US ice cream makers vow to remove artificial dyes from products by 2028 amid health concerns
The move is part of a broader voluntary effort encouraged by the Trump administration to eliminate synthetic colours from the American food supply due to potential health concerns.
Announced on Monday, July 15, the commitment involves approximately 40 companies in the ice cream and frozen dessert industry, although specific brands were not disclosed.
Seven petroleum-based dyes — Red 3, Red 40, Green 3, Blue 1, Blue 2, Yellow 5 and Yellow 6 — will be phased out by 2028, said Michael Dykes, president of the International Dairy Foods Association. Turkey Hill Dairy CEO Andy Jacobs was among those publicly supporting the initiative.
US Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary called the shift 'a Renaissance moment for health in America,' and said new natural alternatives, such as Gardenia (genipin) blue, have already received FDA approval. This plant-based dye can now be used in sports drinks, confectionery, and other products.
The FDA previously banned Red 3 earlier this year due to cancer risks observed in animal studies. While companies have until 2027 to stop using the dye, Makary issued a letter on Monday encouraging faster action.
Despite widespread praise, some health experts caution that removing dyes alone will not make ice cream a healthy food. 'It still is a food that should be consumed in moderation,' said Deanna Hoelscher, a nutrition expert at the University of Texas, noting that added sugars and saturated fats remain key contributors to chronic disease.
Makary also hinted that forthcoming federal dietary guidelines may reevaluate long-held views on saturated fat and heart disease, calling the current position 'a 70-year demonisation of natural saturated fat.'
Consumer advocates, while supportive of the direction, questioned whether voluntary compliance would be enough. 'Talk is cheap,' said Thomas Galligan of the Center for Science in the Public Interest. 'It remains to be seen if they will actually follow through.'
The average American consumes approximately four gallons of ice cream annually, according to industry data. Federal officials have encouraged manufacturers to adopt natural colouring agents derived from fruit juices, plant extracts, and similar sources.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
US Senate to vote on Trump funding cuts, AIDS program funding preserved
The US Senate is due to begin voting on Tuesday on President Donald Trump's request to slash billions in spending on foreign aid and public broadcasting previously approved by Congress, the latest test of Trump's control over his fellow Republicans. However, Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought told reporters it will no longer include a plan to cut funds designated for PEPFAR, a global fund to fight HIV/AIDS, bringing the size of the package of cuts to $9 billion from $9.4 billion. Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the chamber's Republican majority leader, said he expected the first procedural voting on Tuesday. He had said that some members of his party had wanted changes in the bill. The Senate has until Friday to act on the rescissions package, originally a request to claw back $8.3 billion in foreign aid funding and $1.1 billion for public broadcasting. Otherwise, the request will expire and the White House will be required to adhere to spending plans passed by Congress. Approving the Senate bill without the PEPFAR cuts means the measure must go back to the House of Representatives for a vote before it can be sent back to Trump to sign into law. Thune said he expected the House would act quickly to pass the measure. The amounts at stake are extremely small in the context of the sprawling federal budget, which totaled $6.8 trillion in the fiscal year ended September 30. Yet the proposed cuts have raised the hackles of Democrats and a handful of Republicans who saw an attempt to erode Congress's Constitutionally mandated authority over spending. The foreign aid initiatives in Trump's request for cuts included lifesaving support for women and children's health and the fight against HIV/AIDS that have long had strong bipartisan support. The package also cuts funds supporting public broadcasting, which can be the main source of news and emergency information in rural parts of the US. Critics of the cuts said the amounts of money involved were small but funded essential programs that should not be cut. 'What is going on here? Does anyone stand up to these horrible, horrible cuts that hurt the American people?' Senator Charles Schumer of New York, the chamber's Democratic leader, said on Monday. Trump has threatened to withhold his endorsement from any member of Congress who does not vote for the measure without changes. Standalone presidential rescissions packages have not passed in years, with lawmakers reluctant to cede their constitutionally mandated control of government spending. During Trump's first term in 2018, Congress members rejected Trump's request to revoke $15 billion in spending. Trump's Republicans hold narrow majorities in the Senate and House. So far, they have shown little appetite for opposing his policies. The rescissions legislation passed the House by 214-212 last month. Four Republicans joined 208 Democrats in voting against it. Some Republican senators had expressed concern about some of Trump's requests. Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who chairs the Appropriations Committee, had said she opposed Trump's request to cut funding for the global programs to fight HIV/AIDS. Democrats have warned that the foreign aid and broadcasting cuts, which overturn spending agreements between Republicans and Democrats, could make it more difficult to negotiate the package of spending bills that must pass by September 30 to fund the government next year and avoid a shutdown. 'How are we supposed to negotiate a bipartisan deal if Republicans will turn around and put it through the shredder in a partisan vote?' asked Senator Patty Murray from Washington, the top Democrat on the appropriations committee. Appropriations bills require 60 votes to move ahead in the Senate, but the rescissions package needs just 51, meaning Republicans can pass it without Democratic support.
