Council pulls out of proposed water CCO
The decision, made at a council meeting in Oamaru yesterday, overturns the council's previous unanimous support for establishing a shared council-controlled organisation (CCO) with the Clutha, Central Otago and Gore District Councils under the "Southern Water Done Well" initiative.
Only Mr Kircher and Cr Jim Hopkins, Waitaki's longest-serving councillor, voted in favour of pursuing the joint CCO model.
Mr Kircher was shocked by the turn of events.
"We've shared a lot of information on the various aspects of it. We were further advanced with the southern group of councils than with the South Canterbury one, and that was really due to just being far more motivated in the South, but councillors have given their reasons for their particular decisions and that's democracy.
"Now the focus is on delivering a water services delivery plan to DIA [Department of Internal Affairs] in September and we will see what they do with that."
Public consultation across the four councils drew in over 1000 submissions, 57.5% favouring the in-house business unit model, the preferred option in Waitaki (54%) and Clutha, while only 26.7% supported the joint CCO, most popular in Gore and Central Otago.
A series of statements from Waitaki councillors at the meeting pointed to the opposition to the Southern Water Done Well concept, making it difficult listening for the mayors of the other councils involved, who sat grim-faced as one councillor after another shot down the idea of a joint CCO.
Cr Tim Blackler's summary did not pull any punches.
"Southern Water Done Well was the last cab off the rank, no-one wants a ride on it and if we believe the consultation to be some sort of litmus test for community feelings, which I do, then the feedback was clear ... There was a resounding call to keep it local ..."
A joint statement from Central Otago District Mayor Tamah Alley, Gore District Mayor Ben Bell and Clutha District Mayor Bryan Cadogan was issued after the meeting.
"While acknowledging that councils must make decisions they feel are in the best interests of their communities, we believe a jointly owned council-controlled organisation remains the best option for water services delivery in the future.
"The government has been quite clear about its expectations for councils to work together to deliver Local Water Done Well legislation.
"Southern Water Done Well meets those expectations and sets a strategic long-term direction for delivering financially sustainable, efficient water services while retaining local control.
"When considering next steps, councils will need to be mindful of whether alternative options comply with government regulations and expectations."
The Clutha and Central Otago District Councils meet tomorrow to decide their water services delivery model, while the Gore District Council's meeting is on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Council pulls out of proposed water CCO
"I was surprised at how one-sided it was," Waitaki Mayor Gary Kircher told the ODT after a surprise U-turn by the Waitaki District Council, which has voted to withdraw from a proposed joint water services company with three neighbouring Otago councils, opting instead to manage its water services independently — at least for the next two years. The decision, made at a council meeting in Oamaru yesterday, overturns the council's previous unanimous support for establishing a shared council-controlled organisation (CCO) with the Clutha, Central Otago and Gore District Councils under the "Southern Water Done Well" initiative. Only Mr Kircher and Cr Jim Hopkins, Waitaki's longest-serving councillor, voted in favour of pursuing the joint CCO model. Mr Kircher was shocked by the turn of events. "We've shared a lot of information on the various aspects of it. We were further advanced with the southern group of councils than with the South Canterbury one, and that was really due to just being far more motivated in the South, but councillors have given their reasons for their particular decisions and that's democracy. "Now the focus is on delivering a water services delivery plan to DIA [Department of Internal Affairs] in September and we will see what they do with that." Public consultation across the four councils drew in over 1000 submissions, 57.5% favouring the in-house business unit model, the preferred option in Waitaki (54%) and Clutha, while only 26.7% supported the joint CCO, most popular in Gore and Central Otago. A series of statements from Waitaki councillors at the meeting pointed to the opposition to the Southern Water Done Well concept, making it difficult listening for the mayors of the other councils involved, who sat grim-faced as one councillor after another shot down the idea of a joint CCO. Cr Tim Blackler's summary did not pull any punches. "Southern Water Done Well was the last cab off the rank, no-one wants a ride on it and if we believe the consultation to be some sort of litmus test for community feelings, which I do, then the feedback was clear ... There was a resounding call to keep it local ..." A joint statement from Central Otago District Mayor Tamah Alley, Gore District Mayor Ben Bell and Clutha District Mayor Bryan Cadogan was issued after the meeting. "While acknowledging that councils must make decisions they feel are in the best interests of their communities, we believe a jointly owned council-controlled organisation remains the best option for water services delivery in the future. "The government has been quite clear about its expectations for councils to work together to deliver Local Water Done Well legislation. "Southern Water Done Well meets those expectations and sets a strategic long-term direction for delivering financially sustainable, efficient water services while retaining local control. "When considering next steps, councils will need to be mindful of whether alternative options comply with government regulations and expectations." The Clutha and Central Otago District Councils meet tomorrow to decide their water services delivery model, while the Gore District Council's meeting is on Monday.
