Americans need full answers on the Secret Service's Trump assassination-attempt failures
That is, no clear info on the would-be assassin's motives — and no satisfactory explanation of how the Secret Service let him come so very close to succeeding.
The New York Times managed to (seemingly) get access to Crooks' web-browsing history, and still couldn't say much of anything for sure.
His family won't talk to the press; that may be wise of them, but is frustrating to the many Americans who feel we should know more.
He looks like a smart, lonely kid who sank into mental illness at an age common for the onset of several deep disorders; maybe we just can't find out much more.
But we surely can learn more about the security failures that cleared the shooter's way onto that roof.
Indeed, it's pretty telling that only the determination of Corey Comperatore's widow seems to have forced several Secret Service heads to roll — and it was only Thursday, three days before the anniversary, that six agents who worked the Butler, Pa., rally got suspended.
Not fired, suspended, for 10 to 45 days.
The timeline of what went wrong that day is damning: Crooks, armed with a rifle, was somehow able to get onto the roof of the the AGR building just 400 feet from the stage from where Trump would speak — a building the Secret Service had already identified as a security concern, yet somehow failed to secure.
Nearly 30 minutes before the shooting, local cops raised alarms that a suspicious man with a rangefinder was spotted hanging around the building.
And two minutes before, the Secret Service Security Room was told that someone was on the roof.
Yet with all of that information, agents failed to act in time to stop Comperatore from being killed and Trump from very nearly being killed.
This was no run-of-the-mill ball-dropping by one or two agents, but deadly incompetence on every level.
The agency's Biden-era leadership may have slow-rolled any investigation or punishment once then-USSS Director Kimberly Cheatle quit soon after the epic failure, but shouldn't Trump's hires have caught up by now?
Getting to the facts is no impossible task; it starts with grilling each and every agent on duty that day, and the chain of command above them about each of their decisions: Give the public a complete accounting of who left the security team so undermanned; exactly how communications failed so badly; why information about a clear threat didn't bring the appropriate response.
That should be a top priority for FBI Director Kash Patel.
Trump has graciously dismissed the whole thing as 'a bad day' for the Secret Service, saying he has 'great confidence in these people.'
But that doesn't let his top people off the hook; this cannot happen again.
Imagine the national and global turmoil, had Trump turned his head just a second or two later.
At the very least, get Americans a full tick-tock timeline of exactly who decided what when, and so left such gaping holes in Trump's security.
Expose everyone at fault, and hold them all accountable.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
5 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
‘Beautiful' or ‘Ugly,' Trump's big bill shapes the battle for House control in 2026 midterms
WASHINGTON — Debate over President Trump's sweeping budget-and-policy package is over on Capitol Hill. Now the argument goes national. From the Central Valley of California to Midwestern battlegrounds and suburban districts of the northeast, the new law already is shaping the 2026 midterm battle for control of the House of Representatives. The outcome will set the tone for Trump's final two years in the Oval Office. Democrats need a net gain of three House seats to break the GOP's chokehold on Washington and reestablish a power center to counter Trump. There's added pressure to flip the House given that midterm Senate contests are concentrated in Republican-leaning states, making it harder for Democrats to reclaim that chamber. As Republicans see it, they've now delivered broad tax cuts, an unprecedented investment in immigration enforcement and new restraints on social safety net programs. Democrats see a law that rolls back health insurance access and raises costs for middle-class Americans while cutting taxes mostly for the rich, curtailing green energy initiatives and restricting some workers' organizing rights. 'It represents the broken promise they made to the American people,' said Rep. Suzan DelBene, a Washington Democrat who chairs the party's House campaign arm. 'We're going to continue to hold Republicans accountable for this vote.' Whether voters see it that way will be determined on a district-by-district level, but the battle will be more intense in some places than others. Among the 435 House districts, only 69 contests were decided by less than 10 percentage points in the 2024 general election. