logo
Sunday shows round-up: Reed puts his job on the line over water targets

Sunday shows round-up: Reed puts his job on the line over water targets

Spectator11 hours ago
Environment Secretary Steve Reed puts his job on the line over water targets
The government has announced plans to halve sewage pollution from water companies by 2030, with the help of £104 billion of private investment. On the BBC this morning, Laura Kuenssberg interviewed Environment Secretary Steve Reed, noting that halving current sewage pollution would only bring us back to the levels of 2019, when there were 225,000 sewage spills. Reed claimed that that wasn't the end of the government's ambition, and said the target was to restore all water bodies to 'good health' within a decade. Reed emphasised that water pollution has got worse every year, and that Labour have drawn a line now to 'turn this situation around'. He called for a 'revolution in the rules that govern our water sector' in order to meet targets where previous governments have failed. Kuenssberg asked if water companies would be allowed to increase bills again, and Reed admitted it would be up to the regulators. When asked if his job should be on the line if he fails to meet his targets, Reed replied, 'it should be, shouldn't it?'
Farage on nationalising 50% of the water industry: 'It doesn't need to be a big sum of money'
Also speaking to Kuenssberg about the water sector was Nigel Farage, who proposed taking half of the industry into public control. Kuenssberg pointed out that it could cost in the region of £50bn, and asked how much taxpayers money Farage would be willing to spend to achieve this goal. Farage said he didn't know the figure, but he believed it would be 'much less than that, if you strike the right deal'. Kuenssberg noted that Farage used to say Corbyn's economics were from 'La La Land' when he wanted to nationalise water. Farage argued that he didn't want government running water entirely, but that the state needed 'some degree of control'.
Kevin Hollinrake: 'I'm worried it might just be shuffling the deckchairs on the Titanic'
It is expected that Ofwat will be abolished and replaced by a new water regulator, as a result of recommendations made by the review which will be published on Monday. On Sky News, Trevor Phillips asked Shadow Housing Secretary Kevin Hollinrake whether he supported that decision. Hollinrake said that 'good regulation' was necessary, and welcomed Labour's new targets around water pollution, saying they were possible because of measures the Conservatives had put in place, but he compared the water industry to the 'Titanic'. Phillips asked whether the Tories effectively launched the Titanic when they privatised the industry. Hollinrake argued that the level of investment achieved after privatisation wouldn't have happened if it was in public control. Phillips noted that a lot more investment was required over the next couple of decades, and that companies couldn't meet those amounts when answering to shareholders. Hollinrake suggested that in a nationalised system there wouldn't be enough public money to invest in all essential public services.
Steve Reed: 'If people think they're more important than the team, they need to think again'
Trevor Phillips also asked Steve Reed about the four MPs who were suspended from Labour this week. The prime minister told reporters that 'everyone was elected on a Labour manifesto of change', and said he had to 'deal with people who repeatedly break the whip'. Phillips pointed out that Starmer had declared the welfare reform bill to have the achieved the 'right balance' after amending it due to resistance from Rachael Maskell, who was then suspended. Phillips asked why she was being punished. Reed said, 'it's not about one incident, it is about the team'. When asked whether Starmer was being fair, the environment secretary argued it was fair to 'be required to play the team game', and said that Labour needed to get 'big changes through'.
Farage on net zero: 'This is not my religion'
Laura Kuenssberg also asked Nigel Farage about climate change, after Reform UK's Mayor of Greater Lincolnshire Dame Andrea Jenkyns claimed it 'doesn't exist' this week. Farage said he believed in climate change, but had 'no idea' what proportion of it was man-made. The Reform leader said net zero is the 'religion of Westminster now in a fairly Godless age', but claimed that 2.5 million manufacturing jobs in Britain could be gone 'within the next decade' because of net zero policies. Kuenssberg pointed out that there is scientific consensus that human activity has a significant impact on the climate. Farage argued that UK taxpayers were being 'defrauded' of billions of pounds because of renewable energy subsidies for 'literally zero effect on global CO2 emissions'. Farage claimed that net zero policies just export manufacturing and emissions to other parts of the world.
Ed Davey: Move further towards renewable energy, not 'expensive gas'
Finally, Laura Kuenssberg interviewed Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey, who said he was 'disappointed in this Labour government', and called for 'big ideas' to counter Nigel Farage. Davey told Kuenssberg that we must 'halve… businesses' energy bills within the decade', by investing further in renewable energy. He argued that it is the price of gas that has been raising energy bills, and that the Liberal Democrats have a plan to make the country less reliant on 'expensive gas from Vladimir Putin'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government to launch new water ombudsman to boost consumer protection
Government to launch new water ombudsman to boost consumer protection

