logo
From the biography: How freedom fighter MC Davar tried to prevent the partition of India

From the biography: How freedom fighter MC Davar tried to prevent the partition of India

Scroll.in23-06-2025

MC Davar's first meeting with Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose in Calcutta is not recorded, but in his interview to the NMML Davar recalls meeting the great leader a few years later in Dalhousie:
It was 1938 and I went to Dalhousie and there Subhas Chandra Bose was staying as a guest of Dr Dharam Vir…I went to see Sardar Joginder Singh Mann, who became afterwards a Minister and Speaker of the Punjab Assembly. I had gone to treat his wife. Subhas Bose was there and he said: 'Dr Davar, I had wished long ago that you should stop your practice and take up the work which you were doing in Calcutta, that is revolutionary work. But today's revolutionary work, political activities and sufferings of all of us are going waste due to the simple reason that Muslim League comes in the way, and so why should we not devote all our time for unity of Hindus and Muslims?' Dr Davar replied: 'The task is very difficult, moreover this requires a great deal of patience.' But [Bose] said: 'I know your capacity and the way you are tackling the problems…I wish you could leave the practice or depend only on your practice for a few hours to earn your bread, and devote all your time to Hindu-Muslim unity, and especially Congress-Muslim League understanding.'
This conversation with Subhas Bose made a deep impact on young Davar's mind. As the new year began, he met Sir Tej Bahadur Sapru, the Liberal leader who exactly ten years ago at the Calcutta session of the Congress, presided over by Motilal Nehru, had made a brave attempt to reconcile the differences between the Congress and Muslim League over the provisions of the 'Nehru Report'. The All India Parties Conference of 1927 had authorised Motilal Nehru to prepare a report on the Constitution of free India that would address the concerns of the Muslims in a country with a dominant Hindu population. But the report was rejected by the Muslim League, and an early opportunity, two decades before independence, for keeping India united was lost.
The Muslim League's demand for the partition of India and the carving out of a separate Muslim country grew stronger and louder. When the now 26-year-old Davar met Tej Bahadur Sapru in Delhi, where he now lived after spending almost eight years in Calcutta during and after his Homoeopathy studies, he suggested to the veteran leader that he should call another All Parties Conference, like the one in 1927 which had resulted in the Nehru Report. Things might turn out differently this time. Initially hesitant, on health grounds, Sapru finally gave in to Davar's persuasion, and agreed to call an All Parties Conference.
Meanwhile, the Aga Khan came to Delhi and met Sir Mohammed Yakub, the Deputy Chairman of the Central Assembly, and later Commerce Member of the Viceroy's Executive Council. Dr Davar received a message from Yakub that he was unwell and wanted homoeopathic treatment as by now, through word of mouth, many eminent people had come to know that Dr Davar was 'the best' homoeopath in Delhi. When the Doctor was examining his patient, the latter said: 'Dr Davar, why should you not do anything for the country? His Highness the Aga Khan came to me yesterday. He was feeling miserable that people are not united here. I'm suffering from fever but just talking to you I'm getting much relief. Why don't you take up this work?' To Davar's answer that he had decided 'to do his humble bit', Yakub replied, 'You can do much more, you have better capacity to do it.' Davar told Mohammed Yakub: 'Then with your blessings and His Highness Aga Khan's blessings, and also as advised by my leader, Netaji Subhas Bose, I will take up this work.' Yakub then advised Davar to go to Lahore and meet Sir Sikandar Hayat Khan, the then Prime Minister of Punjab who was totally against the partition of the country. Yakub also gave him a letter of introduction to the Punjab premier.
This was the beginning of the year 1940. After his meeting with Mohd. Yakub Khan, Davar left for Lahore the very next day by Frontier Mail. So passionate was he to the cause of Hindu-Muslim unity – the only way, he felt, the partition of the country could be prevented – that he didn't care that he was leaving his newly married wife, Lila Vati (not Dr Lilavati, whom he had met earlier in Calcutta), alone in their rented flat in Connaught Place. But fortunately for Lila Vati, she had parents residing in Karol Bagh, which was not far from the couple's flat.
It was a biting cold morning, in the first week of February 1940, when Davar reached Lahore railway station. After a bath at the residence of his cousin Chaman Lal, he went straight to the bungalow of Sir Sikandar Hayat Khan. Before he could hand him the letter of introduction given by Mohd. Yakub, Hayat Khan said, 'Don't bother about the letter, I know the purpose of your coming here.' Obviously Mohd. Yakub had telephoned Hayat Khan about Davar's mission at his instance. As Davar was about to begin talking, the brother-in-law of the Punjab premier, Mir Maqbool Mahmud, the brain behind the Unionist Party, arrived and joined the talks.
In a lighter vein, Hayat Khan told his brother-in-law, 'Look, Maqbool, Davar has left Punjab, and with it, Punjabi too.' Davar told him this had happened because of the influence of the cosmopolitan culture of Delhi, where one gets used to speaking more in Hindustani or English. But for the remaining conversation, he spoke in Punjabi. Davar presented 26 points against Partition, one of which read: If Pakistan comes into being, it is not the Hindus only who will suffer, but the Muslims will suffer much more, and along with Muslims, naturally, India will suffer and, along with India, the whole of Asia will suffer, and one day Pakistan will become a danger to world peace.
When Davar was on the 13th point, Maqbool interrupted and said, 'Dr Sahib, there is no need to go further. We have fully understood your views and appreciate the points you have enumerated here.' Sikandar Hayat told Davar to convey to Sir Mohd. Yakub and the Aga Khan that 'Punjab will remain for all Punjabis – Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims. As long as Sikandar lives, there will be no Pakistan; no partition of Punjab. And if no partition of Punjab takes place, there will be no Pakistan…Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, and all others will enjoy equal opportunities, all are my own kith and kin, we Punjabis cannot be divided.'
After a week, Sikandar Hayat came to Delhi, where Sir Mohd Yakub and Davar met him and the three of them had a long discussion at the end of which Sir Sikandar repeated his pledge: 'Jab tak Sikandar ke dum me dum hai, koi partition nahi hoga. (As long as Sikander breathes, there will be no partition.)' But soon after he returned to Lahore, an extremely violent incident took place in which many Muslims were killed in a clash with the police who were trying to prevent them from forcibly taking over a Gurudwara. The situation thus became tense just before the Muslim League session was to take place. This was the session in which Muhammad Ali Jinnah had planned to pass the famous 'Lahore Resolution' demanding Pakistan. But he knew that the Punjab premier was strongly opposed to the demand. However, the Gurudwara incident had adversely affected Sikandar Hayat's image, and Jinnah grabbed this opportunity. Through his emissaries, he managed to have the Punjab leader attend the session. Once there, Sikandar Hayat was asked to second the resolution for Pakistan moved by Fazlul Haq, Vice President of the Muslim League of Bengal. In the charged atmosphere of the session, it became impossible for Sikandar Hayat to decline, and he stood up only to say, 'I second the resolution.' He did not say a word after that and immediately left the meeting.
Davar met Sikandar at Shimla a month later and asked him point blank: 'Sir Sikandar, what have you done?' The Punjab premier replied: 'What could I have done when the situation was such? The whole Muslim community would have risen in revolt if I had not spoken. But I assure you again that I will honour my pledge made earlier.' When Hayat Khan returned to Lahore, he was invited to speak at the Islamia College. There, true to his word to Davar, he spoke passionately against Partition, and warned that if Pakistan came into existence, Muslims would suffer much more than any other community. His speech came as a great relief to all his followers and admirers, Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs alike. But the Lahore Resolution of the Muslim League created an atmosphere that led to the widening of the already growing Hindu-Muslim differences.
Excerpted with permission from He Almost Prevented Partition: The Life and Times of Dr MC Davar, Praveen Davar, Speaking Tiger Books.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Get your act together!' Donald Trump blasts internet service provider AT&T after delay in religious call; says he ‘will use another carrier next time'
'Get your act together!' Donald Trump blasts internet service provider AT&T after delay in religious call; says he ‘will use another carrier next time'

