Lena Dunham ‘Understands' How Lack of Diversity in ‘Girls' Was ‘Really Disappointing' for Audiences
'I think one of the profound issues around 'Girls' was that there was so little real estate for women in television,' Dunham told The Independent, '[so] that if you had a show called 'Girls,' which is such a monolithic name, it sounds like it's describing all the girls in all the places. And so if it's not reflecting a multitude of experiences, I understand how that would be really disappointing to people.'
More from IndieWire
Lena Dunham Details Possible 'Girls' Revival Plot: 'I Would Always' Work with That Cast Again
Jason Momoa Unites a People in Apple's 'Chief of War' Trailer
Dunham is now returning to TV again with her semi-autobiographical Netflix series 'Too Much,' which has a large ensemble cast representing a slew of races, genders, and nationalities as the show takes place in both New York City and London. 'The thing I have really come to believe is that one of the most important things is not just diversity in front of the camera, but it's diversity behind the camera,' Dunham said, citing how her experience with 'Girls' impacted how she approached 'Too Much.' 'As a producer, one of my goals is to bring a lot of different voices into a position where they can tell their story.'
The discussions around diversity in 'Girls' plagued the series ever since it premiered in 2012. The NYC-set show had a white core cast; Dunham famously introduced Donald Glover in Season 2 as one of her onscreen love interests, seemingly in direct response to the criticisms. Glover's character Sandy was a devout Republican in a subversive creative decision.
Dunham said in 2012 that the casting was not due to the diversity controversy, though. 'Some are people of color, some are not, some are caucasian because I went to the actors who I wanted to work with and told the stories that seemed vital and exciting,' she said. 'I don't care about satisfying the critics, but I care about satisfying my viewers. And I know I have viewers who are women of color who want to see themselves reflected onscreen. So, that's what matters to me. It doesn't matter to me to satiate people who are looking to kind of put destructive energy onto the world — not to sound like a hippie.'
Dunham added in 2018 that she later discussed Glover's character with him and wanted to make sure he was comfortable with the arc. 'I emailed him later to say, 'I hope you feel the part on 'Girls' didn't tokenize you,' and his response was really Donald-y and enigmatic: 'Let's not think back on mistakes we made in the past, let's just focus on what lies in front of us,'' she said (Glover has been vocal about his love of working with Dunham ever since starring in the series.)
The magnified criticisms of 'Girls' at the time in part led to Dunham taking an acting hiatus. Dunham told The Times early this season, 'I always joke that I need a T-shirt that says, 'I survived New York media in 2012 and all I got was this lousy T-shirt.' And all I got was this lousy PTSD. I didn't really understand how to distinguish between what was and wasn't necessary for the public. I felt confused about how I was supposed to respond. I thought if I explain properly who I am, or give a glimpse of who I am, people are going to have a different perception of me, that we would be friends. But no one cares — and that's fine.'Best of IndieWire
Guillermo del Toro's Favorite Movies: 56 Films the Director Wants You to See
'Song of the South': 14 Things to Know About Disney's Most Controversial Movie
Nicolas Winding Refn's Favorite Films: 37 Movies the Director Wants You to See
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Justin Baldoni's Lawyers Fight Back Blake Lively's Depisiton Request — Report
reportedly claimed that Blake Lively has been using her star power to dictate their forthcoming disposition in their ongoing legal battle. TMZ obtained documents related to a recent filing from Baldoni's team, as they fight back against his 'It Ends With Us' co-star's request to hold the deposition at her lawyer's office. The proceedings are scheduled to be held on Thursday at the office of his attorney. Lively's team filed the request last week, claiming they fear a paparazzi ambush. Justin Baldoni's lawyers reportedly rejected a request Blake Lively made, accusing her of using her popularity to dictate the deposition. TMZ revealed that Lively's team requested to move the location of the upcoming deposition, which will take place at Baldoni's attorney's office in New York City on July 17. Her counsel cited fears of a paparazzi ambush as the reason to switch the venue to her lawyer's office. However, her legal adversary has refused to comply with her desires. In his response filing, Baldoni's team argued a lack of evidence to prove the claims. They alleged that both lawyers' offices are about a mile away from each other. The actor-director's filing further mentioned that a location change would put them at a disadvantage in case they need a private space for discussions. His attorney accused Lively of 'foot-stomping' and using her 'celebrity status' to 'seize control of the film,' but mentioned how a 'tantrum' like that will have 'no place in this Court.' PEOPLE had previously reported that Blake Lively slammed Justin Baldoni's lawyers for making her upcoming deposition in their legal battle a 'spectacle.' On Friday, Lively's team filed a motion, requesting to change the location. In the filings, they accused Baldioni's counsel of making the ordeal 'a public spectacle at every turn' instead of treating it like a serious matter of 'sexual harassment and retaliation.' Originally reported by Nikita Mahato on Reality Tea. The post Justin Baldoni's Lawyers Fight Back Blake Lively's Depisiton Request — Report appeared first on Mandatory.