South Wales Argus

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Argus

Government to launch new water ombudsman to boost consumer protection

The Environment Secretary will commit to setting up a new water ombudsman with legal powers to resolve disputes, rather than the current voluntary system that is thought to lack teeth. The changes, which will expand the role of the Consumer Council for Water (CCW), will bring the sector into line with other utilities by creating a legally binding consumer watchdog. It will also provide a single point of contact for consumers with complaints, instead of leaving them uncertain about where to go. The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said the new watchdog would help 're-establish partnership' between water companies and consumers. In May, a survey by the CCW found trust in water companies had reached a new low, with less than two-thirds of people saying they provided value for money. Only 53% said they thought what water companies charged was fair, even before the impact of a 26% increase in bills that came into effect in April. Steve Reed will commit to setting up a new water ombudsman with legal powers to resolve disputes (Jonathan Brady/PA) CCW chief executive Mike Keil said he welcomed the move to create a mandatory ombudsman, saying it had been a 'key ask' of his organisation 'so people can have absolute confidence that when they complain, they have robust protection'. The new ombudsman is part of Mr Reed's wider plans for a 'root and branch reform' of the water industry, set to be unveiled alongside a major review of the sector on Monday. Following publication of the review, he is expected to say: 'The water industry is broken. Our rivers, lakes and seas are polluted with record levels of sewage. 'Water pipes have been left to crumble into disrepair. Soaring water bills are straining family finances. 'Today's final report from Sir Jon Cunliffe's Independent Water Commission offers solutions to fix our broken regulatory system so the failures of the past can never happen again.' The key recommendation is expected to involve scrapping Ofwat and creating a new regulator, which could incorporate the work of the CCW. Shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said stronger consumer protections were 'welcome in principle' but only 'part of the serious long-term reforms the water sector needs'. She said: 'We all want the water system to improve, and honesty about the scale of the challenge is essential. Steve Reed must explain that bill payers are paying for the £104 billion investment plan. Ministers must also explain how replacing one quango with another is going to clean up our rivers and lakes. 'Public confidence in the water system will only be rebuilt through transparency, resilience, and delivery.' Liberal Democrat environment spokesman Tim Farron called for Ofwat to be scrapped, saying the sector needed 'fundamental change, not another layer of bureaucracy'. He added: 'If Ofwat remains in either name or nature, then the Government will have let the public down. 'Simply scrapping Ofwat but retaining a balkanised and weak regulatory framework will only be window dressing, so we are interested in the Government's proposals but the jury is still out as to whether they'll make much difference.'

Water industry faces ‘root and branch reform' after landmark review
Water industry faces ‘root and branch reform' after landmark review

