Scientists Say The Earth's Core Is Literally Leaking Gold
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links."
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story:
Precious metals are leaking out of Earth's core into the mantle, a new study suggests.
Scientists identified a particular isotope of ruthenium (Ru) in volcanic rock samples—a form that typically only occurs in Earth's core.
Researchers say that they must conduct further studies to determine whether the 'leak' has happened throughout Earth's existence or if it's a new phenomenon.
Gold isn't as rare as you may think—it's just hard to reach. 99.999 percent of Earth's precious metals lay hundreds of miles beneath the surface, trapped inside the planet's molten core. If the transparent distance didn't make accessing gold difficult enough, we're also separated from the ore by (literal) tons of solid rock. Fortunately, Earth is making it easier for us humans. According to a new study published in the journal Nature, Earth's core is 'leaking' gold.
Now, don't get too excited—gold isn't spewing out of the ground in cartoon-esque fountains—but the researchers on the study did find evidence that precious metals are oozing out of Earth's core and into the mantle. Unlike the core, the mantle is mostly solid, and makes up most of the planet (84 percent of the Earth's volume to be exact). Comparatively, the mantle also has less of a platinum-group-metal called ruthenium, or Ru. Scientists discovered traces of Ru while studying samples of volcanic rocks from Hawaii and concluded that they must have come from Earth's core.
'When the first results came in, we realized that we had literally struck gold,' first author of the study Nils Messling said in a press release. 'Our data confirmed that material from the core, including gold and other precious metals, is leaking into the Earth's mantle above.'
New procedures developed by the University of Göttingen allowed researchers to detect the microscopic markers that indicate the Ru actually came from the molten core. According to the paper, when Earth's core formed 4.5 billion years ago, the Ru came from a different source than the trace amounts of the element that naturally occur in the mantle. The differences in the isotopes are so small, however, that it was previously impossible to distinguish them.
On top of procedural revolutions, the study is also notable in that it supports wider geological theories. Evidence from the study affirms the plate tectonics theory that oceanic islands formed from molten material.
'Our findings not only show that the Earth's core is not as isolated as previously assumed,' Matthias Willbold, another author of the study, said in the release. 'We can now also prove that huge volumes of super-heated mantle material–several hundreds of quadrillion metric tonnes of rock–originate at the core-mantle boundary and rise to the Earth's surface to form ocean islands like Hawaii.'
As for the future, the researchers expressed that there is still much to learn, particularly when it comes to the timeline of the 'leak.'
'Whether these processes that we observe today have also been operating in the past remains to be proven,' Messling explained. 'Our findings open up an entirely new perspective on the evolution of the inner dynamics of our home planet.'
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Researchers warn of catastrophic consequences from rapidly intensifying threat: 'As a species, we have never confronted anything like this'
Sustained higher-than-average temperatures and warming seas are projected to severely disrupt agriculture, CNN reports, and scientists are concerned about how to "ensure future food security" in a changing climate. Americans born today could "live in a world where the U.S. can only produce half as much of its key food crops," CNN's recent headline read. The ensuing reporting focused on a groundbreaking study recently published in Nature — one of the most widely cited scientific journals globally — and the outlet described its findings as "stark." Study authors examined the impacts of rising temperatures through a universally understood and relevant lens: the global food supply. Put plainly, the researchers' calculations were grim: Every 1°C (1.8°F) increase in average global temperatures will result in a worldwide reduction in food production equivalent to 120 fewer calories per person, per day. Study author Solomon Hsiang of the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability broke it down further when discussing their findings. "If the climate warms by 3 degrees, that's basically like everyone on the planet giving up breakfast," Hsiang warned. It's well-documented that climate-related matters are routinely and misleadingly cast in doubt, framed as a matter of belief rather than settled science. Not everybody lives in a region routinely walloped by extreme weather — such as wildfires or increased coastal flooding — and the issue can seem abstract, localized elsewhere, or more of a problem for the distant future. However, food is a great equalizer, something all humans require to survive — farmers have long been ringing the alarm about the impacts of unpredictable weather and temperatures on crop yields. Professor and food policy expert Tim Lang told CNN that adaptations to fortify the global food supply are halting and insufficient. "The data pile up. The politicians turn a blind eye … Land use is not altering fast or radically enough," he lamented, addressing the speed at which agriculture is adapting to changes in the climate. Do you worry about how much food you throw away? Definitely Sometimes Not really Never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. "This is a major problem. It's incredibly expensive. As a species, we have never confronted anything like this." Experts reiterated that "adaptation" and "mitigation" were critical steps to safeguard crops in an increasingly unpredictable climate, one in which the United States could lose half its crop yields. Growing your own food is one approach to guard against food supply instability at a personal level, whereas donating to climate-related causes is a good way to make a broader impact. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