Time Magazine
28 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Netflix's Sobering Apocalypse in the Tropics Depicts the Rise of Evangelical Christianity in Brazilian Politics
In the opening shot of Apocalypse in the Tropics, the camera pans across a cracked canvas on which a group of nude figures, all with blurred expressions, seek shelter inside the protective cocoon of a cracked white egg. This detail is part of the enigmatic triptych The Garden of Earthly Delights by Hieronymus Bosch, a painting that serves as a moral warning about the destructive power of unchecked desires. It's a fitting introduction to a documentary that examines the rise of Christian Nationalism in Brazil, which hits Netflix today after premiering at last year's Venice Film Festival. Directed, co-written, and narrated by Petra Costa, whose 2019 film The Edge of Democracy was nominated for an Academy Award, this eye-opening documentary is divided into chapters, each one recounting a seismic sociopolitical moment that gripped the nation. The cinematography blends the historical with the mythic and personal, combining archival footage and interviews with spiritual leaders and political officials. Among the most prominent are televangelist Silas Malafaia and Brazil's current and former presidents, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (known as Lula) and Jair Bolsonaro. 'Making this film was an epic journey. We filmed for four years, almost uninterruptedly, during one of the darkest and most difficult times in Brazil's history,' Costa tells TIME. Her team sifted through thousands of hours of archival footage, filed many freedom of information requests in Brazil and the U.S., gained access to a powerful televangelist and two presidents engaged in power struggles, and navigated COVID-19 wards, mass graves, and the homes of the poor. 'Our desire was to capture the pulse of Brazilian society from the streets to the congress, up to the presidential palace. In doing so, what came into focus through the material was the extraordinary grip religious leaders were holding on political power, and the threat religious fundamentalism is posing to the separation of church and state,' says Costa. Laying the groundwork for Christian nationalism Following the period of colonial rule and tradition, during the fourth Brazilian Republic, President Juscelino Kubitschek envisioned a new future for Brazil centered on democracy, not grounded in faith in God but in progress and equality. He encouraged a nationalistic spirit and the belief that the country would become a great world power. Kubitschek constructed the new federal capital, Brasilia, designed by Oscar Niemeyer and Lúcio Costa, and inaugurated it in April 1960. Brazilians considered the capital city, which replaced Rio de Janeiro, a symbol of the nation's future significance on the world stage. This vision did not fully come to fruition. In recent years, Brazil has become increasingly fragmented, amplified by a widespread subscription to hateful doctrines, culture wars, anti-intellectualism, disinformation on social media, apocalyptic messaging, doomsday conspiracy theories, and ethno-religious identity politics. Apocalypse in the Tropics depicts the Christian nationalists and fundamentalists who have risen to power in Brazil as beholden to a belief in divine retribution. Political and religious leaders such as Malafaia and Magno Malta embrace a vengeful Jesus willing to strike down non-believers and perceived enemies of God. Some of this stems from what the documentary positions as a misinterpretation of the often-cited and controversial Book of Revelation. Their goal is to establish a Christian nation and defend cultural conservatism. Costa's filmmaking firmly establishes the view that this group will pursue these objectives even at the cost of 'loving thy neighbor' and the interests of society at large. For centuries, Catholicism brought by Portuguese colonizers—serving as both a spiritual framework and a political tool—laid the groundwork for Christian nationalism to grow. 'While it provided rituals and beliefs that shaped Brazil's cultural identity, it was also used to legitimize the violent subjugation of Indigenous peoples and the enslavement of millions of Africans forcibly brought to the country,' Costa says. In the past 40 years, evangelism has surged from 5 percent to over 30 percent of Brazil's population. Though it once wielded great influence over people's lives, the Holy See's power has waned in recent times. Still, with the rise of populist and ultra-conservative politicians utilizing nationalistic rhetoric, theocracy is becoming a greater concern for secular societies. Costa sees the message of Apocalypse in the Tropics as having resonance far beyond Brazil. 'From Hungary to India, Italy to the United States, a whole generation of far-right leaders has emerged with strong ties to fundamentalist theologies. And as their movements grow, so does the power of the individual religious leaders at their forefront,' she says. During the 1960s, a vastly different movement emerged within Brazil's Catholic Church: Liberation Theology, rooted in values of social justice and defending the poor. During the Cold War, this was viewed as a threat to U.S. interests, and followers were branded as communists. In archival footage shown in the documentary, Henry Kissinger warns President Nixon that the Catholic Church is no longer an ally in Latin America. The administration worked with a lobbying group called 'The Family' to convert people there to evangelical Christianity. 