ITV News

timean hour ago

  • ITV News

Water industry faces ‘root and branch reform' after landmark review

The water industry is set to be completely overhauled following the publication of a landmark review of the sector on Monday. Environment Secretary Steve Reed is expected to promise 'root and branch reform' of the sector in a bid to clean up England's rivers and limit rises in water bills. The commitment will follow the publication of the final report of the Independent Water Commission led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe. In a speech responding to Sir Jon's report, Mr Reed is set to describe the water industry as 'broken' and welcome the commission's recommendations to ensure 'the failures of the past can never happen again'. He is also widely reported to be preparing to abolish the industry's beleaguered regulator Ofwat, which has faced criticism for overseeing a sharp rise in sewage pollution while failing to crack down on executive pay and large dividends at debt-ridden water companies. In his interim report, Sir Jon criticised the way the sector was regulated, with duties split between Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate. On Sunday, Mr Reed would not confirm that Ofwat was in line to be scrapped, but declined to express confidence in the regulator either, saying it was 'clearly failing'. Both the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats have agreed that water regulation needs to change. Urging the Government to be 'transparent' about what would replace Ofwat and how it would work, Tory shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said: 'No one disputes that the water sector is under pressure, and we all want to see meaningful improvements. 'Reforming regulation must be focused on improving performance and guaranteeing water security.' Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey has called for the creation of a Clean Water Authority that could 'hold these water companies to account' and 'fine them when they fail'. While Mr Reed has pledged to avoid the need for 'huge shock hikes' in water bills, such as the 26% increase seen this year, reform is unlikely to lead to a fall in costs for consumers. The Government hopes that investment in long-neglected infrastructure will make large bill increases unnecessary, but Mr Reed acknowledged on Sunday that there needed to be 'appropriate bill rises' to secure 'appropriate levels of investment'. He is also unlikely to commit to expanding social tariffs that could help households struggling with bills at the cost of higher charges for wealthier families, saying he was yet to be convinced that this was needed. Prior to Monday's announcement, Mr Reed had already committed to halving sewage pollution in England's rivers by 2030 thanks to a £104 billion investment from the sector in upgrading infrastructure. He has also announced the creation of a new, legally binding water ombudsman, expanding the role of the voluntary Consumer Council for Water and bringing the sector into line with other utilities. But the Conservatives have accused Labour of copying the policies of the previous government.

Labour announces major pension review – what it means for your money
Labour announces major pension review – what it means for your money