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
14 Million Children Did Not Receive A Single Vaccine In 2024: UN
London: More than 14 million children did not receive a single vaccine last year - about the same number as the year before - according to UN health officials. Nine countries accounted for more than half of those unprotected children. In their annual estimate of global vaccine coverage, released Tuesday, the World Health Organization and UNICEF said about 89% of children under 1 year old got a first dose of the diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough vaccine in 2024, the same as in 2023. About 85% completed the three-dose series, up from 84% in 2023. Officials acknowledged, however, that the collapse of international aid this year will make it more difficult to reduce the number of unprotected children. In January, U.S. President Trump the country from the WHO, froze nearly all humanitarian aid and later moved to close the . And last month, said it was pulling the billions of dollars the U.S. to the vaccines alliance Gavi, saying the group had "ignored the science." Kennedy, a longtime , has previously raised questions the diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough vaccine - which has proven to be safe and effective after years of study and real-world use. Vaccines prevent 3.5 million to 5 million deaths a year, according to UN estimates. "Drastic cuts in aid, coupled with misinformation about the safety of vaccines, threaten to unwind decades of progress," said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. UN experts said that access to vaccines remained "deeply unequal" and that conflict and humanitarian crises quickly unraveled progress; Sudan had the lowest reported coverage against diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough. The data showed that nine countries accounted for 52% of all children who missed out on immunizations entirely: Nigeria, India, Sudan, Congo, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Yemen, Afghanistan and Angola. WHO and UNICEF said coverage against measles rose slightly, with 76% of children worldwide receiving both vaccine doses. But experts say measles vaccine rates need to reach 95% to prevent outbreaks of the extremely contagious disease. WHO noted that 60 countries reported big measles outbreaks last year. The U.S. is now having its in more than three decades, while the disease has also surged across , with 125,000 cases in 2024 - twice as many as the previous year, according to WHO. Last week, British authorities reported a child died of measles in a Liverpool hospital. Health officials said that despite years of efforts to raise awareness, only about 84% of children in the U.K. are protected. "It is hugely concerning, but not at all surprising, that we are continuing to see outbreaks of measles," said Helen Bradford, a professor of children's health at University College London. "The only way to stop measles spreading is with vaccination," she said in a statement. "It is never too late to be vaccinated - even as an adult." (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
UnitedHealth Group stock down after Wolf Research lowers its price target to $330 from $363
Five days after Wolfe Research gave the UnitedHealth Group stock an "Outperform" rating, the research organization tapered down its stock price target to $330 from the initial amount of $363. Goldman Sachs sees UnitedHealth as one of its top healthcare stock picks, according to the report by Insider Monkey. Company facing billing and profit troubles They did this because the company is dealing with medical billing problems right now. Wolfe Research also revised the 2025 earnings estimate to $18 — showing a more cautious or conservative view, as stated by the reports. ALSO READ: Prince Harry ready to make amends and make peace — Kate supports it, but William says 'Not So Fast' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now The reason is that UnitedHealth is under pressure in Medicaid and health insurance exchanges. The firm thinks Optum Health and Medicare Advantage, two parts of UnitedHealth, are facing big drops in earnings, as stated by Insider Monkey report. Right now, Medicare Advantage is only giving UnitedHealth 1% profit margins, which is much lower than what they normally earn. UnitedHealth is supposed to give a new update about its 2025 earnings soon and explain how it will handle these billing issues, according to the reports. Experts say some AI stocks may be better Insider Monkey says UnitedHealth still has potential, but some AI stocks might be better options right now. They say some AI stocks are more undervalued, could grow faster, and have less risk — especially with Trump-era tariffs and onshoring trends helping them, according to the report by Insider Monkey. Live Events ALSO READ: Putin gets grim warning: Russia's population crisis could wipe out 11 million workers by 2030 FAQs Q1. Why did Wolfe Research lower UnitedHealth's stock price target? Wolfe Research cut the price target to $330 because UnitedHealth is facing medical billing issues and lower profits in key areas like Medicare Advantage and Medicaid. Q2. Is UnitedHealth still a good investment after the price cut? Experts like Insider Monkey say it still has potential, but some AI stocks may offer better short-term growth and lower risk.