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: elections, Ardern and rail
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including engaging in the process of elections, the effects of Ardern's decisions, and where are our railcars? Candidates need to engage with all of us As the Dunedin local body elections draw nearer, voters are beginning to engage in the process by asking questions, challenging ideas, and seeking clarity from those who wish to represent them. It's democracy in motion. That's why it's deeply concerning to see some new candidates already blocking members of the public. They have even admitted to blocking current councillors from commenting on their social media pages. Debate, disagreement, and dialogue are not threats to good governance, they are essential ingredients. Cutting people off from that conversation erodes transparency, reduces trust, and raises serious questions about how some of these individuals would behave once elected. I initially had high hopes, which have unfortunately now been dashed against the wall. If candidates can't handle fair questions now, how can we trust them to stand up for us around the council table? Will they ever be open and transparent? Of course, no-one should tolerate harassment or abuse. But asking about policy, track records, or inconsistencies is not abuse. It's civic engagement. Let's hope all candidates recommit to open dialogue (by unblocking those with genuine questions) and model the respectful, accountable leadership our city needs. [Abridged — length. Editor.] Taylor vs Ardern Whether Jacinda Ardern was sincere, or someone cynically only "signalling virtue" all along, as Ian Taylor implies ( ODT 4.7.25), she was, of course, just a flawed individual. Nonetheless, Ardern carried the projections of millions when she became a living symbol of kindness and compassion. Whether Ardern was duping us or not, she spoke to the best part of our human nature, and the best part responded, if only for a limited time. Atrocities continue to shock and outrage this better part of us, no matter what our politics are. Cynicism aside, maybe the time really is ripe for "a different kind of power" to finally start prevailing in this world. If we're ever lucky enough to see it coincide and shine like that again, why not truly honour and value it next time, rather than just trash it? Sir Ian Taylor has taken a long time to come to the realisation that Dame Jacinda Ardern had another agenda the whole time. The nation is seemingly divided between those that believe that a damehood was not enough reward, and those that never want to see or hear of her again. And that is fine. Each to their own. What really matters is evidence and that is clear by the actions of the small group leading the Labour Party at the time of the Covid event. Ardern needed to be in control and that meant controlling the media from the podium of truth, the installation of the narrative of only her and her team could save us all from thousands of bodies stacked up in emergency morgues all over the country. If that meant a few people couldn't be with their families at times of death, a few couldn't get treatment for cancer because the hospitals were being kept in readiness for the thousands that never showed up – that was just collateral in the big vision. Ardern is now living a privileged life overseas in academic communities that have their own ideological aims that align with her own. She is isolated from the effects of the decisions that she and her small team made. She is now free to peddle her carefully selected narrative and to appeal to those who might need someone to lead them without thinking too hard [Abridged — length. Editor.] Well, can we have our railcars now please? In 2022, after extensive research, I presented Parliament a business plan on passenger rail. The plan has become influential in moving the narrative from hand-me-down and patch and mend to strongly arguing for investment in a new fleet of multiple unit railcars for all New Zealand, but most importantly for the Christchurch-Dunedin and Invercargill service. Political parties now see potential in restoring passenger rail to the South and it is a matter of when, not if, before intercity rail returns. And yet ... as ever I am assailed by voices bemoaning the cost and claiming it is a waste of money to invest in passenger rail. My reply is thus: we have already paid for new trains. The only issue is they are serving Wellington and Auckland. Both cities have received 178 new trains funded by central government over the past decade. Based on the economic contribution