Time of India

time35 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Get your act together!' Donald Trump blasts internet service provider AT&T after delay in religious call; says he ‘will use another carrier next time'

US President Donald Trump The United States President, on Monday afternoon, expressed frustration online regarding his telecommunications service provider and said, "AT&T ought to get its act together." Donald Trump posted on Truth Social about his inability to commence a conference call with religious leaders nationwide due to technical issues. "AT&T is totally unable to make their equipment work properly," the Republican president said in a post. "This is the second time it's happened. If the Boss of AT&T, whoever that may be, could get involved — It would be good. There are tens of thousands of people on the line!" Subsequently, Trump posted, "AT&T ought to get its act together." AT&T representatives responded to the White House press secretary's post about Trump's concerns. "We've reached out to the White House and are working to quickly understand and assess the situation," AT&T stated. According to an anonymous White House official unauthorised to speak publicly, AT&T responded immediately. The issue was resolved, resulting in a 20-minute delay to the call. AT&T released a statement on X on Monday night explaining that "the disruption was caused by an issue with the conference call platform, not our network. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Unfortunately, this caused the delay, and we are working diligently to better understand the issue so we can prevent disruptions in the future." Trump frequently expresses his grievances on social media, targeting various entities from foreign leaders to media organisations. The delayed call was not listed on his official schedule. The call included 8,000 to 10,000 Christian, Jewish and Muslim faith leaders, marking the first in a series of regular White House communications with religious leaders. During the 15-minute call, the official noted that Trump discussed his tax reduction and spending cuts legislation, child tax credit improvements, the Israel-Iran ceasefire, African peace agreements, and his pardons for anti-abortion activists.