Scottish Sun

timean hour ago

  • Scottish Sun

Labour announces major pension review – what it means for your money

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE government will launch a new commission to ensure workers have enough money in retirement. Labour will bring back the Pensions Commission amid fears today's workers face a greater risk of poverty in retirement than their parents. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has launched the commission amid fears people are not saving enough for retirement Credit: PA It comes as experts have warned that people looking to retire in 2050 are on course to receive £800 per year less than current pensioners. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said 45% of working-age adults were putting nothing into their pensions. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said she was turning to the Pensions Commission, to 'tackle the barriers that stop too many saving in the first place'. The previous commission recommended automatically enrolling people in workplace pensions, which has seen the number of eligible employees saving rise from 55% in 2012 to 88%. While the introduction of automatic enrolment increased the numbers saving, saving levels have often remained low. Around 1-in-2 workers in the private sector only save around the minimum contribution level, which is 8% or less of earnings. DWP analysis suggested 15 million people were undersaving for retirement, with the self-employed, low paid and some ethnic minorities particularly affected. Around three million self-employed people are said to be saving nothing for their retirement. Meanwhile, only a quarter of people on low pay in the private sector and the same proportion from Pakistani or Bangladeshi backgrounds are saving. Women face a significant gender pensions gap too. Research found those approaching retirement are in line to receive barely half the income that men can expect. The commission will be led by Baroness Jeannie Drake, a member of the previous commission, and report in 2027 with proposals that stretch beyond the next election. Kendall's decision to revive the Pensions Commission has been broadly welcomed by the pensions industry. Pete Maddern, managing director for Retirement at Canada Life said: "There are many complex behavioural, social, and financial barriers that prevent people from adequately preparing for later life, and this needs to be understood and addressed before it's too late." "The reality is that people are living longer – and while this is something to be celebrated, it also means retirement income needs to stretch further than ever before." Meanwhile, AgeUK's Caroline Abrahams said the commission needed to address the state pension, which provides the bulk of retirement income for most pensioners. She said: 'If we're to avoid future generations of pensioners experiencing financial hardship, we need reforms that enable more people to build a decent standard of living, and we need them sooner rather than later to maximise the numbers who can be helped.' LABOUR PENSION REFORM The Government is currently planning some of the biggest pension reforms in decades. The Chancellor announced the first part of the Pensions Investment Review in July 2024 to significantly reform the pension system. The second phase will focus on developing a future-proof plan to give every worker an adequate income in retirement. The first phase explored new ways to boost investment, increase saver returns and tackle waste in the pensions system. In response to the issues raised in the review, the Government published the Pension Schemes Bill in June. The bill is currently making its way through Parliament and will help savers to combine small pension pots and help those receiving poor returns. The second part of the review will focus on improving outcomes for "future generations of pension savers". Under the current auto-enrolment rules, workers must pay at least 8% of qualifying earnings into their workplace pension every year. At least 3% of this comes from employers' contributions. A single person now needs £13,400 a year for a minimal retirement, or £21,600 if they are in a couple, according to Pensions UK. Previous governments have been nervous to increase the minimum amount you need to pay into your pension for fear that workers may opt out of their pension scheme altogether. Olly Cheng, Financial Planning Director at Rathbones, said: "There is a growing sense that more must be done to ensure that future generations of retirees not only survive, but thrive in retirement." Meanwhile, raising the amount employers need to contribute would pile further pressure onto businesses, which are already having to shoulder huge rises in the minimum wage and increase in national insurance. The pensions minister, Torsten Bell, has already ruled out forcing workers to pay more into their pensions in this Parliament. What are the different types of pensions? WE round-up the main types of pension and how they differ: Personal pension or self-invested personal pension (SIPP) - This is probably the most flexible type of pension as you can choose your own provider and how much you invest. - This is probably the most flexible type of pension as you can choose your own provider and how much you invest. Workplace pension - The Government has made it compulsory for employers to automatically enrol you in your workplace pension unless you opt out. These so-called defined contribution (DC) pensions are usually chosen by your employer and you won't be able to change it. Minimum contributions are 8%, with employees paying 5% (1% in tax relief) and employers contributing 3%. - The Government has made it compulsory for employers to automatically enrol you in your workplace pension unless you opt out. These so-called defined contribution (DC) pensions are usually chosen by your employer and you won't be able to change it. Minimum contributions are 8%, with employees paying 5% (1% in tax relief) and employers contributing 3%. Final salary pension - This is also a workplace pension but here, what you get in retirement is decided based on your salary, and you'll be paid a set amount each year upon retiring. It's often referred to as a gold-plated pension or a defined benefit (DB) pension. But they're not typically offered by employers anymore. - This is also a workplace pension but here, what you get in retirement is decided based on your salary, and you'll be paid a set amount each year upon retiring. It's often referred to as a gold-plated pension or a defined benefit (DB) pension. But they're not typically offered by employers anymore. New state pension - This is what the state pays to those who reach state pension age after April 6 2016. The maximum payout is £203.85 a week and you'll need 35 years of National Insurance contributions to get this. You also need at least ten years' worth to qualify for anything at all. - This is what the state pays to those who reach state pension age after April 6 2016. The maximum payout is £203.85 a week and you'll need 35 years of National Insurance contributions to get this. You also need at least ten years' worth to qualify for anything at all. Basic state pension - If you reach the state pension age on or before April 2016, you'll get the basic state pension. The full amount is £156.20 per week and you'll need 30 years of National Insurance contributions to get this. If you have the basic state pension you may also get a top-up from what's known as the additional or second state pension. Those who have built up National Insurance contributions under both the basic and new state pensions will get a combination of both schemes. What do the changes mean for your money? Currently, most workers in the UK are automatically enrolled into their workplace pension scheme. These are usually defined contribution (DC) schemes, which give you a retirement income based on how much you pay into the pot. The other type of pensions in the UK are "defined benefit" schemes, where workers receive a guaranteed income in retirement based on their years of service. The review will aim to make sure workers paying into a DC scheme are saving enough money for retirement. The review will also consider the role of the state pension in retirement income. This means changes will not be implemented until 2029 at the earliest. The Chancellor will appoint two commissions to lead the review into pensions adequacy and will look at auto-enrolment rates alongside the state pension. Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@ Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store