experiences that shaped Jacinda's socialist beliefs and the pressures that led her to do what she thought best for the country - to resign. And it was partly the sniping criticism of her attempts to better the lives of the less fortunate that led to that decision.
It is true that Jacinda's ideals and inspirational humanitarianism have been tossed aside by this coalition, but she is not to blame for that. She did her wonderful best.
Islay Little
Opoho
Jacinda Ardern never asked the world to idealise her. Jacinda was doing her job as an effective politician taking advice from our top epidemiologist.
New Zealand shut down for good reason. We didn't ask thousands of people from around the world to come here, putting us at risk.They knew they would be isolated. The wonderful healthcare workers made sure nobody was alone when they passed. The internet made it easy for everyone to keep in touch.
Jacinda was and is a special person. After reading her book A Different Kind Of Power I understand where her empathy comes from. We have yet to see any government able to stop the vitriol people seek on social media.
Mary Robertson
Ocean View
Congratulations Sir Ian Taylor for writing the chapter which Jacinda Ardern omitted.
However Sir Ian, you should also have reminded readers about how hard you tried to arrange for the importation of Rat tests and were turned down. These had been thoroughly tested overseas and were so badly needed.
Maybe Jacinda does not remember some of those important facts, but hopefully she does now realise that so many hardworking people are still suffering following the unnecessary stringent laws which she served on New Zealand.
Perhaps Jacinda has a sequel to write soon and maybe, Sir Ian, you can assist her with her memories.
Alex Armstrong
North East Valley
I take issue with Sir Ian Taylor's letter to Dame Jacinda Ardern. Findings about the management of Covid 19 have pointed out what could have been done much better, even though it was done under unpredictable circumstances and immense pressure.
So, why now this diatribe? Some possible reasons present themselves.
1. A woman should be perfect and if not, she offends her devotee; men can appear in the media, but heaven forbid a female politician appearing in Vogue; A selective memory has forgotten the misogyny and death threats Ardern had to endure.
Sir Ian's letter strikes me as unusually cruel at a time when Dame Jacinda might need some generosity of spirit and a welcome home. There are 20,000 of us who might not have been here to do that if not for her.
Leoni Schmidt
Dunedin On surrendering all human endeavour to AI
AI frees us from mundane, time-consuming tasks, and we lap it up. Yet is it actually freedom that we're drinking?
It saves us summarising that report ourselves, and churns out a ''personalised'' farewell song for a friend. When trying to write, we are now offered the most frequently used next word.
If we don't flex our creative muscles, won't we lose them? For what cause are we surrendering the training ground of human intellect and art?
On June 4, RNZ reported that in China, AI is being used to find every online reference to the Tiananmen Square massacre, to delete them.
At a time in global history when tech, big money, and overreaching governments are more closely wedded than ever, can we afford to give up our own voices?
The reply to this might be, ''Sorry love, that horse has bolted.''
But if your kids are on that horse - along with the future of humanity as a free, creative force - then it might yet be worth trying to run it down.
Anna Yeoman
Alexandra Dunstan offers public health
I write to correct the unfortunate error in your correspondent Bob Scott's letter (4.7.25).
Mr Scott states that ''Dunstan Hospital is a private facility''. Dunstan Hospital is owned by Central Otago Health Services Incorporated on behalf of the community and it is run by Central Otago Health Services Ltd, a not-for-profit charitable company.
It provides public health services at no cost - the exception to that is its evening and overnight primary care service which is providing a GP-style service out of hours following the withdrawal of most local GPs from providing these services some years back.
He is correct that this is charged for - as it would be if the patient attended their GP were they still providing the service - but that would be the case with any primary care after hours service anywhere.
Dunstan operates a 24-bed hospital that manages 93% of medical admissions from the Central Otago/Wanaka community - only 7% require to go on to Dunedin. These services are free.
We provide oncology infusion services for the region, district nursing, radiology, blood testing, physiotherapy and rehab services, and a range of other public services.
As they would be in any state owned hospital there is no charge for these services.
We receive extraordinary support from our local community in terms of donations and fundraising and this allows us to do things for which we are not funded by the Crown.
For example, we are funded to deliver three days a week of oncology infusions but provide four.
I do not wish to take away from Mr Scott any of the many other points he makes regarding the relative underservicing, close to home, of a rapidly growing region.
The absence of a walk-in ED facility in the region is a significant public concern.
But I would hate the public to think that Dunstan is anything other than a public health service.
