Batley amputee receives compensation for medical failures
'Kick in the teeth'
Mrs Harbron, who has type 1 diabetes, had gone to the A&E department at the hospital complaining of numbness in her foot and severe calf pain.Doctors suspected deep vein thrombosis and booked her in for surgery at 21:00 BST that evening.However, the operation did not happen until 13:30 BST the following day after a transfer to Leeds General Infirmary.By then, surgeons were unable to save Mrs Harbron's leg and they were later forced to amputate below the knee.Days later she had to have surgery to amputate her leg above the knee.The NHS trust later admitted that mistakes had caused the delay and confessed in a letter that if surgery had taken place earlier, her leg may have been saved. "I was very active, very fit, running three times a week, going out with friends, doing everything - something a 22-year-old does - and then that just stopped," said Mrs Harbron."It got ripped away. I am angry. It's a bit of a kick in the teeth finding out that it could have been prevented."
Mrs Harbron has received the first instalment of compensation from the trust with the rest due to be paid in 2027.The money has enabled her to move from a first floor flat to a bungalow.It has also allowed her to get a prosthetic leg specifically designed for her body, meaning she was able to pass her driving test. "I'm happy, finally, very independent," she said."I'm going out by myself, driving and shopping alone. It's incredible. It's just changed so much."Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
NHS set for winter chaos as nurses and GPs threaten strike action
The Royal College of Nursing will ballot members for industrial action after 91 per cent rejected a 3.6 per cent pay offer, citing feeling 'deeply undervalued' and demanding improved pay and career progression. General Practitioners, represented by the British Medical Association, are also threatening strikes, with a September meeting planned to consider action over their role in the NHS 's 10-year plan and demands for contract investment. These new threats follow a five-day walkout by resident doctors, who were seeking a 29 per cent pay rise, which resulted in the cancellation of some vital cancer operations. The Department of Health and Social Care acknowledges the value of nurses but states they have received two above-inflation pay rises, while the Health Secretary has warned the British Medical Association against a prolonged dispute. The Royal College of Nursing emphasises that widespread vacancies, stunted career progression, and pay erosion are critical issues impacting patient safety, urging ministers to agree on a comprehensive investment plan.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Former nurse loses legal challenge over registration of private gender clinic
The two also challenged the regulator's decision last December to continue the clinic's registration and to allow it to prescribe cross-sex hormone treatment to 16 and 17-year-olds without conditions. The clinic, which was rated outstanding by the watchdog last year, treats people aged 16 and older, including through prescribing gender-affirming – masculinising or feminising – hormones, but, in line with the NHS, does not prescribe puberty blockers. Dr Aidan Kelly, clinical psychologist and director of the Gender Plus Hormone Clinic (Callum Parke/PA) Lawyers for the women told a hearing in June that the CQC had acted 'irrationally' and made decisions that were 'simply not open to it', given the NHS's stance on hormone treatment for children aged 16 and 17 in light of the Cass Review. The CQC and GPHC opposed the challenge, with barristers telling the hearing in London that the legal challenge was 'fatally flawed' and the clinic was found to be 'committed to the safety and best interests of its patients'. In a ruling on Thursday, Mrs Justice Eady dismissed the claim, saying there was 'no irrationality in the decisions reached' and they were within the 'rational range' of options available to the watchdog. Hormone treatment was previously provided on the NHS at the now-closed Gender Identity Development Service (Gids) run by Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, where Ms Evans worked. But a review published by Baroness Cass in April last year said 'extreme caution' should be demonstrated when deciding to prescribe the treatment to 16 and 17-year-olds, and that there should be 'clear clinical rationale for providing hormones at this stage rather than waiting until an individual reaches 18'. The NHS has opened three specialist children's gender clinics and has plans for a further five covering the seven NHS regions in England by the end of 2026, but has said that all recommendations for hormone interventions must be endorsed by a national multi-disciplinary team (MDT). It is understood that the MDT has not yet received any recommendations for hormone treatment for 16 and 17-year-olds since the Cass Review. GPHC was set up by Dr Aidan Kelly and is led by nurse consultant Paul Carruthers, who both worked at Gids, and has previously said it primarily treats patients aged between 16 and 25, using its own MDT. Tom Cross KC, for Ms Evans and XX, said in written submissions that there were 'a number of key differences' between GPHC and NHS safeguards, including that referrals to the former came from Dr Kelly's company, Kelly Psychology, which is unregulated. He said in court that the CQC had 'not factored in' parts of the treatment process on the NHS, which 'serve as important safeguards' and were 'obviously material'. He said consideration of these points would have led to the treatment of under-18s being halted. Jamie Burton KC, for the CQC, said that there was 'ample evidence' that Kelly Psychology 'did not pose an unacceptable risk' to patients, and that a 'significant number' of those assessed by the company were not referred for treatment at GPHC. The court was told that the CQC found no evidence of 'improper decision making or anything that might flag a concern', and that the CQC 'had regard' to NHS processes. Peter Mant KC, for Gender Plus Healthcare Limited, said that there was no legal requirement for a private provider to mirror NHS care and that the clinic's model was 'entirely consistent' with the Cass Review and NHS policy. In a 64-page ruling, Mrs Justice Eady said: 'Accepting that (GPHC) could neither access the NHS national MDT nor precisely replicate it, but keeping in mind the purpose of the NHS model, I cannot say that the CQC's finding of sufficient alignment was outside the reasonable range of conclusions open to it.' She continued: 'The range was set by reference to the substance that underpinned the NHS structures, not merely the choices made as to the form that those structures should take. 'Applying that approach, as I am satisfied the CQC did, the decisions reached fall within the rational range, and the CQC was entitled to conclude that no further conditions were required.' A CQC spokesperson said: 'We are pleased that today's ruling recognises CQC's regulatory expertise. 'It also supports the systems and processes at CQC that put the needs of people using services at their heart and helps to ensure that people receive care and treatment in a safe way.' Dr Kelly said he was 'absolutely delighted' at the judgment, with Mr Carruthers stating that the ruling 'further demonstrates the diligence and integrity of our work'. Ms Evans said she was 'extremely disappointed' by the ruling and believed that the CQC's decision was 'irrational and highly risky', while XX said: 'To say I am disappointed is an understatement.'