James Webb Discovers First-Ever Exoplanet by Taking a Picture of It
Scientists harnessing NASA's James Webb Space Telescope took what appears to be the first-ever direct picture of an exoplanet resulting in its discovery, in yet another accomplishment for the mighty space observatory. An international team of astronomers published a paper on the historic finding in the prestigious journal Nature. "If confirmed, this would represent Webb's first direct image discovery of a planet," they wrote of the finding, "and the lightest planet ever seen with this technique outside the solar system." The planet, dubbed TWA 7 b, orbits a young star and appears to be about the size of Neptune. Though the James Webb has directly imaged other exoplanets previously, they were previously known to exist; in this case, in an apparent first-ever accomplishment, the act of capturing the picture also established the existence of the distant world. Since its launch in 2021, the James Webb has been at the forefront of many exciting space discoveries, from plumbing the depths of the early universe to investigating how our solar system was formed. It's able to do all this because it's the largest space telescope ever built, even bigger than Hubble Space Telescope, with a primary mirror measuring over 21 feet in diameter. TWA 7 b was difficult to detect due to the glare of the orbiting star, so the team developed a clever mechanism that mimics an eclipse in order to pick out any bodies that are lurking in the blinding light. The exoplanet orbits the star TWA 7, a relatively young red dwarf at 6.4 million years of age that sports a sizable debris field. "Here we're looking at a system that is about 6 [million] years old, so we are really witnessing the youth of the planetary system," Anne-Marie Lagrange, astrophysicist and first author of the paper, told The Guardian. More on exoplanets: An AI Identifies Where All Those Planets That Could Host Life Are Hiding
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
New study makes exciting revelation about health advantages of certain diets: 'Substantial nutritional ... benefits'
A new study published in Nature reveals that adopting a plant-rich or vegan diet offers serious benefits for both personal health and the environment. Researchers in Iceland compared the health and environmental impacts of vegan and omnivorous diets. They found that individuals following a plant-based diet not only met more nutritional recommendations, but also decreased their carbon footprint as a result of avoiding meat-production-related pollution. However, both groups showed room for improvement in fully meeting dietary recommendations. While plant-rich diets have long been associated with health benefits, few studies have directly compared vegan diets to omnivorous ones, until now. The research team analyzed dietary data from 651 omnivores and 68 vegans in Iceland, discovering that the vegan group's diet produced 50% less planet-warming pollution, had nine times higher fiber compliance, and consumed less saturated fat than the meat and dairy consumers. "Our results also indicate that in our omnivore population a shift towards a more plant-rich diet without eliminating all foods of animal origin could lead to substantial nutritional and environmental benefits," the study concluded. Another recent study from Harvard Health Publishing involving identical twins found that those on a vegan diet had significantly lower LDL cholesterol and insulin levels, and lost about four pounds — all in just eight weeks. Even if you're not interested in going vegan, these findings suggest that transitioning to a plant-forward diet can have meaningful effects on both short- and long-term health. In addition to personal wellness, the environmental impact is substantial. Meat and dairy production are leading contributors to planet-warming emissions, excessive water use, and land degradation globally. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, agriculture is the top source of methane and nitrous oxide pollution in the U.S., largely stemming from livestock and factory farming. Reducing reliance on animal products, even just a few days a week, can help shrink your environmental impact and support a healthier food system. Why do you eat plant-based foods? The health benefits It's cheaper It's good for the planet I prefer the taste Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. One Reddit user shared their takeaways from the data: "None of this is surprising, but it's interesting to see studied. I wonder if the gap between vegans and omnivores in [the U.S.] is even bigger due to our factory farm processes." "Only 5% of omnivores are eating enough fiber?? Yikes," another user added. "No wonder colorectal cancers are on the rise." Another commenter noted how interesting it was that vegans were closer to meeting macronutrient requirements: "I suspect this is because it's a very conscious dietary choice and is more often actually planned," they said. "Fiber and fats almost take care of themselves." Join our free newsletter for easy tips to save more and waste less, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