Richard Thomson
Chairman, Central Otago Health Services Ltd
Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@odt.co.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
36 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Council pulls out of proposed water CCO
"I was surprised at how one-sided it was," Waitaki Mayor Gary Kircher told the ODT after a surprise U-turn by the Waitaki District Council, which has voted to withdraw from a proposed joint water services company with three neighbouring Otago councils, opting instead to manage its water services independently — at least for the next two years. The decision, made at a council meeting in Oamaru yesterday, overturns the council's previous unanimous support for establishing a shared council-controlled organisation (CCO) with the Clutha, Central Otago and Gore District Councils under the "Southern Water Done Well" initiative. Only Mr Kircher and Cr Jim Hopkins, Waitaki's longest-serving councillor, voted in favour of pursuing the joint CCO model. Mr Kircher was shocked by the turn of events. "We've shared a lot of information on the various aspects of it. We were further advanced with the southern group of councils than with the South Canterbury one, and that was really due to just being far more motivated in the South, but councillors have given their reasons for their particular decisions and that's democracy. "Now the focus is on delivering a water services delivery plan to DIA [Department of Internal Affairs] in September and we will see what they do with that." Public consultation across the four councils drew in over 1000 submissions, 57.5% favouring the in-house business unit model, the preferred option in Waitaki (54%) and Clutha, while only 26.7% supported the joint CCO, most popular in Gore and Central Otago. A series of statements from Waitaki councillors at the meeting pointed to the opposition to the Southern Water Done Well concept, making it difficult listening for the mayors of the other councils involved, who sat grim-faced as one councillor after another shot down the idea of a joint CCO. Cr Tim Blackler's summary did not pull any punches. "Southern Water Done Well was the last cab off the rank, no-one wants a ride on it and if we believe the consultation to be some sort of litmus test for community feelings, which I do, then the feedback was clear ... There was a resounding call to keep it local ..." A joint statement from Central Otago District Mayor Tamah Alley, Gore District Mayor Ben Bell and Clutha District Mayor Bryan Cadogan was issued after the meeting. "While acknowledging that councils must make decisions they feel are in the best interests of their communities, we believe a jointly owned council-controlled organisation remains the best option for water services delivery in the future. "The government has been quite clear about its expectations for councils to work together to deliver Local Water Done Well legislation. "Southern Water Done Well meets those expectations and sets a strategic long-term direction for delivering financially sustainable, efficient water services while retaining local control. "When considering next steps, councils will need to be mindful of whether alternative options comply with government regulations and expectations." The Clutha and Central Otago District Councils meet tomorrow to decide their water services delivery model, while the Gore District Council's meeting is on Monday.
Otago Daily Times
36 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: elections, Ardern and rail
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including engaging in the process of elections, the effects of Ardern's decisions, and where are our railcars? Candidates need to engage with all of us As the Dunedin local body elections draw nearer, voters are beginning to engage in the process by asking questions, challenging ideas, and seeking clarity from those who wish to represent them. It's democracy in motion. That's why it's deeply concerning to see some new candidates already blocking members of the public. They have even admitted to blocking current councillors from commenting on their social media pages. Debate, disagreement, and dialogue are not threats to good governance, they are essential ingredients. Cutting people off from that conversation erodes transparency, reduces trust, and raises serious questions about how some of these individuals would behave once elected. I initially had high hopes, which have unfortunately now been dashed against the wall. If candidates can't handle fair questions now, how can we trust them to stand up for us around the council table? Will they ever be open and transparent? Of course, no-one should tolerate harassment or abuse. But asking about policy, track records, or inconsistencies is not abuse. It's civic engagement. Let's hope all candidates recommit to open dialogue (by unblocking those with genuine questions) and model the respectful, accountable leadership our city needs. [Abridged — length. Editor.] Taylor vs Ardern Whether Jacinda Ardern was sincere, or someone cynically only "signalling virtue" all along, as Ian Taylor implies ( ODT 4.7.25), she was, of course, just a flawed individual. Nonetheless, Ardern carried the projections of millions when she became a living symbol of kindness and compassion. Whether Ardern was duping us or not, she spoke to the best part of our human nature, and the best part responded, if only for a limited time. Atrocities continue to shock and outrage this better part of us, no matter what our politics are. Cynicism aside, maybe the time really is ripe for "a different kind of power" to finally start prevailing in this world. If we're ever lucky enough to see it coincide and shine like that again, why not truly honour and value it next time, rather than just trash it? Sir Ian Taylor has taken a long time to come to the realisation that Dame Jacinda Ardern had another agenda the whole time. The nation is seemingly divided between those that believe that a damehood was not enough reward, and those that never