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Nurses threaten industrial action ballot after pay offer rejected
It comes after members of the union rejected a 3.6% pay increase for 2025/26 in England. Professor Nicola Ranger, general secretary and chief executive of the RCN, said nurses feel 'deeply undervalued'. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) said the Government 'hugely' values the work of nurses, but stressed the profession has had 'two above-inflation pay rises'. The RCN represents hundreds of thousands of nurses across the NHS in England. According to the union, 91% of members voted to reject the pay award on a 56% turnout, with more than 170,000 staff taking part. It warned the profession faces widespread vacancies, stunted career progression and years of pay erosion, and it urged ministers to use the summer to agree an investment plan or face a formal escalation to a dispute and a ballot on industrial action. Prof Ranger said: 'My profession feels deeply undervalued and that is why record numbers are telling the Government to wake up, sense the urgency here and do what's right by them and by patients. 'Record numbers have delivered this verdict on a broken system that holds back nursing pay and careers and hampers the NHS. 'As a safety-critical profession, keeping hold of experienced nursing staff is fundamentally a safety issue and key to the Government's own vision for the NHS. 'Long-overdue reforms to nursing career progression and the NHS pay structure aren't just about fairness and equity but are critical for patient safety.' Nurses in Wales and Northern Ireland were consulted on the same pay award and voted to reject it, according to the RCN. Prof Ranger added: 'We deliver the vast majority of care in every service and deserve to be valued for all our skill, knowledge and experience. 'To avoid formal escalation, the Government must be true to its word and negotiate on reforms of the outdated pay structure which traps nursing staff at the same band their entire career.' A DHSC spokesperson said: 'After receiving two above-inflation pay rises from this Government, new full-time nurses will earn £30,000 in basic pay for the first time this year, so it's disappointing that RCN members are dissatisfied with this year's pay rise. 'We hugely value the work of nurses, and through our 10-Year Health Plan, we are rebuilding the NHS for the benefit of patients and staff, and ensuring nursing remains an attractive career choice. 'This Government is clear we can't move any further on headline pay but will work with the RCN to improve their major concerns, including pay structure reform, concerns on career progression and wider working conditions.' Nurses staged unprecedented industrial action over pay in 2022 and 2023. In June 2023, the threat of more strikes ended because a ballot on further walkouts failed to meet the legal threshold of 50%. In response to the RCN's announcement, the shadow health secretary said 'short-sighted decisions have lasting consequences'. Stuart Andrew added that the Tory party 'warned Labour that giving an inflation-busting pay rise to junior doctors would inevitably raise questions among other hardworking NHS staff, like nurses, about their own value to this government'. An RCN executive director claimed nursing salaries need to be 'raised at the bottom' with clearer career progression opportunities to head off a 'crisis'. Patricia Marquis told BBC Radio 4's World At One programme: 'Nursing pay has fallen further and further behind after years and years of below-inflation pay rises. 'We could argue about the level of inflation over the last few years, but their salaries are really worth less than they were previously. 'But the issue is bigger than that. The issue we can see is not going to be solved in one year with a simple percentage pay rise. 'We need to see nursing salaries raised at the bottom and the career progression recognised for nurses across all of their experience ranges – so it's not about the percentage pay rise, it's about the crisis in nursing and the solutions that the Government needs to come to the table to discuss to ensure that nursing is a profession that people want to join and that there are enough nurses to provide the care that the patients and the public need.' Responding to a question on the prospect of industrial action, Ms Marquis said 'if we have to go there, we will have to go there'. A poll published earlier this week found Britons are split on the idea of nurses striking over pay. The YouGov survey found 19% of 4,300 British adults 'strongly support' nurses going on strike, while 28% 'somewhat' back them. Meanwhile 23% said they 'strongly oppose' strike action while one in five (20%) 'somewhat oppose' it. The RCN warning over a potential ballot for industrial action follows a five-day walkout by resident doctors in England, with medics returning to work at 7am on Wednesday. Health Secretary Wes Streeting has since written to the British Medical Association saying he is willing to meet the union's resident doctors committee to resume talks. However, he warned resident doctors have squandered the 'considerable goodwill' they had with Government after the strike. On Thursday, a Cabinet minister urged health staff to work with the Government on 'delivering the NHS they want to see and we want to see'. Speaking to reporters in Swindon, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'We know the workforce of the NHS had a difficult decade-and-a-half. We know how they feel. 'But we ask them to work with us on delivering the NHS they want to see and we want to see. We've got to be partners with each other.'