'Our film uncovered previously unreported material revealing how American evangelical missionaries were sent to Brazil to counteract the influence of Liberation Theology. Since then, Brazil has developed its own version of evangelicalism,' Costa explains. The country's poor found a home in this Christian movement that preaches the prosperity gospel, believing that church sermons and donations will lead to wealth on Earth. As shown in Apocalypse in the Tropics, evangelical churches in Brazil are plentiful and accessible, often operating out of people's homes, as compared to Catholic churches. The loud, brazen demeanor adopted by many pastors inspires mass trances and a sense of divine supremacy. Wealth is a draw for the rich and poor alike, a capitalist paradise rooted in fervent belief and devotion. Religion, government, and power The ambitious Pentecostal pastor and televangelist Malafaia—considered a kingmaker, is among those religious leaders in Brazil who have amassed wealth and celebrity through their sermons. Over the years, he has expanded his influence into politics, building close ties with politicians and endorsing presidential candidates, including the ultra-right-wing Bolsonaro, whom he claims was chosen and anointed by God to lead. Malafaia's support helped him win the presidency in 2019. He went on to support Lula in 2022, though the relationship disintegrated due to vastly differing values. In the documentary, Costa interviews Malafaia, who sometimes veers off into angry rants, especially concerning the country's leftists. He talks about the power evangelical leaders hold in politics and how they can make or break political candidates.. One major reason the incumbent Bolsonaro lost the 2022 election was his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, widely agreed to be a failure stemming from indifference. He ignored scientific consensus and strategies to fight the pandemic in favor of herd immunity, fasting, promises, and prayers, while also spreading conspiracy theories. When asked about Brazil's high death toll (becoming the second-worst-affected country in the world), in the documentary Bolsonaro chillingly responds, 'So what? What am I to do? I'm Messiah but I don't do miracles. Why make people panic when everyone will die?' Since Bolsonaro is currently ineligible to run for president again until 2030, Christian nationalist leaders, who are closely aligned with the far-right, are seeking a successor in the 2026 general election. 'These leaders have not disappeared, and their caucus is one of the most powerful in Congress,' says Costa. 'To make matters worse, this is also happening at a time when the legislature has essentially robbed the executive branch of much of its power.' In Apocalypse in the Tropics, Congressman and President of the Evangelical Caucus Sóstenes Cavalcante says that the group has grown from 50 members in 2002 to 142 in the Senate. President Lula is dealing with a conservative legislative branch that challenges his leadership and an inability to pass significant reforms, such as increasing taxes on Brazil's wealthiest. 'Taxing Brazil's ultra-wealthy would affect only 50 families and generate an estimated $260 billion USD,' says Costa. A portrait of more than just Brazil Costa suggests that one way to understand the chaos of our current era is as 'the hangover from an information revolution.' Just as the printing press sparked upheaval in its time, social media is now causing widespread fallout. Today's algorithms are not 'designed to foster democratic debate, collective decision-making, or the careful building of consensus,' but are crafted for virality, outrage, conflict, and emotional extremes—amplifying divisive messages. 'This makes these spaces particularly fertile ground for religious fundamentalism and other forms of extremism,' Costa explains. In a scene from a 2018 election rally, Bolsonaro addresses the enraptured crowd, saying, 'If I get there [as president], if it's up to me, every citizen will have a gun at home, there won't be an inch of land for indigenous people and no slavery reparations,' while pretending to shoot at Workers' Party voters from the Brazilian state of Acre with a machine gun. During his presidency, Bolsonaro and his cabinet members repeatedly hinted at challenging the rule of law against opponents like Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who has investigated him several times for illegal disinformation. Another scene where tanks drive through the streets—echoing Brazil's past military coups—Bolsonaro uses the military for protection, supported by his followers whom he encouraged to launch insurrections against perceived injustice. This unrest reached a climax after his defeat in the 2022 general election, when Bolsonaristas stormed the Three Powers Square on Jan. 8, 2023, just days after Lula's inauguration. The ex-president denied his election loss in October, seeking shelter in Florida while stirring discontent among his radicalized supporters. This chilling event, mirroring the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol, closes the documentary's final chapter. Trump is now threatening to impose 50 percent tariffs on Brazil if the Supreme Court doesn't drop charges against Bolsonaro for the attempted coup. While making Apocalypse in the Tropics, it became increasingly clear to Costa that she was not making a film only about Brazil. 