want to see or hear of her again. And that is fine. Each to their own. What really matters is evidence and that is clear by the actions of the small group leading the Labour Party at the time of the Covid event. Ardern needed to be in control and that meant controlling the media from the podium of truth, the installation of the narrative of only her and her team could save us all from thousands of bodies stacked up in emergency morgues all over the country. If that meant a few people couldn't be with their families at times of death, a few couldn't get treatment for cancer because the hospitals were being kept in readiness for the thousands that never showed up – that was just collateral in the big vision. Ardern is now living a privileged life overseas in academic communities that have their own ideological aims that align with her own. She is isolated from the effects of the decisions that she and her small team made. She is now free to peddle her carefully selected narrative and to appeal to those who might need someone to lead them without thinking too hard [Abridged — length. Editor.] Well, can we have our railcars now please? In 2022, after extensive research, I presented Parliament a business plan on passenger rail. The plan has become influential in moving the narrative from hand-me-down and patch and mend to strongly arguing for investment in a new fleet of multiple unit railcars for all New Zealand, but most importantly for the Christchurch-Dunedin and Invercargill service. Political parties now see potential in restoring passenger rail to the South and it is a matter of when, not if, before intercity rail returns. And yet ... as ever I am assailed by voices bemoaning the cost and claiming it is a waste of money to invest in passenger rail. My reply is thus: we have already paid for new trains. The only issue is they are serving Wellington and Auckland. Both cities have received 178 new trains funded by central government over the past decade. Based on the economic contribution of the South Island, 22% of GDP, each and every taxpayer on the South Island has paid for 39 brand new trains. We only need three trains to provide four return journeys a day between Christchurch and Dunedin, with one service going on to Invercargill. Based on accepted utilisation rates and an expected sub five-hour journey time, two modern multiple unit railcars can do three segments a day, one railcar two segments. Four trains can provide a spare for contingency. Four trains. That's it. We've already paid for 39. Can we have ours, now? We've earned the right for passenger rail in South through our hard work and contribution to New Zealand. Why cut off our nose to spite our faces to bemoan the cost of four trains when Auckland and Wellington get so much more?' Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@
Otago Daily Times
39 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Not-so-secret reply to . . . Steve Braunias
Steve Braunias. Photo: supplied Dear Steve, How are you? Good, I hope. Here I am on a train to Paris, staring at your "Secret open letter of ... Sir Ian Taylor," which is staring right back at me. I think I'll be the one to blink first. You may be wondering why I'm on a train instead of a plane. Silly me! I thought de Gare meant airport in French. At least there's a seat on the train ... and I can see my bag. SUNDAY Dear Steve, Sorry I'm a bit late getting back to you. I got distracted by the obese conspiracy theorist sitting beside me on the train yesterday. All he wanted to talk about was the All Blacks. I tried to change the subject to Jacinda, but he was having none of it. "Sacre bleu," he said, "that was our C team." I said, "You need to have more empathy." He ordered another wine. MONDAY Dear Steve, I'm finding this open letter harder to write than the ones I send Jacinda, because I suspect you might actually read it. I made a coffee to steady myself. It was terrible. I blame you. I haven't touched coffee in 20 years, but your writing is so persuasive I couldn't help myself. TUESDAY Dear Steve, I'm at my desk in my Airbnb in Paris. My thoughts are still somewhere over New Delhi, wondering how I ended up on a flight to India when I was meant to be heading to Dubai to see if Jacinda's picture was still on the Burj Khalifa. It reminded me how easy it was to end up in odd places trying to get home to New Zealand during those Covid lockdowns. That thought came back to me when I saw her cover photo at Auckland Airport. Not that I blame Jacinda, of course. I probably just forgot where I was going. I did turn 75 last week and my mind isn't what it used to be. WEDNESDAY Dear Steve, Do you ever get mental blocks when you write? I don't, usually, but today I'm stuck in the middle of my own thoughts. Not the animated ones that come with being founder and managing director of Animation Research Ltd. More wedged between admiration for your craft and mild resentment that you read my mind better than I do. You gave me a whole new perspective on my letter to Jacinda, one I simply failed to see. I still have no idea how I missed it. THURSDAY Dear Steve, On reflection, rather than another open letter, I think I owe you a drink, or at least a half-decent coffee, assuming we can find one between Tihar Prison and the Koru Lounge. I might even bring A Different Kind of Power. We can put it on the table between us and stare at the cover together. Sometimes it's better to look at the photo than open the pages. FRIDAY Dear Steve, Not sure if I've mentioned it before, but I'm a huge fan of your writing. I never imagined I'd end up the subject of one of your columns. Thank you for your piece. Thank you for the mischief. Long may you keep us honest, and just uncomfortable enough. Yours, not so secretly, Sir Ian Taylor PS. Do you think it was possible that when Jacinda said "Be Kind" she meant that we had to be kind to her for the decisions she was making otherwise we weren't part of the Team of 5 Million, and we would be thrown off the waka? I remember feeling quite wet during Covid. By Sir Ian Taylor
