logo
Graft case piles pressure on Turkey's main opposition

Graft case piles pressure on Turkey's main opposition

Yahooa day ago

A court hearing that could upend the leadership of Turkey's main opposition CHP is the latest bid to hobble the party behind a wave of spring protests that shook the government, analysts say.
The hearing, which takes place on Monday at an Ankara court, could render null and void the result of a leadership primary within the Republican People's Party (CHP) in November 2023 on grounds of alleged fraud -- thereby overturning the election of leader Ozgur Ozel.
In February, the Ankara public prosecutor opened an investigation into allegations of vote buying at the congress which resulted in Ozel defeating longtime incumbent Kemal Kilicdaroglu.
The CHP has denied the allegations.
The outcome could see several CHP figures -- including jailed Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu -- facing up to three years in prison and a political ban for graft, Turkish media reported.
And if the election result is cancelled, the party leadership would almost certainly revert to 76-year-old Kilicdaroglu.
He was ousted five months after losing a bitterly fought presidential campaign against President Recep Tayyip Erdogan that was widely seen as the most important vote in generations, leaving the party in crisis.
- Taming the opposition -
"This is a bid to reshape the CHP and create an opposition that is controlled by a government which is becoming more and more authoritarian," Berk Esen, a political science expert at Istanbul's Sabanci University, told AFP.
"This will provoke a split within the party, putting a weak, defeated leader in charge whom the voters don't want any more," he said.
Kilicdaroglu has already said he would be willing to take on the party leadership again if the court overturned the primary result, sparking uproar within the CHP.
"It would be out of the question to not recognise such a verdict. Would it be better if a trustee was appointed to lead the party?" he said, also voicing his disapproval of the mass protests called by the CHP following Imamoglu's arrest and jailing in March.
Widely seen as the only politician capable of defeating Erdogan at the ballot box, Imamoglu was arrested in connection with a graft and terror probe which the CHP has denounced as groundless.
He was jailed on the day that he was named CHP's candidate for the 2028 presidential race, his removal sparking Turkey's worst street unrest since 2013.
"I feel a deep sense of betrayal. I cannot stomach such remarks when so many people are in prison," Imamoglu said in response to Kilicdaroglu's remarks.
"Kilicdaroglu is a politician who will be remembered very badly. Some accuse him of working for (Erdogan's ruling) AKP but I think it's more a case of his ambition knowing no bounds," said Esen.
"He is collaborating with an authoritarian government in order to get his own power back."
Following Imamoglu's arrest, Ozel went from being a relatively low-profile leader to the face of the protests, his impassioned speeches sharpening both his own image and that of the CHP, which has since held rallies across the country and is now leading the polls.
According to a survey by Ank-Ar Research published last week, if an election were to be held now, the CHP would win 34.6 percent, more than five percentage points higher than the 29.4 percent for the AKP.
And the government is not happy.
- No more demonstrations -
"From the government's perspective, it is crucial they get the CHP off the streets because Ozel is seen as dangerous," said Eren Aksoyoglu, an expert in political communication.
"By contrast, Kilicdaroglu is making conciliatory noises to those in power, saying he no longer wants any demonstrations and that he is ready to negotiate a change to the constitution," he said.
If he were to take over the party leadership, it would "put the CHP in a position where it was negotiating with the government rather than fighting it," agreed Esen.
Observers say a more sympathetic opposition would give Erdogan much greater room for manoeuvre in the government's negotiations with the PKK after the Kurdish militants said they were ending their decades-long armed struggle.
It could also help the government push through a constitutional amendment to allow Erdogan to extend his term in office beyond 2028 -- a step that would require opposition support to be voted through.
"I don't think Kilicdaroglu would be able to hold on to the CHP leadership in the long term, but if the process (of leadership change) is drawn out over the course of a year, for example, that would let the government to change the constitution," said Esen.
And that would spell "total disaster for the opposition", he said.
In any event, Monday's hearing would likely spark "a new wave of protest, which will have economic and political consequences for the government", he added.
bg/hmw/sbk

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Most Vulnerable Senate Seat Just Became a Lot More Vulnerable
Most Vulnerable Senate Seat Just Became a Lot More Vulnerable

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Most Vulnerable Senate Seat Just Became a Lot More Vulnerable