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has so far identified 26 Democratic-held seats it must defend vigorously, along with 35 GOP-held seats it believes could be ripe to flip. Republicans' campaign arm, the National Republican Congressional Committee, has so far listed 18 GOP incumbents as priorities, plus two districts opened by retirements. There are a historically low number of so-called crossover districts: Only 13 Democrats represent districts Trump carried in 2024, while just three Republicans serve districts Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris carried. Both committees are busy recruiting challengers and open-seat candidates and more retirements could come, so the competitive map will evolve. Still, there are clusters of districts guaranteed to influence the national result. California, despite its clear lean to Democrats statewide, has at least nine House districts expected to be up for grabs: three in the Central Valley and six in southern California. Six are held by Democrats, three by the GOP. Pennsylvania features four districts that have been among the closest national House races for several consecutive cycles. They include a suburban Philadelphia seat represented by Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, one of just two House Republicans to vote against Trump's bill and one of the three GOP lawmakers from a district Harris won. Fitzpatrick cited the Medicaid cuts. Vice President JD Vance plans on Wednesday to be in Republican Rep. Rob Bresnahan's northwest Pennsylvania district to tout the GOP package. Bresnahan's seat is a top Democratic target. Iowa and Wisconsin, meanwhile, feature four contiguous GOP-held districts in farm-heavy regions where voters could be swayed by fallout from Trump's tariffs. Beyond bumper-sticker labels – Trump's preferred 'Big Beautiful Bill' versus Democrats' 'Big Ugly Bill' retort – the 900-page law is, in fact, an array of policies with varying impact. Democrats hammer Medicaid and food assistance cuts, some timed to take full effect only after the 2026 midterms, along with Republicans' refusal to extend tax credits to some people who obtained health insurance through the Affordable Care Act. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law; 3 million more would not qualify for food stamps, also known as SNAP benefits. 'Folks will die here in Louisiana and in other parts of the country,' House Minority Leader Jeffries warned last week during a town hall in Republican Speaker Mike Johnson's home state of Louisiana. Jeffries singled out vulnerable Republicans like California Rep. David Valadao, who represents a heavily agricultural Central Valley district where more than half the population is eligible for the joint state-federal insurance program. California allows immigrants with legal status and those who are undocumented to qualify for Medicaid, so not all Medicaid recipients are voters. But the program helps finance the overall health care system, including nursing homes and hospitals. Republicans highlight the law's tightened work requirements for Medicaid enrollees. They argue it's a popular provision that will strengthen the program. 'I voted for this bill because it does preserve the Medicaid program for its intended recipients — children, pregnant women, the disabled, and elderly,' Valadao said. 'I know how important the program is for my constituents.' The law includes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. It makes permanent existing rates and brackets approved during Trump's first term. Republicans and their allies have hammered vulnerable Democrats for 'raising costs' on American households by opposing the bill. GOP campaign aides point to the popularity of individual provisions: boosting the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200 (some families at lower income levels would not get the full credit), new deductions on tip and overtime income and auto loans; and a new deduction for older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. 'Everyone will have more take home pay. They'll have more jobs and opportunity,' Johnson said in a Fox News Sunday interview. 'The economy will be doing better and we'll be able to point to that as the obvious result of what we did.' Democrats note that the biggest beneficiaries of Trump's tax code are wealthy Americans and corporations. Pairing that with safety net cuts, Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz concluded, 'The cruelty is the point.' Immigration, meanwhile, was Trump's strongest issue in 2024. NRCC aides say that will continue with the new law's investments in immigration enforcement. Democrats believe the Trump administration has overplayed its hand with its push for mass deportation. The president is a titanic variable. Democrats point to 2018, when they notched a 40-seat net gain in House seats to take control away from the GOP. This year, Democrats have enjoyed a double-digit swing in special elections around the country when compared to 2024 presidential results. Similar trends emerged in 2017 after Trump's 2016 victory. Democrats say that reflects voter discontent with Trump once he's actually in charge. Republicans answer that Trump's job approval remains higher at this point than in 2017. But the GOP's effort is further complicated by ongoing realignments: Since Trump's emergence, Democrats have gained affluent white voters -– like those in suburban swing districts -– while Trump has drawn more working-class voters across racial and ethnic groups. But Republicans face a stiffer challenge of replicating Trump's coalition in a midterm election without him on the ballot. Democrats, meanwhile, must corral voters who are not a threat to vote for Republicans but could stay home. Jeffries said he's determined not to let that happen: 'We're going to do everything we can until we end this national nightmare.' Barrow, Cooper and Brook write for the Associated Press. Cooper reported from Phoenix. Brook reported from New Orleans. AP reporters Michael Blood in Los Angeles and Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report.