Hike in power tariff: Former finance minister seeks review of HERC tariff order, files petition
Hike in power tariff: Former finance minister seeks review of HERC tariff order, files petition

Hindustan Times

time39 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Hike in power tariff: Former finance minister seeks review of HERC tariff order, files petition

Seeking a review of the increased electricity tariff in Haryana, former finance minister, Sampat Singh on Monday said that he has filed a review petition challenging the March 28 tariff order issued by the Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission (HERC). The Congress leader said the regulator's order gave a tariff shock to consumers across all categories when they received their electricity bills in June 2025. During a briefing at Haryana Congress office on Monday, Singh said that there were widespread public protests against the new tariff regime across the state. (HT File) During a briefing at Haryana Congress office on Monday, Singh said that there were widespread public protests against the new tariff regime across the state. Raising concerns over the pricing mechanism adopted by the power utilities, the former minister said that the power utilities were purchasing 7,964.28 crore units of power at a cost of ₹ 3.12 per unit. But the same is being sold to consumers at an average rate of ₹ 7.29 per unit,' he said. Singh also pointed out that out of the total power purchased, only 6,916 crore units were reaching consumers, implying that the transmission and distribution losses exceeded 22%. Referring to the Ujwal Discom Assurance Yojana (UDAY) undertaken by the Haryana government in September 2015, which covered ₹ 34,000 crore of liabilities of the power utilities, he said that post-UDAY, the power distribution companies reported a profit of ₹ 800 crore for the first time in March 2021. 'However, instead of reducing the tariffs, the burden on consumers has been increased,' he said. The Congress leader said domestic consumers now faced fixed charges ranging between ₹ 50 to ₹ 75 per kW. Additionally, per unit charges had been raised by 25% to 50%. This is the first time that fixed charges have been introduced for domestic consumers. Besides the telescopic slab system of consumption of power had been given a go by. Commercial consumers had been adversely affected by the merger of their category with LT and HT supply, raising fixed charges from ₹ 165 to ₹ 290 per kVA, and per unit charges from ₹ 6.65 to ₹ 6.95. He also criticised the continuation of a 47 paise per unit fuel surcharge adjustment that was supposed to end in June 2024.

"Will Lose Their Primary": Musk's Big Threat To Lawmakers Backing Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
"Will Lose Their Primary": Musk's Big Threat To Lawmakers Backing Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'

NDTV

time40 minutes ago

  • NDTV

"Will Lose Their Primary": Musk's Big Threat To Lawmakers Backing Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'

Washington: As the US Senate inches closer to a vote on the White House's massive tax and immigration agenda, tech billionaire Elon Musk has renewed his criticism of President Donald Trump's flagship spending bill-- "One Big Beautiful Bill"-- and threatened to unseat the lawmakers who support the unpopular package, which is expected to slash social welfare programs and add an eye-watering $3 trillion to the national debt. Lawmakers in the US Senate were bogged down in a marathon session of amendment votes on Monday as Republicans sought to pass the "big, beautiful bill", which would extend Trump's tax cuts passed in 2017. "Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame," Musk, who was Trump's presidential advisor till May, said in a post on X. "And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," he added. Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 30, 2025 New Party Threat Musk also warned that he would launch a new party -- the American Party-- an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty, if lawmakers pass Trump's spending bill in the Senate. "If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day. Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE," he wrote on X. Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' President Trump wants the "One Big Beautiful Bill" to extend his expiring first-term tax cuts at $4.5 trillion, boost military spending and fund his plans for unprecedented mass deportations and border security. But senators eyeing 2026 midterm congressional elections are divided over savings that would strip around $1 trillion in subsidised health care from millions of the poorest Americans and add more than $3.3 trillion to the nation's already yawning budget deficits over a decade. The Republicans are aiming to have the package in the Oval Office by the time Independence Day festivities begin on Friday. The process had ground to a glacial pace by early evening, but, after members considered dozens of amendments as part of the so-called "vote-a-rama" required before final passage, they managed to complete only 14 votes in the first seven hours. But, given Trump's iron grip on the party, he is expected to get what he wants in the Senate, where Republicans hold a razor-tight majority. All Democrats in that chamber are expected to vote "nay." The passing of the bill will be a huge win for the Republican leader, who has been criticised for imposing many of his priorities through executive orders that sidestep the scrutiny of Congress. But approval by the Senate is only half the battle, as the 940-page text will have to pass a separate vote in the House of Representatives, where several rebels in the slim Republican majority are threatening to oppose it. Musk-Trump Feud Over Bill The former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) head, Musk, took to X on Saturday, issuing a blistering critique of the Senate's latest draft of tax-and-spending bill, calling the legislation "utterly insane and destructive" right as the chamber prepared to open debate on the nearly 1,000-page proposal. "The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country! Utterly insane and destructive," Musk wrote in the post. The post was a continuation of Musk's opposition to the Grand Old Party's legislation, which he had previously described as a "disgusting abomination" filled with wasteful spending. Musk's criticism of the bill triggered an online feud between him and Trump, with both men bashing one another on social media accounts. The disagreement escalated when Musk posted about an alleged connection between Donald Trump and the Epstein files -- a post he later deleted.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store