On Sunday afternoon, Republican Sen. Thom Tillis announced that he would no longer seek reelection to the seat that he has held since 2014. In so doing the Senate seat most vulnerable to flipping to the other side became even hard for Republicans to hold. (The next two seats are Democratic-held Georgia and Republican-held Maine, followed by a rather precipitous drop-off to the next tier of seats.) To be sure, Tillis was in a precarious position to begin with. Ill talk about the political leanings of the state below, but for now Ill just assert this is a narrowly divided state. This requires Tillis to walk a tightrope of supporting the Republican president enough not to lose his base, but opposing him enough to keep moderates on board. This has become increasingly difficult in Trumps second term, especially as MAGA commentators have increasingly taken a stance that opposing any of the presidents agenda is unacceptable. Tillis, for example, drew heavy fire for opposing Trumps nominee for United States attorney for the District of Columbia. His retirement appears to be precipitated by a salvo of attacks from the president after Tillis voted "no" on a procedural vote to advance the "Big, Beautiful Bill." At the same time, Tillis faced a general election that already likely tilted away from him. His primary concern was former Gov. Roy Cooper. Cooper was never the biggest vote-getter in North Carolina history, but he was a reasonably popular figure in the state. If Cooper failed to get in, the conventional wisdom is that Attorney General Jeff Jackson was waiting to take the plunge. Jackson, while definitely quite liberal, is great on the stump and generates a ton of energy from his supporters. He would be a formidable general election candidate as well. In the absence of those two, Wiley Nickel, former congressman from the 13th Congressional District, is at least a "generic Democrat." With Tillis out, Republicans lose the benefit of incumbency. In addition, Republicans face the prospect of a messy primary, with the possibility that a radioactive candidate, such as former Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson, might emerge. We might laugh, but bad Republican candidates have probably cost the party half a dozen seats in the current Senate. The much-discussed front-runner at this point, Lara Trump, might have been a good candidate in a Trump-friendly year like 2024, but at this point at least, 2026 looks different. Against this background, the rejoinder is that North Carolina functions somewhat like Pennsylvania did for Republicans for quite some time: Lucys football to Charlie Brown. Democrats have won exactly zero federal races since Barack Obama narrowly carried the state in 2008 and Kay Hagan defeated Sen. Elizabeth Dole in the same year. But … Since 2008 Republicans have been fortunate to have only a handful of really bad election years. 2018 was the only "wave"-like environment weve witnessed, with 2012 and 2020 standing more as "not great" years for the GOP. The 2022 elections were disappointing, but Republicans still won the popular vote for Congress by 3 points. Through the vagaries of the calendar, Republicans have only defended one Senate seat in the state in a "bad" or "not great" year for the GOP since 2008: Thom Tillis win in 2020. Tillis won that seat by 1.5 percentage points after it came out that his opponent had (at the very least) exchanged sexually explicit texts with a woman who wasnt his wife. The other Senate races have all occurred in favorable environments for the GOP: 2010, 2014, 2016, and 2022. Of these, 2010 was the only big win for the Republicans. 2016 was a 6-point win for Sen. Richard Burr, while 2014 and 2022 were low-single digit affairs. Not only that, but North Carolina has quietly been moving away from Republicans over the past few decades. The state was 3.5 percentage points more Republican than the country as a whole in 2008. By 2020 it shifted to just under 3 points more Republican than the country as a whole. COVID brought an influx of New Yorkers to the state, particularly the Research Triangle Park area; the state was less than a point more Republican than the country overall in 2024. That would still be enough for a normal Republican to win against a normal Democrat in a neutral year (again, it isnt clear that we will see either a normal Republican or a normal Democrat this year). But 2026 isnt shaping up to be a neutral year. To be clear, people badly underestimate how popular Trump is right now - his job approval is just 4 percentage points underwater in the RealClearPolitics Average - but thats still enough to create an unfavorable environment in a swing state. Of course, theres also a lot of time between now and November. We dont know if Cooper will get in, much less whether Jackson will get in. For now, this seat goes from being vulnerable for Republicans to extremely vulnerable. Sean Trende is senior elections analyst for RealClearPolitics. He is a co-author of the 2014 Almanac of American Politics and author of The Lost Majority. He can be reached at strende@ Follow him on Twitter @SeanTrende.

Jeffries holds back on endorsing Democratic NYC mayoral candidate Mamdani
Jeffries holds back on endorsing Democratic NYC mayoral candidate Mamdani

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Jeffries holds back on endorsing Democratic NYC mayoral candidate Mamdani

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries hesitated to endorse presumptive Democratic New York City mayor nominee Zohran Mamdani but praised his "successful" campaign and messaging. "I have not," Jeffries said when asked by "This Week" co-anchor Jonathan Karl about if he had endorsed the self-proclaimed democratic socialist candidate. Jeffries said he spoke to Mamdani on Wednesday and plans to meet in person soon in Central Brooklyn. MORE: Zohran Mamdani's upset in New York primary reignites Democratic identity debate: Analysis "I congratulated him on the campaign that he ran, a campaign that clearly was relentlessly focused on the high cost of living in New York City and the economy. He outworked, he out-communicated, and he out-organized the opposition, and that's clearly why he was successful," he added. Pressed on why he was holding back from endorsing Mamdani, Jeffries said "We don't really know each other well." "Well, our districts don't overlap. I have never had a substantive conversation with him. And so that's the next step in terms of this process … to discuss his vision for moving the city forward and addressing the issues that are important to the communities that I represent," he said. Jeffries brushed off a question about how Mamdani's win relates to the future of the Democratic Party. "I think it will continue to be important for all of us on the Democratic side to address relentlessly the issue of the lack of affordability in this country. Donald Trump promised to lower costs on Day 1. Costs haven't gone down, they're going up," he said. Jeffries said Mamdani will need to "clarify" his position on Israel and antisemitism. "Globalizing the Intifada, by way of example, is not an acceptable phrasing," he said. "He's going to have to clarify his position on that as he moves forward. With respect to the Jewish communities that I represent, I think our nominee is going to have to convince folks that he is prepared to aggressively address the rise in antisemitism in the city of New York, which has been an unacceptable development." Pressed on Friday's classified briefing in the House on the U.S. strikes on Iran, Jeffries was skeptical of the information provided by the Trump administration. "Why did they not seek the congressional authorization required by the Constitution for this type of preemptive strike?" he asked. "I still haven't seen facts presented to us as a Congress to justify that step, and I certainly haven't seen facts to justify the statement that Donald Trump made that Iran's nuclear program has been completely and totally obliterated." On Friday, the Supreme Court granted a partial stay of nationwide injunctions against President Donald Trump's executive order to effectively end birthright citizenship. Jeffries called the decision "unfortunate" and "reckless." "If there is any instance where nationwide injunctions are appropriate, it would be in a manner like what we've just experienced in terms of birthright citizenship, which is clearly a part of the Constitution. If you are born as a child in the United States of America, you are a citizen. So, it was a procedural setback that was quite unfortunate, and it was a reckless decision, in my view," he said. He said Democrats will need to "intensify our efforts" in district courts or work on a class action suit on behalf of individuals "adversely impacted."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store