UPI
5 minutes ago
- UPI
Trump threatens 100% secondary tariffs on Russia if no peace deal reached
July 14 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump warned Russia Monday that it may face "severe tariffs" if a peace deal with Ukraine isn't negotiated. Trump said the United States would impose 100% secondary tariffs on nations that engage in trade with Moscow. "We're very, very unhappy with them," Trump said. "And we're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days." Trump shared this during a meeting and press conference in the Oval Office Monday with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte in which he also explained how American weapons will now head to Ukraine. "We've made a deal today where we are going to be sending them weapons and they're going to be paying for them," Trump said, reiterating what he had said Sunday to the press at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on the same subject. "The United States will not be having any payment made," Trump added. "We're not buying it but we will manufacture it and they're going to be paying for it." Trump also explained some weaponry, including Patriot missile systems, will be in Ukraine "very soon, within days," and that the arms would first arrive in NATO countries before being transferred to Ukraine. Rutte added that the process will run through NATO's system, and that Ukraine will receive what it requires. "It will mean that Ukraine can get its hands on really massive numbers of military equipment," he explained. "For air defense, missiles, ammunition, etc." "So if I were Vladimir Putin today," Rutte continued, "I would reconsider if I should take negotiations with Ukraine more seriously."
Miami Herald
6 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Miami Herald report on Alligator Alcatraz confirms what we suspected
When the Miami Herald/Tampa Bay Times published a list Sunday of more than 700 detainees held at the Alligator Alcatraz detention facility in South Florida, it confirmed what many have suspected all along: Despite political claims to the contrary, many of the migrants being detained have no U.S. criminal convictions or pending charges. According to the list, published by the Herald/Times in an urgently needed act of watchdog journalism, more than 250 of the detainees have immigration violations but no criminal convictions or charges in the U.S. Some are asylum seekers. Others arrived under humanitarian parole, or thought they were here with permission awaiting the result of ongoing legal cases. In other words, the portrayals by President Donald Trump, Gov. Ron DeSantis, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and others that this detention center in the Everglades is a necessary tool for detaining 'vicious' people and 'deranged psychopaths' is a gross overstatement, underscoring the reasons that due process is so important. No doubt there are some bad characters in the bunch. A third of the detainees on the list, which fluctuates as the population of the detention center changes, have various criminal convictions, the Herald/Times reported, with charges ranging from attempted murder and illegal re-entry to traffic violations. Hundreds of others only have pending charges. But overall, the idea that more than a third of those being held had no pending U.S. charges or convictions should be chilling to Americans. Just how indiscriminate has the U.S. immigration system become? Democratic and Republican members of Congress from Florida and state legislators were given a guided tour of the camp on Saturday, after several Democrats were initially turned away during an unannounced visit earlier in the week. Those on the tour came away with varying conclusions on the conditions, ranging from some Democrats characterizing it as an abomination while some Republicans said the air-conditioned facility meets all prison standards. Conditions aside, the list published by the Herald offers some concrete information on who is being held at the detention center that cuts through the rhetoric surrounding Alligator Alcatraz, which is being run by Florida — the president's home state — and paid for by taxpayers. As Walter Jara, the nephew of a 56-year-old Nicaraguan man taken to the facility following a traffic stop in Palm Beach County, told the Herald: 'That place is supposedly for the worst criminals in the U.S.' The list indicates that his uncle, Denis Alcides Solis Morales, has immigration violations but makes no mention of convictions or pending criminal charges. Jara said his uncle came to the U.S. legally in 2023 under a humanitarian parole program, and has a pending asylum case. Are those people so dangerous that they should be housed in a place called Alligator Alcatraz? DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin insisted to reporters that the absence of a criminal charge in the U.S. doesn't mean migrants have done nothing wrong. She said in a statement that some are 'actually terrorists, human rights abusers, gangsters and more' who 'just don't have a rap sheet in the U.S.' And, she added, 'every single one of these individuals committed a crime when they came into this country illegally.' Trump was elected promising to deport illegal immigrants who committed crimes. Once in office, he revoked Temporary Protected Status ( TPS) and humanitarian parole from thousands of people from places like Venezuela, Nicaragua and Haiti, effectively creating a whole new class of people without legal status. According to polls, Americans overwhelmingly support deporting immigrants with violent criminal records. But the Herald/Times findings reveal a broader dragnet at work — one that ensnares farm workers, people stopped for traffic violations and those who simply attend their immigration hearings. In our state, they are being rounded up with the same zeal used for violent offenders. If we are holding undocumented people in an isolated camp who have no charges or convictions in the U.S., that's a moral and legal failure. Click here to send the letter.