'This portrait is not just a reflection of siloed far-right movements. What we are seeing is how fundamentalist movements in different countries are sharing ideas and practices, forming alliances and acquiring immense global impact,' she says. We are living in divided times, searching for answers amongst the chaos. Amid uncertainty and confusion, people turn to leaders who promise to guide them out of darkness. 'Faced with a population that feels it has lost control of its destiny, whether due to economic globalization, distance from the exercise of power or the force of emerging technologies, the answer offered by the mysticism of the divine is welcomed with fervor and relief at a time of profound earthly uncertainty,' Costa says.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MasterChef's John Torode confirms he was accused of racism in Wallace review
MasterChef presenter John Torode has confirmed he is the subject of an allegation of using racist language that was upheld as part of a review into the behaviour of co-presenter Gregg Wallace. The report, commissioned by MasterChef production company Banijay UK and led by law firm Lewis Silkin, found 45 out of 83 allegations against Wallace were substantiated, alongside two standalone allegations made against other people, including one for using racist language. In a post on Instagram, Torode confirmed he was the person alleged to have used racist language but said he had 'no recollection of the incident' and was 'shocked and saddened' by the allegation. View this post on Instagram A post shared by John Torode (@johntorodecooks) His statement said: 'Following publication of the Executive Summary of the investigation into Gregg Wallace while working on MasterChef, I am aware of speculation that I am one of the two other individuals against whom an allegation has been upheld. 'For the sake of transparency, I confirm that I am the individual who is alleged to have used racial language on one occasion. 'The allegation is that I did so sometime in 2018 or 2019, in a social situation, and that the person I was speaking with did not believe that it was intended in a malicious way and that I apologised immediately afterwards. 'I have absolutely no recollection of any of this, and I do not believe that it happened. However, I want to be clear that I've always had the view that any racial language is wholly unacceptable in any environment. 'I'm shocked and saddened by the allegation as I would never wish to cause anyone any offence.' Reports in The Sun said Torode had been asked to leave the show and claim he had mental health issues following the allegation. It comes after Wallace said he was 'deeply sorry for any distress caused' and that he 'never set out to harm or humiliate' in the wake of the report, which included one allegation of 'unwelcome physical contact' that was upheld. In November 2024, the show's production company, Banijay UK, announced that Wallace, 60, would step away from his role on MasterChef while historical allegations of misconduct were investigated. In a statement to the PA news agency, he said: 'For eight months, my family and I have lived under a cloud. Trial by media, fuelled by rumour and clickbait. 'None of the serious allegations against me were upheld. I challenged the remaining issue of unwanted touching but have had to accept a difference in perception, and I am deeply sorry for any distress caused. It was never intended.' The report found that the 'majority of the allegations against Mr Wallace (94%) related to behaviour which is said to have occurred between 2005 and 2018', with only one allegation substantiated after 2018. It also concluded that the 'majority of the substantiated allegations against Mr Wallace related to inappropriate sexual language and humour', adding that 'a smaller number of allegations of other inappropriate language and being in a state of undress were also substantiated', with 'one incident of unwelcome physical contact' also substantiated. The report noted that during the course of the investigation, which was over a seven-month period, Wallace was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, and said that the findings should be viewed in the context of his neurodiversity. In his statement, Wallace added: 'I'm relieved that the Banijay report fully recognises that my behaviour changed profoundly in 2018. Some of my humour and language missed the mark. I never set out to harm or humiliate. I always tried to bring warmth and support to MasterChef, on screen and off. 'After nearly 20 years on the show, I now see that certain patterns, shaped by traits I've only recently begun to understand, may have been misread. I also accept that more could have been done, by others and by myself, to address concerns earlier. 'A late autism diagnosis has helped me understand how I communicate and how I'm perceived. I'm still learning.' The BBC has been asked for comment.