of the South Island, 22% of GDP, each and every taxpayer on the South Island has paid for 39 brand new trains. We only need three trains to provide four return journeys a day between Christchurch and Dunedin, with one service going on to Invercargill. Based on accepted utilisation rates and an expected sub five-hour journey time, two modern multiple unit railcars can do three segments a day, one railcar two segments. Four trains can provide a spare for contingency. Four trains. That's it. We've already paid for 39. Can we have ours, now? We've earned the right for passenger rail in South through our hard work and contribution to New Zealand. Why cut off our nose to spite our faces to bemoan the cost of four trains when Auckland and Wellington get so much more?' Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@
Scoop
14 hours ago
- Scoop
Marlborough Votes To Establish Separate Water Organisation
The Marlborough District Council has voted to establish a separate organisation to deliver water services in the region. The decision to form a Water Services Organisation (WSO) was passed by eight votes to five at an extraordinary council meeting on Monday. The government's Local Water Done Well policy required councils to come up with a financially sustainable water service delivery plan by 3 September. Mayor Nadine Taylor said it was an incredibly important decision for the region. "We have decided to take a once-in-a-generation opportunity to do things differently. To build better three waters infrastructure and provide greater intergenerational equity, spreading the costs over the long term," Taylor said. "By setting up a new, water-focused organisation, it will be easier to sustainably deliver efficiencies and savings for residents on council's drinking and wastewater supplies." During consultation with the Marlborough community, a slim majority of the roughly 45 submissions wanted a water delivery unit to stay within the council. And some councillors agreed. Defeated councillors Brian Dawson, Deborah Dalliessi, Allanah Burgess and Sally Arbuckle all said there was not enough information to convince them that a separate water services organisation could deliver services better than the council's in-house unit. The Marlborough District Council was in the minority for its preference of a standalone organisation, although not all councils had voted on it yet. Of New Zealand's 65 territorial authorities, only three have preferred a standalone WSO - Selwyn, Queenstown Lakes, and Marlborough. Nearly 68 percent, or 44 councils, preferred a multi-council organisation, joining up with neighbouring districts to deliver water services. The remaining 18 preferred to keep water services in-house. A WSO joining Tasman and Nelson services was briefly floated, but was shelved after Nelson mayor Nick Smith ruled out collaboration on water without a full Nelson-Tasman council amalgamation. Nelson and Tasman both eventually voted to keep their water services in-house, leaving Marlborough without a neighbour to join with. Taylor said having a separate organisation focused solely on Marlborough's water would keep the service in the hands of the experts who knew it best. "The new WSO will have a singular focus on the delivery of water infrastructure and be better positioned to attract the specialist staff we will need in the future," Taylor said. Removing water assets from the council books would free up resources to focus on other services, while allowing the new WSO to borrow against those assets at a lower cost than the council could. "Costs will be spread over a longer period of time through borrowing, leading to lower water charges when compared to retaining water services internally at council," she said. The organisation would be council-owned, the board of directors would be council-appointed, and its direction would be set with a legally binding Statement of Expectations. The governance setup would keep the organisation accountable to Marlburians, the council said. The council said any profit made from the WSO would be reinvested back into the water network. By 2034, Marlborough would need $410m of investment in water infrastructure. Nearly all the townships required upgrades to pipelines, pump stations and wells. "Many of Picton's and Blenheim's stormwater assets have an expected life of less than 10 years," Taylor said. "In addition we have requests from the community to provide new water reticulation services, for example in Ward, Rarangi and Dry Hills in Blenheim." The new organisation would be established on 1 July 2026, and become fully operable by 1 July 2027.
